Last message on previous page:
| cmcghee358 wrote : That was the before picture Shadow...
|
Intel has a Flatness spec of .002+/-//(parallel)
This can be some what problematic for people that like to improve their temps and why lapping can sometimes improve temps several degrees.
being flat is most important.
Figure #1 is an idealized contact.
Sink and IHS are perfectly flat. With proper pressure and heat the paste flows and the gap separating sink and IHS closes or resolves down to the average particle size - the size of the particle determines the ultimate bond line thickness (BLT) Smaller the gap the better the performance in conjunction with material thermal conductivity determines performance. My experience is that too much paste will not affect performance -excess is just forced out
Figure # 2 is an illustration of the interference of high spots between the mating surfaces.
If the high spot is the same height or higher as the particle thickness, Particles on top of that high spot will add a whole new layer of compound to the interface, 2X -4x the amount of paste in the BLT increasing the resistance and negatively impacting performance - Flatness is the first priority when seeking best performance.
Flatness again is most important to getting the most out of you system, a max of 600 grit is kind of the limit I have not seen much improvement beyond that as the compound particle size is generally larger than the polishing imperfections.
Although some people really like a good lap job
I like a good lap job...
Use the compression spread instructions on our website and as noted in our intro post
| Quote : APPLICATION METHOD
|
OK, Here are my results...
Stock heat paste
GPU: idle - 37 C
load - 67 C
IC Diamond 24 Carat
GPU: idle - 34 C
load - 64 C
CPU temp did not change after repasting unfortunately...maybe a bad repasted...
But I will soon repaste the CPU and see if the temps change...

Updated results tally any changes or corrections let me know.
Much appreciation for those that took the time to test and post results.
| Quote : That was the before picture Shadow...
|
Ok, that makes more sense

| IC Diamond wrote : On it's way you should have it in a day or two I will PM you with instructions |
Ok i'll be waiting for my package to arrive and i'll get that done as soon as possible.
Just thought I would add some nonsense mumbo jumbo about my cpu temp, using IC Diamond of course.
I just moved to my new house and idle dropped 2c at the same ambient(72F)...According to the temp sensor on A/C panel, anyways.
In fact, with my intake cranked up to 1700rpm constant, i'm actually getting down to a 28-29c idle with a 45c load. At 1700rpm my "garbage" H50's stock fan is actually pretty quiet.
Of course this data is very non-conclusive, but at least i'm seeing low temps...
When I get that testing material(while I have my computer apart) i'll go ahead and run some more comparison tests vs OCZ freeze and see what I get... But honestly i'll be very surprised if I see a solid variation in temps. The only thing I can conclude from all of my thermal compound comparisons so far is the only variable is how well I install the heatsink...sadly.
Yeah least your temps are gettin down. TBH if you're getting 28-29C with an ambient of 22.2C thats pretty good.
| cmcghee358 wrote : Yeah least your temps are gettin down. TBH if you're getting 28-29C with an ambient of 22.2C thats pretty good. |
I appreciate that. I have reached my real world goals also. Now my room is always comfortable(preferably chilly) with my cpu @3.8ghz. That is what it is all about. That and maybe some vodka and a glass of putang. XD
I'm glad we hunkered through your cooling issues and got you happy!
| IC Diamond wrote : Updated results tally any changes or corrections let me know.
|
May be a browser issue, i'm using Google Chrome, but have you sent me instructions yet? I received the testing material yesterday... Thanks.
| Darshebag wrote : May be a browser issue, i'm using Google Chrome, but have you sent me instructions yet? I received the testing material yesterday... Thanks. |
Check your PM instructions provided
IC would you consider doing more pressure testing I would LOVE to know if I am getting a good seat between my H50 and my I7?????
I have NO idea how much pressure is applied or if there is good contact. I think I'm going to lap my H50 but Not my cpu I don't want to void the warranty.
| IC Diamond wrote : Check your PM instructions provided |
I got those tests done... I even did a GPU pressure test, which looked very snug compared to my H50. I don't know what to expect, but with all four tests it looks like the HS wasn't seated right on the H50.
