Hey guys!
I was wondering what would be a better choice: a 4K 60hz gaming monitor (ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27AQ) or a 1440p 165hz gaming monitor (ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q).
I know screen tearing is one of the issues that sway people away from 60hz monitors, but i dont know if its that much of a deal. is it really visable in real time, or can it really only be observed in slow-motion. From what i can gather hertz are relative to frames per second. A 200 FPS capable pc can be bottlenecked by a 60hz monitor and vice-versa. But since its a 4K monitor, and 4K gaming is very demanding, where you rarely reach 60 FPS, even with a Titan XP, is 60 hz enough? How does g-sync help with the screen tearing? The sort of games i would be looking to play are Forza horizon 3, the witcher 3, battlefield 1, gta V, csgo and rise of the tomb raider.
I was wondering what would be a better choice: a 4K 60hz gaming monitor (ASUS ROG SWIFT PG27AQ) or a 1440p 165hz gaming monitor (ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q).
I know screen tearing is one of the issues that sway people away from 60hz monitors, but i dont know if its that much of a deal. is it really visable in real time, or can it really only be observed in slow-motion. From what i can gather hertz are relative to frames per second. A 200 FPS capable pc can be bottlenecked by a 60hz monitor and vice-versa. But since its a 4K monitor, and 4K gaming is very demanding, where you rarely reach 60 FPS, even with a Titan XP, is 60 hz enough? How does g-sync help with the screen tearing? The sort of games i would be looking to play are Forza horizon 3, the witcher 3, battlefield 1, gta V, csgo and rise of the tomb raider.