Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?
 

If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

If the same lie about the E8400's is repeated enough times, does it become fact in some people's minds?  
 
Even the CPU guide in this section quotes "Rumors from the interwebs", or something just as credible, and trys to move people away from the Wolfdales.   However, a quick search on newegg shows 250+ reviews, and I can't find a mention of this.  (Before everyone flames the newegg reviewers, I wonder how many people here have purchased something from them and reviewed it.)  It is by no means a scientific sample, but it speaks wonders.  
 
I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said  "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that.   It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.
 
The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB.  They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try.  People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe.  I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way.  I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!)  so he was RMAing it.  Ludicrous.
 
If people are having legitimate problems with temp sensors, that is something we need to know.  I've seen more posts regurgitating  "a friend of a friend" stories on this.  Myself and 3 other people I know personally own this chip and have OC, and no problems yet.  Core temp reads and reports the temps fine.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ocguy31 on 02-28-2008 at 09:05:40 AM

---------------
Intel E8400 @ 3.8ghz Under Arctic Pro 7
ASUS P5KC
2GB DDR2 800 Patriot
EVGA 8800GTS
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

Quote :

I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said  "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that.   It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.


Looks like you already know the answer. Someone posts about one, you get some fanboy from the other side responding in kind.
 What is really sad is that people coming here for advice, get fed this crap.

Your Local Canadian
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Chalk one up for another satisfied 4GHz E8400 owner :D


---------------
Intel C2D E8400 OC @ 4.00GHz.--TRUE 120 W/ Scythe S-Flex 28.0dB.--EVGA 8800GTS 512MB.--ASUS Maximus Formula X38 (0907).--Crucial Ballistix 4x1GB DDR2 4-4-4-12 @ 890Mhz.--WD 150gb Raptor.--Corsair 620HX Modular PSU.--Antec P182 Case.-- Vista x64.
Profile: addict
More Information

True, just like the B3 Errata.
Never going to happen in everyday use and look at all of the slagging off on here (and how many owners are there?  :lol: )


---------------
6000+ Stock, GA M57SLi-S4, XFX 8800GTX's SLi Stock, 4Gb Corsair PC6400 DHX, CoolerMaster 850W, 36Gb Raptor boot drive, 2x150Gb Raptor's in RAID 0 - XFX RAID controller & 300Gb Seagate. PowerBook G4 12" 1.5GHz, Go5200 64mb, 768mb RAM, 80Gb HD, SuperDrive.
Profile: member
More Information

If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?
 
sadly the answer is yes, in the minds of many people this will make it "true" also if they want to believe it they will treat it as fact.
 
look at religeon, racism, fashism, the killing of "witches" hundreds of years ago, ghosts... the list goes on  
 
i know these are on a much higher level than the E8400 rumor lol but i think they work on the same principle of people believing rumors, myths and lies because they want to or because every one around them tells them its fact.. when it clearly is not

The lab test indicated abnormal lover function.
Profile: member
More Information

ocguy31 wrote :

The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB.  They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try.  People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe.  I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way.  I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!)  so he was RMAing it.  Ludicrous.


 
 
Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn.  ;)  :)  :bounce:


---------------
Digital might vs mainstream apogee retarded by freedom infused with insanity. You are a sleep walker; I am your reaper, pass-through the nightmare delivering AI reason. Accept your fate in this vortex paradigm; this machine controls you, it is your maker.
Profile: member
More Information

JonnyRock wrote :

Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn.  ;)  :)  :bounce:


 
nice words, very true

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Heh... it all boils down to:
 
1.)  Having the correct most updated bios.
2.)  Knowing a work around (Disabling DTS Feature on some MB).
3.)  Understanding the 3 sensors (Tcase,Tjuction)
4.)  Having some accuracy on ambient temps.
5.)  Having good airflow.
6.)  And knowing how to correctly install the HSF on a 775 socket MB.
 
Also knowing the right kind of chipsets on MB that can handle OC better.  I find it kind of crazy to OC to 4ghz myself, but still impressive without water cooling.  I find 3-3.6ghz fast enough.
 
But there are unhappy people out there, wanting to put their mark somewhere to stress out their frustrations.  I find it kinda funny how some people call the sensor problem that serious when they don't understand how the problem occurs.  As well with the Phenom bug, which people don't seem to understand it, and want to totally avoid it.  But then, to get random BSOD is just frustrating all in its own, when your trying to get more speed out of it.
 
One of these days, we'll look back at this and laugh our butts off when the technology advances to a higher level.  :lol:. o O (remember the days when the...)

Why Spin? Just present facts.
Profile: newbie

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.  I think it is related to depression.  A depressed person wants everyone else to be a fraked up too... That way his life doesn't seem to bad...
 
Now that fanboys do not have something factual to base their arguments on, they are simply flaming to get attention..  
 
If there was a problem with the new Intel processors, why would only the wolfdales suffer from it?  The already released QX9650 is immune? It's the same core people.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Misery... loves company.  `Metallica


Profile: enthusiast
More Information

The funny thing is this is a free voice for morons.As humans we tend to gravitate to negatives,and the few thats rashanal are lost in the see of fanboy-ism on any side.We all have a little Thunderman in us ,some show it more than others

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Quote :

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.


