I'm deciding b/t 2 Asus laptops with these external ports:
1. UX501VW-US71T, $1,499, with HDMI x 1 + Thunderbolt x 1
2. K501UW-AB78 for $869, only HDMI x 1
When I last bought a laptop 4 years ago, you COULD run a monitor off USB 2.0, but the graphics were terrible and laggy - no way you could watch video. But have things improved? I see that for $80 you can buy an external graphics adapter that runs off a single USB 3.0 port and features dual HDMI ports that can run out to 2 external monitors. and you can even daisy-chain them and run 4+ monitors this way. But are the graphics terrible that way?
Long story short, the specs on the cheaper Asus are fine with me so I don't want to pay an extra $650 just for an extra display port. But running multiple external monitors is important to me, so trying to understand whether I'm still better served with 2 true display ports vs 1 HDMI port + 1 USB 3.0.
1. UX501VW-US71T, $1,499, with HDMI x 1 + Thunderbolt x 1
2. K501UW-AB78 for $869, only HDMI x 1
When I last bought a laptop 4 years ago, you COULD run a monitor off USB 2.0, but the graphics were terrible and laggy - no way you could watch video. But have things improved? I see that for $80 you can buy an external graphics adapter that runs off a single USB 3.0 port and features dual HDMI ports that can run out to 2 external monitors. and you can even daisy-chain them and run 4+ monitors this way. But are the graphics terrible that way?
Long story short, the specs on the cheaper Asus are fine with me so I don't want to pay an extra $650 just for an extra display port. But running multiple external monitors is important to me, so trying to understand whether I'm still better served with 2 true display ports vs 1 HDMI port + 1 USB 3.0.