Last message on previous page:
i love how all of you completely ignored this post...
| Quote : lookie what i found:
|
Thatd be fine if you prefer PC gaming... but if you like gaming in general, and want the best, for the money the 360 is a better way to go...eventually it would be wise to get a PC in say a year that is a good value that would be better than the 360.
The ps3 sucks, and its graphical capabilitys are inferior to the 360's, I could care less if sony lasts in the console market, they lack any innovation and it shows. But if I were you id probably get the 360, with the constraints you are on for cash. How ever I could have bought an xbox 360 when I built this pc, but I didnt.
I really hate sony for what they are trying to do to gamers this round. They are forcefully shoving blue-ray down our throats and charging a huge premium for it too. They spent all of their time developing Cell and basically slapped on a 7900gt into the mix because it was what Nvidia would have available at the time. Then they copied nintendo's controller at the last minute, rehashed the DS controller which is simply an extension of the SNES controller. They gave MS shit about 2 SKU's and then they go out and do it them selves. Now they are gonna charge a huge price for the game sequals we are getting tired of. I already have a 360 and plan on getting a Wii along side of it, both for the csot of a single PS3.
| Quote : They gave MS **** about 2 SKU's and then they go out and do it them selves. |
Ya but the worst part is that with MS's way you can upgrade the core into the premium but you can't for the PS3. No HDMI for the basic pack, WTF were they thinking?
| Quote :
|
Totally true and you all have valid points about it being not in the nature of consoles to have two versions in the first place, and certainly not in the nature of consoles to lack the ability to all be equal.
This is a PC forum, and you're all complaining about having to 8O pay extra for more features.
I accept that it's really not cool that they're choosing ^^ that as one of the features borrowed from a PC, but the console market has used the same "Console.....Newer Console.....Newer Console" structure for over a decade.
I think it's a healthy evolution of their business that they're introducing different tiers of their Consoles. If in 5 years it turns out that nobody bought one of the versions of 360 or PS3 and they sold 99% the cheaper model and 1% more expensive one (or the other way round), I'm sure they'll abandon the idea and try to innovate in a different way.
| Quote : This is a PC forum, and you're all complaining about having to Shocked pay extra for more features. |
No I'm complaing that it cant be upgraded. Its like being a socket 939 board getting a venice 3000+ and then not being able to upgrade to a FX 60.
ok then... so it looks like the 360 is the right choice for me, and i may get a new computer in a year or so.
| Quote : i probly should have mentioned that i already have a 50' HDTV... |
get the 360
If your budget is that limited, I would suggest the XBox 360... they contain a hell of a lot of hardware for $399 (probably still being sold at a loss) and no $399 PC can compete with it. Sure, you give up the keyboard and mouse, but you gain one hell of a video subsystem.
I agree with a previous poster... going to an 2800+ processor isn't a large enough upgrade to warrant the expense... aim a little higher or settle for the XBox 360.
low budget go console, there is no debate at all, but i would wait for the other 2 consoles to come out before u make ur decision
If your budget is that limited, I would suggest the XBox 360... they contain a hell of a lot of hardware for $399 (probably still being sold at a loss) and no $399 PC can compete with it. Sure, you give up the keyboard and mouse, but you gain one hell of a video subsystem.
I agree with a previous poster... going to an 2800+ processor isn't a large enough upgrade to warrant the expense... aim a little higher or settle for the XBox 360.
if u rele dont hav money to throw around even in a year or so jus keep on the console, if u do decide to get a gaming comp, my best advice to u is get a mid range system, upgrade the gfx card/cpu/ram either or, around every 2 year, u will be able to play games with high settings(no where near maxed unfortunatly) and keep it within a reasonable budget
You might be interested in this and you could have the best of both worlds
Cellocity - basicly (for how I understand it) if you have anything that resembles a pc with
256 MB of ram.
10 GB of hard drive space.
A 32 bit 64 bit or Cell CPU.
A DVD drive.
you can have a windows-linux-OSX pc even if it is a ps3 or an xbox 360 normaly, I dont know about the rest of you but If I can get a fully functioning pc out of a 360, it just became worth the money to buy it
this is a link to cellocity features page its not much but its what they put up
http://www.cellocity.net/dnn/Featu [...] fault.aspx
Yeah, but that would suck when you compare it to good pc's now.
