Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD Stock Plummets 25% in Response to K10 Release - Investors Scared

AMD Stock Plummets 25% in Response to K10 Release - Investors Scared - Page 4

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - AMD Stock Plummets 25% in Response to K10 Release - Investors Scared

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Last message on previous page:

spoonboy wrote :

"For the enthusiasts crowd, its pretty obvious how well Phenom is selling. You can look around this forum, and see how many people actually bought Phenom, and how many people bought Q6600."

Hold on a second old chap dont forget that the phenom is not nearly as widely available as the q6600, and has been around alot less time. But no I dont believe that the phenom will outsell the q6600.


Then how will AMD be profitable if they can only compete Q6600 on price points, when the cost of Phenom is significantly higher than Q6600? Having more revenue doesn't mean there will be more profits. AMD is about 5 billion in debt, and they've just posted their 5th consecutive loss in Q3.

Quote :

"Who will really buy Phenom? Have you asked that question yourself?"

Yes I have, and yes I still believe it'll be oem purchasers and a segment of the enthusiast community.



When Intel's quad core outperforms it by a noticeable margin, while costing a lot less? Dell won't take orders from AMD if they know AMD can't satisfy the volume needed. Same with HP, and Gateway.

It will be a while before Phenom pops on the OEM market.

Quote :

Despite all the shocking reviews some products get, for some unknown reason people will still go out and buy them, albeit in lower numbers than if it had good reviews, for example take, say, the 2900xt, which still proved to be quite numerous despite all said about it, then on to the dire 2600xt and 8600gt and gts cards, the former of which is pretty much awful, and the latter 2 generally overpriced and falling behind last gen 7900gt's and x1950pros performance wise, with their selling point: DX10, being firmly out of reach except on badly reduced settings. ...In times gone past you could look at the x1800xl which got one of the worst reviews ive ever read in a computer magazine here in the uk when it came out, and then maybe, the strutting baron of all turkeys, extreme edition p4s. I mean, come on, how much? for how much slower than a contemporary athlon? ok that last one is debateable lol but... well, you get the picture.


Fanbase?

But in all honesty, most enthusiasts communities have left AMD for Intel. OEMs only do AMD's dual core business, and quad core in servers (which, is still not available at this point). Phenom will sell. The question is, how much, and how much AMD can make from it?

Quote :

But then again the phenom isnt a terrible product - i'll say once again i have no plans to get one and im quite happy with my conroe from november last year thankyou very much so sit down everyone please - and as far as gaming goes, yes its a few frames off a q6600, but it wont hold you back in any substantial shape or form. For this I will provide a link :)

http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 947,00.asp

Looking at the charts, once you add in settings you'll actually play at (not 800x600 low) there really isnt much in it between a q6600 and a phenom. Looking at 3dmark06 it even nudges second place. Yes I know 'just being a few frames off' isnt the point and it should all be about how the phenom is better than the q6600, but it just illustrates that the phenom isnt a lame piece of kit. Bring down the price enough and it will start looking like a good buy, not a hot smelly brown dog poo.

It will, as they say, 'come out in the wash' in the course of time, but I dont see phenom being the last cpu an independent amd produces, or a commercial failure. ...shall we, you know, make it interesting gentlemen?



As someone already said before, if you game at 1280x1024 or above, then what's the difference between a dual core and a quad core? Phenom was outperformed by its own 6000+ in numerous benchmarks, and nearly all of the games.
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/1 [...] age25.html

------------------------------ http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/TXSuperFly03/478x88copy.png
Reply to Yomamafor1
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

I don't know if this analyst is any good, but he sure is funny:

http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/ma [...] 641_2.html
10. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating): I have no idea why anybody would consider buying AMD when you can buy Intel (INTC - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating). Do yourself a favor: Whenever you feel like typing in A-M-D, teach your muscles to type I-N-T-C. -- SELL

Edit: I think I'll buy if it reaches $9.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by aevm on 12-03-2007 at 11:10:07 PM
Reply to aevm

If AMD gets back on track it would be a great buy right now. More than likely it will; but there's a lot of risk right now.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

All I can say is that AMD has no extra cash. That 622million did nothing to that 5.8billion+ they owe.

