Last message on previous page:
Sounds like you're not on a budget, so then I think an i7 is a good choice for an upgrade of your cpu.
Your 8800 at 1920x1200 isn't enough, especially if you like AA and HIgh Settings which I'm guessing you do.(just curious whats the mem on your card 512?)
I'm still surprised no one on these forums has been urging you to upgrade your vid card with your soon to be new cpu...usually most replies on here are from machines built for gaming, from what I've seen.
Anyway, I'd get a GTX295 if you can, or a 4870x2. Without a vid card upgrade you're not going to see any huge difference in your gaming.
@AMD4Life
I wanted to hear the opinions of others from their perspectives. I'm one of those nerds who genuinely enjoy's this kind of discussion and debate. I've learned a tremendous amount in only 24 hours or so, and posting here has helped me to make a more informed descision.
@boomhowar
Yes, my video mem is 512.
I don't plan on doing everything all at once, I don't have that kind of money at one time, but I do first plan on buying the PSU soon, then perhaps next month buying the mobo, cpu, and ram, then maybe the month after that I will look into video card upgrades.
BTW no one answered my earlier question: Does a multi-GPU setup affect performance in games that don't use PhysX? As far as I know the secondary video card ONLY processes PhysX calculations... but I could be wrong. The reason I ask is cause I could use my 8800 as a secondary, since an SLI configuration would be quite expensive.
I plan on keeping everything stock until about the time Westmere is released, then I will probably overclock, and consider another major upgrade when Sandy Bridge is released.
This is all of course assuming someone doesn't give me reason not to.
| kufan64 wrote : @AMD4Life
|
you are not listening to me. are you? do not buy stuff unless you need it. buy it individually if you find a very very good deal. Otherwise, buy it altogether. You can save on shipping fees. also, it is easy to return. save the money first. buying is easy. Ok?
I would buy the CPU/MOBO/RAM all at once and upgrade as you need to. Better things are right around the corner and when you decide to upgrade, there may be a new GPU around the corner. I also think core i7 is the better choice. The Asus P6T Deluxe V2, i7 920, OCZ Platinum XTC 1600Mhz and a Xigmatek CPU cooler with a retention bracket is hard to beat. This should be right around $700 which also gives you room to upgrade, unlike socket 775. Money well spent is spending it on something you want, which may not be the most economical decision. Feeling good about your purchase may be worth the price difference. After all, it's only money.
After looking at the prices I can get for all this stuff for $630 including shipping and rebates...
Newegg:
ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 (open box item) -$200
Corsair 850TX PSU -$119
Microcenter:
i7 920 -$230
Corsair XMS3 6GB DDR3 1333-$70!
I may just have to put my order in right now...
| kufan64 wrote : After looking at the prices I can get for all this stuff for $630 including shipping and rebates...
|
NO NO NO NO NO!!! Never ever get an open box item. Spend the extra cash and get a regular P6T for 249.99, which is $30 cheaper than the P6T Deluxe V2. You are taking a big gamble with an open box item. I don't think it's worth it for a few dollars and possibly lots of headaches.
@one-shot
Can you elaborate? I'm saving over $70 if I get it open box... I can get an open box from microcenter for $215 plus tax, which would be easier to return in the event there is a problem, but they both guarentee it to work 100%
I know it's a little bit of a risk, but it's quite a bit of money I could save... What are your reasons for me not buying it?
| kufan64 wrote : @one-shot
|
$215 plus tax and with 5% sales tax equals $225.75. A P6T on Newegg is 249.99. $25 dollars difference and many people on here have reported 4.0Ghz overclocks with that board. It also gets very good reviews. The P6T Deluxe V2 is $30 more and isn't much better, if better at all. Spend the extra $25 and get the standard P6T, which is a very good board. An open box to me is like buying a used item. It isn't worth it.
| one-shot wrote : $215 plus tax and with 5% sales tax equals $225.75. A P6T on Newegg is 249.99. $25 dollars difference and many people on here have reported 4.0Ghz overclocks with that board. It also gets very good reviews. The P6T Deluxe V2 is $30 more and isn't much better, if better at all. Spend the extra $25 and get the standard P6T, which is a very good board. An open box to me is like buying a used item. It isn't worth it. |
if you will be overclocking to 4.0 with i920, you should change your ram as well. Get this ddr3 1600 ram. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820227381
That way you do not need to oc your ram.
Get this motherboard.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813128374
and this is very good cooler. Make sure it fits in your case. That cooler is awesome.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835608007
These are the parts i am using now. My 920 i7 is running happily at 3.8g. very easy to oc. clean bios layout.
a final tip. Get a cooler like i mention you above.
@one-shot
Here are the prices I found on newegg:
P6T Deluxe -$290
P6T Deluxe v2 -$280 (with free shipping)
The P6T (not deluxe) that costs $250 apparently supports only 12GB of RAM (as opposed to 24) and doesn't have as high quality of heatsinks (there are a few more things, but those were the most noticable things)
I think maybe we've had a bit of a communications error in that regard... Anyway the only difference b/w the v2 and the v1 is that the v2 lacks a SAS controller, and since I'm not using this board in a high-end server that uses SAS, I have no need for it, so I'll save $10. As an interesting side note, microcenter prices the v2 as $10 MORE than the v1... no idea why.
@htoonthura
I thought the 920 was limited to 1333 RAM
I also looked at that Gigabyte board when I originally compiled my wish list for the i7, and found it and the ASUS to be nearly equal in every way. My decision to go with ASUS was merely a personal preference.
| kufan64 wrote : @one-shot I think maybe we've had a bit of a communications error in that regard... Anyway the only difference b/w the v2 and the v1 is that the v2 lacks a SAS controller, and since I'm not using this board in a high-end server that uses SAS, I have no need for it, so I'll save $10. As an interesting side note, microcenter prices the v2 as $10 MORE than the v1... no idea why. @htoonthura |
You are correct, the non Deluxe version does have smaller heatsinks, but it can still overclock a good CPU to 4.0Ghz which says that they are more than adequate. Htoonthura is also right about the 1600Mhz ram. I mentioned it in one of my earlier posts as a must have. The board he recommended is also very good. I'm trying to decide if I want the Asus P6T Deluxe V2 or the Gigabyte UD4P he posted. Either is great and the Asus P6T is a very good board despite the "smaller" heatsinks.
There are many benchmarks that show there is a very very small if any benefit of having 12GB of RAM. 6GB is great and some can get by on only 3GB. Don't let the 12GB memory limitation scare you off. I have 4GB in my current system and have come nowhere near using all my memory and that's running Crysis and another game minimized switching back and forth.
EDIT: The i7 920 is not limited to 1333Mhz ram. So get the 1600Mhz kit and you'll be happy.
Hang on... let's talk about the RAM for a minute...
Which is better 1333 or 1600 RAM? Apparently with the 920, you have to overclock the 1600 it for it even reach 1600... so does that mean it doesn't put as much stress on the RAM when it's already rated for 1600? I'm just a little bit confused, as I thought I was limited to 1333 unless I bought a 940. Will the 1600's work flawlessly at speeds of 1333 (without overclocking them at all)? Sorry, but a little bit of clarification would really be appreciated.
| kufan64 wrote : Hang on... let's talk about the RAM for a minute...
|
you are right. 1600 ram will have no stress at all since they are tested at that speed. if you go with 1333, you have to oc the ram to reach 4 g. So, get the 1600 ram.
yes, 1600 ram will work even if you do not oc at all.
About the graphics card... Although I might be a bit jealous of you
, I will recommend GTX295 for one simple reason: It's future proof. And that is the first thing you always look. I am buying an ATI 4890 and, even though it is a nice card which will run all of my games at maximum (at 1680x1050), it will be OUTDATED. SOON. 4870x2 is already a bit old, so get 295. Of course, you won't notice any difference between GTX285 and 295 in gaming, but later on you won't have to think every month about changing your graphics card.
RAM... Well, it all depends on what platform you're using. Since you decided that i7 is good for you, I would recommend getting either 3GB or 6GB RAM (depending on your budget again). Now really, do not waste your money for higher frequency RAM (1600), because you won't see any difference at all. DDR3 is very cheap as of late, just order it at NewEgg. I7 uses triple-channel RAM so it's either 3GB or 6GB (or more if you are Bill Gates). Really, frequency of RAM doesn't mean everything. You wouldn't even notice a difference between 1066 DDR2 and 1333 DDR3 (no, I'm not talking cr*p, been through this).
| AMD4Life wrote : About the graphics card... Although I might be a bit jealous of you |
If he wants to overclock his CPU without overclocking his RAM, he will then need 1600MHz DDR3. Have you missed every other post besides the ones you type? If he gets 1333MHz ram and it doesn't overclock well, then it limits the full potential of his PC. Is the $20< difference really worth it. SIGH.........
