Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
 

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2  3
Author
 Thread : Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
 
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Last message on previous page:

Quote :

the Radeon HD 3870 X2, whose consumption we measured with Unreal Tournament III because it was just too underused with Test Drive Unlimited (We measured 235 W, which was actually less than the 8800 GT).


In other words the power test is worthless as the 9800GTX was underused and got the lower power numbers.

Quote :

What that means is that a brand-name 350 W power-supply will be enough to feed a system based on this card.


Suggesting a 350watt PSU for the 9800GTX is border line liable.

Newegg has the EVGA 9800GTX requirements as 450watts.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 9&ref=lmcd

Quote :

Minimum of a 450 Watt power supply.
(Minimum recommended power supply with +12 Volt current rating of 24 Amp Amps.)
Minimum 550 Watt for SLI mode system.
(Minimum recommended power supply with +12 Volt current rating of 30 Amp Amps.)

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: member
More Information

"The end result is that Nvidia has taken care of business with this GeForce 9800 GTX. It delivers very good performance, better than the 8800 GTX' (by an average of 7%) and close to the 8800 Ultra (especially without antialiasing). The performance is also good enough to put the 8800 GTS 512 MB out of the running, with a little surprise:"

SAY WHAT??? Puts 8800GTS out of the running?? Its like 3-5 FPS FASTER!?!?!?!?!?!?!? What are you STUPID? Man I hope this guy doesnt actually believe this. Shoot the 8800GT/GTS looks to be the card(s) to get the other higher models look PATHETIC. NO WAY WOULD I PAY TOP Dollar for 4 BIG FPS no, it should be like 30-40 FPS+....


---------------
Laptop Gateway P6831 FX-- Intel Core 2 1.67 GHZ, 3 GIGS DDR2 Ram, 250 Gig SATA, 17 Inch LCD 1440x900, Nvidia 8800GTS 512 Meg Video, Vista Home Prem. 3Dmark06- 7032 marks.
Profile: member
More Information




Because it sucks? Its way to pricey for what you get?

A better one will come out for the same or less money???


---------------
Laptop Gateway P6831 FX-- Intel Core 2 1.67 GHZ, 3 GIGS DDR2 Ram, 250 Gig SATA, 17 Inch LCD 1440x900, Nvidia 8800GTS 512 Meg Video, Vista Home Prem. 3Dmark06- 7032 marks.
Punch to for your face
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

hmmm... still not impressive enough to replace my 7900 GT. Just checked the dell website, but didn't see an option for the 9800gtx. it was just the 8800 ultras for + $1300


Message edited by dmacfour on 04-01-2008 at 09:57:31 PM

---------------
*This signature is for sale. Will accept cash, check, or Visa*

 

Profile: newbie
More Information

its not nvidia's fault people started all the hype. they expected it to blow everything out of the water.

its not the best card, but its cheaper than the old cards, and supports tri-sli

Profile: addict
More Information

I really don't understand why they put only 512mb on the last 2 generations anyway. For all those Nvidia fanboys let this be a lesson, if you keep wishing for ATI to get dominated expect more of this crap. This is what happens when there is no real competition. All that being said, it's a decent card especially since the 8800 Ultra is no where to be found and about twice the price. It might not be bad to wait and pick up the G92 8800GTS at a discount.


Message edited by cisco on 04-01-2008 at 10:09:23 PM
Profile: member
More Information

THIS IS WHY I KNOW THIS REVIEW IS CRAP

in the gx2 review the 3870 x2 got a 27 at 1920x1200
but in the gtx review the 3870 x2 got a 23.1 at 1680x1050

how does that make any sense
IT DOESNT
unless the pc they were using had a bottleneck somewhere other than the graphics

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by RaptorXT on 04-02-2008 at 12:22:11 AM
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I was hoping to upgrade from my 7800GTX to the next dimension but I am not really beng motivated by this review.

Profile: member
More Information

I am so happy I picked up an 8800 GTS (G92) with a free game and a low price recently. The high 9's are obviously placeholders.

I held on to my magnificent 7950GT for as long as I could, but games with steep shader requirements demand an 8-series.

I game at 1600x1200, and only now with the 8800 GTS do all my games run as I expect them: high FPS and high IQ (image quality)...to me this is the golden age of PC gaming...all of my titles run as fast as I need them to run.

Profile: stranger
More Information

As most of you have alreay said, this card appears to be little more than a rip off. Yes, it is faster than the 8800GT and GTS, but not by much. Definitely not enough of a boost in performance to call it the next generation.

Unless you absolutely have to have the top of the line, I see no reason for spending the extra cash on this card. A pair of 8800Gt's or GTS' in SLI will do a great job on most games, even at high resolutions.

