Last message on previous page:
All of those are fine for 1024x1280 but the HD 4850 is the best between those
Trying to decide between the many choices here. I will be running 1680x1050, and I'd like to have a 2nd monitor running at 1280x1024 if possible.
A) 2x 4850
B) 2x 8800
C) 1x 4870
D) 1x 9800
Obviously I will need to change motherboards based on some of these. With (A) I'll go with an X38/X48, (B) I'll go with an nForce SLI 750i. The other 2 I'm undecided.
I'm trying to stay in the under-$425 range (preferably less) for whichever I go with.
Thanks,
CF
Two 4850's are the clear choice.
Yeah, at 1680x1050 or above, you're better with Crossfired 4850s than the other choices; they should also be by far the best at handling AA.
And the fact that you'd like a second monitor running pretty much says you should get two cards rather than one. While one card might be fine for driving two displays with just the basic GUI running, I think you'd start to notice a difference if you're running some media-heavy apps, such as playing high-definition video on one (or both!) screens.
| Quote : Yeah, at 1680x1050 or above, you're better with Crossfired 4850s than the other choices; they should also be by far the best at handling AA.
|
maziar, you are a 4850 whore.
lol,i'm just talking about the facts
not fanboys here
yeah, the 4850 is a good card actually. I prefer nvidia cards, but I'm tempted by that one because of the price/performance ratio ($200 + better performance than an nvidia 9800 gtx = pretty frickin sweet).
edit: although, nvidia may have some price cuts coming in response
Yep,if NVIDIA drops the price of 9800GTX,then it will be a good buy because the difference between 9800GTX and HD 4850 isn't much.
lol, is there a way to delete a part of this thread (it is 860 posts long!)
Come to think of it, is this the longest thread on the forum?
*Edit* corrected my post to reflected actual number of posts
| jonyb222 wrote : lol, is there a way to delete a part of this thread (it is 86 pages long!)
|
I think this may be the longest thread on the forum; I remember when it was first put up, heh. As for the page-count, you should perhaps change to have more posts per page.
Though in reality, all that really matter is the first post and the last page or two, so you can safely ignore the rest of the posts given how old they are; no need to delete them.
^^ lol I just realized that, I corrected it now
Speaking of which the first page needs to be updated, no biggie though, the best value card are still up on tom's main page...
this is a sticky so of course it will be long, now the pc vs ps3 thread that was still being resurrected after over a year, that was a long thread had to be closed otherwise it would still be on going.
The short and sweet of it is I'm building an entirely new system and I've allowed myself 400ish dollars for video card(s). From what I've gathered most people think that the 8800gts(g92) is a better deal than the 9800gtx because of the price and fairly similar preformance. However, this is all gathered from older posts and since then I've seen people talking about price drops so I wanted to make sure I had my facts straight. As it stands I can get a 8800 gts(g92) off newegg for 159.99 after a $30 mail in rebate or a 9800 gtx for 209.99. Like I said I've got about 400 dollars I can spend on this but I'm a college student so if there's no big difference I'll gladly keep a little more money in my pocket. That said if anyone feels strongly about any other card(s) I'd appreciate your opinion, either a single card or sli works for me. As I'm sure it will make some difference, I'm making this as a gaming computer so I plan to play the newest games on the highest settings . Again any input is appreciated.
^^ get a 4870, end of story
+1 More for HD 4870
I was looking to upgrade my graphic card and the first place i came to research was here. But I dont understand why you guys dont have much with the 9800 gtx. The price has substantially dropped and w/rebate you can get it for 180 right now. TigerDirect has the BFG 9800GTX for 179.99. Whenever I look at price comparison charts of it up against other cards the 9800 gtx always does best or second best . Like in cod4 the charts show the 9800 gtx is better in performance compared to the 8800 ultra by 5fps w/out AA.
Is the 9800 gtx the best graphic card for price right now?
Or is there a flaw with the 9800 gtx im not aware of making it not that valuable.
thanks,
Greg
No,9800GTX cant beat 8800GTX/8800ULTRA in very high resolutions and when AA and AF is enabled because 8800GTX/ULTRA are 768MB and and 384bit.