| one-shot wrote : If he wants to overclock his CPU without overclocking his RAM, he will then need 1600MHz DDR3. Have you missed every other post besides the ones you type? If he gets 1333MHz ram and it doesn't overclock well, then it limits the full potential of his PC. Is the $20< difference really worth it. SIGH......... |
Sigh... I am very well educated in this kind of stuff and I do not need other posts or you to teach me. WOW, REALLY? 1333MHz doesn't overclock well? Why just don't get a NASA PC or something, because really DDR3 1333MHz is s**t. Core i7 920? Bah, with the stupid 1333MHz RAM he won't even use the full potential of that weak processor. Man it's so weak that my pants drop every time I think of it... Get an i7 965 if you want entry level performance. But personally for me, I'd order from NASA to design a specific CPU only for me which costs 1 000 000$. But hey, even that's entry...
Those 20$ can be sent to someone who needs it, someone who is starving now and can't think of even getting a 10$ PC. But you really need the damn RAM because it's more expensive.
If he gets 1333MHz ram and it doesn't overclock well, then it limits the full potential of his PC.
And what difference will he note? Faster boot times for 0.2 nanoseconds? Chill up dude.
| AMD4Life wrote : Sigh... I am very well educated in this kind of stuff and I do not need other posts or you to teach me. WOW, REALLY? 1333MHz doesn't overclock well? Why just don't get a NASA PC or something, because really DDR3 1333MHz is s**t. Core i7 920? Bah, with the stupid 1333MHz RAM he won't even use the full potential of that weak processor. Man it's so weak that my pants drop every time I think of it... Get an i7 965 if you want entry level performance. But personally for me, I'd order from NASA to design a specific CPU only for me which costs 1 000 000$. But hey, even that's entry...
|
SIGH.....................................I didn't say 1333MHz RAM will not clock well. I said "({[- IF -]})" he gets 1333MHz ram, AND it doesn't clock well, he will be forced to user a lower Base Clock. The lower base clock on an i7 920 will give him an overall lower CPU clock speed. AGAIN, you did not read the post, but instead displayed your inability to comprehend a post that is trying to help the OP. 1600MHZ RAM will not have to be overclocked since the freq of the RAM may never reach 1600MHz with relation to the CPU multiplier and Base Clock speed. 1333MHz ram will have to be overclocked when he overclocks his CPU to a high freq. Read, reread, then read again, because you obviously do not get it.
Personally I would just get a new gigabyte 775 motherboard and a Thermalright cooler. The q6600 overclocked to 3gig will still use less power than the 920 i7 and I can't see much of a performance difference. Also PC technology has been very stagnant over the last two years so there is not much point in spending lots on an upgrade. The i7 is expensive, runs hot and the i5 has very little performance gain over the 775. Either buy a new 775 motherboard or go to an AMD quad. I switched from Intel to AMD and haven't looked back.
you could always try software to overclock your CPU.

| one-shot wrote : SIGH.....................................I didn't say 1333MHz RAM will not clock well. I said "({[- IF -]})" he gets 1333MHz ram, AND it doesn't clock well, he will be forced to user a lower Base Clock. The lower base clock on an i7 920 will give him an overall lower CPU clock speed. AGAIN, you did not read the post, but instead displayed your inability to comprehend a post that is trying to help the OP. 1600MHZ RAM will not have to be overclocked since the freq of the RAM may never reach 1600MHz with relation to the CPU multiplier and Base Clock speed. 1333MHz ram will have to be overclocked when he overclocks his CPU to a high freq. Read, reread, then read again, because you obviously do not get it. |
All right, this is getting stupid and I don't want to argue any more. I just don't get why the hell wouldn't 1333MHz overclock well... I read the damn post.
| one-shot wrote : SIGH.....................................I didn't say 1333MHz RAM will not clock well. I said "({[- IF -]})" he gets 1333MHz ram, AND it doesn't clock well, he will be forced to user a lower Base Clock. The lower base clock on an i7 920 will give him an overall lower CPU clock speed. AGAIN, you did not read the post, but instead displayed your inability to comprehend a post that is trying to help the OP. 1600MHZ RAM will not have to be overclocked since the freq of the RAM may never reach 1600MHz with relation to the CPU multiplier and Base Clock speed. 1333MHz ram will have to be overclocked when he overclocks his CPU to a high freq. Read, reread, then read again, because you obviously do not get it. |
Yes, again I get it that I don't get what the damn hell are you talking about. Again: I do not need your posts to know does 1333MHz overclock well. And why the f**k would he want to overclock RAM??? Okay if it was DDR2 667 MHz, but man, 1333 F'ing MHz!!!
i would definitely recommend to invest into a better graphics card instead of CPU for gaming.
