To start off, I will have two gtx 1080's. And obviously this is an opinionated topic. But I want a 4k experience and I was not sure if the PG348Q would look even close to as good as far as image quality is concerned, since there are more pixels on 16:9 4k displays. I like the idea that the pg348Q is really immersive and higher Hz, but If the visuals are significantly different as far as resolution then I would probably want to go with a 16:9 true 4k monitor. and are the 16:9 monitors overclockable ( these monitors in particular). PLEASE HELP!
PG348Q vs. ROG Swift PG27AQ vs. Acer predator XB271HK /// PLEASE HELP
- Thread starter tnance24
- Start date
Solution
The pixel density is about the same. A 21:9 34" is about as high as a 27" 16:9 and, obviously, wider.
The pg348q also has a net advantage in the fact that it's IPS. Nicer to look at, with richer colors.
EDIT: look here
The pg348q also has a net advantage in the fact that it's IPS. Nicer to look at, with richer colors.
EDIT: look here
Hlsgsz
Champion
- Feb 29, 2016
- 8,003
- 5
- 51,415
The PG348Q along with the Acer X34 Predator are widely considered to be the best gaming monitors ever made and for good reason: they hit the perfect balance of features: 34" 21:9 1440p 100Hz IPS with G-sync(which is a must!).
4k is overrated and it's not quite time for it yet. What would you do iin games that don't play ball with SLI?
Also 4k is too much resolution for anything upto and including 21:9 34" and 16:9 27" and you wuold have to use high DPI setting in windows which is not a good experience.
1440p is the sweetspot. Plus, 21:9 ultrawide is fantastic for both gaming and productivity.
4k is overrated and it's not quite time for it yet. What would you do iin games that don't play ball with SLI?
Also 4k is too much resolution for anything upto and including 21:9 34" and 16:9 27" and you wuold have to use high DPI setting in windows which is not a good experience.
1440p is the sweetspot. Plus, 21:9 ultrawide is fantastic for both gaming and productivity.
Hlsgsz
Champion
- Feb 29, 2016
- 8,003
- 5
- 51,415
The pixel density is about the same. A 21:9 34" is about as high as a 27" 16:9 and, obviously, wider.
The pg348q also has a net advantage in the fact that it's IPS. Nicer to look at, with richer colors.
EDIT: look here
The pg348q also has a net advantage in the fact that it's IPS. Nicer to look at, with richer colors.
EDIT: look here
Hlsgsz :
The pixel density is about the same. A 21:9 34" is about as high as a 27" 16:9 and, obviously, wider.
The pg348q also has a net advantage in the fact that it's IPS. Nicer to look at, with richer colors.
Ahh geez. In your opinion, do you think it would be worth the money splurge since I already have a 2560x1440? Will then ips look a lot better than the TN?
EDIT: look here
The pg348q also has a net advantage in the fact that it's IPS. Nicer to look at, with richer colors.
Ahh geez. In your opinion, do you think it would be worth the money splurge since I already have a 2560x1440? Will then ips look a lot better than the TN?
EDIT: look here
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
News Firefox user loses 7,470 opened tabs saved over two years after they can’t restore browsing session- Started by Admin
- Replies: 59
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram