Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > RuneScape Exposed Part 1: An Education Kids Don't Need

RuneScape Exposed Part 1: An Education Kids Don't Need - Page 2

Forum Games General : Games General Discussions - RuneScape Exposed Part 1: An Education Kids Don't Need

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 
- 0 +

Last message on previous page:
Was this one game really worth dedicating an entire (two-part) article to? I would understand if it was an actual review, but that isn't the case. It reads more like a Geraldo-esque "expose" of some game company's plot to destroy our children.

In my opinion a better article would have been about free to play games in general, comparing and contrasting the games and communities out there. As many people have pointed out, the horrible behavior by the players described is hardly unique. Pointing out major flaws, like a developer encouraging and covering up scamming, would be an excellent point in this context.

The way it is, the article reads like an extended version of a forum rant.

Reply to carpens
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

I will first of all say that everything you said is true and it is an extremely well written article. If anything you were more then fair in your overall assessment of the game.

Secondly, I will agree being a female was indeed tough because of the harassment that you could not report and the constant following which made playing less fun. The fact that male players use female accounts to scam others also infuriated me, and gives the real females a bad reputation.

I liked Runescape and played it for three years but it was going downhill with all of the begging and scamming and I was not enjoying it as much because it had changed so drastically. The fact Jagex made some types of scams legal, and not even having the guts to tell the general population was the last straw.

My last complaint to Jagex about the scamming got me the usual form letter saying they were too busy, but had the additional information below, as I was now ftp:

~Unfortunately, due to the massive growth in popularity of RuneScape and the increasing number of queries that brings, we have not been able to keep up, and are not able to offer a personal response this time. We are increasing the size of our customer support unit and hopefully the next time you need help you will be able to get a quick answer!

We always give priority to answering all member queries personally, but we are now aiming to answer more free player queries. This number will increase even more in the coming weeks.

Why not consider becoming a member and help support the continued development of the game? Plus you'll also get a range of extra features and benefits like four extra bank pages, exclusive quests and you get no adverts that can sometimes put you off your game.

As a Member you also get access to the Forums which can usually answer any query you have allowing you more time to play the game~

As a member for 2 and a half years, I never received a reply from Jagex that was written specifically to answer a query, and not one of the bugs I reported was fixed. The people I reported got a few days mute at most and although Jagex says they ban players and catch autoers, it seems they have an arbitrary system much like the arbitrary use of their own rules.

I left the game with 113cb, 1,976 total 121,877,103 overall points. (I am not bragging, but it seems people think ranters didn't actually play) I happily gave away my stuff to ensure I won't be tempted to return, and my son was happy to also leave the game knowing rules were not being followed.

Reply to paulyts50
- 0 +

Man Runescape sounds almost identical to Diablo 2, other than the fact that Runescape is a poorly made game that was made to milk cash off 10 year olds. Diablo 2 was fun but it had many of the same problems, but it has gotten ridiculously hacked making it pointless to play, as Blizzard doesn't care about it anymore :roll: . Anyway it just sounded exactly like a more poorly made version of Diablo 2 in MMORPG form.

Reply to elcold

Of course RuneScape isn't meant for five year olds. THEY TRY TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE UNDER 13 FROM PLAYING!!!!!!!!!!

Also, on the fact that people feel that every player is friendly. Does Jagex tell people that everyone will be friendly? They don't have the force, they know this so they don't make this claim! If you thought that on RuneScape that everyone is friendly YOU ARE AN IMBECILE! Just think for a moment, why would Jagex install a report abuse button, why would they think that everyone'll be friendly? USE COMMON SENSE.

Primitive graphics? Man this article is OLD. Incase you haven't noticed, RuneScape is out of the dark ages and in 3D!

Look, does Jagex ever boast that it has a child safe environment? If it did, it wouldn't discourage children!

Get your facts right fool!

Reply to Buck_Teeth7

Quote :

Man Runescape sounds almost identical to Diablo 2, other than the fact that Runescape is a poorly made game that was made to milk cash off 10 year olds. Diablo 2 was fun but it had many of the same problems, but it has gotten ridiculously hacked making it pointless to play, as Blizzard doesn't care about it anymore :roll: . Anyway it just sounded exactly like a more poorly made version of Diablo 2 in MMORPG form.



I bet more than half the players of RuneScape are not members. Also, RuneScape wasn't made to "milk cash off ten year olds" as you have said. RuneScape members was made avalible (please excuse my spelling if it is incorrect) a few years after it was started fool!

Quote :

And how about the age old rivalry between jocks and nerds? The advent of online gaming has proven computer nerds are no better than jocks. I use to think jocks were pricks. If you couldn't play a sport, you sucked, were worthless in there eyes, made fun of, and picked last in gym class. So there was always this counter-movement that nerds are the nice guys being picked on by big, dumb, arrogant jocks. WRONG! If people are new to a game, or as this article pointed out, just do something stupid by accident you'll be hearing, "Noob!" real quick. Right, looks like Mr. Nerd ain't such a nice guy after all. At least those prick jocks are living in the real world.



Not all jocks are bad. Not all nerds are bad. I consider myself a nerd BUT I'm not going to go around calling all the new players noobs. Besides, if I ever were to do that, I'd say newb which would sound better. BTW, I think people should be NICE to new players. You can't say all nerds are evil and twisted just because a few like to call others noobs. You can't call all jocks bad because a few make fun of nerds. What you are doing is generalisation, a form of discrimination!