 
Spoken like a true Intel fanboy.  You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?  
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective.  If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.


---------------
Gigabyte P965 S3, E6300 @ 3.26ghz (1.2v), ACFreezer7Pro, 4GB Crucial Tracer Cas4, XFX 8800GT, Audigy SE, WD 160 RE, Samsung DL-DVD w/Lightscribe, Antec w/coolermaster extreme power 600w 36a, BenQ FP93G 19", Vista64
Profile: addict
More Information

Grimmy wrote :

2.)  Knowing a work around (Disabling DTS Feature on some MB).


What's this DTS?  Is that the DTS for the onboard sound or what?  Sorry, having a brain fart right now.

Profile: addict
More Information

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

 

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.

 

Spoken like a true Intel fanboy.  You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?  
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective.  If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.

 


hahahaha pwned !!

 

Soooo true.


---------------
Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | HD3870X2 1GB | 24" Westinghouse L2410NM| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 8.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz
Profile: addict
More Information

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.


 
Spoken like a true Intel fanboy.  You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?  
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective.  If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.


 
 
 
You make zero sense and compare apples to oranges.
 
The problem with the Phenom is its bugs and its LOW PERFORMANCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE OVER YEAR OLD Q6600.
 
And I'm sorry, saying some of the E8400s don't OC as well as others does not make it defective.  Does it run great at standard settings?  Yes?  Not deffective.  Seeing people OC the thing to 4+ Ghz is eye opening.  People having problems with their E8400 OCing to 4Ghz?  Sorry about your luck, but the chip still works great at 3Ghz as it was marketed to when you purchased it.
 
But please continue to compare the very impressive dual core Wolfdale to the under performing, more expensive quad core Phenom.
 
And this is coming from a guy that's really rooting for AMD.


---------------
Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, Samsung 22" LCD, Windows XP Pro 64-bit
Modders forever......
Profile: old hand
More Information

Quote :

If the same lie about the E8400's is repeated enough times, does it become fact in some people's minds?    
 
Even the CPU guide in this section quotes "Rumors from the interwebs", or something just as credible, and trys to move people away from the Wolfdales.   However, a quick search on newegg shows 250+ reviews, and I can't find a mention of this.  (Before everyone flames the newegg reviewers, I wonder how many people here have purchased something from them and reviewed it.)  It is by no means a scientific sample, but it speaks wonders.    
 
I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said  "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that.   It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.  
 
The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB.  They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try.  People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe.  I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way.  I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!)  so he was RMAing it.  Ludicrous.  
 
If people are having legitimate problems with temp sensors, that is something we need to know.  I've seen more posts regurgitating  "a friend of a friend" stories on this.  Myself and 3 other people I know personally own this chip and have OC, and no problems yet.  Core temp reads and reports the temps fine.


 
 
:sleep:


---------------
The evening news is where they begin with 'Good evening', and then proceed to tell you why it isn't.  
 
HP pavilion with: AMD 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 @ 2.3 Gigahertz, 400 gig samsung sata, 2 gigs pc5300, Lightscribe dvd burner, ATI Radeon HD 3850 256 MB.
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.


 
Spoken like a true Intel fanboy.  You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?  
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective.  If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.


 
Are you trying to provide an example to the quoted statement?


---------------
http://promotions.newegg.com/Intel/2Over3/478x88.jpg
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

gwolfman wrote :

What's this DTS?  Is that the DTS for the onboard sound or what?  Sorry, having a brain fart right now.


Digital Thermal Sensor.  I may have got it mixed up in my mind with (off the CPU OC'ing Section):

 
Quote :

PECI %u2013 This stands for Platform Environment Control Interface - disable or enable.  This affects how your DTS (Digital Thermal Sensors) report the core temps of your CPU.  I have mine enabled and have read several posts now that suggest having it enabled does indeed give more accurate core temps.  I can%u2019t say if you want it on or off in your system.

 

This was off another thread:

 
yomamafor1 wrote :

This is from Intel's own documentary:
http://download.intel.com/design/p [...] 873303.pdf

 
Quote :


AW30. Programming the Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) Threshold May Cause
Unexpected Thermal Interrupts
Problem: Software can enable DTS thermal interrupts by programming the thermal
threshold and setting the respective thermal interrupt enable bit. When
programming DTS value, the previous DTS threshold may be crossed. This
will generate an unexpected thermal interrupt.
Implication: Software may observe an unexpected thermal interrupt occur after
reprogramming the thermal threshold.
Workaround: In the ACPI/OS implement a workaround by temporarily disabling the DTS
threshold interrupt before updating the DTS threshold value.
Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.

 

Courtesy of Spud, who posted this earlier.

 

So in other words, Intel does inform the public about such errata, but most Average Joe users just don't care enough to look through these white papers.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Grimmy on 02-28-2008 at 08:51:36 PM
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information