I am including a lot of large pictures now, to support this statement. I hope it will not bother the potential readers too much ...
i do personally prefer silent PC and invest into coolers with slow fans and very little noise.
Here you can see the impact of different CPUs on Crysis (uses 2 or 3 cores):
Here is impact of different CPUs for GTA4 (a game that uses 4 cores)
Here is the impact of different graphics cards of Crysis:
Here impact of different graphics cards on STALKER:
| htoonthura wrote : you are not listening to me. are you? do not buy stuff unless you need it. buy it individually if you find a very very good deal. Otherwise, buy it altogether. You can save on shipping fees. also, it is easy to return. save the money first. buying is easy. Ok? |
Keep one thing in mind, he has to have, mobo, CPU, RAM, PSU and a GPU if he doesn't have one, X58 have no on boards, all at the same time so that he can make sure everything works and that he doesn't need to get an RMA. None of the stuff in his old set up will allow him to test the new stuff. He will have to spend about $700 at once.
| bruhthakuga wrote : Keep one thing in mind, he has to have, mobo, CPU, RAM, PSU and a GPU if he doesn't have one, X58 have no on boards, all at the same time so that he can make sure everything works and that he doesn't need to get an RMA. None of the stuff in his old set up will allow him to test the new stuff. He will have to spend about $700 at once. |
Which is another good reason to stick with and OC the Q6600. Yea, its 'old' but the 'new' isnt that much faster at what he does (game).
Start with your new PSU and then get a mobo and cooler. As soon as you can afford, get a good graphics upgrade and your sittin' pretty for a good while.

Have you decided already? I am hardly waiting to see what have you bought and have you chosen the right path
| blackpanther26 wrote : you could always try software to overclock your CPU. |
Yeah, that's how I got my E4600 to about 3.44GHz these days...
I am where you are at, I am about to go X58. I have a couple of PCI GPUs which will work to make sure that everything works, I bought an Antec EA750 PSU which I have put into this PC to make sure it works? Well sort of? This system cannot put but a teaspoon of stress on this PSU. Anyway on my next expenditure I will have to bleed out.
Curently I plan on getting a Gigabyte X58, not sure which, 920, 6GB of RAM and some cooler none of which have I narrowed down to what brand model. Mid grade GPU and PCIe SSD can be added latter.
My current Pooter is something that someone put out on the curb to be taken away, a HP with a 3.06 ghz celron D, 160GB IDE HDD, DVD-RW w/LightScribe, multi card reader, 512 DDR which I replaced with 2 sticks of Corsair value ram.
In my case I see it as better to go I7 as most of my stuff has very little viability left in it (that's what I tell my self so that I can relapse into my addiction of getting the trill of the build).
I would saty out of i7, Intell still need mature its integrated memory controller.
So far they have issues with faster running memories (i believe it was limit 1066MHz when using tripple channel) and i am personally considering this big issue which can also bring additional problems with memory compatibility etc.
Well, I DID make a decision a little while ago, and decided it would be best to upgrade to i7.
This is what my computer looks like right now:
Intel Core i7 920 2.66GHz
ASUS P6T Deluxe X58
3x2GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
1x WD Caviar Blue 500GB (for OS) and 2x WD Caviar Black 500GB (Raid 0, for applications/storage)
Corsair 850TX
EVGA 8800GT
Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
The observent individual will notice that everything is different from my OP except for the video card, and the HDD's.
For your listening pleasure, I will now tell my fairly amusing purchasing experience...
I bought the PSU and sound card through newegg. The sound card was literally a last second decision, as I noticed newegg was again offering a combo deal that included a really nice headset, and I had to have it. The PSU is great, and the sound card/headset is actually really awesome. It's quite immersive for games (FPS's in particular) and for rocking out to music. I might just have to pick up Guitar Hero on PC to experience what it's like with EAX effects and those bells and whistles I paid for. I paid about $280 before rebates for these items.
