the Radeon HD 3870 X2, whose consumption we measured with Unreal Tournament III because it was just too underused with Test Drive Unlimited (We measured 235 W, which was actually less than the 8800 GT).
In other words the power test is worthless as the 9800GTX was underused and got the lower power numbers.
Quote :
What that means is that a brand-name 350 W power-supply will be enough to feed a system based on this card.
Suggesting a 350watt PSU for the 9800GTX is border line liable.
Minimum of a 450 Watt power supply.
(Minimum recommended power supply with +12 Volt current rating of 24 Amp Amps.)
Minimum 550 Watt for SLI mode system.
(Minimum recommended power supply with +12 Volt current rating of 30 Amp Amps.)
"The end result is that Nvidia has taken care of business with this GeForce 9800 GTX. It delivers very good performance, better than the 8800 GTX' (by an average of 7%) and close to the 8800 Ultra (especially without antialiasing). The performance is also good enough to put the 8800 GTS 512 MB out of the running, with a little surprise:"
SAY WHAT??? Puts 8800GTS out of the running?? Its like 3-5 FPS FASTER!?!?!?!?!?!?!? What are you STUPID? Man I hope this guy doesnt actually believe this. Shoot the 8800GT/GTS looks to be the card(s) to get the other higher models look PATHETIC. NO WAY WOULD I PAY TOP Dollar for 4 BIG FPS no, it should be like 30-40 FPS+....
---------------
Laptop Gateway P6831 FX-- Intel Core 2 1.67 GHZ, 3 GIGS DDR2 Ram, 250 Gig SATA, 17 Inch LCD 1440x900, Nvidia 8800GTS 512 Meg Video, Vista Home Prem. 3Dmark06- 7032 marks.
hmmm... still not impressive enough to replace my 7900 GT. Just checked the dell website, but didn't see an option for the 9800gtx. it was just the 8800 ultras for + $1300
Message edited by dmacfour on 04-01-2008 at 09:57:31 PM
---------------
*This signature is for sale. Will accept cash, check, or Visa*
I really don't understand why they put only 512mb on the last 2 generations anyway. For all those Nvidia fanboys let this be a lesson, if you keep wishing for ATI to get dominated expect more of this crap. This is what happens when there is no real competition. All that being said, it's a decent card especially since the 8800 Ultra is no where to be found and about twice the price. It might not be bad to wait and pick up the G92 8800GTS at a discount.
Message edited by cisco on 04-01-2008 at 10:09:23 PM
I am so happy I picked up an 8800 GTS (G92) with a free game and a low price recently. The high 9's are obviously placeholders.
I held on to my magnificent 7950GT for as long as I could, but games with steep shader requirements demand an 8-series.
I game at 1600x1200, and only now with the 8800 GTS do all my games run as I expect them: high FPS and high IQ (image quality)...to me this is the golden age of PC gaming...all of my titles run as fast as I need them to run.
As most of you have alreay said, this card appears to be little more than a rip off. Yes, it is faster than the 8800GT and GTS, but not by much. Definitely not enough of a boost in performance to call it the next generation.
Unless you absolutely have to have the top of the line, I see no reason for spending the extra cash on this card. A pair of 8800Gt's or GTS' in SLI will do a great job on most games, even at high resolutions.
If you really want the top of the line, it seems to me that the 8800GTX would be a much better choice. The performance is there as well as the extra memory that is needed when playing games at ultra-high resolutions.
To boot, the 8800GTX can now be had for $300 or so.
So shame on Nvidia for trying to dupe its customers. You would think that they had heard of Tom's websites and would know their new products would be shown for what they really are. Expensive hype.
What better new cards will be out in a couple of months?
I've got nothing in my NDA pike for a release in 2 months -- can you provide more details?
The entire 9800 series (GX2 and GTX) does indeed seem to be more of an April fools joke considering how bad it's AA/AF performance is. I'm honestly baffled at why nVidia are doing this? Who's gonna buy these cards? Do people really run at lower resolutions with no AA?? And what happened to DX10.1 certification?
Just more evidence of the prison nVidia live in.
Message edited by V8VENOM on 04-02-2008 at 12:17:20 AM
Awww...dammit. I've been waiting for this card for my new pc and now I have no idea what to get so I can game at 1900*1200.
Meh....8800GTS SLI here I come.
Look on the good side - at least there's little real incentive to spend huge sums of cash on a gfx card - just get a 8800GT and enjoy a similar experience to the top end cards.
The reasoning for Nvidia's choice to release all this remodeled old hardware as new hardware is quite simple... Lack of competition! Everyone is thinking about these video cards that Nvidia is releasing from the point of view of the consumer which is understandable, but stop and think from the point of view of Nvidia.
OK, and what's that? That it makes more sense to sell a more expensive die for the same amount of money than a cheaper die for the same amount/more money? Yeah brilliant, no point in a process shrink to save production cost, and why bother moving people from their GF8800Ultras when they can keep those like 'Classic CARdS'. Sure no reason to make a compeling (not ho-hum) refresh there.
Not releasing a card makes more sense than releasing the GF9800GTX, especially as a GF9800GTX.
Quote :
Yes, providing a true next generation graphics card would have put them that much further ahead of ATI dominating the video card market even more but why rush into that?
Yeah who needs to increase profits prior to a recession, brilliant strategy, bring out the new $600 refresh just in time for unemployment later next half instead of while people still have a job, dispossable income and can justify fun purchases. Perfect market strategy.
Quote :
Their true next generation graphics solution will probably kick the pants off ATI's next generation just like the 8800 ultra and GTX did for so long.
Or suck like their refresh after the GF4 did, which was also a slight refresh of the GF3.
Really, less than a year and a half in the driver seat and people seem to forget the ebb and flow of this market.
Quote :
So I agree that the performance of these "next generation" video cards doesn't seem to be so "next generation", but in order to understand the situation and possibly not grow to completely despise Nvidia, look at the market from Nvidia's point of view.
Which still doesn't explain the GF9800GTX other than from a marketing point of view which still makes no sense for what you said, but all the sense in the world for the reasons that a GF8600GT would outsell a GF7900GTX for the same price which have nothing to do with your stated arguments. If nVidia were thinking the way you were they wouldn't have released anything, not released the G92GTX.
Yeah, blame AMD for nVidia putting a big whale tail spoiler on the back of their GF8800GTS and calling it the GF9800GTX, it's all AMD's fault.
Yeah, and S3 made them tweak the paintjob too, cause racing stripes make it go faster.
Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 04-02-2008 at 01:58:00 AM
--------------- You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - REDGREEN. GA to SK HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
--------------- You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - REDGREEN. GA to SK HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2