I tightened it as hard as I could without breaking my mobo and did 4 tests on the cpu and 1 on my gpu. (Used all of the test material)
I got something out of it though! I used IC Diamond on my Gigabyte 5870 @900mhz Core
GPU temp before - 45c ~ 62c
GPU temp after - 41c ~ 57c
4-5c drop allover on my 5870.
Apparently I need to do some sanding or something to smooth out my cpu and heatsink surface, but no matter... My temps are good enough.
| Darshebag wrote : I got those tests done... I even did a GPU pressure test, which looked very snug compared to my H50. I don't know what to expect, but with all four tests it looks like the HS wasn't seated right on the H50.
|
Thanks for taking the time to test, much appreciated
Be interesting to see to see the prints and get the lab work done
| BorNej wrote : IC would you consider doing more pressure testing I would LOVE to know if I am getting a good seat between my H50 and my I7?????
|
I could use another H 50 test I have some more contact tests slated to go out next week
I haven't been to Tom's in a long time, but either way I might be able to put some more ICD on my CPU heatsink, and maybe run a few tests.
Results would be interesting since the ambients are about 45C here.
@ICD, what application method do you recommend? I read this guide a long time ago, and I was wondering what your input on the validity of this would be:
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index. [...] 0&Itemid=1
Cheers.
Our Method was developed by forum users on the first 4 or 5 giveaways we did. As a group of a couple hundred more or less they tested lines, rice sized, manual spreads, cross etc. The "pea sized" amount turned out to be the best for the high viscosity of our compound.
So we spent some time investigating it to refine the method and explain results and our application instructions page was the result of the process.
This prompted the contact/pressure testing to examine those tests where people do not see a result with the end result we can explain 96% of what goes on.
There are 3 things that determine paste performance
1. Application - Amount and method used.Relatively easy to observe and control.
2. Contact - Flat is best - lap to 600 grit for best performance
3. Pressure - Each compound has their own pressure/performance curve along with different viscosity's. IC diamond is recommend 50 PSI >
If you are trying to define an application amount without the context of 2 and 3 above you are basically shooting blanks in the dark because you have no reference point on the performance curve or on the contact quality.
I believe most people generally understand that testing is a non trivial pursuit so read multiple reviews and multiple user experiences and mentally average to draw there own conclusions.
So in short I highly recommend using our method as proved out in over hundreds of user tests.
| Darshebag wrote : I got those tests done... I even did a GPU pressure test, which looked very snug compared to my H50. I don't know what to expect, but with all four tests it looks like the HS wasn't seated right on the H50.
|
got a chance to review your prints today
From the images it looks like the IHS is warped in a concave with most of the force applied on the edges, a fairly typical IHS contact pattern as these things go, thats why people lap - be interesting to see the lab results on the pressure side as the edges From a quick glance seemed off the high end of the scale limit of 98 lbs.
The GPU print was very interesting, it had near perfect contact along with high pressure - very good print
Alright, so I'm finally getting around to posting my results.
Gaming laptop P-7801u: I originally wanted to do this one mainly for the graphics card. I then saw just how much disassembled to nothing you have to get to access that heatsink and decided against it. I may one day go back to it. But the CPU and northbridge were accessible from a panel on the bottom of the laptop.
I wasn't aware how important teh thermal pad was for the northbridge and got my fingers all over it and put it down on the counter. I then read the disassembly guide. It said you have to reuse it since normal stuff was unsuitable besides the few very dense stuff including IC Diamond, boy was that lucky.
So:
Ambient: 26°C
Before (Stock paste/pads): Idle: 29°C
Load: 42°C
After: Idle: 29°C
Load: 33°C
That's quite a difference.
I also applied it to my Phenom II X3 720 with a cooler master hyper 212+ in a coolermaster HAF 922 case. Before testing I was running at stock, but decided to overclock a little just to make a bit of a difference. It apparently barely made any difference at all. It's now running at x16 or 3.2 gigahertz per core. Also I used speedfan and the AMD overdrive for reading temps, they still looked lower than ambient, so I guess you'll just have to use the delta between the two. Also, the cooler ran at different speeds so if it had run at the same speeds this new stuff would have done even better.