I bought the three major components (CPU, Mobo, RAM) from my local Microcenter. Everything had just recently been marked down tremendously, and I think I would have paid several hundred more dollars if I had shopped even a few weeks earlier. I DID opt to purchase a open-box mobo from them, and I am sorry to say that it may not have been worth the $50 or so that I saved. The first one I picked up with the rest of the parts had several bent pins in the CPU socket. I returned it the next day after work, but as luck would have it, it wasn't merely raining, but it was POURING rain and I think there was a tornado warning, but I was determined damn it! I got another open-box mobo, and not one to be fooled twice, I told the guy behind the returns desk that I was going to inspect it in front of him to make sure everything at least LOOKED ok this time. No bent pins, no broken ports, nothing out of the blue, and just as I was about to put it back in it's anti-static bag, I noticed the CMOS battery was absent. (I later found that it had fallen out and was still in the box) I got him to give me the one from the board I had just returned, wrapped my new board up in my coat, (Yes, I cared more about keeping my new hardware out of the pouring rain more than myself) and drove home soaking wet. I think I paid about $560 before rebates for these items.
The new board works fine, and I haven't had any problems with it at all. I'm happy with my decision. It was awfully expensive, but I am confident now that everything I've got is pretty top-of-the-line, and I shouldn't have to upgrade anything for at least several years. (my video card being the exception) I plan to overclock at some point, but for now I'm still breaking in the new hardware.
I created a post in the graphics card forum requesting help on what video card would be a good replacement, but it got very little attention.
LINK HERE
Thanks again to everyone that helped to educate me, and thanks for all the opinions and suggestions.
| kufan64 wrote : Well, I DID make a decision a little while ago, and decided it would be best to upgrade to i7.
|
Thank you for thanking, if I am included
Nice, but you are very far away from the top line. That is reserved for Quad SLI GTX295, 12GB RAM and I7 965. Personally, I am sad that Intel wins another customer and another $560 in their deep pockets, but hey, it's your choice.
PS: I'll soon get a new AMD system for $1300 (the one that I was speaking about). Let me know when you're ready so we can compare our PC's in some stuff
(except gaming, because I'll have a stronger GPU). I am interested in how does a "petty" AMD system compare with Intel's...
PC Specs (a bit redone):
1. AMD Phenom II 955 AM3
2. GIGABYTE GA-MA790XT-UD4P AM3 ATX
3. ATI 4870x2 (or 4890, we'll see
)
4. 6GB 1066MHz DDR3 Transcend RAM
5. 1TB Hard Drive for everything
6. SB Audigy 2
That should be it.
| AMD4Life wrote : Thank you for thanking, if I am included |
Great system AMD. I decided to go with the for the replacement of my current board/CPU/RAM
i7 920
P6T
6GB DDR3 1600MHz
What cooler did you get for the 955? Also, 2 4890s would look great in Xfire.
| one-shot wrote : Great system AMD. I decided to go with the for the replacement of my current board/CPU/RAM
|
Thanks. I was thinking of sticking with the reference cooler for a while, because 3.2 GHz is only 0.2 below my record on E4600
But now that you mentioned it, I have my eye on this one:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835118020
By the way, I am not so "experienced" in coolers, so you can also recommend me one if you want. I think that this cooler above will satisfy, but I'm not so much into that stuff because I usually stay with the coolers AMD/Intel ship with their processors...
| AMD4Life wrote : Thanks. I was thinking of sticking with the reference cooler for a while, because 3.2 GHz is only 0.2 below my record on E4600 |
WOW, that cooler costs way too much. I would highly recommdend the Xigmatek HDT-S1283. It is relatively inexpensive and works very well. I'm using the same one on my i7 as I did on my last CPU. It will also cool better than that Zalman despite the massive difference in price.
What are you thinking of getting for GPUs?
| one-shot wrote : WOW, that cooler costs way too much. I would highly recommdend the Xigmatek HDT-S1283. It is relatively inexpensive and works very well. I'm using the same one on my i7 as I did on my last CPU. It will also cool better than that Zalman despite the massive difference in price.
|
What, coolers? Nah, if you thought of that I'm not that much into overclocking GPUs. I like overclocking processors and sometimes memory, but that is not necessary...
| AMD4Life wrote : What, coolers? Nah, if you thought of that I'm not that much into overclocking GPUs. I like overclocking processors and sometimes memory, but that is not necessary... |
The Xigmatek HDT-S1283 is for CPUs. It's one of the best CPU coolers. IMO I think it's the best price/performance of any cooler.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6835233003
It looks to be on sale with MIR for around $26. I got mine last year for 36.99 + 6.99 for the socket 775 retention bracket. It comes with an AM2 bracket so I assume it should work for AM3.
