Last message on previous page:
Ya I did, it's the only way t show the hidden memory sub-timings....lol then what the heck did I set to '8'....system hasn't acted funny though...As a matter of fact I have an old picture of me messing around and I have all the memory timings in this screenshot. This doesnt reflect anything I have set right now but if you could just point to the one that would be good enough
What BIOS are you using? I'm on F8a.
F5
You should always keep you BIOS updated. Download either F7 or F8a from here:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Support [...] uctID=2629
To upgrade the BIOS from Windows use the @BIOS program found here:
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Support [...] uctID=2629
Just be sure that you don't lose power or anything during the update. Failed BIOS flashes can kill motherboards.
^ Agreed. You should upgrade the BIOS, BUT not through Windows (seen so many bad flashes via Windows). Just use Q-Flash or DOS. I would recommend Q-Flash.

I understand the risks involved with flashing from Windows, but I couldn't get Q-Flash to work right. Granted I didn't give it much time, but it would never recognize my flash drive.
Hmm...I think it is FAT but I'll check.
Does Fat16 vs FAT32 matter? I have a feeling I could answer these question myself with a bit of Google...
Edit: Yep the drive is FAT32. I guess I'll try again when the next BIOS is released.
But is the reason Static tRead Value is not shown is because of my old BIOS. I know it's old but I heard there is no need to update BIOS unless the specified fixes in the update notes are ones that pertain to a problem you are having. Or are there other things behind the scene that are happening that will say, improve my OC?
| bildo123 wrote : But is the reason Static tRead Value is not shown is because of my old BIOS. |
That's the only thing I can think of.
| bildo123 wrote : I know it's old but I heard there is no need to update BIOS unless the specified fixes in the update notes are ones that pertain to a problem you are having. Or are there other things behind the scene that are happening that will say, improve my OC? |
There is lots of behind-the-scenes stuff that goes into BIOS updates that can improve your OC as well as your overall system stability.
In short, always update to the latest BIOS.
| homerdog wrote : That's the only thing I can think of.
|
Hmmm I knew it! Well, maybe I'll go F7, I don't like the word Beta..especially when paired with BIOS. I'll wait for the real F8 to come out and unlock my uber leetness super clock and make my E2180 go to 4Ghz on stock voltage! Actually maybe I'll test my 3.33Ghz speed again when I get the update. that would be so nice, but my voltage already has to be to high for such a clock, should got a 2140....
Would you rather have an E2160 @ 3.0-3.2GHz with 55515 timing or the E2160 @ 2.8GHz with 44412 timing?
I'm struggling to run Prime past 3.0GHz with 4x1GM mem @ 44412. I could do it before I added the extra RAM, now I'm stuck.
Thanks
Generally having 4 sticks limits OCing capability
I would say 3.0+....ram timings make little difference but to be sure u can just benchmark both and see which is better
Adding extra ram will make it harder to increase the frequency of the ram and/or lowering the timings.
| Dunkel wrote : Would you rather have an E2160 @ 3.0-3.2GHz with 55515 timing or the E2160 @ 2.8GHz with 44412 timing?
|
2.8GHz at 4-4-4-12. Performance wise the higher clockspeed should be slightly faster, but not enough to justify the added heat and power consumption (in my opinion).
| homerdog wrote : 2.8GHz at 4-4-4-12. Performance wise the higher clockspeed should be slightly faster, but not enough to justify the added heat and power consumption (in my opinion). |
Depends on how much more heat 3.0GHz produces I suppose.
Well I would just shoot for 2.8GHz and try to minimize voltage. Of course it is a cheap processor, so longevity might not be that much of a concern...
| Silverion77 wrote : Generally having 4 sticks limits OCing capability
|
Yes another thing against team Bildo....It's alright though I believe I found running 5-5-5-16 @ 1.8V is memtest86+ solid, although I havent' tried a blendtest....
I'm stable at 2.8 with timing at 44412, Vcore is around 1.35V. Temps stay around 54C under load.
