both tims hardware and anandtech now have raised the pointlessness of having a portrait mode on a wide-aspect monitor.
never have they said that portrait mode is useless, only on wide-aspects, i'm very confused...surely you can only have a noticeable portrait mode on a wide-aspect monitor, i wouldn't notice too much on my 4:3...its uses are obvious...
1) for viewing portraits (duh) that includes photoshop images, etc
2) for offices: viewing spreadsheets, PDFs, etc
and probably all sorts of other niches.
i dont have a wide-aspect yet, but when i get one i'm sure portrait mode will be a deal-breaker for photoshop and programming.
perhaps i mis-understand something? but i really wanna know why, now, two sites have said its useless (anandtech in every monitor review).
never have they said that portrait mode is useless, only on wide-aspects, i'm very confused...surely you can only have a noticeable portrait mode on a wide-aspect monitor, i wouldn't notice too much on my 4:3...its uses are obvious...
1) for viewing portraits (duh) that includes photoshop images, etc
2) for offices: viewing spreadsheets, PDFs, etc
and probably all sorts of other niches.
i dont have a wide-aspect yet, but when i get one i'm sure portrait mode will be a deal-breaker for photoshop and programming.
perhaps i mis-understand something? but i really wanna know why, now, two sites have said its useless (anandtech in every monitor review).