Last message on previous page:
I want to use this monitor for 3D
htttp://www.ecoustics.com/avrev/princeton/
however I remeber the specs saying its a 60 Hz monitor at 1024X768. I cannot find any specs anymore since this thing is so old.
I run it maxed out at 1280X720 which is great.
My question is will this CRT with a refresh rate of 60 Hz give me the same strobing effect that the article mentions a 60 Hz DLP projector will do ??
| Quote :
|
Yes. ideally you need a monitor/project that is capable of providing 120hz refresh rate at your desired resolution. A projectors "native" resolution must be the resolution you use for stereo.
John
| Quote : I am thinking about buying the optoma HD70 beamer.
|
We tested the Optoma HD72i - a 'similar' projector. It would work at 60Hz 3D, but not 85Hz 3D. i.e. flicker city.
The HD70 could be completely different - but is unlikely to be able to do 85Hz 3D since in the 45 projectors that we tested, none over XGA resolution would do anything higher than 60Hz 3D.
Thank you for the List of Projectors, I was hoping you had Tested some of the infocus IN32/34/36 Projectors as they have a shorter throw lens for folks like me with a small room... Any Chance you will be testing anything else in the future?
Doon1, your saying I will get the strobing effect with my 60 Hz CRT right ?
Why 120 Hz ? That seems expensive. The article states 75 - 85 Hz is okay.
120 Hz must be for extra extremely FPS right ?
| Quote : Just to be perfectly clear, 2 DLP with polarizing filters and a silver screen, plus the polarizing glasses is the same price as the way this article describes, possibly a few $xxx cheaper as you are using simpler technology and can source it anywhere (aka bone-standard DLP and the same old paper glasses from forever) Da-Lite has been making silver screens for I don't know how long (how long has there been slide projection or home movies?), like I link to the screens are plenty cheap $160 with shipping New from the factory.
|
Please forgive me if this has already been covered,
How hard is it to line up two DLP Projectors for a projection setup?
Do you have a how-to with pictures, similar to how Tom's Article is put together?
[quote="anthonybuchanan"]
120 Hz must be for extra extremely FPS right ?[/quote
At 85 Hz on a CRT, it's pretty good, just like the DLP screen in the article.
At 120 Hz I'd imagine the glasses strobe so quickly that it must look perfectly smooth, but this doesn't have much to do with FPS - just eliminating the strobing effect you'd see.
I've just created a web page listing all the projectors that I am aware of that have been tested for 3D compatibility.
The page is here:
http://www.3d.curtin.edu.au/3dmovies/projectors.html
The list not only includes those that ARE 3D compatible, but also those that are NOT 3D compatible.
| Quote : Any Chance you will be testing anything else in the future? |
Not unless we receive some further grant funding (or are paid to do it).
The higher the refresh rate the smoother the view. You're effectively cutting the refresh rate in half when in stereo. It's said the human eye can see a distinct "stutter" at any rate below 30FPS. Many can see this at even higher rates. So a monitor with a refresh rate of 60hz is a frequency of 30hz per eye. I can see this very clearly. At 85hz your getting 42.5hz per eye. While this is much better it is still noticable. This is one of the main reasons people started going with dual projector setups. Then you had to keep your head in a vertical orientation (no leaning into turns). This was then overcome with hemispherical filters on the projector lenses. Of course a higher quality, more emmersive stereo experience comes with a price tag. for $30k you can have a high resolution head-mount display with head-tracking. Emagine has a 800x600 visor with head-tracking that when it came out cost $900. then they dropped the price to $600. currently the price is $1500, go figure.
My suggestion would be that if you have a Nvidia card and a CRT monitor go ahead and buy the I-art glasses and try them out. This will give you a good idea if stereoscopic gaming is for you. The reason I recommend the i-art setup is because it comes with two sets of glasses and there is no need for an inverter as it's built into the glasses. It's also a GREAT idea to invest in a rechargable batter unit as these things love to suck the life out of a pair of AAA in no time.