I was stable at 3.2GHz until I added the extra 2x1GB of memory.
1. Should I leave timings at 44412 while going to 3-3.2GHz?
2. Should I loosen the timings to 55515 first, before shooting for 3-3.2GHz?
What you can do is bring up the voltage for the ram and try the 4-4-4-12 at 3.2GHz.
My RAM is rated at 2.0V so I am currently adding +0.2 to get there from 1.8V.
Is it safe to increase the voltage more? There is literally no space between this Kingston HyperX for airflow.
Is OCing safe? No, it's not. As long as it isn't too hot, I'd think you could do +.3V without major issues, but it's not recommended.
As Evilonigiri has already stated, running 4 sticks is much more stressful that running 2. For Intel processors the stress is placed on the northbridge, or MCH, where the memory controller resides.
I wouldn't raise the RAM voltage yet, it's probably the MCH that is limiting you. If your cooling is really good you could try increasing the MCH voltage, but mine runs hot as hell as it is. Maybe yours is better.
I'm not too sure it's the NB, I'm running 4x1Gb with 4-4-4-12 at 800MHz on my Quad without raising any NB voltage. Nonetheless, it's worth the try.
How should I go about testing the NB temp?
Thanks for the input.
Try downloading EasyTune 5 from Gigabyte's website and see if that program shows you the temps.
| Evilonigiri wrote : I'm not too sure it's the NB, I'm running 4x1Gb with 4-4-4-12 at 800MHz on my Quad without raising any NB voltage. Nonetheless, it's worth the try. |
I've tried playing with the MCH voltage when I tried 8x400(High FSB no?) still crashed but check this out...At 10x320 I was able to run prime for almost 6 hours.... When I was at 8x400 I tried increasing the MCH voltage to +.2 and it didn't grow a bit more stable, I really believe that the MCH/FSB voltages aren't really usefull.
BTW I got the F8a BIOS and the timings layout is much different and I now see the Static tRead value, I set it to 8 and everything seems good. Will have to test though...
I have a couple of questions. In this OCing guide you leave PCI Express set to auto. In the other guide referenced it says to manually set the frequency to 100. Does this board ALWAYS keep the frequency at 100 when on auto or do I need to set it.
I am currently running a E4500 at 333 FSB with a 9x Multi. tRD 6 and have been able to back on the speedstep settings and remain stable. (prime 95 torture 12 hours, no errors no warnings)
The other guide suggests to run memory in synchronous mode so I have the System Memory Multiplier set to 2 for 667. Am I right that this is synchronous? Just want to make sure since the memory was set differently in BIOS on the other guide. This did seem to help drop the north bridge temp 2 degrees when running prime 95 (51 down to 49 max)
The other guide seems to suggest that I might get lower temps by running a higher Muti and a lower FSB. Would 300 with 10x multi or 270 with a 11x give lower temps? (current 61 max when running prime 95)
Sorry for the newb questions and thanks for all the great info that has gotten me this far
| paul6060 wrote : I have a couple of questions. In this OCing guide you leave PCI Express set to auto. In the other guide referenced it says to manually set the frequency to 100. Does this board ALWAYS keep the frequency at 100 when on auto or do I need to set it. |
The board should keep it at 100MHz if left on auto, but I locked mine there just in case.
| paul6060 wrote : I am currently running a E4500 at 333 FSB with a 9x Multi. tRD 6 and have been able to back on the speedstep settings and remain stable. (prime 95 torture 12 hours, no errors no warnings) |
SpeedStep is more likely to cause instability when your system is moving in and out of load. Still, if everything is stable I see no reason to disable it except for maybe the added peace of mind.
| paul6060 wrote : The other guide suggests to run memory in synchronous mode so I have the System Memory Multiplier set to 2 for 667. Am I right that this is synchronous? Just want to make sure since the memory was set differently in BIOS on the other guide. This did seem to help drop the north bridge temp 2 degrees when running prime 95 (51 down to 49 max) |
Yep, a multiplier of 2 is where you want to be. As long as you are running a minimum FSB of 333MHz I would recommend setting the memory multiplier to 2 and tightening the timings as much as possible.
| paul6060 wrote : The other guide seems to suggest that I might get lower temps by running a higher Muti and a lower FSB. Would 300 with 10x multi or 270 with a 11x give lower temps? (current 61 max when running prime 95) |
I think you are good with 333x9. You might get lower MCH temps with lower bus speeds, but you will also get a slower computer.
| paul6060 wrote : Sorry for the newb questions and thanks for all the great info that has gotten me this far |
Those were good questions; that's what this thread is for (right Shadow703793?)
