Last message on previous page: @overchocks
I think your question is a bit limited. Do you want to debate on the best CPU in term of brutal performance or just bout the overall price/performance?
If the answer is the first option then why did you put the i5 750 on the list?
@overchocks
I think your question is a bit limited. Do you want to debate on the best CPU in term of brutal performance or just bout the overall price/performance?
If the answer is the first option then why did you put the i5 750 on the list?
did you read my first post, and read the poll question? you don't know what "raw" performance is?
why i put 750 on list? why not, the performance is similar not that bad.
------------------------------You can select me as Best Answer e6400 oc'd 3.2ghz,CCF cooler
3870x2, p5k/epu
750watts psu, antec 900
Reply to overshocks
------------------------------You can select me as Best Answer e6400 oc'd 3.2ghz,CCF cooler
3870x2, p5k/epu
750watts psu, antec 900
Reply to overshocks
i7 930 is not going to be 32nm! if it was going to be 32nm we would have been hearing Intel shouting about how they have a 32nm quad-core ready for Q1 2010!!!
i7 930 is nothing special. they are making it because they want to give more incentive into buying an i7 1366, because honestly, you can buy an i7 860 which is faster at stock. The i7 930 is the counter against the i7 860 so the 1366 will literally be the faster socket in all spectrum's.
regardless, the i7 930 will most likely be MORE expensive then the i7 860 and i7 920 currently (higher frequency), probably $325+? Like all the other i7's you could easily overclock the i7 920 to the same speed.
Message edited by impaledmango on 11-07-2009 at 04:35:28 AM
------------------------------You can select me as Best Answer e6400 oc'd 3.2ghz,CCF cooler
3870x2, p5k/epu
750watts psu, antec 900
Reply to overshocks