EDIT: I mean to say what kind of GPUs are you thinking of getting? Dual 4890s? or 4870s?
| alvine wrote : @kufan64
|
I agree, and this is coming from an i7 owner. It's a great chip, but you already have a great chip, and if the motherboard will take it, buy the q9550 and sell your q6600 on ebay. You'll probably end up paying a 100 for a nice upgrade. Only reason I went i7 is I was coming from a P4 Northwood!
| one-shot wrote : The Xigmatek HDT-S1283 is for CPUs. It's one of the best CPU coolers. IMO I think it's the best price/performance of any cooler.
|
Ah sorry, stupid of me, but it just sounded like that
GPU... I'll probably be happy with one 4890 for quite some time, because getting 4870x2 seems pointless. DX11 cards are coming at the beginning of 2010, so getting a faster dual DX10 card will be a waste of money. Same for Crossfire. Two cards would be a waste of money... If my 9800GT satisfies all my needs and runs a great portion of the games at maximum (with AA, except Crysis, of course), then there's really no need for more.
And it's all coming this wednesday
| AMD4Life wrote : Ah sorry, stupid of me, but it just sounded like that |
The worst part of putting together a computer is the suspense of hoping it boots up right away and there aren't any parts to RMA. I have been lucky with all of my builds off of Newegg. I agree with you on not investing large amount of money into a GPU with DX11 right around the corner. The 3870X2 came out then the 4850 came out shortly after with equal or better performance for much much less. I have a GTX 260 C 216 and my PSU can't handle another one. I think I may wait until it's too slow for games and upgrade with 2 slower cards in SLI. I only have a 650W PSU.
| one-shot wrote : The worst part of putting together a computer is the suspense of hoping it boots up right away and there aren't any parts to RMA. I have been lucky with all of my builds off of Newegg. I agree with you on not investing large amount of money into a GPU with DX11 right around the corner. The 3870X2 came out then the 4850 came out shortly after with equal or better performance for much much less. I have a GTX 260 C 216 and my PSU can't handle another one. I think I may wait until it's too slow for games and upgrade with 2 slower cards in SLI. I only have a 650W PSU. |
No, it doesn't work like that for me. It won't be a problem to RMA because I'm not ordering from Newegg or something. Instead, I'm buying it from a local shop for a much higher price than on those sites. Why? Because I live in a trash dump called Serbia, which has so much taxing that you can't imagine (except you live in it, of course). And because of that, anyone can put thrice the price on any component, and anyway it will be cheaper to buy from him than order from America. Sigh... At least they are testing the configuration before they give me, so there are no worries. And, even if something happens after all, the store is ten meters away from me
and they usually got everything stocked.
PS: I am curious... How does Crysis work on your system? Are you able to max out everything (on 1680x1050) with a little Anti Aliasing? I saw a video on youtube with same graphics card but with a Phenom II 920, and it ran as smooth as hell on enthusiast. And I don't think it's a problem that you don't have a quad, because this game is highly optimised for Intel and doesn't benefit so much from 2 more cores. And do you think the game will run as smooth on 4890? My 9800GT handles 1680x1050 maxed out with 2xAA in multiplayer. In Singleplayer I have to drop the AA, but the game still runs fine (not nearly as smooth, of course).
Microcenter only has pickup for products such as CPUs.
So you need to live in a state with Microcenter if you want the $230 i7 920
| AMD4Life wrote : No, it doesn't work like that for me. It won't be a problem to RMA because I'm not ordering from Newegg or something. Instead, I'm buying it from a local shop for a much higher price than on those sites. Why? Because I live in a trash dump called Serbia, which has so much taxing that you can't imagine (except you live in it, of course). And because of that, anyone can put thrice the price on any component, and anyway it will be cheaper to buy from him than order from America. Sigh... At least they are testing the configuration before they give me, so there are no worries. And, even if something happens after all, the store is ten meters away from me |
I usually play with everything on high except ultra high shaderr, water, and physics @ 1920x1200 with no AA. I usually get right around 30fps with my single GTX 260 C216
| one-shot wrote : I usually play with everything on high except ultra high shaderr, water, and physics @ 1920x1200 with no AA. I usually get right around 30fps with my single GTX 260 C216 |
Ok, so because I'm getting the damn computer on Wednesday
, can you please try with all Very High , but on 1680x1050 resolution?