Ambient:26°C
Before (AS5): Idle:22°C
Load: 31°C Fanspeed at load: 1068RPM
After: Idle: 20°C
Load: 29°C Fanspeed at load: 966RPM
Alright, more results for you.
This time I replaced the stock thermal paste in a first generation MacBook.
Same testing methodology as my previous tests.
CPU: Intel Core Duo T2500
Cooling setup: Stock MacBook
Old Thermal Paste: Stock Apple Goop
Cure Time: Approximately 4 years
Ambient Temperature: 27°
Load:
Core 0: 88°
Core 1: 86°
Δ Between Ambient and Load:
Core 0: 61°
Core 1: 59°
Low, Cooling Down from Load:
Core 0: 48°
Core 1: 47°
Δ Between Ambient and Cool Down Low:
Core 0: 21°
Core 1: 20°
Idle After Fan Speed Stabilized:
Core 0: 56°
Core 1: 54°
Δ Between Ambient and Idle After Fan Speed had Stabilized:
Core 0: 29°
Core 1: 27°
New Thermal Paste: IC Diamond
Cure Time: Tested immediately after reassembly
Ambient Temperature: 28°
Load:
Core 0: 79°
Core 1: 79°
Δ Between Ambient and Load:
Core 0: 51°
Core 1: 51°
Low, Cooling Down from Load:
Core 0: 46°
Core 1: 44°
Δ Between Ambient and Cool Down Low:
Core 0: 18°
Core 1: 16°
Idle After Fan Speed Stabilized:
Core 0: 52°
Core 1: 50°
Δ Between Ambient and Idle After Fan Speed had Stabilized:
Core 0: 24°
Core 1: 22°
Improvement between Stock Apple Goop and IC Diamond:
Load:
Core 0: 10°
Core 1: 8°
Cooling Down From Load:
Core 0: 3°
Core 1: 4°
After Fan Speed has Stabilized:
Core 0: 5°
Core 1: 5°
Notes to the test:
The high temperatures allowed by the stock thermal paste where enough to cause the CPU to throttle, severely impacting useability.
Since the reapplication it has not throttled once and is quite a bit more usable.
In addition, the fan ramps up noticeably slower and peaks at a much lower level than with the old thermal paste.
All in all, excellent gains with every application of IC Diamond
AMD Phenom II x4 @ 3.6ghz
Cooler Master Hyper 212+
Ran two tests of Cinebench 11.5 so all four cores are at 100% performance. Used HWmonitor to capture temps. All the cores where within 1c of each other so I just posted the highest temp.
Pre-IC7
Compound: Antec Silver
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] -_-Product
1st run
Idle Temp: 32
Load Temp: 52
2nd run
Idle Temp: 32
Load Temp: 52
Installed IC Diamond as per instructions and let it cure for several hours.
1st run
Idle Temp: 31
Load Temp: 51
2nd Run
Idle Temp: 32
Load Temp: 52
I did notice while playing ME2, my CPU would usually be in the 52-53c range but with IC Diamond its in the 49-51c range. That is just an observation though, not a controlled test.
@ct1615
Did you record the actual fanspeed each test? I had something similar happen where my temps were only slightly better, but the biggest difference was the fan running slower.
| False_Dmitry_II wrote : @ct1615
|
my fan is set on a manual controller so it can't be changed by the motherboard.
Spammer's post has been removed
| False_Dmitry_II wrote : Alright, so I'm finally getting around to posting my results.
|
Did you just happen to buy that laptop on Ebay? haha I sold mine, it was a P-7801u(Edit : I think it was 7805) with 9800m gts and 2.8ghz T9600 processor.
