that web site only works on IE (maybe firefox, opera user me) and its an drop down box from downloads when on get to the hidden demo box (link above will take you strate there)
I just love it how all of you people that go out and buy video cards that just come out and complain that you have no DX10. Why don't you people wait until DX10 is proven? So for all of you 8800 owners I say this: Nice DX9 card you got there!
LOL...Another ATI fanboi and his ENVY at NVidia. Had ATI delivered as all the "wait for the R600" fans had said, then I sincerely doubt you would post these comments. Admit it, you are extremely frustrated and angry that ATI/AMD let you down. (Its part of life)
Yes I bought the 8800GTX card as soon as it was released, and am EXTREMELY happy with my purchase. There is no reason to believe that the 8800GTX will be inferior when DX10 games are thrown at it.
P.S> You say "Nice DX9 card you got there!", LOL, I say eat this...
that web site only works on IE (maybe firefox, opera user me) and its an drop down box from downloads when on get to the hidden demo box (link above will take you strate there)
I've searched high and low for a resolution to this problem, so I figured I would come to the forums here to see if someone knows of a way to fix it.
I currently have an 8800GTS 640mb EVGA card, this is my second one actually. Both cards have performed oddly to me, with artifacting occurring (at desktop or in game or during a test, seems completely random) at a resolution of 1600x1200. I haven't had it occur at lower resolutions, but it just doesn't look right on a 20.1" LCD to have a lower resolution. Anyway, I was wondering if anyone here has come across this issue before or know of a way to resolve it.
Otherwise I've gotten to the point where dealing with mediocre performance from a high end card (works great except the artifacting and random black screen flashes) has turned me away from nVidia and decided to pick up one of these 2900XTs instead. At the same price for similar(although sometimes lower) performance, it's a hit I'm willing to take to have a card that functions properly.
Have you checked the temps??
Have you checked that the fan is spinning??
And try to underclock the cards a bit cause they are really suffering by showing artifacts in windows(idle).
Another guess would be your power supply.Check that too!
all the temperatures are within normal ranges according to EVGA...
power supply is an antec 650 watt
running amd 4600+ X2 2gb ram 250gb hdd, sata dvd drive...
650watts should be enough though, right? can't imagine needing more than that...
Only reason I never thought PSU was it doesn't matter whether the system is under load or not, and the only time i had a problem previously with the PSU was when it was obvious the system wouldn't get enough under load...
but, stranger things have happened. i can check it out tomorrow.
I've searched high and low for a resolution to this problem, so I figured I would come to the forums here to see if someone knows of a way to fix it.
I currently have an 8800GTS 640mb EVGA card, this is my second one actually. Both cards have performed oddly to me, ... has turned me away from nVidia ...
Your logic is broken. If you've tried 2 cards and they both do it, and no one else is reporting such problems, then its something to do with the rest of your PC not the cards so don't blame nVidia.
Are you using the latest nVidia drivers? Perhaps your PSU is failing, or perhaps you just have such a low-end PC it can't keep up with the video card at that high res.
My intial impression (from other sites) of the 2900xt was that it was only even with a 8800gts (or a little better). Looking over the benches on Tom's paints a different picture. We'll have to wait for a clearer picture re drivers and such, but part of the reason Tom's put it against the 8800gtx (a rather more expensive card) I suppose is because of these numbers that put it above the gts, not even with it. It's looking like this version will fall between the gts and gtx, which is actually a nice position in several ways.
******************
...
Before we go any further, I would like to include a preface about what you are going to read. You undoubtedly will read several other Websites looking for more detail or additional benchmark results. Do, though, remain on guard against biases that can taint your opinions. There are a lot of angles as to how information from the companies gets into your hands. We sign agreements so we can have an inside look before launch but some break those agreements. Such is life. The problem with that is the information is not always full or accurate: "Does it have this or that?" "AMD is done for!." "Nvidia will get crushed!" Speculation is fun to read but it needs to be taken with a smidgen of understanding and awareness that all of the information is not on the table. That leaves you having to take one person's opinions at face value... that isn't always a healthy thing to do.
The other side of the story is how companies try to taint the opinions of those writing the stories about their products. To give you both sides, ATI flew over 200 writers and editors to Tunis, Tunisia, for two days and nights of technical briefings and fun. While this, plus a pair of graphics cards, is enough to sway the opinions of some, there are those who remain unbiased. At the same time, a launch would not be a normal one without backlash from Nvidia. A wealth of information hits writers like a broadside of comments and rebuttals. It also never ceases to amaze me how fast a driver can be produced when the competition might have the upper hand in something. So the miracle driver made available to fix known issues and push performance.