Grimmy thanks for showing the performance differenc there. I had yet to see what a QX9650 that uses less power than a Phenom 9700 and even 9600 could do except wipe the floor with them.

Either way AMDs stock isnt skyrocketing like it should have with claims of 40% better performance. Those Phenoms should have sold like hotcakes but it seems that the Q6600 is selling like hotcakes.

Fun time. They put a smile on my face.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty
- 0 +

aevm wrote :

I don't know if this analyst is any good, but he sure is funny:

http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/ma [...] 641_2.html
10. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating): I have no idea why anybody would consider buying AMD when you can buy Intel (INTC - Cramer's Take - Stockpickr - Rating). Do yourself a favor: Whenever you feel like typing in A-M-D, teach your muscles to type I-N-T-C. -- SELL

Edit: I think I'll buy if it reaches $9.



Cramer has made some good calls, but he's had his share of bad ones as well. I watched him this morning admitting to a particualrly bad call in which he said he personally lost about $100,000. No telling how many millions were lost by those who took his advice. Though I have a degree of respect for him, I also know think a lot of average people who did some study could do just as well as if they never heard of him or took his advice.

AMD is a high risk stock at the moment, but its also one that I think is worthwhile for someone who has some money to gamble. At least its a far better gamble than those who drop their money in slot machines here in Nevada. I looked over his picks and pans on the link you provided and see that he panned Washington Mutual as well, yet WM, selling at about $19, has a P/E rating of 9, which is very good, a dividend yield of about 12%, which is excellent, and has a good chance of going back towards $40 where is was a few months ago. Even if it stays at $19, the 12% yield is a very good interest rate.

Picking and buying stocks is not for the faint hearted. It takes individual research, weighing the odds, and then putting down some money. It also means being willing to stay with a stock for a term and not panic selling at every hickup that occurs. Myself, I bought some AMD stock last Friday. Its very low at the moment and has a good chance of increasing far enough to make me some money. I also bought some Washington Mutual. U.S Treasury Secratary Paulson is meeting with Congress in plans to bail out the home loan industry and that should boost WM substantially.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

I have no way to prove this, but I'd bed to venture that people have gained more money than lost on Cramer's advice; but that's also the nature of the stock market, if you're diversified enough in a growing stock market you'll only gain money.

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

jimmysmitty wrote :

...AMD has been just dropping where as Intel has been hovering from $24.90-$26.00+ currently. You can really see the difference. In fact almost every firm that watches stocks has downgraded AMD to either neutral or sell where as Intel has been at buy for the past few months. The downgrades have hit AMD even harder which makes that $622 million investment almost useless.


Your missing the point that Sailer and I are talking about.
We don't care who's company stock "holds value" as that does not earn us money...I buy and sale 1K of shares at a time and both of us don't really want the stock to hold steady or only go up $2 a -year.
Waiting for a dividend check on Intel is lost income vrs other investments that pay higher intrest as well.
I bring that up as AMD does not pay dividends at all.

I no longer build homes and stock buy/sales are how I could afford to go fishing for the past 5 months while paying my bills rather than dig into saveings.

@ Sailer...
I was staying in Alturas for my "base" on this last fishing trip...must have drove past your place on the way and back (or near it).


------------------------------ *While we crash and burn, small, low tech, agrarian societies such as the Hmong in the mountains of Laos will continue on without so much as blinking an eye.*
Reply to ZOldDude
- 0 +

ZOldDude wrote :


@ Sailer...
I was staying in Alturas for my "base" on this last fishing trip...must have drove past your place on the way and back (or near it).



You may have. I live close to Carson City, Nevada. I was up through Alturas last summer. Beautiful country. I used to fishing there years ago, along with the high lakes around Lake Almanor. I've taken to ocean sailing and fishing now.

Yes indeed, buying stocks in the thousands of shares, holding until there's a some profit and then selling is how I get to go on vacations, buy cars, and afford other pleasures of life. I do have a few long term stocks that pay a steady dividend, but its short term buys and sells that seem to pay best. Buy a few thousand, watch it go up a dollar, and my vacation in the islands last summer got paid for. And all the work I did was press computer keys a few times.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

What you two propose is very risky. Money Management among a host of other things would need to be taken into account.