John
It's probably also due to the strobing effect. The glasses are creating a pitch black frame between each frame that you do see.
In regular video... even 24 frame-per-second film - there is no black frame inserted between frames for any appreciable length of time. So this is probably the main reason why higher refresh rates look alot better when you use shutter glasses.
| Quote : buy the I-art glasses and try them out. John |
What is the "Sync Doubling" the I-Art Website Mentions?
http://www.i-art.com.tw/ENG/Produc [...] es_Eng.htm
| Quote : What is the "Sync Doubling" the I-Art Website Mentions?
|
Sync Doubling is described here:
http://www.3d.curtin.edu.au/3D-PC/index.html
But this is now an obsolete technique. It was a hack to get high-refresh rates from video cards which couldn't generate high frequencies. The NIVIDIA cards can do high frequencies (including up to 120Hz) in their sleep - so no need for the sync double technique.
Great article, and quite a bit of useful information in the comments here already.
I'm wondering if this will work with a DLP projection HDTV. I have a 50" Samsung rear projection DLP, which isn't quite projector size but still much larger than my monitor. It seems like it should work... Anyone know for sure, before I go buy a bunch of new hardware?
//edit- I'm refering to using the PC input on the TV, which will run at 1024x768. I can't find the set's refresh rate in the online specs
| Quote : Just to be perfectly clear, 2 DLP with polarizing filters and a silver screen, plus the polarizing glasses is the same price as the way this article describes, possibly a few $xxx cheaper as you are using simpler technology and can source it anywhere |
I can't see it being cheaper as we bought the cheapest 1024x768 projector we could find for the article, and you're automatically doubling that expense...
But I'll look into it. So, two projectors, two polarizing filters, polarized glasses. Do you need anything special to hook the buggers up? How do you get the two separate signals to the projectors?
Are you guys saying that the Nvidia drivers can be set up to do it automatically through the two video card outputs?Yes, when you choose the 3D mode you get a drop-down with 10 options to set up the type of stereo.
I just came back from checking DLP prices, you are right, they are still expensive, I used 2 Lumenlab Evo LCD projectors $500 apiece, $30 replacement bulb (6,000 hour life). I do know of cheap DLP projectors, the AVS forums is probably a good place for info on the best DLP's. If you see some on sale for $450-$500 then you will know what to do with them.
The benefit to the dual method is the scalability, if you want 10 people to view the effect the cost is $6 more with the dual method. For a single person the shutter method is cheaper, IF there is a 140hz DLP out there that will not trigger the flicker issues, and IF you buy a pair of shutter glasses specifically designed for projection, if not the off state is too dark and image will not look good.
Look at the added cost of two projectors Vs. the price of several pairs of shutter glasses and associated wiring or batteries to let everyone watch.
If you set out to do the polarized it can save you trouble as a silver screen will be purchased and you will not have to purchase one later, you can still use the silver screen in any way possible, just it also functions with the polarized light.
On the subject of 2 LCD monitors, you can't tell me that it isn't cheaper and higher-resolution. 2 17" 1280x1024 screens on eBay will only set you back $250 or less in good working condition (I bought 3 broken ones for $180 total and will be repairing them into 2 working ones, cheaper if you have the skill), the mirror is only $40. Since likely you are running an LCD monitor anyway, just get a second and the half-mirror, the cost is much less that way as you have about 1/3 of the setup already sitting on your desk and you don't need to buy it.
Please go look at the links above, I posted some DIY dual Projection and LCD monitor setups.
Doon1: I have never heard of a registry hack, nor have I used one to enable this method of 3D, look in your nVidia control panel under the 3D settings and choose the appropriate method from the 10 or so that drop down.
NO Strobing: I will not use the shutter glasses. I get a distinct headache that pulses (migraine) when I view even 15" monitors at 60hz, how does making it 42.5 hz help anyone?
