Hi all, in as few words as I can:
I bought a PS4 pro, would like 4k but play competitive (wagers/tournaments).
Currently using BenQ XL2720Z (note: 60hz console limit- will stick to this screen for PC)
Thinking I can gain pixels without loosing any competitive edge since ps4 is limited at 60hz but now concerned at different lag ratings.
I need low input lag but don't mind trading a low increase in ms for 4k pixels and better colour.. I've been looking at the Asus MG28UQ. Very happy with everything I've read about it apart from the "Absolute response time" this is listed at 64 while BenQ is listed at 21ms!
Now my question is basically is the BenQ this much lower just because its tested at 144Hz against the Asus at 60Hz? If so would the difference be as drastic/any idea what the difference would be at 60Hz?
Also I have read 4k monitors are tested at 1080p does this mean it might actually be better than that?
If not is there a good choice for competitive response times at 4k through 2.0 HDMI?
Thanks for the help!
Dave
I bought a PS4 pro, would like 4k but play competitive (wagers/tournaments).
Currently using BenQ XL2720Z (note: 60hz console limit- will stick to this screen for PC)
Thinking I can gain pixels without loosing any competitive edge since ps4 is limited at 60hz but now concerned at different lag ratings.
I need low input lag but don't mind trading a low increase in ms for 4k pixels and better colour.. I've been looking at the Asus MG28UQ. Very happy with everything I've read about it apart from the "Absolute response time" this is listed at 64 while BenQ is listed at 21ms!
Now my question is basically is the BenQ this much lower just because its tested at 144Hz against the Asus at 60Hz? If so would the difference be as drastic/any idea what the difference would be at 60Hz?
Also I have read 4k monitors are tested at 1080p does this mean it might actually be better than that?
If not is there a good choice for competitive response times at 4k through 2.0 HDMI?
Thanks for the help!
Dave