That being said, we at Tom's Hardware refuse to cater to companies with their PR and marketing spin teams. We love looking at hardware and explaining our adventures with you. Our soul purpose is to give you as much information and as many resources to help you make up your own mind about a new product or technology.
...
*****************
Thanks a lot man.
I like people who are able to stay objective even when rich companies try buy their "vote", their "heart", their "brain", their soul.
I prefer read detail article who talk about real things that short article who just want put powder to our eyes.
Hopefully Tom's Hardware exist and can give us real "beat" of things.
One thousant thanks !!!!!!!!!!
Hopefully the drivers will improve performance, because right now it is hit or miss. In some games, the 2900XT beats a 8800GTX, and in others, it loses to a 8800 GTS 320. This would imply to me that the 2900 has the power, but ATI screwed up the drivers. A six month delay and the drivers are still running like betas. How embarassing.
In my opinion ATI still haven't got an answer to the 8800 GTX at the moment, I actually believe this could be the end of them competing at the very high end with Nvidia. I think the 2900XT was originally designed to beat the 8800 GTX but it clearly doesn't which is why they have priced it lower. To have the most powerful card is what ATI and Nvidia ALWAYS try to achieve when they bring out a new line of cards and ATI have failed this time round. I reckon Nvidia have probably got a lot still up their sleeve and their next high end product is going to obliterate anything ATI can produce.
It's known that the 2900xt wasn't to be the high end part, which was to be called the 2900xtx or something like that. The 2900xt is instead only an important part, anlogous to the 8800gts (but newer and looks to be above that point) imo. Re the xtx on the other hand, it probably either can't beat the 8800gtx or isn't practical yet re power use, etc. But...we can't really say much about what will happen, imo, since ati is presumably working still. In the meanwhile, the 2900xt looks to be fairly priced for now, imo.
In my opinion ATI still haven't got an answer to the 8800 GTX at the moment, I actually believe this could be the end of them competing at the very high end with Nvidia.
Not a chance, the R700 is still in the pipe and AMD has already said their long term strategy depends on the high end until they transition to Fusion and VPCPUs.
Quote :
I think the 2900XT was originally designed to beat the 8800 GTX but it clearly doesn't which is why they have priced it lower.
I don't understand what is so difficult to get about this. There's a difference between the CHIP and the card, if you don't know the difference stop posting, it's best for everyone.
The HD2900XT was not originally designed to beat the GTX, if anything the XTX was. Now that the XTX didn't come out doesn't change the XT to now being the card designed to beat the GTX, it is still the card designed to beat the GTS which it looks like it may achieve in some areas, and miss in others. The XT's lower memory amount, lower clocks shows it wasn't near the top of it's potential so it's been cut back for price concerns, not performance concerns, so that's not a high end part.
Now the R600 most definitely was meant to dethrone the G80, and at this point in the game it has failed in that.
Quote :
To have the most powerful card is what ATI and Nvidia ALWAYS try to achieve when they bring out a new line of cards and ATI have failed this time round.
Actually the 'most powerful card' is a PR issue, nV brought out the less powerful card in the GF7900, so your 'ALWAYS' doesn't rely fit now does it? The main thing is if it's not worth the money to make the XTX, the smart thing to do, like in the past for both companies, is to sell the money making card, like nV did with the GF6800GT.
Quote :
I reckon Nvidia have probably got a lot still up their sleeve and their next high end product is going to obliterate anything ATI can produce.
Sure, and I 'reckon' that S3 will come out with a super-secret uber part that destroys them both and leaves scar tissue on intel.
LOL you muppet I have been buying the fastest graphics cards in the world for years my friend and have am quite confident that I have plenty of knowledge, speaking as someone who bought the first graphic accelerator cards (3dfx).
Ape, in the graphic card market it is very important to ATI and Nvidia whether their card is the fastest. This is a massive PR win over their rival. My point is this, I can't see why ATI would take so long to develop a card that doesn't beat their rival and take the performance crown, unless they simply couldn't. This way Nvidia don't have to drop their price and ATI lose in my opinion the most significant market sector, the top end. I have been buying ATI cards for quite a while as their card was the most powerful at the time when i came to upgrade. I actually waited for the R600 to come out and did not buy an 8800 GTX becuase of this. Now I am gutted and wished I had becuase I have missed out on months of better quality gaming and I bet there are many people out there in the same position.