Well, For that amount of money, I'd note that your PC would fall seriously behind the capabilities of the Xbox 360, so unless you have significant reasons for gaming on the PC, go for the console.
However, I'd caution you to examine the other console contenders before making your choice; it looks as this round of "the console wars" will wind up being more open, and perhaps a lot closer, than the last round.
Also know that technically, a console will be fine playing any games released within its lifespan, but on the other side of that coin, if it's also availible on PC, it will work on an equally-old system, just at lower settings; with what will then be a modern system, you'd be able to SURPASS the settings found on the console.
However, looking more in-depth into your setup, let me give a few more details:[*:fc51af5ace]The AXP 2800+ and 6600GT, contrary to what some might believe, is actually not ALL that far from an Xbox 360. However, it is still significantly less, perhaps a little better than half as good. Also, for those with an SDTV, that sort of system would actually produce similar results to an Xbox 360.
[*:fc51af5ace]You've got a 50" HDTV? What are you using it for? With an HDTV, you've got the other necessary component to actually make the Xbox 360 or other console a viable good-looking platform.
PS2 is a Pentium 2 with 32mb RDRAM. Still outperforms a PC in certain areas (some RPGs, for example. And PC racing games are nowhere near as good)
The comparison of specs between PC and console - i.e. "It's just an Athlon XP with a 6600" are pointless, consoles have been able to do a shitload more with 'inferior' components and always have been able to.
we must not forget that consoles do not need to run windows, which itself consumes a lot of memory, not so much cpu and all games must be api-bound. With a console, you have none of these elements, and there's much more flexibility in game development.
Also, with a fixed hardware configuration, game developers make a game that is meant to run optimally in that particular piece of hardware. PC games have minimum and recommended requirements, so the developers have more "freedom" to do their games. If they can develop a game to run with 4GB of ram and 2.5GHZ, why would they mind if the game runs on a 1GHZ 256MB?
Build a computer and learn something, you may want to spend a little more because a computer can do more.
Nice TV.
| Quote :
|
Hmm so he should upgrade to a PC that will only last him another 6months of gaming?
In his case, and what he has told us, he should definately get the 360, especially with a 50" TV!!!!!
What type of computer do you use that needs to be replaced in 6 months?
The last one I built uses:
Optron 146 (running 2.95Ghz on 1.4 volts) $200
7900GT $287
G.Skill DDR500 ram (2X1GB) $160
I average 127 fps in FEAR with everything turned up (tops out at 308 fps) and I have not even OC the card yet.
Yes it will connect to HDTV sets.
If you think any of this will need to be replaced in 6 months....your just not thinking.
| Quote :
|
Hmm so he should upgrade to a PC that will only last him another 6months of gaming?
In his case, and what he has told us, he should definately get the 360, especially with a 50" TV!!!!!
What type of computer do you use that needs to be replaced in 6 months?
The last one I built uses:
Optron 146 (running 2.95Ghz on 1.4 volts) $200
7900GT $287
G.Skill DDR500 ram (2X1GB) $160
I average 127 fps in FEAR with everything turned up (tops out at 308 fps) and I have not even OC the card yet.
Yes it will connect to HDTV sets.
If you think any of this will need to be replaced in 6 months....your just not thinking.
Probably this kind of computer:
| Quote : hey guys i was just debating between getting a 360, or upgrading my pc... here are my current specs
|
If he had said he could upgrade to an AMD 64 and a top of the line vid card I certainly would have recommended the PC upgrade path.
| Quote : PS2 is a Pentium 2 with 32mb RDRAM. Still outperforms a PC in certain areas (some RPGs, for example. And PC racing games are nowhere near as good)
|
Don't spread misinformation like that. A simple Google search would disprove the idea that a PS2 is a Pentium 2 based system.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayS [...] patibility
Read it in context. Someone has just said that an Xbox 360 is similar in specification to an Athlon XP 2800 with a GeForce 6600 graphics chip. I was saying that a PS2 is similar in specification to a PII with 32mb RDRAM.
i think he meant that it's supposed to perform like a P-II, as it's ~300mhz, but that proved wrong...