Reply to Buck_Teeth7
- 0 +

Quote :



Primitive graphics? Man this article is OLD. Incase you haven't noticed, RuneScape is out of the dark ages and in 3D!




Go play World of Warcraft, Linage II, Guild Wars, or any other popular MMO and reply with the same argument about graphics.

Yes, RS2 is a big step above RSC. However, It is definitely not special compared to the newer RPGs.

The 13 year old limit is only in place due to a US constitutional law stating that no child under 13 years of age is allowed to give out personal details without parental consent. it is the only reason why Jagex has imposed the verification upon registering a new account. From what I hear; it was either imply the check field or disable registration access to the site for American users.

Reply to unzinc

Quote :

Of course RuneScape isn't meant for five year olds. THEY TRY TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE UNDER 13 FROM PLAYING!!!!!!!!!!



The Official Handbook and Strategy Guide for Runescape, written by a children’s author, was just published in January and the book is geared to age 9 to 11 (below the age 13 required in 2006 to play the game) and being it is a scholastic book, it may soon be available in schools on their order forms in the USA and Canada.

Quote :

Look, does Jagex ever boast that it has a child safe environment? If it did, it wouldn't discourage children! Get your facts right fool!



The Runescape website itself has a Parents' Guide which says the game is educational, safe (and Jagex brags it prides itself on keeping children and their possessions safe) and fun.

Being you have called 2 people a fool and one an imbecile, and then proceded to boast that you are polite in-game, perhaps you should be more polite outside of the games as well.

Reply to paulyts50

lol, I guess you're right, I was contradicting myself. I apologize for insulting anyone.

When I feel strongly about something or I'm in a bad mood there's a repeat of Nagasaki and Hiroshima (the two cities that were bombed by the Americans using atomic bombs). Sorry again for the insults. Also, I will get angry if I am annoyed enough and can be quite impolite in the game too. This rarely ever happens as most of my friends in real life do not play in RuneScape and there the ones who annoy me the most.

I'd like to point out that schoolastic and runescape are two different companies. A person's opinion on the matter does not mean that the opinion is instantly correct. There's a difference between opinion and fact.

Reply to Buck_Teeth7

The world of Runescape mirrors are own. It definitely is "educational," though it mainly teaches street smarts, not book smarts, and it does it the hard way. People remember lessons that are learned the hard way, and virtually, it's as safe a way to learn it the hard way as possible. I'd rather have my child duped, PK'd in the wilderness, and have everything stolen from them, to learn not to follow strangers... theninstead of being duped by some school friends and beat up/robbed in an alleyway.

The only problem I see is that in the former situation, the child is less likely to tell their parent, while the latter is unavoidable. Parental guidance, and support, is instrumental in making sure that lesson stays with you for life.

The game is also excellent evidence as to why our society needs and has laws.

Reply to TheMULLET

I think we're seeing a division into the "It's not bad" and "It's terrible" camps. That to me says that there probably is a problem with the game, as you don't usually get a debate like that for the fun of it.

I think that the central point of Charles' argument is "The developers do not give parents the information they need to make an informed decision about allowing their children to play the game. Indeed, they may well mislead parents."

We are constantly buggering on in the games press about how parents should take more responsibility for their childrens gameplay. We do not suggest that parents should play games - they would have no interest, time nor technical skills to do so in many cases. What we suggest is that parents read into the games. Therefore if there are negative blemishes on the game, then that information should be available to parents.

I think that Charles makes a good point when he says that this is what this article sets out to do. We cannot say "Parents should read up on a game before they let their children play it" and then only have positive information from the developers as their only source.

Reply to Aaron McKenna
- 0 +

Please check this forum topic:
http://forum.tip.it/viewtopic.php?t=634393

The tip.it forums are part of the tip.it website, which is the biggest fansite website for the game Runescape. Many more mature gamers of the Runescape community frequent those forums.

Many points of the article are discussed with the author. If you're a parent, and that you have never personally played Runescape, then know that this article is rather misleading, making Runescape seem much worse than what it is. I am myself a Runescape player with a lot of experience, and I do not agree with this article.

Reply to 5657

Buck_Teeth7 said

Quote :

I'd like to point out that schoolastic and runescape are two different companies



No need to point that out, but you are going to have to read more carefully. Scolastic is the printer and distributer of course, and being that this is the "official" guide, that means it was made so by Jagex.

In other words it had to be endorsed by Jagex to be the official guide, and the fact Scolastic sells the majority of their books in schools ensures a huge new target base in elementary schools. The guide also repeats much of what was said in the parents guide, which is probably why Jagex is covering up it's lack of rule adherance and correct information.

Reply to paulyts50

"Runescape Exposed Part I" - Educational? Well, this article certainly wasn't!

Whilst the writer of that article is perfectly entitled to his opinion, it is extremely disappointing to see such overzealous sensationalism used by anyone who claims to be at least, a reviewer and at best, a journalist. Any good writer would know that you cannot allow personal subjective comments that are quite openly plastered through that little rant, to influence the state of your review or article.