And, as always, another question... What do you think, will it be better getting 4GB 1600MHz or 6GB 1066MHz? Lol, this is starting another topic on this finished forum...
Haha I already have 30 posts! Hehee... lol
| AMD4Life wrote : Ok, so because I'm getting the damn computer on Wednesday |
Well, I think the 4GB 1066MHz is better because you can run it in Dual Channel mode. With 6GB you'll have to run it in single channel. I'm stress testing my i7 920 right now at 3.6GHz and my RAM is around 1450MHz and it's 1600MHz DDR3. The difference between 4GB and 6GB is pretty small if you're mostly gaming. Tom's actually did an article a few days ago about memory scaling on Phenom II and another article a week or so ago on "How much memory you actually need". I'm tunning on 8hr 52m on my stress test, so I should be able to try running Crysis on the specs you wanted. I'm guessing the FPS will be in the mid 30s, but we'll have to wait and see.
| one-shot wrote : Well, I think the 4GB 1066MHz is better because you can run it in Dual Channel mode. With 6GB you'll have to run it in single channel. I'm stress testing my i7 920 right now at 3.6GHz and my RAM is around 1450MHz and it's 1600MHz DDR3. The difference between 4GB and 6GB is pretty small if you're mostly gaming. Tom's actually did an article a few days ago about memory scaling on Phenom II and another article a week or so ago on "How much memory you actually need". I'm tunning on 8hr 52m on my stress test, so I should be able to try running Crysis on the specs you wanted. I'm guessing the FPS will be in the mid 30s, but we'll have to wait and see. |
Thank you mate.
| one-shot wrote : Well, I think the 4GB 1066MHz is better because you can run it in Dual Channel mode. With 6GB you'll have to run it in single channel. I'm stress testing my i7 920 right now at 3.6GHz and my RAM is around 1450MHz and it's 1600MHz DDR3. The difference between 4GB and 6GB is pretty small if you're mostly gaming. Tom's actually did an article a few days ago about memory scaling on Phenom II and another article a week or so ago on "How much memory you actually need". I'm tunning on 8hr 52m on my stress test, so I should be able to try running Crysis on the specs you wanted. I'm guessing the FPS will be in the mid 30s, but we'll have to wait and see. |
Wait, I have to correct myself. The PC is coming tomorrow. Eh, I had to say that, because I'm either getting it tomorrow or on Wednesday, and I DON'T WANT to get it on Wednesday! Lol...................
| AMD4Life wrote : Wait, I have to correct myself. The PC is coming tomorrow. Eh, I had to say that, because I'm either getting it tomorrow or on Wednesday, and I DON'T WANT to get it on Wednesday! Lol................... |
Haha, I hate waiting for things in the mail, especially computer parts. I just ran Crysis @ 1680x1050 @ all very high no AA. My i7 920 is overclocked to 3.6GHz and the GTX 260 Core 216 is mildly overclocked. I don't think the CPU speed changes much because the game is more GPU limited. My average FPS with the resolution was about ~30FPS. I usually run it at 1920x1200 with all high and very high shaders, water, and physics. The max FPS at the tested resolution was 58FPS and the lowest I saw was 25FPS using FRAPS. I prefer running the higher resolution with lowered graphics versus lower resolution and higher graphics in this case.
I hope that helped.
| one-shot wrote : Haha, I hate waiting for things in the mail, especially computer parts. I just ran Crysis @ 1680x1050 @ all very high no AA. My i7 920 is overclocked to 3.6GHz and the GTX 260 Core 216 is mildly overclocked. I don't think the CPU speed changes much because the game is more GPU limited. My average FPS with the resolution was about ~30FPS. I usually run it at 1920x1200 with all high and very high shaders, water, and physics. The max FPS at the tested resolution was 58FPS and the lowest I saw was 25FPS using FRAPS. I prefer running the higher resolution with lowered graphics versus lower resolution and higher graphics in this case.
|
Yay, it did... I just needed to know will a card like GTX260 run it all very high on my resolution, because it would be stupid if ATI4980 couldn't when I already have a 9800GT that can run it pretty good on 1680x1050 very high. As for now, I have a 22'' monitor so resolution isn't a problem. But man, how much I'll love to see those new 5.1 speakers...