Yes you will see a strobe effect, pray you aren't epileptic.
I see where the projectors have to be mounted one-on-top-of-the-other, but i am a bit confused.
In several examples it looks like you must have 2 screens side-by-side to get the effect.. Is this in-correct? Does the two projectors "overlay" the same image on each other?
If So,
I take it you have the two projectors mounted together and a Polarizing screen over each lens.
You project on to 1, Silver screen.
You install the nVidia Driver and have projector 1 on output one of your video card and projector 2 on output 2 of your video card.
Everyone simply wears Polarized glasses and they can view images in 3D up to 60 degrees or so?
When in 3D Mode, you get 60-85hz PER Eye? (Meaning flicker free)
Am in Correct?
| Quote : NO Strobing: I will not use the shutter glasses. I get a distinct headache that pulses (migraine) when I view even 15" monitors at 60hz, how does making it 42.5 hz help anyone?
|
I am currently using 3 19" CRT monitor all running at 60hz and I am not bothered in the slightest by flickering and I use these 8 hours a day @ work, 5 days a week.
gm0n3y, consider yourself lucky about not having problems at 60Hz. I have to have monitors set to at least 85Hz to avoid headaches and even then I still notice the flicker. For me flicker doesn't alleviate until about 100Hz :?
SQ40, it sounds like everything you posted after "If So," is correct. I have seen this kind of rig in operation before and it is marvelous when done right. The only real things I recall that you have to pay close attention to are stable mounting and proper keystoning. Both concerns should be one-shot issues at initial setup - after that, good to go!
I am very confused.
The 3D article has changed everything for me. I am definitely going 3D.
I cannot see though how in this forum people aspire to have an 8800 that can run up to $700 or more however the list of 3D projectors only lists sub $1000 projectors with 1024 and less resolution.
It seems if you have the 8800 and you are going 3D and also, 3D with a projector, then then you should invest in a more expensive projector that at least does 1080p.
Id like to know, on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being perfect. From this current setup (the article) how good are movies?
This might sounds dumb but can we use those glasses for a movie?
Thanks
The article say you can use the screen for mvies the regular way minus the glasses.
| Quote : Your very own life-sized 3D theme park for under $1500 |
What about 3D WITHOUT glasses?
That's been out for a while now (at least on 15" monitors)
A better one is HERE
just costs a few $xxxx
| Quote : I'm wondering if this will work with a DLP projection HDTV. I have a 50" Samsung rear projection DLP, which isn't quite projector size but still much larger than my monitor. It seems like it should work... Anyone know for sure, before I go buy a bunch of new hardware?
|
Good question! I am looking at the Samsung HL-T6189S DLP rear projection TV and would like to know if it would be compatible with the 3D shuttered glasses technique? This TV uses LED's rather than a color wheel (ie: no rainbow effect), has a 61" screen, a resolution of 1920 x 1080, a screen refresh of 120Hz, a VGA PC input, and it is very bright. Sounds like the perfect 3D display to me!
Has anyone tried this with a rear projection display?
| Quote : I see where the projectors have to be mounted one-on-top-of-the-other, but i am a bit confused.
|
LCD's DO NOT flicker, they have a slower die-off of the pixel brightness and the refresh rate being lower does not have any effect on the flickering, I am comfortable with refreshes of 60hz on LCD technology, since it is a digital display technology there is no scanline at all.
The shutter glasses are what are adding to the flickering effect.
It is not hard to "line up" the projectors, since each eye sees only one image they only need to be close to aligned, preferably with the pictures vertically aligned the most, as the 3D driver will be diverging most of the picture horizontally anyway.
Have you checked out the links above to Barry Aldous web-site?
Hi everybody! I have a PLV Z4 (LCD) projector & using HDMI, 7800GT. What setup would be the best considering it's an LCD projector? What's the ~cost?
