Consider this,
How can Physics, at a fundamental level, be probabilistic?
How can the mere act of observing an experiment, interfere with the progression of the experiment?
Science, should make EXACT predictions. A theory, which can only predict the probability on an event, is fundamentally flawed.
Just because the apparent results match some predictions, doesn't make the theory a proper scientific theory.
A great philosopher once said- moving objects eventually get tired, and stop. The prediction made by this theory, is that an object moving on our planet, without an external source of propulsion tethered to it, will eventually slow down and stop. The basic theory, however, is still highly incorrect.
The fact that some observed results don't deviate from predicted results, doesn't conclusively prove that the theory is correct.
Why has modern science abandoned Einstein's last quest?
Why won't modern Physicists try to continue Einstein's work, and pursue a higher theory that doesn't involve quantum nonsense, yet explains the observed random nature of the quantum world?
How can Physics, at a fundamental level, be probabilistic?
How can the mere act of observing an experiment, interfere with the progression of the experiment?
Science, should make EXACT predictions. A theory, which can only predict the probability on an event, is fundamentally flawed.
Just because the apparent results match some predictions, doesn't make the theory a proper scientific theory.
A great philosopher once said- moving objects eventually get tired, and stop. The prediction made by this theory, is that an object moving on our planet, without an external source of propulsion tethered to it, will eventually slow down and stop. The basic theory, however, is still highly incorrect.
The fact that some observed results don't deviate from predicted results, doesn't conclusively prove that the theory is correct.
Why has modern science abandoned Einstein's last quest?
Why won't modern Physicists try to continue Einstein's work, and pursue a higher theory that doesn't involve quantum nonsense, yet explains the observed random nature of the quantum world?