Anyways, I just posted a video on youtube showing a small benchmark in gtaiv using ic diamond... cpu was running warmer than normal at idle. Here is a link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRWMH7UgdbM
btw, what the $*(# is this above me! LOL
| Darshebag wrote :
|
My thoughts on the spammer who was here earlier.
lol. Yeah I was talking about the spam actually. The website title didn't look like it would be selling computer components...eh. DAM HAXXORZ ! lol
No, I bought that laptop near when it came out, the Christmas more or less that year.
hi,
i am john,I have a hitch when removeing my stock heatsink to apply the IC Dioamond, I noticed one of the retaing clips to the heatsink had failed at some point. It was loose and the black part fell into two pices when i unlocked it. I mannaged to get the heatsink back on not to loose to test the same heatsink with the IC Dioamond. Im showing 14degree diffirance in core temp with a 2degree diff in ambient but cant say how much the defective clip effected the results. thank you so much
i also enjoy spamming websites with my failing SEO business so please click on the link that i seem to have lost so that i can get a higher google search rank
Prime 95 to stress CPU, FurMark for GPU, HWMonitor used for temps taken after 30+ mins or idle or load. Room temp varied 3 degrees in F (75F + - 3F)
Both CPU and GPU where stressed at the same time for worst case on the desktop.
Desktop: Intel E8400, Asus P5Q, MSI 5770 Hawk
Pre-IC7:
CPU:
Compound - Arctic Cooling MX-2
Idle: 31c
Load: 57c
GPU: Fixed fan to 65% at load 30% at idle
Compound - Whatever MSI put on it
Idle: 45c
Load: 79c
NorthBridge:(Guessing it's listed at motherboard in HWMonitor)
Compound - Whatever Asus put on it
Idle:36c
Load:42c
IC7:
CPU:
Idle: 31c
Load: 53c
GPU:
Idle: 41c
Load: 72c
NorthBridge:
Idle:34c
Load:41c
Laptop: Dell insprion 1420, intel T8300, Nvidia 8400M GS
Pre-IC7:
CPU:
Compound - ZALMAN ZM-STG1
Idle: 27c
Load: 65c
GPU:
Compound - Dell thermal pad with a thin copper between it and thermal paste (seriously ionno wtf was up with that)
Idle: 63c
Load: N/A furmark kills it and forces a throttle down maxed out around 90c
IC7:
CPU:
Idle: 27c
Load: 60c
GPU: - just the copper with 2 layers of tim on each side
Idle: 54c
Load: 83c
This topic has been desticky in top of the forum by Jpishgar
| IzzyCraft wrote : Prime 95 to stress CPU, FurMark for GPU, HWMonitor used for temps taken after 30+ mins or idle or load. Room temp varied 3 degrees in F (75F + - 3F)
|
IzzyCraft Thanks for the detailed tests much appreciated, not much on the northbridge, I do not see tests on that often so have not much to compare to. - Thanks for the GPU data.
Probably do the final report in beginning of September.
Closing out the giveaway phase tomorrow 12 midnight and will give the last group 30 days to post or have their name entered on the Wall of Shame.
I will post some interesting research this weekend on abrasion.
Hint: What material do they make sandpaper out of and is nearly as hard as diamond?
Lab analysis next week on Darshe's h50 and other loose ends tied up next week as well as updated results
| IC Diamond wrote : IzzyCraft Thanks for the detailed tests much appreciated, not much on the northbridge, I do not see tests on that often so have not much to compare to. - Thanks for the GPU data. |
I'm not even sure if it's my northbridge that is being monitored in that i did the test again it is cooler but i think that could just be from an overall cooler system, i did change the paste on the northbridge but i have no way of knowing if motherboard = the northbridge temp or not in hwmonitor. shame i don't have a tiny fan tied to that heatsink then it can be pretty easy to tell if it is what i think it is when i turn off the fan.
Sorry for the late post, but just finished the last of my exams, Woo-hoo!! I finally got a chance to work with the tube of IC7 I got last week that has been glaring at me during my studies just begging to be used lol
First let me just say that I wanted to thank IC Diamond for providing me with the chance to test out their TIM, and I would definitely recommend this to a friend
Without any further ado, the results are... *drumrolls*
Pre-IC7
Compound: AS5
Abient Temp: 28°C
Idle Temp: 40°C
Load Temp: 69°C
IC7
Ambient Temp: 28°C
Idle Temp: 38°C
Load Temp: 63°C
As you can see, the idle improved by 2°C which although a minor improvement is still a very modest one nonetheless. Wasn't expecting much gain on idle, so any improvement is a welcome one.