Although I know Cleeve is busy, I'm still a little disappointed to see the list here neglected for so long, and even to find the "official" list article posted on the main page has not quite updated as much as it should; it covered the launch of the Radeon 4800 series, but neglected to cover any of the price re-arrangements that occured immediately thereafter. As such, out of boredom I took the liberty to go and see what's happened... To find that perhaps on the terms of the price-performance scale, nVidia's doing even worse than I thought, as three of their cards have been effectively "bumped off" the list by virtue of holding their price as the next-up tier dropped down to reach them.
BEST GAMING VIDEOCARDS FOR THE MONEY:
PCI-E video cards, Late July, 2008
Best PCI-e card for under $80US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$100US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$120US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$150US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$180US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$290US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$360US:
Best PCI-e card for ~$580US:
BEST GAMING VIDEOCARDS FOR THE MONEY:
AGP video cards, Late July, 2008
I only saw one real change, and that is that it appears the price on AGP 3850s have dropped to roughly $140-150US, from $160-170US. Much smaller price drops were seen on the 2600pro and XT cards, though overall their respective descriptions of "under $100" and "approximately $100" still fit.
Cross fire for HD4800 series doesn't look like it's quite ready for the money yet.
Maby be a better idea to get 1 HD4800 card and enjoy it till drivers improve for CrossFire support and by then the price on the 4800 series cards will be less money.
Newegg has a great deal on Gigabyte HD3870
$99 after rebate+free shipping:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814125086
| SonDa5 wrote : Cross fire for HD4800 series doesn't look like it's quite ready for the money yet. |
Perhaps not. To be honest, I wouldn't bother with anything in that price range or above m'self in this current situation; it's not like you could ever be truly satisfied with playing Crysis at 1920x1200 or above with those... But at any rate, I'll just defend myself as forward-thinking...
| SonDa5 wrote : Newegg has a great deal on Gigabyte HD3870
|
As both Cleeve and I have consistently decided, we don't really like to consider after-rebate prices as valid for comparing the card's price overall, because they are never very consistent, and generally limited in time as to when they're offered.
im using a asus m2n sli deluxe..
im tired of my aged 7600gt..would 8800gt would be a better upgrade option as it leaves the sli route a potential upgrade or is ati 4850 better??
ATI HD 4850 is better than 8800GT,but 2 8800GTs beat 1 HD 4850(Even the HD 4870)
4850 or 4870 for the win. For now Nvidia is obsolete.
8800GT SLi costs approximately the same as a 4870 while being a tad more powerful, provided you're running at medium-high or above resolutions. (anything above 1280x1024, I'd say) I'd say it's perhaps a worthwhile option if you have a SLi-ready board... Otherwise, I'd not worry too much about having SLi, especially since these days, there tend to be superior chipsets (namely from Intel) than those that support SLi.
First page needs updating.
Edit - Nevermind, I see nottheking has handled that.
Hi guys,
Is there a "Sticky" here that discusses Graphic Cards for the Laptops ... you know kinda the way you guys are doing here!?!?
Thanks,
G!
Hello and welcome to the forums mate
Well unfortunately this topic doesn't talk about it,but which model do are u considering? i may help if i know
Someone above considered sli or cf for a dualmonitor setup - but doesn't sli and cf cancel the option for extended desktop? That's what I was told by some nerd in here anyway. Or is it only the connectors on the secondary card that are disabled?
(sli is pointless with the current cards being so powerful in my opinion, so never tried it)
No, having an SLi or CrossFire setup will not make it impossible to have multiple monitors running at once. They just won't all be running when you're playing a game; it's been many years since video cards came to support hot-switching of video modes; it was kinda a necessity in order for SLi to work in the first place. So it'll simply be that when at your desktop, you'll have multiple monitors; with two video cards, you could actually have as many as FOUR monitors, quite possibly arranged arbitrarily, (well, either in a line or as a square) as well as two or three. It'd just switch off all but the first monitor when playing a game; in other words, it'd shift from simply a dual-video-card mode (something that'd been possible before SLi existed) to actually running in SLi mode.
Good to see another update, Cleeve, though your lack of posting here is a little disconcerting. I just have a couple of warnings to point out about the latest revision...