TIA
| Quote : Id like to know, on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being perfect. From this current setup (the article) how good are movies? |
If you can control the ambient light... I'd give it a 9. It's really very good, much better than I'd have thought.
| Quote : This might sounds dumb but can we use those glasses for a movie?
|
Certain movies I think you might. But they have to be specially made.
I now this sounds silly, but there is a thing called Google.
Some choice words to type in might include 3D movies, shutter glasses.
Forums of the hardware manufacturers, perhaps any one of the numerous guides written on the subject of Stereoscopic 3D viewing/photography and projection.
Ugh, I should just leave.
someone should try this in 3D
http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbou [...] rightdome/
I had purchased an Asus GeForce 4 TI 4600 delux with 3d stereoscopic glasses. Here is what I observed... (albeit I was using dated hardware)
A. If you wear glasses already, stacking the glasses makes it difficult to wear. (I can't wear contacts....)
B. Nvidia's drivers at the time and games that used 3D were few and the ones that were there were clunky and buggy at best. I recently played Far Cry with them and it was difficult to get it to work with the glasses. When I did get the game to play, It was really cool up to the point I got motion sick driving around......
C. Stereoscopic is for solo's ... sharing your experience with others in the room without glasses is the pits.... If you have enough to go around it is fine.
D. I didn't like being tethered by a wire and when I went to LCD screen they were useless. (both desktop and projector) I went with the LCD projector because I couldn't stand the halo effect the DLP projectors had.
Stereoscopic glasses a fun novelty but not for everyone. For me it was a great waste of money (for the glasses and Video card) plus the heartache of gettiing it to work properly. They have been collecting dust since 2002......
| Quote : A. If you wear glasses already, stacking the glasses makes it difficult to wear. (I can't wear contacts....) |
This will vary depending upon the type of glasses you wear and the type of LCS 3D glasses that you have bought. I have a wide selection of LCS 3D glasses and most are fine with the prescription glasses that I wear, but people's experience with this will vary considerably.
| Quote : B. Nvidia's drivers at the time and games that used 3D were few and the ones that were there were clunky and buggy at best. |
A LOT has changed in this since 2002.
| Quote : D. I didn't like being tethered by a wire |
There are wireless LCS 3D glasses available from eDimensional and others.
| Quote : I had purchased an Asus GeForce 4 TI 4600 delux with 3d stereoscopic glasses. Here is what I observed... (albeit I was using dated hardware) |
How about the drivers? That is more than half the battle.
| Quote : A. If you wear glasses already, stacking the glasses makes it difficult to wear. (I can't wear contacts....) |
[/quote]That is legitimate, I personally wear my glasses high on my nose and very close to my eyes, it is hard to get the shutter glasses to be on top of my glasses and still see through the LCD shutters.
| Quote : B. Nvidia's drivers at the time and games that used 3D were few and the ones that were there were clunky and buggy at best. I recently played Far Cry with them and it was difficult to get it to work with the glasses. When I did get the game to play, It was really cool up to the point I got motion sick driving around...... |
Fair, did you actively search the nV website and Guru3D for the tweaks and latest drivers? I remember trying this on my 5200 a few years ago, aside from the piece of crap FX series chip being slow it worked.
| Quote : C. Stereoscopic is for solo's ... sharing your experience with others in the room without glasses is the pits.... If you have enough to go around it is fine. |
Go back to my links to Barry Aldous and Planar. Two LCD monitors are required, but since it is a simple polarized filter they make clip-ons for $12 http://www.berezin.com/3d/3dglasses.htm#Polarized
| Quote : D. I didn't like being tethered by a wire and when I went to LCD screen they were useless. (both desktop and projector) I went with the LCD projector because I couldn't stand the halo effect the DLP projectors had. |
See above, you can make a dual 19" LCD high-res monitor for 3D for under $500, using entirely new parts. If you currently use an LCD the cost is only 1 more LCD monitor and a mount and mirror. Good LCD's are currently under $200 new, used on ebay $150 or less.
