Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Collection of AMD K10 data
Word :    Username :           
 

Last message on previous page:

Quote :

This slide:
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/2699/amdbarcelona13cn9.jpg
confuses me. I found a lot of articles stating that the L1 would be 128kB, same as on K8. So:
1. the 64kB L1 on the AMD slide is a typo or
2. the L1 is 4-way


In the context of this slide, it is possible the slide is describing the L1 cache for data and not the L1 cache for instruction.

Reply to Ranman68k
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

That is basically the same diagram as Phil Hester's June Analyst Day presentation, page 14.

As far as I can tell, the diagram simply didn't have enough room to show both the L1 Instruction and L1 Data caches. I believe the diagrams were simplified to make it easier to show the 3 levels of cache. I would say that the diagram only shows one of the two L1 caches and therefore does not show total L1 size.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ
- 0 +

What do you think about the L1 to L2 and the L1 to L3 buses?
Do you think that L2 is connected to L3 at all?

Reply to gOJDO

Yes, I have a lot of respect for Hans. He was the one who refuted the notion that K8L had 4 instruction issue. It is too bad that he stopped posting technical articles on his website. Those were first rate. I know of another gentleman who did very detailed analysis of memory and cache on AMD and Intel processors but then he stopped when K8 was introduced.

That thread you linked to was brutal. It had already deteriorated into flaming by the 2nd page and just got worse from there. Yes, it does have real information in it but the flames and personal attacks really knock things down. I once described that on AMDZ as like eating ice cream with sawdust in it. This thread is going smoothly with lots of information and discussion and no flames and that makes a huge difference in how easy it is to read.

Yes, everything I've seen would suggest 64KB's each for Data and Instructions. BTW, I've just seen at AMD their latest press release is Ultimate Datacenter Performance-Per-Watt. This again makes me think that the 40% number is mostly power draw and not processor speed.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

What do you think about the L1 to L2 and the L1 to L3 buses?
Do you think that L2 is connected to L3 at all?


I can see why L3 would only need to be connected to L1 when L3 gets a hit. There wouldn't be any reason to pass this to L2. However, L3 gets updated when L2 overflows. So, it would seem that L2 would need to be connected to L3 to transfer whatever gets pushed out.

However, from the diagram it rather looks like AMD has some kind of crossbar switch on the L1 cache controller. Perhaps this is the most flexible arrangement if not the most direct.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ
- 0 +

Quote :

However, L3 gets updated when L2 overflows. So, it would seem that L2 would need to be connected to L3 to transfer whatever gets pushed out.


Why to push out to L3? The L2 is directly connected to the ODMC, bypassing the crossbar.

Reply to gOJDO
- 0 +

The $1 Million Dollar Question is...

When?

Reply to slim142

Quote :

Yes, I have a lot of respect for Hans. He was the one who refuted the notion that K8L had 4 instruction issue. It is too bad that he stopped posting technical articles on his website. Those were first rate. I know of another gentleman who did very detailed analysis of memory and cache on AMD and Intel processors but then he stopped when K8 was introduced.

That thread you linked to was brutal. It had already deteriorated into flaming by the 2nd page and just got worse from there. Yes, it does have real information in it but the flames and personal attacks really knock things down. I once described that on AMDZ as like eating ice cream with sawdust in it. This thread is going smoothly with lots of information and discussion and no flames and that makes a huge difference in how easy it is to read.

Yes, everything I've seen would suggest 64KB's each for Data and Instructions. BTW, I've just seen at AMD their latest press release is Ultimate Datacenter Performance-Per-Watt. This again makes me think that the 40% number is mostly power draw and not processor speed.



Too bad that AMD's claim about performance is not valid :?

Reply to qcmadness

I don't think they'd stivk it in for release - surely with ZRAM being so radically different it would require an entire new version of the chip?

It would be really cool if we see this as one of the enhancements in the 2008 update though.

Reply to Julian33

I have to admit that I greased my head since some of this thread has been sliding over the top of it, but my "seat of the pants" guesstimate is that K10 performance will compare within 7-10% of competitive Intel offerings. I can't see anything so breathtakingly innovative or different that is going to amount to much more than that. Again, I'm only dealing clock to clock, not per watt, which is a measure that is irrelevant for my own purposes.