Nvidia have had their 8800 GTX card out for months, I think we can safely say they haven't been twiddling their thumbs. I also reckon they bought out the the Ultra version of the 8800 GTX just before ATI were due to release the R600 to make ATI's new range look even more inferior. If the 2900 XT was not due to compete with the 8800 GTX where is the card that was? I have not heard about the XTX but do they expect people to wait even longer? I am not.
if your so knowledable then why aren't you aware of the see-sawing of the performance crown that has always happened.
why do you have such a noobish, knee-jerk sensationalism attitude.
what is so different about now than the previous years? ATi's product has been released 4 days and already you are making completely unfounded doomsday predictions.
my argument that you are an idiot stands and is IMO unrefutable.
the best post i have ever seen in this thread. there is no card that future proof because there will be a next card out every 6 months. and people will go to buy that. so saying R600 is more future proof is just absurd.
the best post i have ever seen in this thread. there is no card that future proof because there will be a next card out every 6 months. and people will go to buy that. so saying R600 is more future proof is just absurd.
people do not have the money to buy cards every generation.
some people will have been waiting for the ATI cards to come out before making their choice. they may be in need of an upgrade and will be buying now.
in that case, deciding how future proof a card is is a big thing, indeed it may be the most important thing. it was a very important thing to me over a year ago when i chose the x1900. it has been a good choice on my part. who knows, it may be like that again, maybe it won't.
therefore, your argument is useless. perhaps you ought to take into account real world scenario's before posting.
ye, skyguy's post is the best ever.....unless you engage your brain for a second.
Their Fusion will fail & then the 3rd world war will start between ATI & nVIDIA's Fanboys and then some Nuclear bombs will destroy the whole Earth and then we will spend the eternity together fighting each other about ATI & nVIDIA!(Wow, that's gonna fun! )
if your so knowledable then why aren't you aware of the see-sawing of the performance crown that has always happened.
OMFG What see sawing performance crown? That is my point. The crown hasn't see sawed this time. As you say, normally when ATI or nvidia bring their new range it takes the crown but ATI have failed this time. This isn't a "noobish, knee-jerk sensationalism attitude" this is a fact. Nvidia are going to be racking up sales and guess where the money is going to go? R & D on their next project which will raise the bar even higher
Their Fusion will fail & then the 3rd world war will start between ATI & nVIDIA's Fanboys and then some Nuclear bombs will destroy the whole Earth and then we will spend the eternity together fighting each other about ATI & nVIDIA!(Wow, that's gonna fun! )
that actually scared me
*goes to suck heroe's brains*
HA!, suck it sylar!
if your so knowledable then why aren't you aware of the see-sawing of the performance crown that has always happened.
why do you have such a noobish, knee-jerk sensationalism attitude.
what is so different about now than the previous years? ATi's product has been released 4 days and already you are making completely unfounded doomsday predictions.
my argument that you are an idiot stands and is IMO unrefutable.
Exactly.
If ATi pops out a 2900 XTX on 65nm this summer, which is possible as thats what the mainstream cards will be, we'll see the see-saw again.
ATi didn't plan on 80nm leakage and I'm sure TSMC didn't either.
I am not an ultra high end GPU buyer. Historically, I have always purchased in the mid-high band of products. As such, the 8800GTS & 2900XT falls within my “zone”.
From my perspective, I am disappointed with the 2900XT’s balance of Price/Performance/Power/Features. When compared with the 8800GTS it wins in some areas & loses in others. I had hoped that ATI/AMD would substantially raise the competitive bar. They did not. Their product simply competes with the currently established Price/Performance/Power/Features balance of the 8800GTS. Hence, there is not a huge competitive fire under NVidia to improve their products. I had hopes that a very strong showing by ATI would motivate NVidia to raise the bar again.
well do you think Nvidia is just sitting around. they will shrink the die for G80 to 80MM and increase the clock Speed and if rumours prove to be true for 8900 series that it has 160 stream processors then there no chance for R600 to take the crown back
well do you think Nvidia is just sitting around. they will shrink the die for G80 to 80MM and increase the clock Speed and if rumours prove to be true for 8900 series that it has 160 stream processors then there no chance for R600 to take the crown back
I do not believe that Nvidia is just sitting around. Nor do I believe that they are moving as aggressively as they would have if AMD/ATI had substandially raised the competive bar.
ati's x1 series had the high end covered, now, for the time being at least(remember only 4 days since launch) nvidia has the performacen crown over the 2xxxx series.
you are mixing up generations and product cycles.
indeeed, as far as sales go(which is what really matters), we have no idea who is going to win. my money is on ATI again for the mid to mid high end.
i do not see nvidia even having a 7600gt this time around to compete.
again, you really are looking like a noob, a newb is one thing but a noob, pitiful
I can't see why ATI would take so long to develop a card that doesn't beat their rival and take the performance crown, unless they simply couldn't.
Well we don't know that, we haven't seen the XTX, so whether they could or couldn't is questionable, that they decided not to initially is obvious, but that was the same with the X1800XL launch, and then shortly after the X1800XT outpaced it. So who is this scenario different? If they took another month to launch the XTX it would be the same timeline, so drawing conclusions now would just be as weak as those who said the exact same thing last time.