Reading the article you posted, there's this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotion_Engine
and it says it is 2 times faster than a P-III 733... oh boy
A PS2 and a Pentium 2 have virtually nothing in common... and in terms of performance they're not in the same league either. I'm still waiting for you to delete your misinformation-filled post
Just conceptually think about what you're saying... keep in mind that the original X-Box was essentially a Pentium 3 class CPU (some might argue it's more similar to a Celeron, but I disagree) Those two gaming platforms were pretty similar in terms of performance... think about the quality of graphics on each platform. Do you REALLY believe that the PS2 could have kept up with the XBox with less than half the processing power? MHz mean NOTHING... I believe you saw it was a 300 MHz processor and said "Ahh... Pentium 2's were that speed!" and ran with it.
Just trying to cut down on misinformation.
The information I was referring to was in some article Toms' did about RPGs a while ago (about how on PC there were hardly any people in a city scene, whereas it was densely populated on PS2).
Xbox and a P3 class CPU perform similarly because
a) they use a VERY similar CPU
b) An Xbox is pretty much a PC anyway
As for deleting my post? Why? It was relative to another post. Like I said, read it in context. If you care that much you'll search the archives for the article I'm referring to.
| Quote : Read it in context. Someone has just said that an Xbox 360 is similar in specification to an Athlon XP 2800 with a GeForce 6600 graphics chip. I was saying that a PS2 is similar in specification to a PII with 32mb RDRAM. |
If something is blatantly false, how can it be relevant?
It is similar in specification.
Emotion Engine - 294mhz, 10.5 million transistors, 64 bit, 16k + 8k + 16k cache
Pentium 2 - 3-8 million transistors, 32 bit, 512k cache
I'd say that's pretty similar.
I'm not saying that either is an exact clone of the other, but those specs read pretty darn similar.
| Quote : It is similar in specification.
|
except for the fact that the execution of code on the two is completely different. but whatever. close enough, right?
hahhahhah
Thats the most retarded thing I've ever heard.
| Quote : Thats the most retarded thing I've ever heard. |
Agreed. Mesa i'm surprised AM did'nt give you a slinkie.
| Quote : I average 127 fps in FEAR with everything turned up (tops out at 308 fps) and I have not even OC the card yet. |
With antialiasing disabled on what resolution?
| Quote : It is similar in specification.
|
You're kidding right?
| Quote : I average 127 fps in FEAR with everything turned up (tops out at 308 fps) and I have not even OC the card yet. |
With antialiasing disabled on what resolution?
| Quote : It is similar in specification.
|
You're kidding right?
i guess i understand his point... i think what he's trying to say is that if you take two systems with similar specs (i.e. ps2 and pII) to see the results.
what he's trying to say is that; both being 300mhz, regardless of being 32 or 128 bit, RISC or CISC, etc, you get very different results.
I also think the comparison is relevant to this topic, as some are arguing about performance of xbox being far from a pc and stuff.
the point is:
a console, even with lower specs compared to a PC run faster than a same priced PC.
So i guess the decision to whether buy a console or a PC comes down to the games you want to play, if they're avaiable for the console or PC or both.
My two cents:
If you are in a hurry, get the Xbox 360. If you need to upgrade to the spec of the 360 you need a lot more than $400.
If you can wait, then all PC hardware will reduce in price later. RAM, the current AMD, and Intel CPUs, etc as AM2 and Conroe will come out, as well as the next gen DX100 GPUs. So PC upgrade to the level of the 360 will be cheaper than if you upgraded now.
From your specs, I would don't think "Upgrade" would be worth it, (old MB, RAM). In your case a new system in early 2007 would be best value for money).
As with all console purchases check out the current and forthcoming games. Not all PC games will come out for console and vice versa. Some games play better on the PC, so what games you like should influence your decision.
I'm sorry but it is retarded and irrelevant.
The only thing they have in common is clock speed and possibly process. Wow so similar!
| Quote : I'm sorry but it is retarded and irrelevant.
|
That's what I was saying.
I'm going on something I read on Toms' (which I can't find now, unfortunately) quite some time ago.
I'm clutching at straws trying to find out what they meant in that article. I wouldn't claim to be a CPU expert, but that information I posted before is what I assumed they were talking about (apparently not)
If I find that article I'll post it.
I bet Tom is hastily digging through his archives to delete that before you find it.
sorry guys i havnt updated you for a while... i chose pc upgrade, and now i have 2gb pc3200 RAM, and a x1600 pro vid card. you could say it was a waste, but the card was only 100$.
if your only upgrading that much, the 360 is the clear choice
*ic you already upgraded... so anyways.... have fun i suppose
There are 1123 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

