Do you like 16:10 resolutions or 16:9? pixel count wise they are the same PPI's typically when implemented. i'm in favor of the 16:9 2560x1440 as most media is formatted for 16:9 but there are those who are staunch supporters of 16:10. also 2560x1440 resolution monitors are significantly easier and in much wider availability than 2560x1600 displays.
Do you like 16:10 resolutions or 16:9? pixel count wise they are the same PPI's typically when implemented. i'm in favor of the 16:9 2560x1440 as most media is formatted for 16:9 but there are those who are staunch supporters of 16:10. also 2560x1440 resolution monitors are significantly easier and in much wider availability than 2560x1600 displays.
Even if I would like more vertical real estate (2560x1600) lack of market share for that pretty much says, "no"
You would benefit more from higher than 60Hz refresh rate, g-synch, freesynch or faster response time.
cuz of sharpness and ppi got it ty hmm i havent seen any at my face ill just go to a store and see the difference myself its killing me not knowing if that sharpness and ppi in 1440 is worth the 1600p