Reply to CaptRobertApril

I was reading somewhere that the Barcelona's memory controller will be able to support DDR2 as well as DDR3, so when the time comes you can just stick it in a motherboard with the right socket and use DDR3, is this true? Also, I'm assuming this cores memory controller will support 8GB of memory , eg, a regular desktop board with 4 ram slots, and four 2gb ddr2 sticks, like the ones Kingston makes?

Reply to rammedstein

Later version CPUs will have DDR-3 support, but for Barcelona and its derivatives, they only integrate two 64-bit DDR-2 memory controllers. :wink:

Reply to qcmadness

Quote :

Later version CPUs will have DDR-3 support, but for Barcelona and its derivatives, they only integrate two 64-bit DDR-2 memory controllers. :wink:



Correct me if I'm a dong, but the 2x64bit DDR2 controllers should be able to handle 4GB each?

Reply to CaptRobertApril

Quote :

Later version CPUs will have DDR-3 support, but for Barcelona and its derivatives, they only integrate two 64-bit DDR-2 memory controllers. :wink:



Correct me if I'm a dong, but the 2x64bit DDR2 controllers should be able to handle 4GB each?

I have no idea, but I will expect each controller can handle 2GB or 4GB depending on the speed.

Reply to qcmadness
- 0 +

Quote :

Later version CPUs will have DDR-3 support, but for Barcelona and its derivatives, they only integrate two 64-bit DDR-2 memory controllers. :wink:



Correct me if I'm a dong, but the 2x64bit DDR2 controllers should be able to handle 4GB each?
The sAM2+ and s1207+(Quad FX) will support 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
2channels x 64bit x 1066.666MHz = 136Gb/s = 17GB/s or 8.5GB/s per channel

The s1207(Opteron 2xxx/8xxx) will support 667MHz buffered DRAM:
2channels x 64bit x 666.666MHz = 85.3Gb/s = 10.7GB/s or 5.3GB/s per channel

Reply to gOJDO

Quote :

The sAM2+ and s1207+(Quad FX) will support 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
2channels x 64bit x 1066.666MHz = 136Gb/s = 17GB/s or 8.5GB/s per channel

The s1207(Opteron 2xxx/8xxx) will support 667MHz buffered DRAM:
2channels x 64bit x 666.666MHz = 85.3Gb/s = 10.7GB/s or 5.3GB/s per channel



I think he is asking about the maximum memory size supported per channel :wink:

Reply to qcmadness
- 0 +

as the core2duo is the last iteration of the p6 line, barcelona will be the last for the k7......surely that the perfs will be significantly higher than its intel s coutepart...amd claim some 42 % improvement in certain tasks..more realistically, it will be closer to a solid 20%, according to ipc improvement available...the main advantage of the core duo is its 128 bit sse units, while amd s k8 only offer 64 bit see unit...with a width of 128 bit execution unit, along with the 4 instructions/cycle capability, this processor will blow up intel s product..that s why intel is desesperatly pushing for 45 nm, which will allow it a higher frequency to catch up in the performance duel..frequency versus ipc....smell the p4 versus axp era...

Reply to abw

Very interesting information. It's great to see that AMD has a plan to strike back and get itself back into the game.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

Quote :

The sAM2+ and s1207+(Quad FX) will support 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
2channels x 64bit x 1066.666MHz = 136Gb/s = 17GB/s or 8.5GB/s per channel

The s1207(Opteron 2xxx/8xxx) will support 667MHz buffered DRAM:
2channels x 64bit x 666.666MHz = 85.3Gb/s = 10.7GB/s or 5.3GB/s per channel



I think he is asking about the maximum memory size supported per channel :wink:

Yeah, I'm angling for a 2xQuad and I wanted to see what the max RAM would be for a K10 setup as a single CPU or as a double. It would seem that the AM2+ is for single and the 1207+ would be for double, so would it or would it not figure that the 1207+ could handle twice as much physical RAM?

