£900 ($1700) - New build, opinions/advice welcome

edward301

Distinguished
Aug 21, 2008
2
0
18,510
Hi,

Im new to the forum but ive relied on THG for quality reviews for years.

Looking to build this:
Will be used for gaming, graphics and cad etc (very heavy multi tasking), Dual screen a must, I will be using XP pro for the moment but I mite go 64bit os/Vista at somepoint.

I already have spare screens and other accessories.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/
spec2.jpg


Processor Fan
http://www.tekheads.co.uk/s/product?product=609196
Xigmatek HDT-S1283 Heatpipe £25

Total
£805

Thanks
-Edward301
 

edward301

Distinguished
Aug 21, 2008
2
0
18,510
Thanks for the advice guys,

Derbixrace and iluvgillgi ll, what does the 4870 do which the 4850 doesn't, it's an extra £50ish which is ok but would the performance be much better verses waiting 6mnth-year and putting that money to a new card altogether?

jtt283, whats the advantage of JEDEC standard 1.8V is it better for OCing?

-Edward301
 
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-4870-review--asus/10
HD 4870, at 1600x1200, in Frontlines, gets 56 fps. HD 4850 gets 39 fps. You can play all right at 39 fps, but 56 fps is a real treat. Ideally, if you have an LCD with 22" size and 60 Hz refreshing rate, you want a card that gets as close to 60 fps as possible at 1680x1050. You can use benchmarks for 1600x1200 to approximate 1680x1050.

In Crysis the difference is much smaller (44 fps, 48 fps).

It really depends on the games you play. I suggest you find more benchmarks (Google "HD 4870 review") and then decide.
 


It's just that honest companies say things like "5-5-5-15 at 1.8V", while others say things like "4-4-4-12 at 2.2V". At first glance the second one has better timings so it's better and you're tempted to buy. But, some times the first one can do 4-4-4-12 at only 2.1V, so it's actually better. As voltage goes up you can tighten timings. Companies that show timings at higher voltage are inflating their results unfairly.