Can we expect to play Crysis at high resolutions on High this year?

Show comments: By default All Good ratings Poor ratings

Word : Username : Filter :
Page : 1 2 3 4 Next Previous Bottom
Author	Thread : Can we expect to play Crysis at high resolutions on High this year?

spoonboy

If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand

More Information

03-22-2008 at 07:04:38 PM

Hide

Last message on previous page:

jkflipflop98 wrote :

You spent most of the game in cloak mode because you're a confrontation avoiding wussy. At least act like you have a pair and shoot someone.

quote of the week lol.

Related Pr oduct

spoonboy

If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand

More Information

03-22-2008 at 07:15:32 PM

Hide

TheGreatGrapeApe wrote :

You were quite clearly criticizing the gameplay, an aspect of the game which is fine, so I don't know why you try to deny it. It's not that you criticize it's that your defense of that criticism is ignorant, and that's my opinion on your statement.

Quote :

So you want to victim 4? Ok, I already found something flawed in your statement, so bring it.

Dude, you think you're racking up 'victims', but you're the only one getting repeatedly wounded like the Black Knight. Whats next, bite my ankles will you?

http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pict [...] ail020.jpg

Mmmm shouldnt the moderator be rising above it all rather than joining in?

...and can we use your own smilies or are they reserved for you?

Message quoted 1 times

MrGB

Profile: stranger

More Information

03-22-2008 at 07:24:01 PM

Hide

spoonboy wrote :

about the 3000 shots, I read loads posts saying that before I played the game, then I bought it and its just not the case. If you shoot in strength mode, your shots wont deviate much at all and a quick burst takes out enemies no problem. If you shoot with maximum armour mode with long-ish bursts most of your shots aren't hitting anything. The enemies aren't really that tough either, maybe we've been molly-coddled by games giving us no-real-threat cannon fodder foot soldiers *cough cough half life 2*.

Personally I'll take America's Army (which is a free game) over Crysis and Half Life. But, that's just me I guess.

LAN_deRf_H A

Profile: addict

More Information

03-22-2008 at 07:49:34 PM

Hide

We can play it maxed at high resolutions now through various means... My personal favorite is two voltmodded g92 GTS cards. Next best option will be the 9800 GTX... goes up to 860 core without mods. As for crysis as a whole, its not a bad game at all.... but sadly the gameplay is only really balanced properly on easy... and even then koreans take way too many bullets.

jaydeejohn

Profile: Forum Veteran

More Information

03-22-2008 at 07:52:04 PM

Hide

Wish those koreans would quit taking those bullets. Think maybe theyre meltin em down and selling em to the PRC so they can make toys to sell? heheh

---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief

Falken699

Profile: enthusiast

More Information

03-22-2008 at 08:02:15 PM

Hide

I don't think it is a Crysis issue, or lack of computing power... I just think that DX10 on Vista is what is causing all the holdup.

Vista, to me, should have been Windows XP, with all of the current patches and fixes, all rolled into Vista, PLUS all the XP bloat systematically stripped free (including the swears in the code), make some graphical enhancements, stick in a svelte new DX10, and we should be at 60 FPS on current hardware.

So, don't blame the hardware. Cause the stuff on the market is unbelievable.

I just OC'd my Opteron 165 to 2.73 GHz, have 2 GB Ram, and an 8800GTS 640, OC'd as well. How great of a computing experience would I have if I bought Vista this afternoon? Not a very good one, now that is just sad.

My suggestion is build with XP x64 and don't think about Vista at all. Because you won't be getting good results for the next 2 years, and it is not the hardware's fault.

If game publishers made games run on Linux, I'd never use another Windows product again. I got burned on Windows Millenium Edition, and after that I decided to never upgrade an OS until it can deliver the goods, and the way that looks is it is 2 years from now Vista will be worth considering.