If you really want the top of the line, it seems to me that the 8800GTX would be a much better choice. The performance is there as well as the extra memory that is needed when playing games at ultra-high resolutions.

To boot, the 8800GTX can now be had for $300 or so.

So shame on Nvidia for trying to dupe its customers. You would think that they had heard of Tom's websites and would know their new products would be shown for what they really are. Expensive hype.

Profile: member
More Information

DXrick wrote :

The real purpose of this card is to market to the yutzes that build their PC at Dell and see this:

  • nVidia GeForce 8800 Ultra 768MB [add $800 or $24/month1]
  • nVidia GeForce 9800GTX [add $900 or $30/month1]


NOTE: I just copied the 8800 Ultra line from their site. They really are charging $800 for it! :pt1cable:

They can select it believing it must be the best because 9 > 8 and $900 > $800.

It is not targeted at people that read reviews!



Ah man, that is hilarious.

Profile: addict
More Information

What better new cards will be out in a couple of months?

I've got nothing in my NDA pike for a release in 2 months -- can you provide more details?

The entire 9800 series (GX2 and GTX) does indeed seem to be more of an April fools joke considering how bad it's AA/AF performance is. I'm honestly baffled at why nVidia are doing this? Who's gonna buy these cards? Do people really run at lower resolutions with no AA?? And what happened to DX10.1 certification?

Just more evidence of the prison nVidia live in.


Message edited by V8VENOM on 04-02-2008 at 12:17:20 AM
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I'll just take a magic marker and cross out 8800GTS and write 9800GTX on my GTS 512!! :lol: :D

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

mihirkula wrote :

Then they shudve at least named it 9800GTS at least... the GTX is a sort of a premiuim spot ...like miss world.



No, the 9800GTS is already coming out aswell. God only knows how that'll perform. :sarcastic:

Profile: stranger
More Information

Awww...dammit. I've been waiting for this card for my new pc and now I have no idea what to get so I can game at 1900*1200.
Meh....8800GTS SLI here I come.

Profile: old hand
More Information

Look on the good side - at least there's little real incentive to spend huge sums of cash on a gfx card - just get a 8800GT and enjoy a similar experience to the top end cards.

Sniper
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

enigma700 wrote :

The reasoning for Nvidia's choice to release all this remodeled old hardware as new hardware is quite simple... Lack of competition! Everyone is thinking about these video cards that Nvidia is releasing from the point of view of the consumer which is understandable, but stop and think from the point of view of Nvidia.



OK, and what's that? That it makes more sense to sell a more expensive die for the same amount of money than a cheaper die for the same amount/more money? Yeah brilliant, no point in a process shrink to save production cost, and why bother moving people from their GF8800Ultras when they can keep those like 'Classic CARdS'. Sure no reason to make a compeling (not ho-hum) refresh there. :heink:

Not releasing a card makes more sense than releasing the GF9800GTX, especially as a GF9800GTX. :pfff:

Quote :

Yes, providing a true next generation graphics card would have put them that much further ahead of ATI dominating the video card market even more but why rush into that?



Yeah who needs to increase profits prior to a recession, brilliant strategy, bring out the new $600 refresh just in time for unemployment later next half instead of while people still have a job, dispossable income and can justify fun purchases. Perfect market strategy. [:thegreatgrapeape:5]

Quote :

Their true next generation graphics solution will probably kick the pants off ATI's next generation just like the 8800 ultra and GTX did for so long.



Or suck like their refresh after the GF4 did, which was also a slight refresh of the GF3.
Really, less than a year and a half in the driver seat and people seem to forget the ebb and flow of this market. :sarcastic:

Quote :

So I agree that the performance of these "next generation" video cards doesn't seem to be so "next generation", but in order to understand the situation and possibly not grow to completely despise Nvidia, look at the market from Nvidia's point of view.



Which still doesn't explain the GF9800GTX other than from a marketing point of view which still makes no sense for what you said, but all the sense in the world for the reasons that a GF8600GT would outsell a GF7900GTX for the same price which have nothing to do with your stated arguments. If nVidia were thinking the way you were they wouldn't have released anything, not released the G92GTX.

Yeah, blame AMD for nVidia putting a big whale tail spoiler on the back of their GF8800GTS and calling it the GF9800GTX, it's all AMD's fault.
Yeah, and S3 made them tweak the paintjob too, cause racing stripes make it go faster. [:thegreatgrapeape:1]


Message edited by TheGreatGr apeApe on 04-02-2008 at 01:58:00 AM

---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

Shadow703793 wrote :

:cry: :cry: I want One!!!!!!!!



There you go;
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] rchInDesc=

Ready and waiting for you. :hello:


---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Profile: newbie
More Information

For new builds it's a good card that'll give you time to up later this year with hopefully better performing cards.

But what disappoinment. Price point is a little high and with more ram it could have been a contender!