Reply to this thread
Solved Forum question
Started by ETEl2NAL407 | | 17 answers
I'm planning on upgrading to the GTX 970/980. I use 2 monitors and plan to some day add in 1 or 2 more, but for now all I need is 2.
Currently I'm using a GTX 560 Ti and it has 2 DVI ports, so it's pretty straight forward, but as I read about the 970/980 I discover they will come with a Dual Link DVI port...
Does that mean I'll have to purchase some sort of adapter or splitter to connect both monitors to DVI? My monitors both have DVI, VGA, and HDMI inputs, so given the card I plan on getting, what would be the cheapest and easiest way to get these 2 monitors connected?
Currently I'm using a GTX 560 Ti and it has 2 DVI ports, so it's pretty straight forward, but as I read about the 970/980 I discover they will come with a Dual Link DVI port...
Does that mean I'll have to purchase some sort of adapter or splitter to connect both monitors to DVI? My monitors both have DVI, VGA, and HDMI inputs, so given the card I plan on getting, what would be the cheapest and easiest way to get these 2 monitors connected?
I know you may well be done with this thread, but I will drop some more info for you.
I can ensure you that the video transition of HDMI and DVI are the same. The image quality should also be the same because of this.
HDMI started life as a way to bring digital HD video to TV sets(and they also wanted a nice way to intro DHCP). To make it easy they used DVI(single link because 1920 x 1080 does not need 2 links. this reduces the number of contacts in the plug) as the base and added audio. Over the years new features have been added and the link speed has been increased to allow things like 4k.
The image should look the same, but you may have to adjust an option called overscan/under on your video card. In some rare cases a monitors HDMI will just never look good(over/underscan adjustments just do not help.), but to be honest this is almost exclusively limited to monitors that are also TV's. It is also not a problem for most modern screens. This is so rare I do not think I will ever see a user effected.
In the case of HDMI not working the HDMI to DVI cables solve this issue because the screen thinks it is getting DVI(because that is what HDMI was based on) and this no overscan/underscan issues happen.
The cpu clock speed and even core count seems low for a desktop i7, but they release so many cpus, I can see that.
Overclocking is only an option with the cooling required as well as a board/cpu combo that will handle it.
The video card is still older for sure and mid level for sure. Do not worry about what Windows says about hard drives. They ALL score that low. SSD's are great but do nothing for actual game performance one loaded. MMO games load lots of stuff on the fly, so pauses may be reduced, but still not removed.
I can ensure you that the video transition of HDMI and DVI are the same. The image quality should also be the same because of this.
HDMI started life as a way to bring digital HD video to TV sets(and they also wanted a nice way to intro DHCP). To make it easy they used DVI(single link because 1920 x 1080 does not need 2 links. this reduces the number of contacts in the plug) as the base and added audio. Over the years new features have been added and the link speed has been increased to allow things like 4k.
The image should look the same, but you may have to adjust an option called overscan/under on your video card. In some rare cases a monitors HDMI will just never look good(over/underscan adjustments just do not help.), but to be honest this is almost exclusively limited to monitors that are also TV's. It is also not a problem for most modern screens. This is so rare I do not think I will ever see a user effected.
In the case of HDMI not working the HDMI to DVI cables solve this issue because the screen thinks it is getting DVI(because that is what HDMI was based on) and this no overscan/underscan issues happen.
The cpu clock speed and even core count seems low for a desktop i7, but they release so many cpus, I can see that.
Overclocking is only an option with the cooling required as well as a board/cpu combo that will handle it.
The video card is still older for sure and mid level for sure. Do not worry about what Windows says about hard drives. They ALL score that low. SSD's are great but do nothing for actual game performance one loaded. MMO games load lots of stuff on the fly, so pauses may be reduced, but still not removed.
Forget the SSD for gaming performance.
It will load windows faster, and will load the game faster, but won't improve the performance of the game.
There are slight exceptions, like flight simulator, that loads scenery all the time.
Not a gamer, so I don't know what games an SSD will help, if any.
I waited to buy my Samsung SSD, and now there is a slow down problem with most Samsungs.
They say it is fixable with firmware, though.
It will load windows faster, and will load the game faster, but won't improve the performance of the game.
There are slight exceptions, like flight simulator, that loads scenery all the time.
Not a gamer, so I don't know what games an SSD will help, if any.
I waited to buy my Samsung SSD, and now there is a slow down problem with most Samsungs.
They say it is fixable with firmware, though.
ETEl2NAL407
September 28, 2014 7:21:36 PM
Yes, thank you. That makes sense, but I still will feel a bit uneasy using 2 different video cables for the same signal...Something just seems off about that, but I guess that's my only option if I want the 970/980.
Another question though...Some have told me with the 560 Ti I don't need to upgrade and have suggested I just upgrade my processor. I'm venturing into some pretty graphic intensive games recently and noticing that these games could run much better. According to windows rating, my only system drawback is my slow drive (7200 rpm). So, I know I want a better drive and aiming for SSD that's affordable and gives me >500GB, but is there validity to the argument that the only other thing I'd need to upgrade would be my CPU? Currently I'm using i7 dual core 2.33 and it was suggested I either A) overclock that to 3 or better, or B) purchase a new processor. What to do?
Another question though...Some have told me with the 560 Ti I don't need to upgrade and have suggested I just upgrade my processor. I'm venturing into some pretty graphic intensive games recently and noticing that these games could run much better. According to windows rating, my only system drawback is my slow drive (7200 rpm). So, I know I want a better drive and aiming for SSD that's affordable and gives me >500GB, but is there validity to the argument that the only other thing I'd need to upgrade would be my CPU? Currently I'm using i7 dual core 2.33 and it was suggested I either A) overclock that to 3 or better, or B) purchase a new processor. What to do?
ETEl2NAL407
September 28, 2014 7:03:53 PM
ETEl2NAL407
September 28, 2014 6:59:49 PM
hunter315 said:
It should be one port per monitor and one cable per monitor, you shouldn't be doubling up on anything.Yes I am. 1 DVI to monitor 1, 1 DVI to monitor 2. That is 2 cables. If the 970/980 has only 1 output for DVI, how can I connect 2 monitors? This is my original question, still unanswered in terms I am able to follow.
See all answers