---------------
djcoolmasterx - "Ofcourse there is nothing that you are doing that will use that kind of power, beacuse you don't have that kind of powr to do things with."

sportsfanb oy

Profile: enthusiast

More Information

03-22-2008 at 08:16:50 PM

Hide

I play Crysis with everything on high exept post processing on med. on a 22' monitor. Resolution is 1680x1050. 4xAA with no lag or slowdowns.

Win Xp...

I really don't understand why everyone is having a hard time running this game. Specs below...

Q6600@3.0, 2Gb Ballistix@ 1005-4-4-4-12, (old GTS!) 8800gts 640MB
580/1400/1800

Message quoted 2 times

LAN_deRf_H A

Profile: addict

More Information

03-22-2008 at 09:12:22 PM

Hide

Crysis runs better in vista than xp, so take your ignorance to another thread please.

---------------
Xeon X3350 @ 3.4 GHz >Asus X38 P5E >4 gigs DDR2 @850mhz 4 4 4 12 >X-fi Fatality
>Thermaltake Toughpower 650w >PALiT 8800 GTS 1024MB @800/2000/2200

Hatman

OddJob's side-kick!!
Profile: Honorary Poster

More Information

03-22-2008 at 09:22:02 PM

Hide

sportsfanboy wrote :

I play Crysis with everything on high exept post processing on med. on a 22' monitor. Resolution is 1680x1050. 4xAA with no lag or slowdowns.

Win Xp...

I really don't understand why everyone is having a hard time running this game. Specs below...

Q6600@3.0, 2Gb Ballistix@ 1005-4-4-4-12, (old GTS!) 8800gts 640MB
580/1400/1800

because rather then just play the game and realize that its slow paced action doesnt require many FPS theyd rather look at a 2digit number and decide from that fi its good or not.

The 30FPS min in crysis is like 20FPS.

---------------
Na na na na na na na na HATMAN!

iluvgillgi ll

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster

More Information

03-23-2008 at 12:33:48 AM

Hide

can we not go off topic to military knowledge confrontation!?!?

The 9800GTX should play the game well when overclocked.but still wait for the review.10days to go!!!!!

ntrepid8

Profile: newbie

More Information

03-23-2008 at 01:48:33 AM

Hide

I have a Q6600 @ 3.2GHz and 2 8800GTS's in SLI on an evga 680i and I can play at 1920x1200 on "high" under winXP and get 40fps.

I the beta forceware drivers and and 1.2 patch are really important. Make sure to use them for high res and SLI.

---------------
EVGA 680i, Q6600 oc'd to 3.2GHz, 4GB of DDR2800 4-4-4-12, 2 x 8800GTS (G92) in SLI, 2 x 150GB raptors in raid 0, Tagan BZ 1100 PSU.

randomizer

Official Core 2 Overheater
Profile: Forum Veteran

More Information

03-23-2008 at 02:03:10 AM

Hide

The problem with the crysis patches is they introduce plenty of other bugs while fixing a few.

---------------

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/Ibanezrandom-1.png

http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w179/random1301/hot_cat-1.jpg

Sig art copyright verndewd

iluvgillgi ll

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster

More Information

03-23-2008 at 02:46:42 AM

Hide

is there anyone who is working behind the scene of crysis that will let us know when 1.3 patch is coming out?

doomsdayda ve11

werd.
Profile: addict

More Information

03-23-2008 at 03:00:43 AM

Hide

of course. Get a quad socket server board, put 4 Core Extremes in there, pair with 64 gigs of RAM, and SLI a 9800GX2. It all depends on what you mean. I'm sure scientists are putting their own custom video cards in their super computers with a couple petabytes of RAM, and laughing at us, because they're running Crysis at 2560x1600 and getting a couple hundred FPS.

Message edited by doomsdayda ve11 on 03-23-2008 at 03:06:32 AM

---------------
"Steve Jobs is not making enough money"
E8400 @ 3.6GHz (9x400FSB 1.32v)|4GB|HD4870

jkflipflop 98

Profile: addict

More Information