Reply to this thread
Solved Forum question
Started by Agera One | | 6 answers
I've marked the difference. Why R9 270x has no "boost" section but there is "shaders" and that too grayed out? I know CUDA and Physx are Nvidia terms, isn't open CL an AMD term? PCI-e is backward compatible, that's ok..
Best solution chosen by Agera One
Newbbuilder11
September 17, 2014 1:13:14 PM
Agera One
September 17, 2014 7:01:19 AM
Newbbuilder11
September 17, 2014 6:55:44 AM
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-270X-vs-GeForce-GTX-7...
Take a look here at benchmarks, the R9 270X offers somewhat close to performance but 80$ cheaper, the GTX 760 is more expensive, but better.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-280X-vs-GeForce-GTX-7...
Where as, the 280X is the same price and is better in almost every aspect.
Take a look here at benchmarks, the R9 270X offers somewhat close to performance but 80$ cheaper, the GTX 760 is more expensive, but better.
http://gpuboss.com/gpus/Radeon-R9-280X-vs-GeForce-GTX-7...
Where as, the 280X is the same price and is better in almost every aspect.
Newbbuilder11
September 17, 2014 6:54:06 AM
Agera One
September 17, 2014 6:52:17 AM
Newbbuilder11
September 17, 2014 6:50:40 AM
Agera One said:

I've marked the difference. Why R9 270x has no "boost" section but there is "shaders" and that too grayed out? I know CUDA and Physx are Nvidia terms, isn't open CL an AMD term? PCI-e is backward compatible, that's ok..
Both cards are great, but look at the more important stuff. The GTX 760 has higher clock, higher memory, more texture fillrate, and is just better overall. The R9 270x however supports mantle and is great for gaming as well.
See all answers