The mirror is available for $40 for a 17" diagonal LCD http://www.telepromptermirrors.com/ The correct size is about 15"x10"
| Quote : Stereoscopic glasses a fun novelty but not for everyone. For me it was a great waste of money (for the glasses and Video card) plus the heartache of gettiing it to work properly. They have been collecting dust since 2002...... |
That card was likely too expensive true, I bought a $120 7900GS recently and it is a monster (I did put a Zalman with ramsinks on it and clocked it at 650mhz Core and 790mhz (DDR 1.58Ghz) RAM with a re-flash of the Firmware and a simple core voltmod).
A 7600GT is a good choice too, but the 7900GS is a killer card even stock. Basically it is a 7900 chip cut down to a 7800 level, imagine the performance.
The drivers are much improved, all I had to do was install the latest (93.81) drivers and the stereo drivers and I was playing Oblivion in 3D, Tomb Raider: Legend, etc.
You can do this with a standard hand mirror and two Monitors by the way (any kind) http://www.crystalcanyons.net/page [...] ewing.shtm
Just skip to the part where he holds up the mirrors. Use a "clone" setup with two monitors in the "nview settings" part of the nvidia control panel.
In the "Stereo Properties" section choose "Planar Mirror left/right" and then apply the settings.
Arrange the monitors and hold up the mirror. Once it looks completely awesome go shopping on eBay for another LCD monitor to build a Planar setup, it is far superior to the hand-held mirror setup.
| Quote : I'm wondering if this will work with a DLP projection HDTV. I have a 50" Samsung rear projection DLP, which isn't quite projector size but still much larger than my monitor. It seems like it should work... Anyone know for sure, before I go buy a bunch of new hardware?
|
I haven't tested any rear projection DLPs but I think there's a good chance that many will work at 60Hz 3D (but not likely at 85Hz).
The only thing you need to perform a simple test is a pair of LCS 3D glasses and 3D Dongle ($50 from Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ [...] dmovies-20 ).
I'm assuming you've already got a PC with an NVIDIA graphics card (even an older one will do).
nubie wrote:
| Quote : The drivers are much improved, all I had to do was install the latest (93.81) drivers and the stereo drivers and I was playing Oblivion in 3D, Tomb Raider: Legend, etc.
|
How do these glasses work with LCD monitors?
assuming I have a 75 Hz refresh rate and 8ms gtg?
| Quote : How do these glasses work with LCD monitors?
|
Liquid Crystal Shutter (LCS) 3D Glasses DO NOT work with LCD projectors or LCD monitors.
It doesn't matter what refresh rate or pixel response rate (gtg) the LCD monitor or LCD projector has - it's to do with the way that the LCD monitor/projector outputs light and update alternate frames.
More technical information about why this is so is available in this technical paper:
http://www.cmst.curtin.edu.au/publicat/2006-30.pdf
"Compatibility of LCD Monitors with Frame-Sequential Stereoscopic 3D Visualisation"
Cleeve, where was your projector set up in respect to you? Ceiling mounted, mounted behind or in front of you?
And how far from the screen do you sit for the best effect?
In my testing, it was behind me.
Basically, it worked best the closest I could get to the screen without causing a shadow...
My old projector the Sharp PG-M20x is DLP and can display up to 200hz. Specifically for XGA it does 140Hz (see manual here http://www.sharpusa.com/files/pro_man_PGM20X.pdf)
You can pick this up now for about $350 , a couple on ebay at the moment.
This is probably the cheapest option yet which won't have any flicker problems.
I'm just about to get a new projector (currently on Sanyo ZLV -Z4) perhaps thinking of the BENQ W9000 (or the JVC DLA-RS1U)
but I'm keen to make sure these work with the stereoscopic display. (For quality projectors I don't think the passive polarised dual projector set-up mentioned is an option)
Does anyone know if an LCOS type projector (ie the JVC one above ) will work steroscopically. ie are the pixels quick to refresh.