On top of this, to use such quotes as:

Quote :

I was once selling items to a player in RuneScape who told me that his nephew would also buy some of my items. I sold to him too, but a few days later my friend asked me to stop selling to his nephew. I asked why, and he told me that his nephew was addicted to the game and he was trying to get him to play less.

My friend's nephew was 10 years old.



I mean, please! It's like an advert for Children in Need!

And:

Quote :

"I have been desensitized by this game, and had to quit due to my addiction. In order to pass school I actually got myself banned on my level 95. It set me free: grades went up, happiness went up, weight went down (the only good thing going down lol)."



13 year olds don't talk like this! Come on! I was a teacher for 3 years and I never once heard a 13 year old speak with this sort of pre-prompted satire!

I'm appalled that people even get away with writing this sort of uninformed and ludicrous drivel to be perfectly honest.

Reply to Arkhanaut
- 0 +

Why do I see buy RS2 gold advertisements on this page lol.. good ole goooooogle ads.

Reply to STEMNIN

Quote :

Buck_Teeth7 said 'd like to point out that schoolastic and runescape are two different companies



No need to point that out, but you are going to have to read more carefully. Scolastic is the printer and distributer of course, and being that this is the "official" guide, that means it was made so by Jagex.

In other words it had to be endorsed by Jagex to be the official guide, and the fact Scolastic sells the majority of their books in schools ensures a huge new target base in elementary schools. The guide also repeats much of what was said in the parents guide, which is probably why Jagex is covering up it's lack of rule adherance and correct information.

I bought a copy of this book. It is not just that they endorsed it as official -- the book was actually written by Jagex; their name is on the copyright notice.

Scholastic is a company specializing in childrens' books; they also have in-roads into many schools. Here is a link to the Official Runescape Guide.

What's the age range on that book?

This and other issues are covered in Part 2 of the article.

Charles

Reply to charlesk

Quote :

13 year olds don't talk like this! Come on! I was a teacher for 3 years and I never once heard a 13 year old speak with this sort of pre-prompted satire!



My 11 year old son may well have written that. A child's ability to speak and write well is due to his environment, which includes the influence from teachers.

Quote :

I'm appalled that people even get away with writing this sort of uninformed and ludicrous drivel to be perfectly honest.



The article is neither uninformed nor ludicrous. I do not know the author other then agreeing with his point of view. We have both played the game a long time, and have seen first hand everything he has stated.

"Uninformed and ludicrous drivel" uses three words which in no way apply to the article. This man is very bright and informed, the article is not comical or non-sensical and it certainly is verbose, but not drivel. You do have the right to your opinion, but it lacks merit, regardless of whether you taught 3 years or not.

Reply to paulyts50

Quote :


Whilst the writer of that article is perfectly entitled to his opinion, it is extremely disappointing to see such overzealous sensationalism used by anyone who claims to be at least, a reviewer and at best, a journalist. Any good writer would know that you cannot allow personal subjective comments that are quite openly plastered through that little rant, to influence the state of your review or article.


It wasn't a review. It was an editorial, and clearly marked as such at the beginning of the article.

The title -- "Runescape Exposed" -- should also have been a pretty good hint that it was an editorial.

Quote :


I mean, please! It's like an advert for Children in Need!


The incident happened, exactly as I said it did. And it's far from a one-of-a-kind occurrence.

Quote :


13 year olds don't talk like this! Come on! I was a teacher for 3 years and I never once heard a 13 year old speak with this sort of pre-prompted satire!

I'm appalled that people even get away with writing this sort of uninformed and ludicrous drivel to be perfectly honest.


Should I be appalled that, with absolutely no evidence of any sort, you are effectively claiming that I am lying? As an online and published author for 10 years, I take such accusations seriously.

That quote came directly from a Runescape forum discussion; I only cleaned up the language and punctuation to make it more clear, which I also said in the article.

If my editorial was really as "uninformed and ludicrous" as you say, I'd think you could come up with a more substantial reply than a personal attack.

Charles

Reply to charlesk

Arkhanaut: Just for you, I went back to the Runescape forums and hunted down the source for that quote. (No easy task since those forums do not include a full text search.)

Here it is: http://forum.runescape.com/forums. [...] 07,goto,51

Second-to-last post from the bottom, near the end.

Charles

Reply to charlesk

"it's a lengthy, detailed account of his experiences with this game and his beliefs regarding the content." That sentance outlines the very purpose of a blog to me, not an article on a decent quality technology site.

"a lot of people are backing up the claims in the piece." If you wrote articles attacking paedophilia, or Mugabe, or Hitler, or slavery, or any number of other topics, you'd likely get a positive response. That doesn't mean the article is of a high quality, or that it is deserving of THG's endorsement.

I don't think that THG has an "anti-technology agenda". Nor did I say so, but that's beside the point. I do think the article is overly judgemental and biased, and that it reflects badly on THG, BUT it need not point to a deeper, site wide agenda (fingers crossed anyway).

To my mind, two wrongs do not make a right. In the same way, having some articles that, rightly or wrongly, praise videogaming, and others which savage it, do not even out. The fact is, you should alter the existing bias, rather than attempting to neutralise the situation by leaning the other way.