Reply to CaptRobertApril
- 0 +

Oh..I thought that he was speaking about bandwidth. It would be the same as for the K8. The s1207 with buffered ODMC will support 4GB per channel, while the unbuffered ODMC will support 2GB per channel.

Reply to gOJDO

Quote :

Oh..I thought that he was speaking about bandwidth. It would be the same as for the K8. The s1207 with buffered ODMC will support 4GB per channel, while the unbuffered ODMC will support 2GB per channel.



OK, let's see if I got this straight:

The sAM2+, 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:

4GB Total RAM in single CPU config.

The s1207+(Quad FX), 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:

8GB Total RAM in dual CPU config.

The s1207(Opteron 2xxx/8xxx) will support 667MHz buffered DRAM:

8GB Total RAM in single CPU config. 16GB Total RAM in dual CPU config.

Right? :?

Reply to CaptRobertApril

Quote :

Yeah, I noticed that verbage in other articles --- 40% Pref/watt sound more reasonable that a straight up 40% per clock IPC advantage.


My thinking was along the lines of this. AMD will probably match the power draw of C2D. However, a dual or quad FSB northbridge would draw more power and FBDIMM would draw more still. They would need 29% less power draw in a system comparison to hit the 40% number. It is difficult to say because they could also be doing Tulsa comparisons since this is currently the only 4-way. I'm certain they will have plenty of slides on this by the June Analysts Meeting. The big question is if they will have anything sooner. Supposedly, there will be limited deliveries of Barcelona in Q2 however, actual volume looks like Q3.

Quote :

Parrot challenged the notion of ZRAM in the L3 cache which created some decent snooping around to figure out that, at least in this die shot, ZRAM is not operative.


We had the same discussion on AMDZ and concluded that the cache size eliminated ZRAM and there was also a lot of doubt that ZRAM would be fast enough. I had still been wondering though if TTRAM would be fast enough and it too is small than SRAM. Lately I've been wondering if AMD has any ideas about using ZRAM for video buffering with an on-die GPU.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

OK, let's see if I got this straight:
The sAM2+, 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
4GB Total RAM in single CPU config.

The s1207+(Quad FX), 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
8GB Total RAM in dual CPU config.

The s1207(Opteron 2xxx/8xxx) will support 667MHz buffered DRAM:
8GB Total RAM in single CPU config. 16GB Total RAM in dual CPU config.

Right? :?



I have found out that Asus M2N32-SLI Premium Vista Edition said that the maximum memory supported is 8GB.
http://www.asus.com/products.aspx? [...] odelmenu=2

And I have also found out that from AMD's technical paper,
the maximum support memory is 16GB for one Socket F CPU 8O
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/co [...] /32559.pdf
Page 98

Updated: from page 32 of the same document, the maximum memory supported for Socket AM2 will be 8GB, the same as claimed by Asus.

Reply to qcmadness

Quote :

as the core2duo is the last iteration of the p6 line, barcelona will be the last for the k7


Not sure what you mean. The P4 line will end with Tulsa. C2D is derived from PIII. PIII->Banias/Dothan->Yonah->C2D. However, C2D will continue to evolve every two years according to Intel and AMD will also change the architecture.

Quote :

......surely that the perfs will be significantly higher than its intel s coutepart


No. The only area where AMD might still have a big lead is in purely stack based FP computations. I don't see a big lead by either company in SSE or Integer.

Quote :

...amd claim some 42 % improvement in certain tasks..more realistically, it will be closer to a solid 20%, according to ipc improvement available...


An actual improvement in IPC of 42% would be nearly impossible. AMD gained about 20% with K8 over K7. Intel gained about 20% with Pentium M over PIII and about same with C2D. AMD will need another jump of about 20% to match C2D.

Quote :

the main advantage of the core duo is its 128 bit sse units, while amd s k8 only offer 64 bit see unit...with a width of 128 bit execution unit, along with the 4 instructions/cycle capability, this processor will blow up intel s product


No. You are wrong. AMD's hardware doubling on SSE plus doubling of the L1 cache bus and instruction Prefetch will match what Intel already has. Intel had the same doubling from Yonah to Conroe. That is why Conroe is much faster in SSE.