Anyone know if the BEnq one is compatible.
Thanks
| Quote : Cleeve, where was your projector set up in respect to you? Ceiling mounted, mounted behind or in front of you?
|
My projector room is 16' long allowing a screen size of 10'. I made a small swing away desktop for my office chair and set it up 8' from the screen. Awsome FOV. The general rule for a 1024x768 screen is 1 to 1.5 times away from the screen as it is wide. Closer and you start to see the pixelation.
John
Cleeve, was the projector directly in line with you, but above & behind you, or off to the side?
Your article inspired me and I'm planning on getting your same basic setup running soon
The reason I asked was, I was trying to figure out where to put the projector, but it seems pretty difficult to get all of these things at once:
-100" screen
-sitting directly in the center of the screen (width-wise)
-not blocking the projector with your body
-not sitting too far away
The only way I could think of was either ceiling mounted, or setting the projector off to the side of you, which my be awkward if you're not looking at the screen dead center (especially with the 3d effect).
| Quote : Cleeve, was the projector directly in line with you, but above & behind you, or off to the side?
|
Pretty Much Every Projector can be Ceiling Mounted. The Kits are about $200-$250 to mount one, that is the very best way to do that. DA-Lite Screens are excellent too, a 100" Manual pull down should run you about $150 Shipped from someone like projectorpros.com
| Quote :
|
Okay, thanks for the tip
| Quote :
|
I was hoping to find a solution that didn't incur that extra $200-$250 expense (and effort) of ceiling mounting. I don't believe that was included in Cleeve's pricing of the sub-$1500 setup.
| Quote :
|
I was hoping to find a solution that didn't incur that extra $200-$250 expense (and effort) of ceiling mounting. I don't believe that was included in Cleeve's pricing of the sub-$1500 setup.
If you are wanting to go cheap, I think Newegg has a Universal Ceiling mount kit for projectors for $99... I am not sure that it works for all of them, but It might be worth a shot.
wow what an interesting and enlightening article. Bravo Cleeve, I should have known you were the author when I was so interested from the start!
I really hope nvidia makes a new driver revision for the 8000 series cards and beyond, but I have a feeling it may be limited by all the DRM crap and HDCP requirements. I find it odd that ATI is completely out of the picture on this concept, unfortunately making it necessary to buy another video card for me.
I think a few people worded their replies poorly, making suggestions that the article may have been misleading or irresponsible because it only presented one method of 3d projection display. It's unfair to harp on Cleeve because he did not attempt more than one method, when he's using his own equipment and personal home to set it up. If he was in a test lab with a lot more resources, it would be more practical to ask for more. As for me, I am thoroughly happy to even know that one method exists for decent 3d gaming with current technology. It may not be the most perfect method, but it sure sounds easier to hook up than a lot of the other suggestions made (though I appreciate being informed of other options too, which is a very positive compliment to this forum's readers!).
| Quote :
|
I was hoping to find a solution that didn't incur that extra $200-$250 expense (and effort) of ceiling mounting. I don't believe that was included in Cleeve's pricing of the sub-$1500 setup.
If you are wanting to go cheap, I think Newegg has a Universal Ceiling mount kit for projectors for $99... I am not sure that it works for all of them, but It might be worth a shot.You guys are shopping in the wrong places Monoprice.com has one for $17.
http://www.monoprice.com/products/ [...] t=2&style=
You can also get 25' and longer VGA cords for under $20, they are of high quality, I percieve no difference between a 3' cable and the 25' cable.
| Quote : wow what an interesting and enlightening article. Bravo Cleeve, I should have known you were the author when I was so interested from the start!
|
There are 8800 series drivers in the works, go to mtbs3d.com for some info and the beta drivers, so far they don't appear to work, but at least nvidia is working on it.