You'rre not "picking on" me, far from it. You're just voicing disagreement with my opinion, which is to be expected. I debated the "motive and objectivity of the author" because it gets to the heart of the problem much more effectively than trawling the article for quotes to bicker with. If the article was written with a certain bias in mind, then it will undoubtedly end up flawed.

In fact, the very point that I did not pick through the article should infer that there is something more than the superficial content that I disagreed with. "I just wish you would give us a little more credit before dismissing us after reading a column that you don't agree with." shows you rather missed my point. Yes, I disagree with the article's content, but I wasn't here to say that. I was here to say that I didn't think the article should ever have been on THG in the first place, which is a subtly different issue.

Reply to Synergy6

Great Article, i was a runescape player many moon's ago but quit because it was laggy (Now wasn' that a blessing in disguise!)

However some people in response have posted what can be done about it?

Take the online game Neopets for example, it has a far larger player base and suffers many of the same problems yet there site is monitored a hell of a lot better...

Now Jagex may not have the funds Neopets now has but when i started playing Neopets it was a community of under 10,000, the difference is Neopets has put player safety as its number 1 priority for many years...

I look forward to part 2 of the article..

Reply to TheMuffinMan

Quote :

13 year olds don't talk like this! Come on! I was a teacher for 3 years and I never once heard a 13 year old speak with this sort of pre-prompted satire!



My 11 year old son may well have written that. A child's ability to speak and write well is due to his environment, which includes the influence from teachers.



Ok, points noted - and I'll ignore the unsubtle innuendo at the end of that remark as well.

So let's delve further into this article then.

Quote :

RuneScape is child-oriented, with some players as young as five online.



As far as I am aware, there are two major faults with this line. First, to my knowledge Runescape in no way professes to be directed towards children. If the general player base age happens to be that of teenagers, this is simply due to the age group that wish to play it. However there was a recent poll that proved at least ~40 per cent of the player base was over the age of 18.
Second, there is an age restriction on registering / playing the game of 13+. Note: This restriction isn't a PG13, but more like that of a 15-cert on a film. So if there are players that young playing then it is more the fault of parents not taking an interest into what their child is doing than that of the the game itself.

Quote :

Jagex made some types of scams legal



I find that highly unlikely, again for two reasons. First, why would any game company deliberately allow it's players to ruin the experiences of it's other players. This would be completely unpractical and against any business ethic. If that were the case, Runescape would have died a long time ago instead of steadily climbing to become one of the most played online MMO's in the world.
Also, they would not openly object to scamming and continue to ban scammers for something which they supported. That makes no sense whatsoever.


I also find it very interesting to note that the writer of the article, whilst hating the game so vehemently, decided to continue playing it for so long. It sounds more like a disgruntled player who did not get what he wanted in the game and is venting his frustration in the only way he can think of. Poor form.

Quote :

Jagex' child-directed advertising



To my knowledge, Runescape is a game that has never been advertised other than by word of mouth and this is what has made it so impressive. I'd like to see the advertisements the author is writing about myself (And will take note if ther is, of course). And by advertising, I don't mean 3rd-party website adverts about gold-farming or eBay and the like.

Quote :

A new player who is level 50 could end up fighting an experienced PKer whose character is also level 50 but far more powerful.



The game was never intended to work this way but apparently was an unexpected mechanic within the game itself that our "innocent teenagers" exploited for their own ends.... ^^

Quote :

decent players who just want to have fun and have no idea what they are getting themselves into.



A decent and experienced player with no idea about the wilderness? That's highly unlikely...

Quote :

Many young players get exasperated trying to earn the money they "need"



Sounds like some older people I know as well. Perhaps it's because the game is too close to real life then?

Quote :

My friend's nephew was 10 years old.



And the writer didn't raise a point that the nephew was too young to play Runescape? Funny, because that would have been the more responsible approach.

Quote :

There are whole companies that create "bot armies" to earn millions in RuneScape gold, which they sell online for real-world cash.



This is completely illegal and Jagex bans any instances of "botting" that it comes across. Of course, people will continue to invent new and innovative ways of cheating, but that's human beings for you - you can't blame a deck of cards because the dealer is giving all the Aces to himself.


(Last bit removed as unnecessary ;) )

Reply to Arkhanaut

Quote :

Arkhanaut: Just for you, I went back to the Runescape forums and hunted down the source for that quote. (No easy task since those forums do not include a full text search.)

Here it is: http://forum.runescape.com/forums. [...] 07,goto,51

Second-to-last post from the bottom, near the end.

Charles



Thanks - I will go and read it now. :)

Reply to Arkhanaut

Quote :



If my editorial was really as "uninformed and ludicrous" as you say, I'd think you could come up with a more substantial reply than a personal attack.




Ok, all personal opinions and feelings aside:

I am sure you would agree that an article such as this one is going to provoke strong feelings one way or another. In my case they are obviously feelings of complete disagreement whereas for others it might be big nods of approval.

It's a bold article for sure and in that respect, I commend your work. I simply disagree with most of it ;)

In no way are any comments I have made intended to be a direct attack upon yourself, although the same might be said for poor Jagex from yourself.

In any case, I have said my piece(s). :) And everyone is entitled to their opinions of course.

And thus, henceforth and forsooth. :P

Reply to Arkhanaut

Quote :


"it's a lengthy, detailed account of his experiences with this game and his beliefs regarding the content." That sentance outlines the very purpose of a blog to me, not an article on a decent quality technology site.


