Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Intel delays 45nm QC...
 

Intel delays 45nm QC...

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2
Next 
Author
 Thread : Intel delays 45nm QC...
 
Profile: addict
More Information

Last message on previous page:
Just read the xbitslabs article. They must have been reading my posts.LOL. I said the exact same thing near the beginning of this thread.

Even though they say there is a defect I can't see that it would be a major issue otherwise the QX9650 wouldn't have been released.

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: old hand
More Information

So it begins... stagnation is such a horrible thing. I wouldn't be surprised if Nehalem gets pushed back as well.

 

-mcg


Message edited by MrCommunis tGen on 12-19-2007 at 09:59:52 PM

---------------
Athlon X2 3800+ (230x10) @1.40v w/Tuniq Tower | Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe
2x1GB Corsair XMS PC3200 2.5-3-3-8 1T @409MHz | eVGA 7900GS (500/1380)
WD 640GB AAKS, Seagate 7200.8 250GB, Hitachi 80GB
Corsair VX450 | Samsung 206BW | Vista Ultimate x64
Profile: addict
More Information

I reckon AMD has a secret plant which is producing 32nm Phenoms with Z100 stepping as we speak. I heard the process has something to do with melting babies and gutting fat people. Its got to be true I read it on the INQ/FUD.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Much if not all of the above speculation sounds very plausible. One thing to consider, maybe Intel is giving AMD a break. They can sell their current CPUs no problem, fix any errata, deplete stocks etc. Does anyone really think that they want to drive AMD into receivership? That would throw the whole industry into turmoil. Intel doesn't want that, they want to keep AMD crippled not kill them.

Edit: aevm, I just saw your post. I think you hit the nail on the head.

 

@ MrsBytch: It didn't take long, did it? I'm not even going to address your post.


Message edited by Zorg on 12-20-2007 at 12:40:59 AM
CTRL-ALT-DE1337
Profile: addict
More Information

gpippas wrote :

I reckon AMD has a secret plant which is producing 32nm Phenoms with Z100 stepping as we speak. I heard the process has something to do with melting babies and gutting fat people. Its got to be true I read it on the INQ/FUD.



It's kinda like Soylent Green. TLB = Tallow Lipid Butchering.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

I wonder if this is a "Good" thing for 680i owners?

I wonder if the defect has anything to do with the issues those boards were seeing and if correcting it will make them work?

Not that I care that much since I don't have a 680i, but for those of you that do, this might be good news.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Saw this earlier. Similar to that other link regarding the real reason for the delay.
http://www.behardware.com/news/926 [...] layed.html


---------------
Intel C2D E6400 OC@3.33Ghz, Asus P5B Deluxe Wifi/AP, EVGA 8800 GT 512,
Zalman 9500, Corsair Dom PC6400 2*1 Gig (4-4-4-12), Corsair 620HX PSU,
2 x WD Raptor 36Gig (10,000 RPM) Raid 0, Other HDs: 750 + 500 + 250 Gigs
Samsung 20X DVD-RW, Antec 900
Sniper
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Living proof why competition :) is good


---------------
E2180 @3.2Ghz + P35DS3L +8400GS (700/475 OC)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/2588429538_b3c41b29c3.jpg
Profile: addict
More Information

Another thing to consider is that now they have said there is a fault they can easily justify extending the delay come Feb if they still don't want to release.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Well, nothing has been "confirmed".

The Digitimes source tends to be reliable, but most other sources are likely spins on this one article.

Profile: addict
More Information

That is true Zen I forgot Intel hasn't officially said anything.

Profile: newbie
More Information

AMD screwed up and maybe Intel got sloppy also ;) They just don't have to admit to it cause they aren't stuck in the same time frame to compete with AMD's now delayed release.

Call me Ishmael.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I will admit I didn't read all the posts so I may not be the only one who thinks this......

but.....

Have you ever heard the "saying don't kick a man when he is down". In a sports game you don't intentionally run up the score when you are already in the lead.................did you ever think that maybe this is Intells way of showing a little respect to AMD......



---------------
Athlon 64 AM2 6000+
Gigabyte M61P-S3
4 GB A-Data DDR2 800
Asus 4850 512mb
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Apparently, Dailytech thinks this story is a "conspiracy".

http://www.dailytech.com/DigiTimes [...] e10095.htm

Quote :

Intel insiders, speaking off the record, would not comment on the specific January 20th launch parts. One employee added, "It’s a gigantic stretch and almost humorous to think [Intel] would delay products based on a rumored ongoing delays of a competitive product line announced just six days ago."


---------------
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/TXSuperFly03/478x88copy.png
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

I doubt Intel is being "Kind".........

1) It's All FUD and it's shipping on time.
2) There is an issue and Intel is choosing to delay things...
3) Intel is delaying things to help clear old stock
4) Intel will take 2-4 weeks longer to get sufficient stock than expected to have a clean launch
5) Mobo Vendors has asked for the delay to finish BIOS updates.
6) System Vendors have asked for the delay to finish clearing stock.
........

It could be any of those ranging from "No Delay" to lots of reasons.
I don't think kindness is one.
In fact, that would open them up to ShareHolder lawsuits.

Profile: addict
More Information

caamsa

Just to let you know it has been said. I said it back near the beginning and its been repeated. My point was that Intel have no reason to pound AMD. If AMD were to go Intel would find itself in a monopoly which they don't want and obviously we don't want. I think there is a little professional courtesy going on. Basically like I said ealier I think Intel wants things the way they were pre K7/K8. Amd is around but not a hugely substancial threat occupying the lower/mid range market and getting nowhere near the top stuf.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

This totally sucks!
No matter what the reason!

CTRL-ALT-DE1337
Profile: addict
More Information

It's been a rollercoster day. It's delayed. No it's not delayed. Any idea when this will all shake out and we'll know for sure what the heck Intel is doing with these Yorkys?

I WANT A Q9550!!!!

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I think it's all part of AMD's grand strategy ... they knew phenom was underperforming, so...

They release phenom.
Performance is low enough that Intel decide to delay their own chips due to lack of competition.
AMD use this extra time to make k11/12 with uber performance, releasing it on a possibly unprepared intel.

Probably all wrong, but it's a nice theory :D

ATI is back with a toilet flush on Nvidia
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

coret wrote :

I think it's all part of AMD's grand strategy ... they knew phenom was underperforming, so...

They release phenom.
Performance is low enough that Intel decide to delay their own chips due to lack of competition.
AMD use this extra time to make k11/12 with uber performance, releasing it on a possibly unprepared intel.

Probably all wrong, but it's a nice theory :D




Yeah with performance soo mind numbing that it places AMD 2 years ahead of Intel.

Yes they are conspiring..


---------------
12,450 3DMark's06
AMD X2 6000+@3.3
Vista 64 bit
Gigabyte..AMD 780G
Factboy
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Intel has no sympathy for AMD. Intel would charge admission so that people could watch them kick AMD while they were gone to make it more profitable.


---------------
http://promotions.newegg.com/Intel/2Over3/478x88.jpg
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information