Thanks for the reply and help Homerdog
| Quote : homerdog wrote :
|
I locked it just to be sure also
| Quote : homerdog wrote :
|
Would Boinc set to use less than 100% cpu be a good test for this. I noticed that when I ran it that way with my cpu at stock speedstep would kick in and out. Or it there a better program someone can suggest?
Also a couple more Questions: E4500 @ 333x9
CPU-Z and Speedfan showed my VCore at 1.37 to 1.39 when on auto. The other guide suggested trying to lower the VCore under manual. I tryed locking it at 1.3125 and that was not stable. 1.325 booted but I got an error in prime 95 after about 5 minutes. I bumped it to 1.35 and am in prime 95 now for a couple of hours with no errors so far. CPU-Z and Speedstep show VCore at 1.328 to 1.34, this is normal right due to Vdroop right?
Also my memory is C4 but running at 5 5 5 18 with 1.9 V under auto. CPU-Z shows it as 1.8 V for 5 5 5 18 timing and 2.1 V for 4 4 4 12 timing. So if I try and tighten the timing to 4 4 4 12 I should set the DDR2 overvoltage control to a +0.03 correct? or will auto put it there when I change the timing?
Screen shot:http://www.flickr.com/photos/24601 [...] 3/sizes/o/
| homerdog wrote :
|
Yup. Its all about OCing

| paul6060 wrote : Thanks for the reply and help Homerdog
Also a couple more Questions: E4500 @ 333x9 CPU-Z and Speedfan showed my VCore at 1.37 to 1.39 when on auto. The other guide suggested trying to lower the VCore under manual. I tryed locking it at 1.3125 and that was not stable. 1.325 booted but I got an error in prime 95 after about 5 minutes. I bumped it to 1.35 and am in prime 95 now for a couple of hours with no errors so far. CPU-Z and Speedstep show VCore at 1.328 to 1.34, this is normal right due to Vdroop right? Also my memory is C4 but running at 5 5 5 18 with 1.9 V under auto. CPU-Z shows it as 1.8 V for 5 5 5 18 timing and 2.1 V for 4 4 4 12 timing. So if I try and tighten the timing to 4 4 4 12 I should set the DDR2 overvoltage control to a +0.03 correct? or will auto put it there when I change the timing? Screen shot:http://www.flickr.com/photos/24601 [...] 3/sizes/o/ |
Explain more. If SpeedStep is disabled in the BIOS it SHOULD never kick in to effect when running Prime95. SpeedStep will how ever kick in to effect (even if you disabled it) if the CPU is over heating. What CPUZ is showing under "SPD" are the values from the RAM's built in SPD table. To see the current values look under "Memory" in CPUZ.

| Quote : Shadow703793 wrote:
|
I have Speedstep turned ON in BIOS. The other guide you referenced suggested than after getting the system to a stable OC, to try and run with speedstep on since it will save energy and reduce temps when the system is not under load (as long as it does not create problems, if it does turn it back off). It never kicks in and out when running Prime 95, but will when I run Boinc, IF I set it to use less then 100% CPU (with no problems). What I was asking was if there is a better program to test if speedstep is creating a problem than Boinc set to use less than 100% CPU
My Current Values are DRAM Freq 333.0 FSB: DRAM 1:1
Cl 5
tRCD 5
tRP 5
tRAS 15
Speedfan reports 1.9 V for Vcore2, which I read is the memory V
What I was wondering was if I try to set timing to
CL 4
tRCD 4
tRP 4
tRAS 12
Do I need to bump the V to 2.1? Like the SPD table seems to suggest?