Where I was really blown away were the load temps. 6°C cooler using the IC which is roughly an 8.7% improvement over the AS5! It absolutely blew me away that simply changing the TIM could cause such a drastic improvement on performance! I'll never think the same way when it comes to TIM's again lol The only reason I'm sad is I don't have the means to run any more tests, but if this is any indication I'm sure I would not be disappointed!
I have a new build coming up, and will definitely be taking these results to heart when choosing my TIM. Thanks again IC Diamond for providing us with a great product! Keep em coming!
Here the results for my 65nm Core2Quad Q6600. OCed from 2.4GHz to 2.8GHz - 1.14v idle, 1.25v load.
Temps recorded with HW-monitor.
Artic Cooling MX-2 + CoolerMaster N520
Ambient ~27'C/81'F
Idle: 33'C-36'C
Load: 51'C-55'C
IC7 + CoolerMaster N520
Ambient ~27'C/81'F
Idle: 32'C-34'C
Load: 49'C-51'C
Idle temps dropped by 1'C to 2'C
Load Temps dropped by 2'C to 4'C
Cool thanks
My results:
Arctic Silver 5 + CoolerMaster 212 Hyper+
(AS5 cure time, ~2 weeks)
Ambient ~18C/63F
Idle: 20C
Load: 35C
IC7 + CoolerMaster 212 Hyper+
(IC7 cure time, 2 hours)
Ambient ~18C
Idle: 18C
Load: 31C
Idle temps dropped by 2C
Load Temps dropped by 4C
Seems like good stuff!
Alright so sorry i actually do not have a previous temp that is comparable to the IC7 as i kinda screwed up putting on the AS5
Along time ago sorry.
But my temps were:
IC7 + Cooler Master V8
After running Prime95 for 9 hrs 21 mins:
Ambient - 22C/73F
Idle - 37C
Load - 55C
My CPU was a AMD Phenom II 955 running at 3.9ghz at 1.49v
Now i see why ICD chose diamonds as a part of their compounds.
"Under normal conditions, diamond has the highest thermal conductivity of all known materials." -link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon
Will return with results.
In the next week, I will be disassembling and reassembling my water cooling system, and I'll have another system with some numbers for you.
In the programs I've used (Speedfan, Everest, Realtemp) to monitor temperatures on my CPU and GPU, I have not been able to figure out what my northbridge temperature is. If anyone has any idea how I can figure this out, I'll gladly see if I can remove the NB sink and reseat it with ICD.
You can check the heat sink temperature with a laser thermometer. That will give you a basic idea of how high the temperature on the Nb is.
I don't have one or have access to one.
I do not know my NB temp eider, but i know that in really warm days this summer it gets hot, i can not keep my finger on it for more then 4 seconds. It is overvolted and no direct fan on it, but the sys temperature sensor is somewhere else.
If it is just warm then i would not worry about it, if it is how and you can not keep your finger on it for 10s then you can try to change the thermal paste.
My results:
AS5
IDLE
core 0 47C
core 1 43C
fan idle 1600 rpm
Load with prime 95 blend test for 1 our
core 0 66C
core 1 65C
Fan speed 2500rpm
ICD
IDLE
core 0 45C
core 1 42C
Fan speed 1500 rpm
Load with prime 95 blend test for one our
core 0 63C
core 1 61C
Fan speed 2500rpm
Cpu cooler: arctic freezer 7(not rev 2)
Monitored with CPUID HWmonitor, CPU-Z, core speed 3400 MHz from 2.66ghZ on a core 2 duo E6750.
Bus speed 425MHz, rated fsb 1700 MHz, core voltage set in bios to 1,387v, ambient temperature ~28-32C.
No game has ever stressed the CPU this much so i say a blend test is ok, i have never reached over 62C i any game, metro2033, NFS, Crysis, COD..etc.
Thank you for the chance to test this, it has given me lower temperatures. Also i do not know how much pressure my coolers exerts. The test was done after 24+ ores.
PS: the ICD test i think was made on higher ambient temperatures then AS5
Finally got some results. Got a brand new EVGA GTX 460 EE Superclocked Edition today. Now normally I would not buy a factory overclocked card but it was the only one they had in stock with a lifetime warranty the day I ordered so for an extra $10 I went ahead and ordered it anyway.
My case is an Antec 1200 with 7 x 120mm Antec TriCools on low and the 200mm top fan on medium. My CPU cooler is a ZeroTherm Nirvana NV 120 with a 120mm fan and my Corsair 750TX has an additional 140mm fan. I have excellent cooling obviously.
Ambient temps are 25C for these tests. The fan profile was left on auto and did not exceed 55%.
I used the EVGA Precision Utility and the EVGA Overclock Scanner to measure temps and stress the card. Load time was one hour of stressing the GPU to a reported 96% with the Overclock Scanner. Idle temps were measured after 20 minutes of Windows 7 desktop.
I use Windows 7 Ultimate x64. The rest of my specs are in my sig.
Stock this card runs:
Clock: 763
Shaders: 1526
Memory: 1900
Temps out of the box were:
Idle: 36C
Load: 77C
I then replaced the stock thermal compound with IC Diamond 24.
Temps were quite a bit lower. Ambient temps stayed the same 25/26C. I played Dragon Age Origins for about 2 1/2 hours after applying to allow the new paste to "cure".
Stock clocks again.
Idle: 29C
Load: 73C
Great product. Those are some amazing temp decreases from the stock paste.
Off topic this is an amazing card as well. I am testing right now at:
Core: 820
Shaders: 1640
Memory: 2000
And my temps after 30 minutes of stressing with the Overclock Scanner seem to be stable at:
76C with the fan at 57%
Still 1C lower than at stock speeds before the new thermal paste. Thanks for the free overclock IC
Motherboard died 2 days before IC Diamond arrived
All I'm left with now is my laptop. Don't think I will be able to provide any results in a timely fasion, as it will most likely be a month or two before I get a working desktop pc again
When does this end? I got my tube today and I just read all of the results here. I am excited and can't wait to test it out but my mobo fried over the weekend and I'm RMAing it at the moment. When I get it back I'll try it on my proc and both video cards as it looks amazing, especially for GPUs. If the time on this runs out and you'd like me to post my results somewhere else just let me know. Thanks.
CPU: Pentium 4 (630 SL7Z9)
MoBo: P965T-A
RAM: 3 GB Corsair DDR2 533
HD: Seagate 7200.7 160 GB (ST3160827AS)
GFX: ATI Radeon X1600 PRO (stock heat sink)
CPU Cooler: Stock Intel heat sink
Used Hardware Monitor to get temps, Prime95 and 3D Mark06 trial version for load testing.
Room temp between 20-21C
All recorded temps where taken after 2 hours operation for their prospective tests.
Manually set Intel heat sink to 100%
P4 Idle / Load Arctic Silver 5 (6+ months cure)
46 / 61 C
P4 Idle / Load IC Diamond (~6 hours cure)
43 / 58 C
A cool 3C drop in idle and load.
Forgot to Find a program that would manually set the X1600 fan speed, I was to excited to take it apart.
X1600 Idle / Load Stock Paste (3+ years cure)
54 / 73 C
X1600 Idle / Load IC Diamond (~6 hours cure)
52 / 71 C
~10% / ~20% Less Fan Speed
So a definite 2C cooler + a quieter fan for the X1600.
CPU: i5 530 @ Stock
HSF: CNPS 10X QUIET
Case: Antec 300
Fan RPM: 1450
Measured with HW Monitor. My i3 seems to have a sensor bug as it starts at 5'C when ambient is 17. However I think that it doesn't matter for this purpose. All temperatures are measured in Celsius.
Pre-IC7
Compound: Zalman ZM-STG1
Abient Temp: 17
Idle Temp: 5
Load Temp: 28
IC7
Ambient Temp: 17
Idle Temp: 4
Load Temp: 22
Saw a great improvement over the Zalman paste.
There are 2334 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
By rolli59, 1 hour ago:
So did you apply new thermal paste when replacing the CPU? Is the cooler clean and...
Chesteracorgi - bronze Expert
Specialties : Home Brew, Motherboards, Graphics, Storage, Overclocking, CPUs
1204 messages since 1970/01/01
