So I've come to terms with the fact that a 144hz monitor is a waste on my rig with a GTX 760 (cry). I'm trying to buy a nice 1080p 60hz monitor for gaming and narrowed it to two ASUS Monitors. For some reason, the one with seemingly better specs (like 1ms vs 5ms response time) is $50 dollars cheaper. What am I missing? Is it just cause its a 1 year older model or is there another spec i'm overlooking?
1. More Expensive
2. Less Expensive, but better?
Thanks for any clarity provided!
My Specs:
CPU - Intel Core i7 930 @ 2.8GHz
Mobo - ASUS P6T SE (Second Edition, not the P6T, so a little worse, not to mention old)
RAM - 2x4gb DD3 Corsair RAM in dual channel (Unlocked XMP setting in BIOS to run at 1600Mhx)
PSU - Corsair HX750 (750 watt)
GPU - GTX 760
1. More Expensive
2. Less Expensive, but better?
Thanks for any clarity provided!
My Specs:
CPU - Intel Core i7 930 @ 2.8GHz
Mobo - ASUS P6T SE (Second Edition, not the P6T, so a little worse, not to mention old)
RAM - 2x4gb DD3 Corsair RAM in dual channel (Unlocked XMP setting in BIOS to run at 1600Mhx)
PSU - Corsair HX750 (750 watt)
GPU - GTX 760