Quote :

..that s why intel is desesperatly pushing for 45 nm,


AMD is making an even bigger push to reduce the time to 45nm; are they desperate too? You need to understand that quad cores are big chips and are much more economical on 45nm than 65nm for both Intel and AMD.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

OK, let's see if I got this straight:
The sAM2+, 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
4GB Total RAM in single CPU config.

The s1207+(Quad FX), 1067MHz unbuffered DRAM:
8GB Total RAM in dual CPU config.

The s1207(Opteron 2xxx/8xxx) will support 667MHz buffered DRAM:
8GB Total RAM in single CPU config. 16GB Total RAM in dual CPU config.

Right? :?



I have found out that Asus M2N32-SLI Premium Vista Edition said that the maximum memory supported is 8GB.
http://www.asus.com/products.aspx? [...] odelmenu=2

And I have also found out that from AMD's technical paper,
the maximum support memory is 16GB 8O
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/co [...] /32559.pdf
Page 98


Thanks for the info, however I'm now more:

http://talks.php.net/presentations/slides/php5xml2/confused.gif

Than ever!

:?

Reply to CaptRobertApril

See the updated one :wink:

Reply to qcmadness

Quote :

See the updated one :wink:



Thanks. That's a bit better. What I'm still funcused about is:

QFX (dual socket F) can handle 32GB??? Really???

And just 'cuz the M2N32-SLI can take 8GB does that translate into the chip on the AM2 socket being able to use it all?

:?

Reply to CaptRobertApril

Quote :

See the updated one :wink:



Thanks. That's a bit better. What I'm still funcused about is:

QFX (dual socket F) can handle 32GB??? Really???

And just 'cuz the M2N32-SLI can take 8GB does that translate into the chip on the AM2 socket being able to use it all?

:?

I think so. From what I read on the AMD's technical paper, socket AM2 CPUs can accept 2GB memory modules and 4 sticks of memory modules can be used.

QFX can handle 32GB if:
1. memory modules are registered
8 memory slots are available

Reply to qcmadness

Quote :

And I have also found out that from AMD's technical paper,
the maximum support memory is 16GB for one Socket F CPU 8O
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/co [...] /32559.pdf
Page 98

Updated: from page 32 of the same document, the maximum memory supported for Socket AM2 will be 8GB, the same as claimed by Asus.


They currently support 4 sticks per channel with registered memory and 2 sticks per channel with unregistered. Since 2GB is the common memory size this would be:

unregistered - 2 channels X 2 sticks X 2GB = 8GB total
registered - 2 channels X 4 sticks X 2GB = 16GB total

The memory controller itself can handle up to 16GB per DIMM. So, if 4GB DDR2 DIMMs are released soon anything from Revision F and up can handle it. The maximum speed for Revision F and G is DDR2-800 so Barcelona does support a bit faster speed with DDR2-1066.

The maximum for 1207 with 2BG registered DIMMs is:

1 socket - 16GB
2 socket - 32GB
4 socket - 64GB

Some server OEMs do have special hardware on the motherboard to allow 8 sticks per channel with registered DIMMs (128 GB for quad socket). However, this is not a function of AMD's hardware.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

They currently support 4 sticks per channel with registered memory and 2 sticks per channel with unregistered. Since 2GB is the common memory size this would be:

unregistered - 2 channels X 2 sticks X 2GB = 8GB total
registered - 2 channels X 4 sticks X 2GB = 16GB total

The memory controller itself can handle up to 16GB per DIMM. So, if 4GB DDR2 DIMMs are released soon anything from Revision F and up can handle it. The maximum speed for Revision F and G is DDR2-800 so Barcelona does support a bit faster speed with DDR2-1066.



Yes, I got it wrongly (16Gigabyte => 16Gigabit) :roll:
Thanks for correction :wink:

Reply to qcmadness

Quote :

And I have also found out that from AMD's technical paper,
the maximum support memory is 16GB for one Socket F CPU 8O
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/co [...] /32559.pdf
Page 98

Updated: from page 32 of the same document, the maximum memory supported for Socket AM2 will be 8GB, the same as claimed by Asus.