If so, when DDR overvoltage is set to normal will it automatically bump the V to 2.1, or do I need to go in to manual and select +0.03? 1.8 + 0.03 =2.1
You probably will have to manually set the memory voltage to +.3V to run at the tighter timings. I don't know where you're getting +.03 from
I'm afraid I can't answer your question about Bionc since I've never used that program before.
Sorry I meant +.3 not +.03
Guess I will just load some games and see if Speedstep creates any problem
Thanks for all the help
Yeah just use the thing for few days and see if it's stable. I wouldn't do anything too important on it during those few days though unless you keep good backups...
You should probably set that PCI frequency to 100 MHz...I hear you can ruin things if you leave it on auto.
| lschmidt wrote : You should probably set that PCI frequency to 100 MHz...I hear you can ruin things if you leave it on auto. |
While you can potentially ruin your vidcard, it can also boost your vidcard speed. Apparently, up to 120MHz is safe, according to MSI's site.
| Evilonigiri wrote : While you can potentially ruin your vidcard, it can also boost your vidcard speed. Apparently, up to 120MHz is safe, according to MSI's site. |
Seriously? I was under the impression that overclocking the PCIe bus had virtually no impact on performance given the already massive amount of bandwidth provided by a 16x PCIe slot. Now this would be different for the 9600GT, but we won't go there...
| homerdog wrote : Seriously? I was under the impression that overclocking the PCIe bus had virtually no impact on performance given the already massive amount of bandwidth provided by a 16x PCIe slot. Now this would be different for the 9600GT, but we won't go there... |
According to quite a few people, increasing the PCIe bus helped achieve higher OCs. For example, at 100Mhz, the vidcard could only OC to 700MHz. At 120Mhz, it can now OC to 715Mhz. Apparently, it's not the same for everybody, and I do not know how it works or why it does.
Very strange, but interesting. Unfortunately I won't be able to test it out because my 8800GT is hot enough as it is
My point was to set it to something manual, don't just leave it on auto. People who haven't done their research and come across this thread wanting to jump right into overclocking could potentially ruin their video card if they follow the OP...
| lschmidt wrote : My point was to set it to something manual, don't just leave it on auto. People who haven't done their research and come across this thread wanting to jump right into overclocking could potentially ruin their video card if they follow the OP... |
Auto should keep it at 100MHz, so it's not that big of a deal. Still might be worth mentioning though.
Yeah, point taken. I don't think auto will bring it past 120MHz, but anyways you're right in locking the PCIe at 100MHz
| homerdog wrote : Very strange, but interesting. Unfortunately I won't be able to test it out because my 8800GT is hot enough as it is |
I had the luxury of testing this, I made a thread on my find awhile ago.
My 8800GTS 320MB went from 672 to 680MHz core. Let me find the thread...
8MHz? By the way we're way off topic now
Found it: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] -overclock
Some testing I did awhile back.
| homerdog wrote : 8MHz? By the way we're way off topic now |
Hey, it's an improvement. 3dmark score increased too!
Any guesses?
Off topic, but very interesting.
@:Evilonigiri Do you happen to have a link to that MSI web page or any more info on it? I should try it some time and will post the results here.
IMO, doing volt mods,etc is much stable (as long as you know what you are doing
) than increasing PCIe frequency just for such a small % increase.

| Shadow703793 wrote : Off topic, but very interesting.
|
Yes, here it is: http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php [...] tech_p35_1
| Quote : 5. Adjust PCIE Frequency : Usually, PCI Express bus clock has no direct relationship with overclocking; nevertheless, fine tune will help overclocking as well.(The default value is 100, it is not recommended to set to 120 above, which might damage the graphic card.) |
I figured if MSI said it was okay up to 120MHz, why not? Seems like when I did it, there was hardly any improvements. If could differ for others, however.
There are 598 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