With AMD sub $10 a share what do you do now? buy more? If the one stock does tank how low must it go before you pull the plug or lose it all? Stock trading fees could also eat a good amount of profits as well. It's much riskier than you both let on.

Reply to pip_seeker

Grimmy wrote :

http://common.ziffdavisinternet.co [...] 630,00.jpg

You mean, ignore that one? That's basically one of the important things to look at. Why? Cause at lower resolutions, the CPU is taking allot of the load. Higher resolutions, the GPU does more, hence why you don't see a difference.

And what ya know... this is what it says below that cap:

Quote :

At low resolutions with low detail, we can see the impact of the CPU on a game more readily. There's little to show for Phenom in these tests. Even scaling up resolution and detail levels, Phenom generally can't keep up




Precisely ignore that one, why? because thats more a cpu test than a cpu in a gaming environment test. You wont actually game at that resolution and detail setting, will you?

Reply to spoonboy

systemlord wrote :

Spoonboy all you do is repeat yourself, make non-factual claims and guess how people behave when confronted with a purchase. You seem to know it all when it comes to how non-enthusiasts will behave, but all your doing is making a statement that you think is right when your way wrong. Either you like to be the center of attention or almost everyone in this post is factualy wrong. Do you see all these people picking away at all your posts? This is just my opinion on the lack of actual facts/links that you seem be missing. Theres a reason for it but I think you will just come back for more attention, you can have the floor now. :sarcastic:



I dont deny that I enjoy "stiring the pot" a little, bringing all the interesting smells to the top, but then again, tell me the phenom isnt marketable in any way, shape or form, and that it will not be taken up by an oem an a section of the enthusiast community. Lets bring this up again when the q4 results are in.

Reply to spoonboy

Yomamafor1 wrote :

Again, no links. TBH I feel like you're just giving out words based on your opinions, not facts. We'll see how AMD does once their Q4 earning is out. I don't expect a large increase from the desktop segment.

Quote :

"Let's see. 8800GT has completely sold out, while RV670s are having mail in rebates. I wonder which is more "attractive" to the market?" all sniping aside, ...links?


http://image.ak.outpost.com/art/re [...] .11508.pdf <= rebates for Diamond 3870/3850.


3870 will be a great deal, but probably only to those with Xfire boards. Dell was selling 8800GT @ 210USD a pop. But I agree, RV670 will probably be a break even for ATi, and cover up some losses from R600 debacle. To say it will be profitable is a little stretching it.



On the subject of uk pricing and availability, take a look for yourself!

"3870 will be a great deal, but probably only to those with Xfire boards. Dell was selling 8800GT @ 210USD a pop. But I agree, RV670 will probably be a break even for ATi, and cover up some losses from R600 debacle. To say it will be profitable is a little stretching it."

So you think it will lose money for amd?

Reply to spoonboy

The aforementioned links,

Rising sales:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/po [...] d.html?rel

Cash on hand with projection of new figure including recent share sales:

http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 461,00.asp

...and yes im aware of the contents of these articles! but concerning the figures or wooly claims I have made they are sufficient. There are some more if thats not enough for your perusal, but I will have to hunt for them so there will be a delay in getting back.

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

spoonboy wrote :

Precisely ignore that one, why? because thats more a cpu test than a cpu in a gaming environment test. You wont actually game at that resolution and detail setting, will you?

 

What? Errr, that is exactly what it is. Its testing the CPU in a game environment, which is depending on the CPU. If I have a low-end card, perhaps I would run it the best I can, which will be CPU dependent. Not everyone is going to be able to get a nice high end for their rig.

 

What's the point in bring up any CPU, when its a gaming environment on those tests if you have a high end video card? I mean there is no point in my case, using an E4400 OC to 3ghz with a 8800GTS on the side. But hey, I'm glad I have my system, over phenom at this time.