*The cheaper Radeon card appears to be identical to the more expensive one save in that it has only one DVI port, and has a D-SUB port instead of a second DVI, and lacks the extra stuff; I'd judge it to be a "lite" edition of the card, which should probably be fine for most people looking for a dirt-cheap video card.
[edit]After checking again, I retract what I said about the 2600 mentioned; it appears to be another one of those DDR2 cards; so a DDR2 card for $30US, or a full 2600XT for $60US. Shame on me for paying all-too-careful attention for DDR2 GeForce cards, but missing it when looking at the Radeons on the other side...
what card is highest performer?
ASUS ATI RADEON 3870 512MB GDDR4
MSI GEFORCE 8800GT 512MB OC GDDR3
MSI GEFORCE 9600GT 512MB OC GDDR3
ASUS GEFORCE 9600GT 512MB GDDR3
XFX GEFORCE 9600GT 'XXX ALPHADOG EDITION' 512MB GDDR3
SAPHIRE RADEON HD 3850 512MB GDDR3
ASUS ATI RADEON HD 3650 512MB GDDR3
the help would be much appreciated, pleeeeaaase....
8800GT
and the
ASUS ATI RADEON HD 4850 512MB GDDR3
GIGABYTE HD 4850 512MB GDDR3
SAPPHIRE HD 4850 512MB GDDR3
HD 4850>8800GT>HD 3870
SO 4850 OVER THE 8800GT? FROM WHAT I HEAR THE ATI CAR IS THE BETTER PERFORMER
ATI HD 4850 performs like a 9800GTX(It has a slight lead over its nvidia's rival in some games),so its more powerful than a 8800GT(however if someone has a 8800GT,it isnt worth it to upgrade to a HD 4850)
SPAM
Well that's some pretty random ****...
| nottheking wrote : Good to see another update, Cleeve, though your lack of posting here is a little disconcerting. |
Well, I just had my third son a couple weeks ago, so the whole lack of sleep thing is a factor. I'll be behind on things for a bit until I can catch up.
The 9500 GT GDDR3 is $80 on newegg now; GDDR3 2600 XTs are $60. It's a tough call, and I see your point about the 3850. I'll probably mention them both next month.
well 8800 gt needs to go in the cards for 100 dollars category or at least the cards for 125 dollars category.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 814141074R
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applica [...] =P450-8830
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814133232
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6814500007
| Cleeve wrote : Well, I just had my third son a couple weeks ago, so the whole lack of sleep thing is a factor. I'll be behind on things for a bit until I can catch up. |
Ah, I didn't know this. Then allow me to congratulate you for becoming a father yet again. I'm certain your son will grow up to be absolutely brilliant. ![]()
| Cleeve wrote : The 9500 GT GDDR3 is $80 on newegg now; GDDR3 2600 XTs are $60. It's a tough call, and I see your point about the 3850. I'll probably mention them both next month. |
Of course, that's contingent on what the situation looks like a month from now. Clearly we're seeing things shook up quite a bit...
...And it appears that NewEgg has decided to "deactivate" the lite edition of the 2600 XT, though the DDR2 version remains there, and two GDDR3 cards (One & Two) have appeared to replace it at the same/lower price. (one even has a MIR to bring it down to $20US, heh)
Further shaking things up, we see the 8600GT has seen a price plummet, so now it is cheap enough to compare to the 2600XT's pricing as well, and possibly threatening the validity of the 9500GT even more, much like how the 3650 was never recommended. (One & Two, though there are also a mix of DDR2 cards in there as well)
Also, it appears that we're starting to see the 3850 dip below the $100 mark. (One, Two, Three, though it has only 256MB VRAM) Technically, there's also One 9600GSO under the $100US mark as well, (the other one is a 128-bit card) though it's close enough that I round it up to $100US.
| scippy4848 wrote : well 8800 gt needs to go in the cards for 100 dollars category or at least the cards for 125 dollars category. |
The first card you mention is an open-box card; i.e, no warranty, potentially "dead on arrival." (DOA) Cards two and three include a rebate to get a price even close to $100US. The third is $120US, and considerably cheaper than any other brand; chances are it's a temporary price, as the rest (the other 26 cards currently listed) begin in the $140-150US range.