Quote :
This way Nvidia don't have to drop their price and ATI lose in my opinion the most significant market sector, the top end.
It's far from the most significant market sector, that's the midrange $100-250 sector, and that's a shambles right now. There is PR value in the high end butit's still rather limited, because only a few people know the top performing cards, and those do enough research to figure out what's best. You wanna talk PR, then 3Dmark is equally valuable, and it seems one of the few things the HD2900 does well out of the box is 3Dmark. So by your reasoning those printed THG barcharts and such at BestBuy and FutureShop for the Sheep to read, would currently favour the AMD solution, even if thos of us smart enough to do research would know that Bunghoiomarks don't tell the whole story... by far.
Quote :
I have been buying ATI cards for quite a while as their card was the most powerful at the time when i came to upgrade. I actually waited for the R600 to come out and did not buy an 8800 GTX becuase of this. Now I am gutted and wished I had becuase I have missed out on months of better quality gaming and I bet there are many people out there in the same position.
While I understand the sentiment, remember alot of us, including me, said get the GTX when it came out, or get the eVGA GTS and give upgrade options, and when the GTS-320 was selling so low, once again, good time to buy. While I understand your dissapointment, I would over-react by painting the entire scenario black, because while it's not rosey red, it's not terrible, and there's obvious improvement points for the R600 to take into the R650 design. So it's far from a final step. It just sucks to anticipate something better and being let down, to me that was like Spiderman3.
Quote :
Nvidia have had their 8800 GTX card out for months, I think we can safely say they haven't been twiddling their thumbs.
No company does, but like the HD2900 launch proved, and the GF7900 launch proved, despite having the time to make another product, it doesn't mean your next one will be significantly better than the other guy's next product. If the GF7800-7900 vs X1800-1900 launches showed us anything, they don't have to twiddle their tumbs to come up short, and both companies have experienced that (just look at the X1650Pro)
Quote :
If the 2900 XT was not due to compete with the 8800 GTX where is the card that was? I have not heard about the XTX but do they expect people to wait even longer? I am not.
If you haven't heard about the XTX then you haven't been researching all that much. There's still as little solid evidence about the XTX as there was about the XT prior to it's launch. Lotsa rumour, but little colid info.
However, that it's eventually launch and arrival may be in question, it's existanceisn't as there have been many engineering samples out there with the higher clocked bios and GDDR4 memory, so it's not questionable that there was another card meant to compete with the GTX, that it would or will be effective is another story.
dude check your post again it's FarCry NOT FartCry. who's little boy smart a ss
No it's FartCry, and check your history, I've called it that (check pretty much every time I've called it that) since nVidia got busted for optimizing their drivers for it.
So really, whose the smart boy now little man.
My wording is a pun for those in the know, your statements are just plain FUK-ups!
I actually waited for the R600 to come out and did not buy an 8800 GTX becuase of this. Now I am gutted and wished I had becuase I have missed out on months of better quality gaming and I bet there are many people out there in the same position.
I am so fuking glad I did not wait around like this and instead bought an 8800GTX at launch because for the past 7 months it has been pure gaming heaven for me and now ATI's supposed 8800GTX killer is out and we all get to see who is laughing last and the hardest
What I am finding interesting about the entirety of R600 (not just the top-end HD2900XT, but even the bottom-end HD2400, not to mention the entire middle) is that certain things are absolutely universal across the entire line (which is certainly not the case with nVidia's G8x):
1. HDCP is standard, literally, from top to bottom, as is VIVO/AVIVO. Unlike nVidia's approach with G8x (or even ATI's approach with R5xx), there is no need to worry about support for HD DVD or BD in any R600-based card; the support is there, in hardware.
2. As was the case with G8x's launch, the launch of R600 is hobbled by driver issues; however, the degree of hobbling is not as great.
3. While the 8800GTS has a lead in most benchmarks, the $64USD question has to be: will further Catalyst driver improvmements eat away at that lead, if not make it disappear altogether? However, the HD2900 series has one rather nasty advantage that the 8800GTS owner (or 8800GTX owner, for that matter) cannot wish away, no matter how much he may want to: no-quibble HDMI/HDCP support, even with dual-link DVI. If you want HDMI/HDCP support, you have to drop down to the 8600GTS; even then, if you are doing SLI or dual-link DVI, you can forget HDCP.
2. As was the case with G8x's launch, the launch of R600 is hobbled by driver issues; however, the degree of hobbling is not as great.
People that have not owned a G80 since launch really need to STFU about the drivers as you don't even have a clue to what you are talking about
The 8800GTX's launch drivers presented a few bugs in some games but the performance it self was nothing short of anything but stellar, Unlike what we are seeing with ATI's bad image quality plus unusually low performance.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.