 

Or have you ever thought why that chart sticks out like a sore thumb for phenom? Maybe answering that question, you could come up with some constructive comments.... or maybe not. :whistle:


Message edited by Grimmy on 12-04-2007 at 03:38:33 PM
Reply to Grimmy
- 0 +

When you recall a bunch of Phenom chips that equates to loss in revenue

------------------------------ Q9400 @3.2Ghz-HD4870 512MB GDDR5-2GB DDR2-1066
"You figured it out. All new CPU's are nothing but overclocked Pentium 1's with a few bells and whistles added, ask any ol timer whose been around."

 

Reply to bfellow

Well its a difference of viewpoint i guess, something that is allowed on forums last time i checked :whistle:. If you had a low end card and were gaming at 800x600 low detail, chances are you wouldnt have any of the processors on the chart from earlier anyway, or anything in that league.

Taking results from settings approaching what people actually game at would appear to myself more useful of say, how cpu dependent a game is, or is not. Then making the higher resolution higher detail results more, ...relevant?

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

spoonboy wrote :

Well its a difference of viewpoint i guess, something that is allowed on forums last time i checked :whistle:. If you had a low end card and were gaming at 800x600 low detail, chances are you wouldnt have any of the processors on the chart from earlier anyway, or anything in that league.

Taking results from settings approaching what people actually game at would appear to myself more useful of say, how cpu dependent a game is, or is not. Then making the higher resolution higher detail results more, ...relevant?



Heh, view point? You chose to ignore that test. So it was my view point that you seem to disagree with. So your right, it is allowed, and why I posted. :heink:

Reply to Grimmy

and its my view point your looking at the wrong test, and ignored the one I was talking about. :heink:

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

Heh... you mean the tests that didn't make phenom look bad? As in higher resolutions, when the GPU is doing all the work? Oh... my bad.. :lol:

 

Hell... like I said before, my E4400 is cheaper, but then even an E2160 OC to 3.2ghz can out do phenom with a decent graphics card. I guess it would be more simple if the CPU didn't execute any code in games... is that what your saying?

 

Edit:

 

Whoops... I should backup what I'm saying.. huh?

 

New Budget Dual-Core CPUs: Intel Pentium E2160 and Pentium E2140 (page 14)

 

http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu/pentium-e2160/cpu-3402.png

 

:oops:. o O (so I was off by.. 200mhz)

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Grimmy on 12-04-2007 at 04:51:27 PM
Reply to Grimmy

Grimmy wrote :

Heh... you mean the tests that didn't make phenom look bad? As in higher resolutions, when the GPU is doing all the work? Oh... my bad.. :lol:

Hell... like I said before, my E4400 is cheaper, but then even an E2160 OC to 3.2ghz can out do phenom with a decent graphics card. I guess it would be more simple if the CPU didn't execute any code in games... is that what your saying?

Edit:

Whoops... I should backup what I'm saying.. huh?

New Budget Dual-Core CPUs: Intel Pentium E2160 and Pentium E2140 (page 14)

http://www.xbitlabs.com/images/cpu [...] u-3402.png

:oops:. o O (so I was off by.. 200mhz)



"As in higher resolutions, when the GPU is doing all the work? Oh... my bad.. :lol:"

gpus tend to do most of the work in games yes. My point was phenom isnt terrible, in a gaming environment its not that far off the intel cpus on the chart, at very low resolutions and detail levels, it sure is. Thats all i tried to say. honest guvnor.

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

Actually it is terrible. Even when its own cousin, AM64 X2 6400+, out paces it. And all the hype (that was prolly said to help sell it) that was brought to everyones attention.


Message edited by Grimmy on 12-04-2007 at 05:09:20 PM
Reply to Grimmy

Had to read that twice, cousin? ..had i clicked on the wrong thread?

It is a bit odd that in games that dont thread well it loses to the old x2, maybe the extra gubbins surrounding the cores of the phenom drag it down a bit. L3 cache? It does quite well on threaded ones though. a spot of Sup. Com. anyone?

