Dear readers,
I've recently built my second computer and I did my first ever overclock today.
I'm wondering whether I should concider myself lucky or whether I just achieved a normal OC.
My pc spec's are the following
-i5 8600k
-Gigabyte aurus ultra gaming
-Corsair H100i (1st gen)
-Adata SX7000
-Asus GTX 770 (Bitcoin mining )
-Corsair CX750
-16gb Corsair LP 2400 DDR4
-Aerocool Quartz RGB
My i5 8600k is overclocked to 4.7Gz @ 1.28v.
Temps during stresstesting go up to 60°C with H100i stock fans running below 1200RPM.
I'am quite satisfied with this overclock as this if my fist OC and I have temps which i'm very comfortable with.
My question is whether 4.7Gz @ 1.28v is on the better end or quite normal for an 8600K.
All feedback is highly appreciated!
-SoLo-
I've recently built my second computer and I did my first ever overclock today.
I'm wondering whether I should concider myself lucky or whether I just achieved a normal OC.
My pc spec's are the following
-i5 8600k
-Gigabyte aurus ultra gaming
-Corsair H100i (1st gen)
-Adata SX7000
-Asus GTX 770 (Bitcoin mining )
-Corsair CX750
-16gb Corsair LP 2400 DDR4
-Aerocool Quartz RGB
My i5 8600k is overclocked to 4.7Gz @ 1.28v.
Temps during stresstesting go up to 60°C with H100i stock fans running below 1200RPM.
I'am quite satisfied with this overclock as this if my fist OC and I have temps which i'm very comfortable with.
My question is whether 4.7Gz @ 1.28v is on the better end or quite normal for an 8600K.
All feedback is highly appreciated!
-SoLo-