They currently support 4 sticks per channel with registered memory and 2 sticks per channel with unregistered. Since 2GB is the common memory size this would be:

unregistered - 2 channels X 2 sticks X 2GB = 8GB total
registered - 2 channels X 4 sticks X 2GB = 16GB total

The memory controller itself can handle up to 16GB per DIMM. So, if 4GB DDR2 DIMMs are released soon anything from Revision F and up can handle it. The maximum speed for Revision F and G is DDR2-800 so Barcelona does support a bit faster speed with DDR2-1066.

The maximum for 1207 with 2BG registered DIMMs is:

1 socket - 16GB
2 socket - 32GB
4 socket - 64GB

Some server OEMs do have special hardware on the motherboard to allow 8 sticks per channel with registered DIMMs (128 GB for quad socket). However, this is not a function of AMD's hardware.

Thanks for the clarification, guys.

Ok then, let's do some hypotheticals (all UNregistered):

Single Socket AM2+ - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

Single Socket AM2+ - 4GB x 4sticks = 16GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 4GB x 4sticks = 16GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 4GB x 8sticks = 32GB

Are all those configurations correct and would K10 be able to fully access all that RAM, given the appropriate motherboard and OS?

Reply to CaptRobertApril
- 0 +

well, the pIII was built around the p6 architecture, first available with the pentium pro, and then used in the pII with a half speed l2 cache instead of the full speed 256/512/1 mo l2 cache of the pentium pro..apart from taht fact, you seems unaware that 128 bit sse execution cut some calculus times by a factor of 2....athlon64 need several passes to realize a 128 bit sse fpu instruction, core2 duo need only one.as you seems unaware that truncated fpu calculus are made using 128 bit sse precision instead of x87 commands...it s now a classical horse for intel : unable to beat amd in the ipc race, they tend to create new instructions, allegedly for better performan in fact to create inabilities among its rival s products..so it was with the p4 and sse2....so the improvement of the fpu are not limited to the x87 commands, but are massively used for the 128 bit sse units, which are located along the classical x87 fpus...

Reply to abw

Quote :

well, the pIII was built around the p6 architecture, first available with the pentium pro, and then used in the pII with a half speed l2 cache instead of the full speed 256/512/1 mo l2 cache of the pentium pro


Ah, then you should know that the significant difference with Pentium Pro was the use of micro-instruction decoding, translating the x86 instructions into RISC-like instructions. AMD first did this with K5 although it was done independently by Nexgen with K6. Of course, the lead Nexgen architect was a former Intel employee (although he did not work on Pentium Pro). However, K7 would have included any experience gained from both K5 and K6. That is a reasonable separation between the classic and modern instruction decoding on X86. So, if you want to take C2D back to Pentium Pro then Barcelona goes back to K5.

Quote :

..apart from taht fact, you seems unaware that 128 bit sse execution cut some calculus times by a factor of 2....athlon64 need several passes to realize a 128 bit sse fpu instruction, core2 duo need only one.as you seems unaware that truncated fpu calculus are made using 128 bit sse precision instead of x87 commands...


Curious assumption on your part, SSE was released in 2002 and you think I am unaware of it five years later. Also, when you use the word, "passes" that implies that AMD peforms 128 bit SSE operations serially which it does not. The hardware can handle 128 bit words by loading 64 bits through the SSE Multiply port and 64 bits through the SSE Add port. Since the loads themselves have to be done one at a time this takes several cycles but the computation itself is still on a 128 bit word. Barcelona simply removes this necessary hack and makes all of the hardware 128 bits.

However, SSE still does not contain all of the functionality of FP (although it has improved with each update), and math routines are still easier to do by first converting infix notion to postfix notation. This same level of functionality would have to be added to SSE with a math library and this would increase the overhead.

Quote :

it s now a classical horse for intel : unable to beat amd in the ipc race,


They already did with C2D. C2D's IPC is higher than K8's.

Quote :

they tend to create new instructions, allegedly for better performan in fact to create inabilities among its rival s products..


I suppose someone could argue that AMD did the same thing when they created AMD64. And, perhaps the same could be said of 3DNow!