I don't find it odd, Nvidia has from the start had excellent driver support and Linux support, besides CAD and workstation products, all around they are just a more solid company, while ATI focuses on gamers. Not all of PC use is for Gaming, and I hope that ATI comes around, healthy competition will benefit the Nvidia products.
| Quote : I think a few people worded their replies poorly, making suggestions that the article may have been misleading or irresponsible because it only presented one method of 3d projection display. It's unfair to harp on Cleeve because he did not attempt more than one method, when he's using his own equipment and personal home to set it up. If he was in a test lab with a lot more resources, it would be more practical to ask for more. |
I too am using my own equipment in my personal home, and my setup cost the same amount ($1147 to be precise), I didn't ask that he attempt more than one method, just to give them honorable mention for existing.
| Quote : As for me, I am thoroughly happy to even know that one method exists for decent 3d gaming with current technology. It may not be the most perfect method, but it sure sounds easier to hook up than a lot of the other suggestions made (though I appreciate being informed of other options too, which is a very positive compliment to this forum's readers!). |
I don't know, I seem to be blessed (cursed?) with the need and talent to tinker.
2 LCDs desktop monitors and an inexpensive mirror (~$40) are just 3 components, setting them up is not rocket science, also there are pictures. I will say that I am pretty sure that Cleeve can get his hands on 2 LCD monitors, even if he borrowed one or set it up at work. I do realize this is outside the scope of the article, namely projection of 3D, but it is a more viable solution for many, also it can't be more complex than shutterglasses because with passive glasses you have removed the complexity of the viewing apparatus and moved it to the display apparatus.
"Sounds easier to hook up" is ridiculous, the quality is very different and the scalability is not in question with glasses starting at ~$0.50. True this may not be the setup for everyone, but I encourage you to try shutter glasses and anaglyph and any method you deem within your reach to decide for yourself, that is the beauty of personal choice. My only complaint was that there are much better options available and before one invests heavily in this option they can at least leave the door open to other options.
For example the purchase of a new Da-Lite silver screen (for a price identical to that which is quoted in the article, and for which I provide a link above), does not preclude the use of the author's method, in fact it may improve contrast and brightness, while at the same time allowing polarized light to reflect off the screen intact should you decide to try a polarized projection method later (I don't know if you could rent some DLP projectors, but that would be one way to test which method is the most desirable for your situation).
I do point out that a darkened room is not the best place to try and run a cord to ones headgear, especially for many people viewing, it is a recipe for tripping, equipment damage and headaches. Ask me how I know, I tripped on a cord and damaged my LCD I was using for an Overhead-projector based project. Speaking of which, if you like to tinker a DIY LCD projector is an excellent way to do the dual-polarized projection. There is an enterprising fellow in Spain who has used 2 19" LCDs to enable High-Definition 3D movie and game playing, he even smoothed his wall and painted it silver. Very interesting, it is in the Plog section of Lumenlab.com forums.
Just curious, I know the test was done with the cheaper DLP projectors but I was wondering if anyone has tried a 3D setup to the other extream? No money concerns how would it look in 3D using the more expensive equipment like with the tripple (3) chip DLP projector and the most expensive video card produced today? I bet it is the abosolute best 3D it since it does not use a color wheel and with super fast Pixel response times coupled with the fastest mhz a video card can produce...
| Quote : Just curious, I know the test was done with the cheaper DLP projectors but I was wondering if anyone has tried a 3D setup to the other extream? No money concerns how would it look in 3D using the more expensive equipment like with the tripple (3) chip DLP projector and the most expensive video card produced today? I bet it is the abosolute best 3D it since it does not use a color wheel and with super fast Pixel response times coupled with the fastest mhz a video card can produce... |
Money no object you would want to look into the $400 "projection shutter glasses" and a proper 3D projector.
OR,
A setup with 2 projectors and polarizing, this way the glasses are high-contrast, passive, and are much brighter than LCD shutter-glasses with no ghosting.