PS: And I can't wait to compare benchmarks with you on that I7 rig! No lies, no fanboys this time, it's I7 vs. Phenom II.
| AMD4Life wrote : Yay, it did... I just needed to know will a card like GTX260 run it all very high on my resolution, because it would be stupid if ATI4980 couldn't when I already have a 9800GT that can run it pretty good on 1680x1050 very high. As for now, I have a 22'' monitor so resolution isn't a problem. But man, how much I'll love to see those new 5.1 speakers... PS: And I can't wait to compare benchmarks with you on that I7 rig! No lies, no fanboys this time, it's I7 vs. Phenom II. |
Haha, Good morning. I actually just got done feeding my i7 some PIIs for breakfast.
A 4890 is a little bit better than a GTX 260 Core 216. I'd say 4890=GTX 275 and GTX 260 Core 216=4870 1GB.
I had a 20", 22" and 24" in the past 17 months and I love my 24". I don't plan on trading it off like the others. Except the Samsung 22" died prematurely. After we compare Crysis we can compare some rendering and encoding, too! haha
EDIT: Also, when we do the benches. I think 1024x768 and medium quality on everything tested with the included Crysis benchmark in the game folder. Four runs and paste the results like I have shown below. This way it'll be CPU limited instead of GPU limited at the resolutions we normally game at. I can run the 64Bit test, but I can only get the results after running a set of the 32Bit tests for some reason. The 64Bit results are a little higher. I also overclocked my GPU for the test even though it shouldn't matter much at all because of the low resolution.
When you get yours ran through I'll post my scores up so we can compare.
Also, if you could copy and paste your results directly off of the Command Line. It should look something like this
Running CPU benchmark 1
Results will depend on current system settings
Press any key to continue . . .
Running...
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: XX.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: XX.07s, Average FPS: XX.03
Min FPS: XX.70 at frame 875, Max FPS: XXX.03 at frame 717
Average Tri/Sec: XXXX332, Tri/Frame: XXXXX
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: X.07
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: XX.31s, Average FPS: XX.00
Min FPS: XX.81 at frame 895, Max FPS: XX.73 at frame XX
Average Tri/Sec: 663X84, Tri/Frame: 6XX51
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: X.06
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: XX.04s, Average FPS: XX.73
Min FPS: XX.81 at frame 895, Max FPS: XX.73 at frame 354
Average Tri/Sec: 67X232, Tri/Frame: 67X18
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: X.06
!TimeDemo Run 3 Finished.
Play Time: XX.25s, Average FPS: XX.37
Min FPS: XX.81 at frame 895, Max FPS: XX.73 at frame 354
Average Tri/Sec: 66X36, Tri/Frame: 67X18
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: X.06
TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Press any key to continue . . .
| one-shot wrote : Haha, Good morning. I actually just got done feeding my i7 some PIIs for breakfast. I had a 20", 22" and 24" in the past 17 months and I love my 24". I don't plan on trading it off like the others. Except the Samsung 22" died prematurely. After we compare Crysis we can compare some rendering and encoding, too! haha EDIT: Also, when we do the benches. I think 1024x768 and medium quality on everything tested with the included Crysis benchmark in the game folder. Four runs and paste the results like I have shown below. This way it'll be CPU limited instead of GPU limited at the resolutions we normally game at. I can run the 64Bit test, but I can only get the results after running a set of the 32Bit tests for some reason. The 64Bit results are a little higher. I also overclocked my GPU for the test even though it shouldn't matter much at all because of the low resolution. When you get yours ran through I'll post my scores up so we can compare. Also, if you could copy and paste your results directly off of the Command Line. It should look something like this Running CPU benchmark 1 |
Lol, Phenom II will eat that Intel as a snack. ![]()
PS: It......is.....coming.....on.....Wednesday....
And by the way, you said we should see the benchmarks on 1024x768 for them to be CPU limited. I quote: "You buy $xxx$ CPU's specifically to avoid playing at settings like those, right?"
I'll say this in Serbian now:
Phenom II стиже сутра! Ура! Lol... Phenom II is coming tomorrow! Horray! ![]()
Oh, I'm losing myself... Better go and watch South Park.
There are 874 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

