Last message on previous page:
| BigMac wrote : Cheating implies that one is violating some rule. If you follow the Bible then I guess this co-worker is correct in his own frame of reference but he should not bother others with that.
|
Well, he wasn't bothering us with it. The discussion started with myself and another co-worker due to a spam message he got. Then GodWad jumped in and said it was cheating...
And I don't feel that cybersex is cheating, as it's just a personal hand shandy. But I believe you owe your partner full disclosure about it before things get too serious. And if they say no, and you do it behind their back, then it's cheating...
It's also better if there's no personal relationship. If you call a sex line and talk to someone different every week, it's a little different than setting dates and times to chat with the same person every week.
If there's no physical contact, and you are hooked on the act, and not the person on the other end of the line, I don't see it as a big deal...
I thought as much but I did not want to hurt your feelings if it was about soccer.
Certainly looking forward to the big bang.. I have high hopes something useful will come of it but I do not believe for one microsecond that it will be the end of the world... that must have been thought up by a bunch of now 60+ year old hippies...
| JustPlainJef wrote : If there's no physical contact, and you are hooked on the act, and not the person on the other end of the line, I don't see it as a big deal... |
Who needs phone-sex or cyber-sex as an aid or pretext to masturbation? That's why I don't buy the "hooked on the act" thing, when people bring up cyber-sex or phone-sex.
As an expert in masturbation i can say, with much assurance, and with full knowledge of oncomming man-muck replies, that indeed, the only requirement for exquisite masturbational orgasms are that of a clear, free and unobstructed imagination.
Always knew you were a full-time tosser.
Doesn;t matter what you call it: adultry is still wrong. Unequivocally.
true...a name is just a name...so what does "adultry" include or better yet, what doesn't it include.
I'm not your dictionary.
and you shouldn't use a dictionnary to guide your life....what i mean is who is to say what is and what is not adultery!
Is it still adultery if you're just shagging someone's wife but not married?
[sig]





[/sig]
| Tom_Smart wrote : Is it still adultery if you're just shagging someone's wife but not married? |
Yes, but only 50% of the time.
I'm not too sure how you arrived at that figure. If you could tell me the adultery percentage for shagging a bisexual wife and her unmarried sister, I'll be able to work out the rest myself.
[sig]





[/sig]
I started thinking about it, Tom, and my mind went numb from the numbers, and then I got jealous of your score, and almost wet myself, then passed out in my chair, crying...
I need to find the Zpyrd / Assman posts...
Don't make me remind you about crying, again!
[sig]





[/sig]
CRAP!
...*hardens the fcuk up*...
A ten rules on extramarital affairs.
1) Don't get caught.
2) Don't get caught.
3) Don't get caught.
4) Don't get caught.
5) Don't get caught.
6) Don't get caught.
7) Don't get caught.
8) Don't get caught.
9) Don't get caught.
10) If you get caught, deny it, above all, do not confess.
| Tom_Smart wrote : I'm not too sure how you arrived at that figure. If you could tell me the adultery percentage for shagging a bisexual wife and her unmarried sister, I'll be able to work out the rest myself. |
20% of the time. Assuming she has a girlfriend as well.
Naturally she has a girlfriend, otherwise what would be the point?
[sig]





........1977...................1978....................1981..................1984.....................2005....................????...........
....................................................So far five times European Champions.....................................................
[/sig]
She coulda' been one of the college only bisexuals.
If she's hot, and in turn has a girlfriend of her own, by my calculations not only is it not cheating, it allows you to show pics to anyone that doubts you, then swat them. Twice. After charging them to see the pics of course.
Pics? AKA incriminating evidence. Sorry, my natural instincts avoid such things.
[sig]





........1977...................1978....................1981..................1984.....................2005....................????...........
....................................................So far five times European Champions.....................................................
[/sig]
Ah, good point.
There are 932 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