TwitchGuru has a long tradition of posting editorial pieces related to gaming. That includes the whole series of "Counter-Point" pieces between Rob and Aaron, for example.

Quote :


To my mind, two wrongs do not make a right. In the same way, having some articles that, rightly or wrongly, praise videogaming, and others which savage it, do not even out.


The article doesn't "savage videogaming". It raises specific concerns with one game.

Quote :


I debated the "motive and objectivity of the author" because it gets to the heart of the problem much more effectively than trawling the article for quotes to bicker with. If the article was written with a certain bias in mind, then it will undoubtedly end up flawed.


Again.. I am not some sort of anti-gaming, anti-technology Luddite. The article is written in a negative way because my goal is to raise awareness of the negative issues in the game that Jagex is deliberately suppressing.

The fact that an article is biased doesn't mean it is inherently flawed -- editorializing is a valid form of communication and has been pretty much forever.

Charles

Reply to charlesk

Ahhhh. Allow me to bask in this: reasonable people, debating important issues, expressing points of views, and engaging in intelligent discourse without personal insults or bad behavior.

One more thing. Some of you clearly disagree with Charles' editorial, but that's the point, I suppose of writing an editorial or opinion column. In any even, I believe Charles deserves quite a bit of credit for taking the time to respond to many of these questions and criticisms on this forum.

Reply to robwright

Indeed - I appreciate that the author is willing to hear both criticism and praise for his article/editorial and to respond to points raised.

It's far more irksome when you have no way of contacting the writer to offer praise or conjecture on issues.

So gratitude for that, sir!

Reply to Arkhanaut

Quote :

The article is written in a negative way because my goal is to raise awareness of the negative issues in the game that Jagex is deliberately suppressing.



Perhaps it would be better to raise awareness by using a balance of positive and negative aspects within the game rather than purely negative as this often is more detrimental to the point, inducing panic and fear into the target audience.

I am sure that people would much rather hear the whole truth in any argument for or against any subject?

Reply to Arkhanaut
- 0 +

Quote :


Perhaps it would be better to raise awareness by using a balance of positive and negative aspects within the game rather than purely negative as this often is more detrimental to the point, inducing panic and fear into the target audience.

I am sure that people would much rather hear the whole truth in any argument for or against any subject?



That is exactly my opinion on the subject aswell, which I find to be the major flaw of this editiorial.

Reply to 5657

First, thanks for all the comments and replies, I do appreciate them. Yes, I realize that this article is controversial and I did expect many negative responses. I have a reasonably thick skin and no problem with disagreement.

Please understand that this article is not a review of Runescape. I did not set out to create a comprehensive analysis of the entire game with pros and cons. It was an expose', as the name suggests.

I obviously don't think the game has only negative aspects, or I wouldn't play it and I wouldn't let my kids play it either. It is my opinion that Jagex already presents the positive side of the game adequately. I saw no real benefit to repeating all those points when the pieces were already long and I had much to say.

Consider the role of an investigative reporter. Suppose he conducts an investigation into a restaurant chain and discovers health code violations. Would the reporter spend 50% of his time extolling the positive attributes of the restaurants to be "fair"?

Similarly, the goal here was awareness, not a complete review. It also was not to whip anyone into a froth. I highly doubt that any parent would be induced into "panic and fear" over this article -- but I hope it would make them think twice.

Charles

Reply to charlesk
- 0 +

Quote :

I obviously don't think the game has only negative aspects, or I wouldn't play it and I wouldn't let my kids play it either. It is my opinion that Jagex already presents the positive side of the game adequately. (edited for space)
Charles



I usually don't join forums and respond but I ran across your article and found it to be on the whole an accurate description of MMORPGS in general.

I've played Runescape since the days of 2d graphics. My children and grandchildren have also played it BUT...they were not initially allowed to play it alone. Perhaps this is the crux of the problem. It's not really the game.... it's the lack of scrutiny of the child's activity. I have found parental handbooks to fall quite short of the experience of actually playing or watching the game with my kids. No handbook can aptly describe an online community. In addition, without any enforced rules, people resort to very barbaric behaviors. Does "Lord of the Flies" come to mind?
Combine lack of parental involvement, and understanding of online communities, and the need to boost an ego at any cost.. [children have very needy egos] and you have the deterioration of online games, any of them.

This lack of civility is not limited to children, as many of my friends and family play online games and it is fairly predictiable who will act civilally and who is prone to exploit situations, otherwise known as cheat.
It is also fairly predictable that if a child has been taught about gaining status items in real life, that child will seek status items in a game and pay exorbitant prices for it. I had a friend who actually supported buying in-game gold because her child could not "do without". Yes, people are a bit crazy..and she is an adult.

It was a lot of fun to get holiday items. I was sad when they didn't hand things out anymore. However, the drop system was a bit frustrating. If you weren't fast, you didn't get anything; and those who ran programs that auto-looted got most of the goods. Again a minor exploit.... but all's fair isn't it?