Really, remember that mail-in-rebates can't be counted, and likewise, unstable "fluke" pricing can't be counted either, since this is a guide meant to be usable for multiple days, rather than however long those freak prices last.
Yes but it's still should be in the 125 even without open box, fluke pricing and mir. 8800 gt's have gone way down on newegg and tigerdirect especially.
The video hierarchy link is broken
MY son has a gaming computer basd on a Athlon 6000X2 processor and 2 8600GT is SLI mode. He got a new 26" monitor and would like to upgrade the performance of his system. We were looking at the Geforce 280 or the 9800 GX. Both in the $380-420 range.
Are these the best options? Should we consider somthing else?
IMO your best bet is to get a 4870. I say that because it comes very close to the 9800gtx x2 in power even without new drivers. It's cheaper (250-270) and since it's not sli it won't suffer from sli problems. The only downside is that if you want to get another one like 2 years from now you can't do crossfire.
4850 in crossfire (but you need new mobo...)
| scippy4848 wrote : Yes but it's still should be in the 125 even without open box, fluke pricing and mir. 8800 gt's have gone way down on newegg and tigerdirect especially. |
It's still a fluke price if only a single card or two of that model strays down that far, with the bulk sitting at a price $15-20US above it. That is what the case is for the 8800GT.
| ijourneaux wrote : MY son has a gaming computer basd on a Athlon 6000X2 processor and 2 8600GT is SLI mode. He got a new 26" monitor and would like to upgrade the performance of his system. We were looking at the Geforce 280 or the 9800 GX. Both in the $380-420 range. Are these the best options? Should we consider somthing else? |
Well, if you had CrossFire capability, I would've recommended $340-360US for Radeon 4850 CrossFire, but with SLi... At such a high resolution as you would with a 26" monitor, another SLi setup *MIGHT* make sense, with 9800GTX cards, which should best either the 9800GX2 or GTX 280. Of course, that will depend a lot on what prices you can get the cards at; sadly, while they're a hair weaker than 4850s, they tend to be priced a bit more these days.
Alternatively, you could go for a single Radeon HD 4870; while weaker than either of those cards, it only falls short by a small (10-15%) margin, and would bring you notably under the $300US mark. There is also the 4870X2 which is to be released sometime this week or so, (as well as not requiring CrossFire support to use) but while vastly powerful than any other card out there, is expected to run $500-550US, making it considerably more expensive than your other options.
new kid on the block now deserves to go to the top for best gfx card and price for topend . 4870X2. (until nvidia respond next year that is)
| samuraiblade wrote : new kid on the block now deserves to go to the top for best gfx card and price for topend . 4870X2. (until nvidia respond next year that is) |
True, for $550-560US, the 4870X2 is remarkably good. The frightening part is that it provides a level of power-for-value that isn't all that much worse than the 4850 and 4870; normally after you pass the $300US mark, you'd only find cards a hair more powerful for considerably more money.
Of course, this list really doesn't need to go that high. Of COURSE people will all know what the best video card is, and know that if you've got the money to spend, the best card is the one to get. So its inclusion in a list here is kinda redundant, for something so self-evident.
Of course, currently it appears that AMD has a target of Q1 2009 for the release of RV870, which should be using either a 45 or 40nm process, which would bring the size down to 67% or 53% or so... So it's quite possible that with this much of a lead, nVidia's looking at a minimum of a year or two playing second fiddle in the graphics card market.
Simply put, I don't think that either GT 200b or GT 300 will be able to threaten AMD's dominance here; while they can bring themselves up to speed and compete against RV770/R700, AMD has made it clear that they do not wish to stand still long enough for nVidia to do so; once they manage to trump R700, they'll have to contend with R800 instead.
I would have chose the 9800gtx (not +, original) over the 4850.... they are around 175$ and beat the 4850 in gaming. (On my opinion.)
Benchmarks seem to disagree with you; the 4850, in Crysis, (pretty much the only game there's a difference at with such potent cards) averages a 35-38% lead over the 9800GTX+ when anti-aliasing is enabled.
There are 974 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