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/for [...] iew-5.html

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

is spoonboy trying to spoonfeed us his non-constructive argument in hopes of stirring up emotion? i see no point of continuing this thread as it is quite obvious at this point that many tech savvy users in this thread are arguing with a ten-year old passing off as a mature dunce. :na:

Reply to doragi

doragi wrote :

is spoonboy trying to spoonfeed us his non-constructive argument in hopes of stirring up emotion? i see no point of continuing this thread as it is quite obvious at this point that many tech savvy users in this thread are arguing with a ten-year old passing off as a mature dunce. :na:



Damn ive been busted lol!

im actually 9 if you must know.

Did you create that account just to write this. Im honoured sir.

How is what i have said not constructive? I made loads of points I didnt back up, now I have stuck some links in to make amends. What else are you after?

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

spoonboy wrote :

Damn ive been busted lol!

im actually 9 if you must know.

Did you create that account just to write this. Im honoured sir.

How is what i have said not constructive? I made loads of points I didnt back up, now I have stuck some links in to make amends. What else are you after?



Errr... did you actually think I'd create another account? :lol:

So, your 9, eh? Whelp... it would prolly take too much time to explain what is and isn't constructive of what you've said.... but what can ya say to a 9 year old, who simply thinks he knows everything, and is on top of the werld. :D

Have a nice day!

Reply to Grimmy

I didnt say I thought YOU had made the account. I lied a little, i'll be 9 next birthday. and yes, I do feel on the "top of the werld". Are you sure your not 9 as well? Feel free to reply everyone lol

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +


Could we have a moderator lock this thread, please? It's clearly past the point where anything useful will come of it.

Thanks

------------------------------ Which Chip? Well, it depends on which set of thieving b@stardz you choose to support: The ones who use insider trading to enrich themselves while running their company into the ground, or the ones who illegally pay vendors to not support the first group.
Reply to Scotteq

:bounce: mate that happened after the second page :lol:

ok ok lets call it a day on this one, just so long as were all agreed that they started it....

....only joking!

I wont post again on this thread, but I would put a few coins on it that someone will want the last word.

Reply to spoonboy
- 0 +

pip_seeker wrote :

What you two propose is very risky. Money Management among a host of other things would need to be taken into account.

With AMD sub $10 a share what do you do now? buy more? If the one stock does tank how low must it go before you pull the plug or lose it all? Stock trading fees could also eat a good amount of profits as well. It's much riskier than you both let on.



For myself, I understand the risk. AMD is quite volitatile, with the ability to drop down suddenly as well as go up. Such investments are not for the feint of heart. Its why I call the AMD investment gambling money.

To ease your wondering, AMD is only one of a dozen stocks that I own, Most would be called good solid companies that aren't going to disappear. Or if they do, the economy will be so wrecked that the depression of the 1930's will seem easy. I only have a couple investments that are in the gambling zone. I do my trading on-line so the fees are $7 to buy and $7 to sell. Therefore, if I buy 1000 shares of a company and it goes up 50 cents, I still make a fair amount of money with the sale, though I like to get a larger return.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

spoonboy wrote :

I dont deny that I enjoy "stiring the pot" a little, bringing all the interesting smells to the top, but then again, tell me the phenom isnt marketable in any way, shape or form, and that it will not be taken up by an oem an a section of the enthusiast community. Lets bring this up again when the q4 results are in.



If AMD can price the CPU's like their doing with the 3800 series ATI cards then AMD will do what it wanted to do, offer good performance to price ratio in the mainstream market. Thats were most consumers on a budget go for anyway.

------------------------------ Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord

AMD Stock Update:

At 1:30pm today the stock is down nearly 4% at 9.30


I'm going to make a bold prediction: AMD Stock will be below $8 per share by the end of this month.

I make this prediction because I think investors are going to have a fit when analysts start spouting their concerns about the Errata issue which is now said to affect all K10's at any frequency. The fix for said issue SLOWS the K10 processor down by 10-20%, according to TechReport (10% being AMD's number).

I know I'm spouting out doom and gloom, but that's the reality for AMD, doom and gloom. Launching a new processor slower than your competitor's weakest processor, and having to recall and patch your brand new state-of-the-art technology, NOT GOOD.


Message edited by TechnologyCoordinator on 12-04-2007 at 07:51:48 PM
Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

doragi wrote :

is spoonboy trying to spoonfeed us his non-constructive argument in hopes of stirring up emotion? i see no point of continuing this thread as it is quite obvious at this point that many tech savvy users in this thread are arguing with a ten-year old passing off as a mature dunce. :na:



Well he did say, "I don't deny that I enjoy stiring up the pot".

------------------------------ Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord
- 0 +

I remember someone last winter predicting that AMD would drop to 7 in the late spring to early summer. Ok, maybe he was just late. But as the stock keeps dropping, that will be more inviting for a take-over bid from IBM or someone else. Such a thing could ralley the stocks pretty good.

For now, maybe I need a drink. What's that? Its not 12 o'clock yet? Just move the hands while nobody's looking.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

spoonboy wrote :

Damn ive been busted lol!

im actually 9 if you must know.

Did you create that account just to write this. Im honoured sir.

How is what i have said not constructive? I made loads of points I didnt back up, now I have stuck some links in to make amends. What else are you after?



Actual facts/links to back up your statements because knowone will or is taking you seriously. You did say that you like to stiring things up and you seem to have pulled that off well.


Message edited by systemlord on 12-04-2007 at 07:53:15 PM
------------------------------ Intel C2D E6600 @ 3.2GHz * Asus P5E * 2x1 GB Crucial Ballistix Tracers * Raptor X * EVGA Geforce 8800GTX 768MB 651MHz/1525MHz/2100MHz * X-FI Fatal1ty Pro * Enermax Infiniti 720W PSU * Creative THX5.1 * Tuniq Tower 120
Silverstone TJ09 * Windows XP
Reply to systemlord

Sailer wrote :

For myself, I understand the risk. AMD is quite volitatile, with the ability to drop down suddenly as well as go up. Such investments are not for the feint of heart. Its why I call the AMD investment gambling money.

To ease your wondering, AMD is only one of a dozen stocks that I own, Most would be called good solid companies that aren't going to disappear. Or if they do, the economy will be so wrecked that the depression of the 1930's will seem easy. I only have a couple investments that are in the gambling zone. I do my trading on-line so the fees are $7 to buy and $7 to sell. Therefore, if I buy 1000 shares of a company and it goes up 50 cents, I still make a fair amount of money with the sale, though I like to get a larger return.



To call this gambling is an understatement and now brings back into question the whole argument of choosing a higher priced stock [INTC] that is destined to fall less vs another stock [AMD] in the same category that is likely to fall more. As well as the old proposed failed approach of buying and holding.

So I guess you could call this the catch 22. The fact is had you bought INTC instead you would be in less dire circumstance right now even though you would use more funds for such a purpose. There is no reason to believe even that it will stop at $8. So the "time factor" that you were trying to avoid has sucked you into a bad situation.

Not to say you won't eventually get out of this, it reduces the argument for making a "quick" score to rubble. While this may have worked for you the past year... it was probably just a small case of luck. This was my whole point in not buying a stock that is falling, just because it appears cheap... there's nothing to support that it will all of a sudden become worth something over night.

As far as a buy out from IBM... I wouldn't plan on it. IBM sold off their PC business including harddrive business to focus on more profitable sectors. I wouldn't plan on them back stepping now. IBM could never keep up with Intel processors what makes you think they could do this with AMD? Just because they license tech to AMD doesn't mean they are looking to merge.

A couple more likely candidates might be Nvidia or possibly Samsung or even a more extreme pick would be Sony. But I doubt this would happen in the current climate. Why buy a company now that is having a host of problems when you can get it for fire sale prices a little later?? The time to buy IMHO is when it's hit rock bottom and starts coming back up. Then you can decide how long you want to hold it for.

Reply to pip_seeker

Hello Sailer:
Your philosophy is definitely not for the faint of heart.
I lost on wcom/nt - bought more when they went down, But
Made out on csco - Bought 200 share (split to 900) sold 400
(Paid $8.73 got $18.51) still have 500 shares. Paid equivalent of $470 - Current Balance $13,500.

Like you said - win some, lose some, as long as wins come out ahead
As someone said " know when to hold um and when to fold"

Editted - added
To bad I didn't sell Csco at $60 (54 grand vs cost 8 grand o'well that life.
Typed this awhile ago - Forgot to hit send went a raked the D___ leaves.

Anyway at the start of this post AMD was 10.83
End of today $9.25 -4.24% (Cube only down 0.21%, & INTC up +0.23%)
Quite a while back I prediced a drop to the $10.00 level, believe at that time someone else prediced the $8 (Think it was the same post


Message edited by RetiredChief on 12-04-2007 at 11:52:51 PM
Reply to RetiredChief
- 0 +

I read some breaking further bad news about AMD a few hours ago and made the decision to sell. I got out before it went down to $9.25. That was a Kenny Rogers song, "The Gambler", and I decided it was time to fold. I looked over my gains for the year and I still came out ahead on AMD, so I won't cry to much.

The news that came out is that the Phenoms that were released are defective, the Barcelonas that have been sold are defective, AMD has stopped shipments and is recalling unsold chips. The errata is appearing on all chips, no matter what speed they run. To make it worse, it appears that AMD knew that the Barcelona and Phenom chips were defective at time of sale, but proceeded with the sales anyway in hope to finding a cure. So far AMD has found an update that helps with the errata, but it slows the chip 10-20%. This does not look good, and I expect AMD stock prices to drop a lot more.

@pip_seeker, IBM was only one particular thought that came to mind while I was typing, since IBM and AMD have had some business ties. If all of what came out at TechReport and is appearing elsewhere is true, I can't begin to guess where the stock price will bottom.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

my sell amd and buy intel trade is looking all better and better - research me you see i said the barcie was doomed months ago - the mobos do not work amd blamed bios

well all this is boring the stock is at 9.50 or so last i looked - what now?

amd can make 2nd rate dual cores for while - they might try a 800 series 2 dual core chips in a package as intel did 2-3 years ago!

the amd EE 840 - i can see it now " amd buys the 840 dies from intel" and technology to build quad core's mandated by the EU

amd stock will not go down too much due to the ati turn around - ati has some good stuff and the nvidia intel war is real the news is - lets get off the barcie failure amd will fix it eventually

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by dragonsprayer on 12-05-2007 at 07:13:54 AM
Reply to dragonsprayer
- 0 +

dragonsprayer wrote :

amd stock will not go down too much due to the ati turn around - ati has some good stuff and the nvidia intel war is real the news is - lets get off the barcie failure amd will fix it eventually



Why Dragonsprayer, is that really you? Cause you're sure sounding generous to AMD at the moment.

I do hope your right about the ATI cards helping AMD sufficently to turn things around. Even though I'm a bit ticked off at AMD at the moment, I don't want them to disappear completely. Besides, if AMD did die, half the bickering on this forum would disappear and a lot of people wouldn't know what to say after that.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

Their stock is dropping again, from the anouncments today.

------------------------------ And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
Reply to spaztic7

spaztic7 wrote :

Their stock is dropping again, from the anouncments today.

 

8.91 at the moment...and still dropping

 

I wonder how low it'll go.


Message edited by Yomamafor1 on 12-05-2007 at 10:33:32 PM
------------------------------ http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/TXSuperFly03/478x88copy.png
Reply to Yomamafor1

Everett01 wrote :

AMD = Another Major Disappointment



LAWL. I'm going to use that if AMD screws up again!

Reply to TechnologyCoordinator
- 0 +

I suggest you all have a look at the front page, AMD are being propped up by national governments. This is bad as well as some what embarrassing if you’re the managing director of AMD.

Reply to JeanLuc

AMD Stock Update:

AMD closes BELOW the nine dollar mark, at $8.91; loses 3.68% in a single day.

Market capital drops below five billion.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by TechnologyCoordinator on 12-05-2007 at 10:56:40 PM
Reply to TechnologyCoordinator
- 0 +

TechnologyCoordinator wrote :

AMD Stock Update:

AMD closes BELOW the nine dollar mark, at $8.91; loses 3.68% in a single day.

Market capital drops below five billion.



And the auctioneer calls out, "Do I hear 9, do I hear 9? Do I hear 8, 8 anybody? Ah, how about 7, is there a bid of 7? Is anyone bidding?

So at a market capital below 5 billion. Isn't that less then AMD paid for ATI? Might that mean that its the ATI division alone which is giving AMD its value? That could be taken to mean AMD has no value. This is sad.

------------------------------ Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.

Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it, but I miss it.
Reply to Sailer

I say this much. AMD does not have "real" cash on hand. If you consider the debt then its pretty much just nothing.

AMD is going to lose sales now and their stock keeps dropping even when the entire market is up. Thats just sad.

Either way AMD is in a sinking wooden ship while Intel cruses by in a battleship waving.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

All I can say is I hope it is still in the $8 range in January as I have some CD's due then and would love to pick up more shares.

They own alot more products than just CPU/GPU (good amount of cellphone items for one) and have just started to ship their new early GFX cards.

They are also revamping the K8 line @ 65nm while droping the top two lvl CPU's in that line and bosting the others 100Mhz at the same time.

I for one wish they would use the above and crank out some more skt 939's as they could sale alot for those who built out on that system 2-3 years ago and just want a fast cheap upgrade that will keep up or even pass the new systems in many respects.

They seem to be on time with their projected NM build out and part of that is 45nm by early 2009. They are working with IBM and the game plan from last year is 22nm by the end of 2010.

The more shares I pick up cheep just means that after saleing off most for fast profit I still have share left over that are "free" and by this time next year even those shares which I bought that need to pass $14 will provide a very nice return.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ZOldDude on 12-06-2007 at 02:07:49 AM
------------------------------ *While we crash and burn, small, low tech, agrarian societies such as the Hmong in the mountains of Laos will continue on without so much as blinking an eye.*
Reply to ZOldDude
- 0 +

ZOldDude wrote :


They seem to be on time with their projected NM build out and part of that is 45nm by early 2009. They are working with IBM and the game plan from last year is 22nm by the end of 2010.




Uh...unless AMD snuck in the back way to NM, there is no AMD fab being built here.
The INTEL 45nm fab is being built here, yes, and should be ready around 2009, I guess.

------------------------------ 1:http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/481029.png
2:http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/464866.png
Reply to NMDante

spoonboy wrote :

To the last 3 guys who quoted/replied off my post, yes it might sound like a load of hokum, but take OFF your informed person hat and put ON your uninformed one. Those who dont take an interest in pcs or gaming, or no nothing about substantial about the general subject, can both easily be baffled and impressed by the words "native quad core" or what have you. Numbers and impressive sounding names and features CAN sway many a uninformed consumer when confronted by them by the salesman or tv or newprint adverts upon pondering or buying a new / first pc. Yes it sounds guff but yes it is very much marketable. Yes it iss dumn but architectural specifications and impressive adjectives are to consumers what shiny things are to magpies. Hence p4s were very successful products for intel, hence amd and cyrix used the pr/+ system to mark their products, hence people will buy cheap crap gpus with 512mb of vram because they think that high number has an effect or donates real ability. You can debate the merits and falsehoods of this entire way people are irrationally influenced by advertising, but gentleman, it is real, it is happening right now, and it will continue to go on.

The gigahertz wars were indeed pathetic, and it eventually all came a little undone for intel, but win it, in that they pulled the wool over many peoples eyes and made alot of money from a poor product, they certainly did. I know I know a better product makes better advertising, but a poor product can also be spun very well. #see above.



ah the joy of being vindicated, phenom oem machines ftw

http://www.techspot.com/news/28827 [...] ktops.html

Reply to spoonboy

Despite all the doom and gloom in this thread, AMD lost only $9 million in Q3 from their bank account.

Reply to Amiga500

Exactly mate, most here got caught up in believing their own doom and gloom. I said they were turning it around and they certainly are according to the q4 numbers (when i saw them my first thought was this thread). That was the trend in their numbers as of q3, not some wild guess.

Reply to spoonboy
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > AMD Stock Plummets 25% in Response to K10 Release - Investors Scared
Go to:

There are 1088 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 01:00 vishnuvamp won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 whiz won the Freshman badge
  • 01:00 jconline won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 qiaoda won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 sykohedd won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 jundja won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 cnsftci won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 VistaVendetta won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 batuchka won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 Nick_C won the Uniformed badge