Children need to know what happens to thier character when it dies.To them a character or "toon", is real and in combat it will die eventually. Not over a disrespect for real death, but because Runescape is a game and I personally don't like collecting and then losing stuff and neither does a child. I have received phone calls from a frantic grandchild who "died" in a game [while playing without me] and I needed to go rescue them and save thier "loot". Actually, when I died it was fairly painful and I even called my friends for help so as not to lose my precious loot. This has lead me away from punitive games. I do not like to play games where dying causes great frustration. I also inform the rest of my family and allow them an informed decision about the treatment of character death. Yes, I'm still a kid inside.

It is my opinion that your expose is not really one of the evils of a particular game but what evils will people do to one another for greed and pride. I have seen what you describe and fully agree that everything occurs as you say. However, Runescape, and any online community merely reflects the current accepted behaviors of people. In short, what you see in a MMORPG is what you find in society in general. The only difference is the attempt to enforce rules. The fix is not in the game but in the people playing.

BTW.... on another note.. I got a set of Easter bunny ears in the bank somewhere... you got a billion? :lol:

Reply to Emme
- 0 +

Quote :

Jagex made some types of scams legal

Quote :


I find that highly unlikely, again for two reasons. First, why would any game company deliberately allow it's players to ruin the experiences of it's other players. This would be completely unpractical and against any business ethic. If that were the case, Runescape would have died a long time ago instead of steadily climbing to become one of the most played online MMO's in the world.
Also, they would not openly object to scamming and continue to ban scammers for something which they supported. That makes no sense whatsoever.

You find it highly unlikely? Imagine my surprise as a long time player. I can guarentee you, its the truth.


Quote :

Second, there is an age restriction on registering / playing the game of 13+.



There is now. There didnt used to be. Its a fairly recent addition. There was no real advertisement about the change. Nor were children under this age asked to stop playing. It only applied to new accounts created.

Reply to Wildy
- 0 +

Hello snik. I purely visit Tom's Hardware for the hardware articles but I happened upon this article upon which this forum discussion is based. I was interested in seeing the reactions to this article. I had to stop and take some time out of my day to reply...to you and only you...snik.

I know nothing of role playing games. I remember long long ago playing D'n'D...just around the time of the first Nintendo...say...1985. I have played first person shooters for thier simplicity. You go in...blow up stuff...mindless devestation (including lots of sniping) and you leave. Lots of fun. Gaming that is easy to forget. Kill. Leave.

What amazes me is your reaction to the person who has written the article. I do believe you are a highly intelligent person and very articulate. You know this game inside and out...not doubt something you are proud of.

What floors me is your absolute flippant attitude towards the level of violence, distrust and melevolence that is being instilled in the young kids that are playing this game. We aren't talking about adults here. We are talking about impressionable children. Whether you want to dismiss this as just a game is purely ignorant on your part. Blaming parents that let the children play the game too long is even more laughable.

After reading this article and seeing your reaction to this story alone makes me want to make this game a reality for you. To turn you into a young boy and thow you into Jagex world and see just how this might change your attitude about the game. This may be a harsh reality...but think of it this way. You as an adult have the pure luxury of dismissing this as just a game based on the fact that...A) you are a grown man with the intelligence(I assume) and bravery of an coarse thick skinned adult and ...B) you may just very well be a person that is capable of these things in the real world.

As scary as option B seems this is the difference between you and the young impressionable children that are playing these games. Children for the most part start out with a clean slate but as stated many times in the article turn out to take alot of these little game lessons and translate them into the real world. THAT IS WHAT THE ARTICLE WAS ABOUT.

But obviously you weren't smart enough to get that point...snik.

SNIK. This question if for you and I really do look forward to your reply:

Would you be prepared to fall victim to a violent offender who claims that the life lessons they learned from your precious "Runescape"

Choose wisely snik. Remember. There is always someone more powerful ...no matter how bravely you choose to answer this question.

Reply to kansur0

Essentially, we should ban every violent videogame, movie, TV show, peice of music etc. That is, to extrapolate your idea that parents and children cannot be held possibly be held responsible for their own actions (which, presumably, only leaves the developers at fault).

"level of violence, distrust and melevolence" The last time I checked, the world (the bit outside of the monitor) has quite a bit of this too. Is it better to build the "thick skin" you refer to in a game, or in the real world? After all, knives are hard to fit through telephone lines.

Reply to Synergy6

I want to say to the writer, I really liked the article. Now saying that I played Runescape, for a grand total of maybe a hour, but I have played several MMORPG's over the years. Those being Nexus: Kingdom of the Wind, Star Wars, and Guild Wars.

For the most part I agree, but the one thing I do partially disagree with is something you said in the part about scams (or I should say led me to believe)...Now correct me if I am wrong, but you led me to believe that you put all blame on the scammer entirely. I disagree with that. The first mmorpg I played was Nexus. I played for a little over a month as paying customer. I was about 12 at the time, and I convinced me mom to pay so I could play a character past lvl 10, I think that was the limit at the time. I played for over a month and made a few friends that I played and quested with online. Then I met this guy, who said he would give me 10000 gold or what ever the currency was (it has been years since I have played) if he could "borrow" the character for a hour. So like a idiot I accepted and gave him the password to the character. A hour later I went to log on, and of course I couldn't. I had lost my character, but l was able to delete from the main website, since I still had the whole account password.

I was upset to say the least I had been scammed, so I quit the game in order for that to not happen again. It would be about 6 years until I played another mmorpg, that being Guild Wars.

My point for the whole thing is, even at a younger age it is partially the person who got scammed's fault. Even at a young age someone should know not give out your password for anything to anyone, I am pretty sure that all mmorpg's state that somewhere that is out in the open somewhere either in the game itself or on their website.

Also something else I disagree with, is the taking away of rare artifacts, weapons, etc.... Like someone else said most people that play like to show off something that shows their game playing abilities. Where it be their name in a top ten list, or a special item or trophey they got for doing something special. Of course that doesn't mean they should be arrogant about it... I mean yes you got a special prize....in a game... it isn't like you cured cancer, or rescued a child from a burning building...

Also for those others who insult others by calling them "newb" or what ever word is "in" at the moment... I think that is just stupid... When I call of duty 2 on my friends network, if we kill some body or just completly own the person in a game, we will make jokes, but we don't try to humilate them....even if we did it was because we personally know each other and we know our limits and where to stop... but to make fun of someone we don't know is just wrong... You could really hurt some body...

Those just my thoughts on the article. Like I said at the beginning good article, writer.

Reply to KaiserZr

Quote :

Essentially, we should ban every violent videogame, movie, TV show, peice of music etc. That is, to extrapolate your idea that parents and children cannot be held possibly be held responsible for their own actions (which, presumably, only leaves the developers at fault).


That's a whopper of a straw man there, Synergy6.

If you think parents and children should be accountable, is it too much to ask that when the developer creates a "Parents' Guide" that it actually has some resemblance to the reality of the game? Because Runescape's does not.

Quote :


"level of violence, distrust and melevolence" The last time I checked, the world (the bit outside of the monitor) has quite a bit of this too. Is it better to build the "thick skin" you refer to in a game, or in the real world? After all, knives are hard to fit through telephone lines.


Words can hurt too.

And to continue on your parental responsibility theme, shouldn't it be the parents who decide when and how their kids get "thick skin" -- not Jagex?

Charles

Reply to charlesk

Quote :

I think we're seeing a division into the "It's not bad" and "It's terrible" camps. That to me says that there probably is a problem with the game, as you don't usually get a debate like that for the fun of it.

I think that the central point of Charles' argument is "The developers do not give parents the information they need to make an informed decision about allowing their children to play the game. Indeed, they may well mislead parents."

We are constantly buggering on in the games press about how parents should take more responsibility for their childrens gameplay. We do not suggest that parents should play games - they would have no interest, time nor technical skills to do so in many cases. What we suggest is that parents read into the games. Therefore if there are negative blemishes on the game, then that information should be available to parents.

I think that Charles makes a good point when he says that this is what this article sets out to do. We cannot say "Parents should read up on a game before they let their children play it" and then only have positive information from the developers as their only source.



The parents are given information if they wish to seek it using the KBase.

Reply to Buck_Teeth7
- 0 +

Quote :

The parents are given information if they wish to seek it using the KBase.



That is simply untrue. If i were not a player myself i would not have the information to pass onto my child. The ONLY way i know what i do, is by spending a whole lot of time in game. The knowledge base is nothing but yet another weak diversion.

Tell me where in the knowledge base it says, the report abuse button is only there to give people a false sense of security. Because Jagex are simply to overwhelmed to deal with most problems.

Tell me where in the knowledge base it says that my account status will be threatened if i speak about something they deem inappropriate? Even though its a very serious matter to a parent.

Tell me where in the knowledge base it tells me that after i send in an extremley serious concern i will be met with an auto response that tells me to seek membership as i will get better service? - I'm already a member.

Tell me where in the knowledge base it states that the rules are fluid depending on your location.

Tell me where in the knowledge base it states that the parents@jagex email address is nothing but a joke.

Tell me please because i cant get the answers anywhere else....

Reply to Wildy

Quote :

Tell me where in the knowledge base it says that my account status will be threatened if i speak about something they deem inappropriate? Even though its a very serious matter to a parent.



Ya, I agree for a part of it. I once tried to help and warn people that someone was password scamming. I was smacked with password scamming myself and copped an instant 10 blackmarks. But, also, I believe that sometimes Jagex can be fair.

There's a simple soloution to the problem. Hire PMods that are good. They seem to hire people who aren't capable of being PMods.

Also, Charles, try to be more optimistic, the good features of RuneScape outnumber the bad by far, stop breeding a race of people who think that RuneScape is nothing but cr*p.

Reply to Buck_Teeth7
- 0 +

Quote :

Tell me where in the knowledge base it says that my account status will be threatened if i speak about something they deem inappropriate? Even though its a very serious matter to a parent.



Ya, I agree for a part of it. I once tried to help and warn people that someone was password scamming. I was smacked with password scamming myself and copped an instant 10 blackmarks. But, also, I believe that sometimes Jagex can be fair.

There's a simple soloution to the problem. Hire PMods that are good. They seem to hire people who aren't capable of being PMods.

Also, Charles, try to be more optimistic, the good features of RuneScape outnumber the bad by far, stop breeding a race of people who think that RuneScape is nothing but cr*p.

Buck teeth i will respond here in Charles' defence although i'm sure he will as soon as he can. I am aware as i am sure Charles is that Runescape can be a wonderful place to be. People still praise the community as it once was. I personally would not have played for as long as i have if everything was bad. You must see the overall point that i persoanlly feel the article is trying to get across (I could be wrong but i dont think so). Which is that Runescape can be and should be improved. Unfortunately sometimes the people who matter choose not to listen.

I can see and understand why this article seems so full on, in its attempt to make Runescape seem nothing but bad. Do a search, try your hardest to find anything of substance (other than tiny blogs) that portrays Runescapes bad sides. You will find so many wonderful comments about the great game Runescape is. Well how bout just for once someone is not too scared to stand up and say "Hey you can do better".

And regarding your comment about player mods, yes. yes and yes. It would be a great start in cleaning up the ingame community. Out of 9 million players surely they can find some decent honest people who care. Both in F2P and P2P. I have seen myself all manner of bad things stop the instant people realise there is a Player Mod present. However i feel there should be levels, as they earn Jagex's trust, they are given more power to control the environment within the game. This is not a complete solution but hey, it would be a tiny step in the right direction.

Reply to Wildy

Quote :

tiny step in the right direction.



The NSW (Australia) premier had is campaign, his slogan for the better part of it was "There's more to do but we're heading in the right direction".

I do see your point but the reason why I said what I said was that it seems that almost everyone who's posting has something else to add that is negative for the game or something making Charles a king.

Although, I do applaud you Charles for you definately have research skills to find around everything that is bad about the game. I know that it would take me quite a while to attempt such a task.

Reply to Buck_Teeth7

Quote :


Charlesk, in reply to mandrake, you seem to imply that Jagex deny players knowledge that would leave them entirely at the mercy of scammers, and although perhaps some might have fallen to them because of poor communication, i doubt it is the main problem.

How is a new player supposed to learn about scams and how to avoid them when Jagex refuses to describe them, refuses to eliminate them, and hides any mention of them in the Runescape forums?



Well, there are the guides in Lumbridge where you first start in the game?

The stronghold of security which is the only time I have EVER seen an in game instance of educating players in how to keep their accounts secure and be protected against scamming.
It takes the player through many steps in what to avoid and how to stay safe both in the game and on the internet.

There's also plenty of banners and the like that warn against scammers and account hijacking.

You don't have to read them, of course ;)

Reply to Arkhanaut

With regards to Jagex making scamming 'legal', here are some direct quotes from the Knowledge Baser and Forum Code of Conduct.

Again, you only have to read them to see this - you don't even need to have a n account or be logged in...

Quote :

Scamming:[/]
You must not scam or deceive other players. Lying to other players for your own personal gain is not in the spirit of the game.
You may not advertise items for sale, which you do not actually possess. You may also not ask for payment in advance for any goods or services.
If you don't understand why we have this rule, try to imagine how you would feel if you had spent hours achieving something and then somebody else tricked you out of it. We want RuneScape to be fun, and being scammed is anything but fun.

To 'scam' means to cheat another player. This goes against the spirit of RuneScape, which is to play fairly and with respect for your fellow players as members of a worldwide community.



Jagex are very much against scammers - and do their best to prevent and discourage it.

As for not being 'allowed' to 'warn other users' on the forums about scams, etc, this is explained nicely here:

Quote :

If your account has been hijacked, you should use the 'Recover a locked account' link on the main page of the RuneScape website. There is no way for you to recover your account via the forums.

You may not post about scams on the forums - even to warn your fellow players about ones to watch out for. It simply spreads the details of scammers' methods, which could then be used by any unscrupulous players who read your post.



The last thing that I would want as a player is to tell 9 million players about how I was scammed by 1 person, only to find that now 9 million other people know how to do it. That makes a lot of sense to me. Sure, I would want other people to be warned about it to protect them, but the way to do this would be to report it to Jagex privately who would then take the necessary steps to try and stop it.

Also, it protects that person from being ridiculed or laughed at (by other children, of course) in the event that they perhaps did something a bit silly which caused them to be scammed.

With regards to price increases by players:

Quote :

So what if another player is deliberately trying to increase the price of an item?

Purposefully trying to change the value of items is not allowed. The following examples are considered price manipulation:
* Pretending to buy or sell when you have no intention of doing either. This includes pretending to sell to another player to raise/lower the price of an item.

* Telling others to raise or lower the price of an item. For example, "OMG noob item X is worth so much more. Sell for this price."

* Openly telling everyone to raise/lower a price, such as, "Listen here whip owners, we're going to push the price up to 10 mil; join me!"

* Ganging up with other players to raise/lower a price by filling the forum with false threads, pretending to buy or sell items.



Price manipulation is illegal in Runescape and again, Jagex does its best to prevent it.

From the knowledge base regarding Education and Account security:

Quote :

Educational Banners

In order to show our players a variety of useful security tips, we have implemented banner adverts into our website. These short animations imitate an in-game security problem and then show the player how to resolve or prevent it. These often appear on the front page of our website and change on a regular basis in order to educate our players on a variety of important security issues.



As in my previous post, I mentioned that there are plenty of banners and information available on the website to inform new players how to be safe and have an enjoyable gaming experience. It's all there [b]if you choose to read it.

Quote :

Scamming

A big concern we share with many players in RuneScape is account hijacking, the act of taking control of another player's account. With many hours invested in creating and moulding a character, it can be distressing to find out that it has been stolen.

A problem that shares many similarities with ