big time newbie here !
looking at 23-24 inch monitors, only have about 300 bucks to spend.
which is better, traditional HD or 1920x1200?
asking because it appears that the aspect ratio in the tradition HD 1080p resolution looks tighter and I see references to it being "faster?" which doesn't make sense to me.
I guess I am just worried about eye strain. I see that there are more 16:10 monitors than 16:9 in 23 and 24 inch but that significantly jacks up the price.
Looking at dell ultrasharp 2412 and hp zr24.. can anyone provide input.
thanks mucho guys.
looking at 23-24 inch monitors, only have about 300 bucks to spend.
which is better, traditional HD or 1920x1200?
asking because it appears that the aspect ratio in the tradition HD 1080p resolution looks tighter and I see references to it being "faster?" which doesn't make sense to me.
I guess I am just worried about eye strain. I see that there are more 16:10 monitors than 16:9 in 23 and 24 inch but that significantly jacks up the price.
Looking at dell ultrasharp 2412 and hp zr24.. can anyone provide input.
thanks mucho guys.