Please look back to my post to MR. Barry Aldous website, he has a setup with 2 polarized projectors.
ANY DLP will work with polarization, just get 2, wide-screen would be good.
| Quote : Just curious, I know the test was done with the cheaper DLP projectors but I was wondering if anyone has tried a 3D setup to the other extream? No money concerns how would it look in 3D using the more expensive equipment like with the tripple (3) chip DLP projector and the most expensive video card produced today? I bet it is the abosolute best 3D it since it does not use a color wheel and with super fast Pixel response times coupled with the fastest mhz a video card can produce... |
It is interesting to note that in the 120Hz capable DLP projector category, there is currently a big gap between the DepthQ (800x600 @ 120Hz) and the next step up - projectors from Christie Mirage (3-chip, 1400x1050 @ 120Hz) or also from Barco. Don't expect much change from about US$50k for the lower models.
If you're interested in seeing what a high-end system is capable of, visit a 3D showing of "Meet the Robinsons" on a REAL D 3D cinema system - VERY high quality! These systems use a single 3-chip DLP projector running at 144 fps - usually a Christie CP2000 or a Barco DP100. There are about 700 REAL D systems around the world. Resolution is 2048x1080. Visit the REAL D website for a list of REAL D 3D cinema locations: www.reald.com
| Quote :
|
I definately wouldn't say that the 1080p BenQ W9000 DLP projector I'm thinking about getting is about $3,500 street price. (100Hz).
I'm still possibly interested in the passive polarised option though. Will this method work with LCD projectors as they are cheaper than DLP (I presume it would as they pixel decay time isn't relevant for this method)
thanks for the input. actually, it's funny you mention the DIY projector project, as I built one already based on the old article on Tom's Hardware for building one with the overhead projector (I was looking all over lumenlab's website at the time). I did it on the cheap with old LCD's from ebay, but I had a hard time finding a used projector so bought a new lower-end one. The results are pretty good, I have it set up in a small room and built a homemade screen with a queensize bedsheet and cheap white shower curtains sewn together to make a 2.5mx2m screen (HUGE!).
I have read lots about people building enclosures for their LCD projectors to make them more visually appealing and more portable, but my engineering skills are lacking to go to that extent, and that's the only way I could see using two LCD projectors in tandem to be a practical cost for me currently, though adding an enclosure increases cost too. As for the mirror method with two monitors, I'm pretty happy with my 22" LCD and would be hesitant to buy a second 22" monitor I'd hardly use anyways, except for 3d gaming when I want it. I also watch a lot of television and movies on the computer, which would require removing the apparatus I suppose and I'm pretty darn lazy.
HOWEVER, after my tour in Afghanistan starting January I'll have some money to spend, so I'd love to see some new Nvidia drivers and figure out a practical way to implement this (likely with a new store-bought projector). I certainly have a lot more reading to do if I'm going to make an informed decision about which method to use (if any), so far I am only basing my information on what scraps I've figured out from posts in this forum. Hooking up some wireless shutter glasses with an inverter and installing a driver sounds just too easy to consider another method using mirrors, dual projectors, fresnel lenses or whatever else, unless it makes a truly dramatic difference (this is just in my house for fun after all, i'm not doing professional presentations or charging admission).
| Quote :
|
I was hoping to find a solution that didn't incur that extra $200-$250 expense (and effort) of ceiling mounting. I don't believe that was included in Cleeve's pricing of the sub-$1500 setup.
If you are wanting to go cheap, I think Newegg has a Universal Ceiling mount kit for projectors for $99... I am not sure that it works for all of them, but It might be worth a shot.You guys are shopping in the wrong places Monoprice.com has one for $17.
http://www.monoprice.com/products/ [...] t=2&style=
You can also get 25' and longer VGA cords for under $20, they are of high quality, I percieve no difference between a 3' cable and the 25' cable.
Awesome!! Have you used this particular Unit? How sturdy is it?
There are 1312 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.