Quote :

so it was with the p4 and sse2....so the improvement of the fpu are not limited to the x87 commands, but are massively used for the 128 bit sse units, which are located along the classical x87 fpus...


BTW, are you aware that AMD uses the same hardware to do FP as SSE and that Barcelona will as well?

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

So,what would be your guess as to the performance increase over the last core design?do you think they have achieved 40-60%?


I would say a 15-20% increase in Integer IPC.
an 80% increase in SSE
at least a 26% reduction in power draw with 65nm over 90nm

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

See the updated one :wink:



Thanks. That's a bit better. What I'm still funcused about is:

QFX (dual socket F) can handle 32GB??? Really???

And just 'cuz the M2N32-SLI can take 8GB does that translate into the chip on the AM2 socket being able to use it all?

:?

What would you be running to utilize so much memory?unless you do rendering or video editing or that type of thing ,i dont see the need.

SuperFetch could make good use of it. I'm not sure what the point of diminishing returns would be, but i suspect that on a QuadFX platform, one could make use of a substantial amount of memory.

Reply to piesquared

Quote :

What would you be running to utilize so much memory?unless you do rendering or video editing or that type of thing ,i dont see the need.


Well, you never know, 2GB's might be the minimum to install when Vista gets updated. :lol: Current AM2 systems could be used for CAD and other applications that take a lot of memory. I don't imagine most home systems would need more than about 1 GB right now.

Reply to Scientia_From_AMDZ

Quote :

4x4 i can see alot of memory in,but for the avg.joe.2-3gb.with a single chip.



My bad, I thought you were refering to 4x4. :oops: But yeah one would think that 2-3-4 GB would be plenty for avg. joe.

Reply to piesquared

Quote :


I would never reccomend 1gb even with XP.I have 2 and I wont be satisfied till i have at least 3.With vista my suggestion starts at 2gb as well,because there is so much more reliance on the gfx card.



I've pretty well settled on 8GB so that I can allocate the maximum 4GB to Photoshop and run the rest of the system on the other 4GB. I often have Photoshop running all day and it's such a RAMHAWG that I want to be able to be able to run anything else I want without shutting down Photoshop, rebooting, running the apps I want, shutting them down, rebooting and then running Photoshop. I'm not too hot on the RAMdisk aspect as my 150GB Raptor OS HD will serve perfectly well.

Reply to CaptRobertApril
- 0 +

thanks for alla the insight..yes, i know, as it s showed in the barcelona diagram that the x87 fpu and sse fpu are in the same pipe..i didn t say that the k8 was unable to make a 128 bit sse calculus, but that it need more clock cycles, as the execution unit are only 64 bit...for the rest, i m agree with the majority of your sayings...

Reply to abw

Forgive me for the repost, but I'd really like to get some confirmation on this:

Let's do some hypotheticals (all UNregistered):

Single Socket AM2+ - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

Single Socket AM2+ - 4GB x 4sticks = 16GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 4GB x 4sticks = 16GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 4GB x 8sticks = 32GB

Are all those configurations correct and would K10 be able to fully access all that RAM, given the appropriate motherboard and OS?

Reply to CaptRobertApril

i didn't think you could get 4gb unregistered sticks, and current amd memory controllers only support 2gb unreg sticks, so maybe, i know they can handle the 8gb no problem, but i dont know about any of them that use 4gb stick configs, because i don't know if it supports 4gb unregistered sticks yet, or if they even exist, and even if they did they would cost one hell of a lot of moulah

Reply to rammedstein

Quote :

i didn't think you could get 4gb unregistered sticks, and current amd memory controllers only support 2gb unreg sticks, so maybe, i know they can handle the 8gb no problem, but i dont know about any of them that use 4gb stick configs, because i don't know if it supports 4gb unregistered sticks yet, or if they even exist, and even if they did they would cost one hell of a lot of moulah



You're absolutely right that 4GB unreg sticks aren't on the market yet, but given the expectation that K10 won't be around for a while longer, I'm guesstimating that they'll both hit the channel at about the same time. The price of the 4GB sticks will be astronomical when they first hit the streets, but like everything else it will come down fast. RAM prices are generally treading downwards into the realm of reality again anyway, as they had peaked too far and too fast.

So to keep things current, let's only talk about the:

Single Socket AM2+ - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

As that is the RAM point that I'm most interested in.

It's now the 12th of Never and K10 is out in all its glory in AM2+ and 1207 config. So out I go and buy it and get 4 sticks of 2GB RAM to plunk into an appropriate motherboard.

Therefore, if I get the AM2+ CPU, and/or if I get 2x1207 CPUs, what now stands in the way of me booting up XP 64, allocating 4GB to Photoshop and the other 4GB to OS and various sw? I'm asking as I am quite unclear on this.

Reply to CaptRobertApril

Quote :

i didn't think you could get 4gb unregistered sticks, and current amd memory controllers only support 2gb unreg sticks, so maybe, i know they can handle the 8gb no problem, but i dont know about any of them that use 4gb stick configs, because i don't know if it supports 4gb unregistered sticks yet, or if they even exist, and even if they did they would cost one hell of a lot of moulah



You're absolutely right that 4GB unreg sticks aren't on the market yet, but given the expectation that K10 won't be around for a while longer, I'm guesstimating that they'll both hit the channel at about the same time. The price of the 4GB sticks will be astronomical when they first hit the streets, but like everything else it will come down fast. RAM prices are generally treading downwards into the realm of reality again anyway, as they had peaked too far and too fast.

So to keep things current, let's only talk about the:

Single Socket AM2+ - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

Dual Socket 1207 - 2GB x 4sticks = 8GB

As that is the RAM point that I'm most interested in.

It's now the 12th of Never and K10 is out in all its glory in AM2+ and 1207 config. So out I go and buy it and get 4 sticks of 2GB RAM to plunk into an appropriate motherboard.

Therefore, if I get the AM2+ CPU, and/or if I get 2x1207 CPUs, what now stands in the way of me booting up XP 64, allocating 4GB to Photoshop and the other 4GB to OS and various sw? I'm asking as I am quite unclear on this.

From the specifications, I am quite sure K8 (at least rev. F) and later CPUs can handle 8GB per socket. :wink:

Reply to qcmadness

Quote :

From the specifications, I am quite sure K8 (at least rev. F) and later CPUs can handle 8GB per socket. :wink:



This is my happy dance:

http://www.ilovehou.com/twonicknames/gifsite/july02/happydance.gif

That's great! So I can go off and get my 2xQuad and 4x2GB sticks and live happily ever after! :D

Reply to CaptRobertApril

Quote :

From the specifications, I am quite sure K8 (at least rev. F) and later CPUs can handle 8GB per socket. :wink:



This is my happy dance:

http://www.ilovehou.com/twonicknames/gifsite/july02/happydance.gif

That's great! So I can go off and get my 2xQuad and 4x2GB sticks and live happily ever after! :D

yeah AMD is the only way u can go with that....965\975 boards dont even support 2 gb modules

Reply to lordpope

Quote :

From the specifications, I am quite sure K8 (at least rev. F) and later CPUs can handle 8GB per socket. :wink:



This is my happy dance:

http://www.ilovehou.com/twonicknames/gifsite/july02/happydance.gif

That's great! So I can go off and get my 2xQuad and 4x2GB sticks and live happily ever after! :D

yeah AMD is the only way u can go with that....965\975 boards dont even support 2 gb modules

explain how i am wrong again? i said it doesnt support 2 GB MODULES... i didnt say it couldnt support 8 gb's

you are wrong here P965 supports up to 8GB of memory
thats 4x2GB

http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/p965/index.htm

Reply to lordpope
- 0 +

pope, can you stop trolling on this thread!
if you have something to say about K8L, go ahead. if not, please don't destroy this thread. Also, you don't have to answer me.

Reply to gOJDO

Quote :

pope, can you stop trolling on this thread!
if you have something to say about K8L, go ahead. if not, please don't destroy this thread. Also, you don't have to answer me.




so stating a fact is considered trolling? since when? i agreed with FUD that for his desires...AMD is the platform for him

again how is that trolling?

Reply to lordpope
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > Collection of AMD K10 data
Go to:

There are 1325 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them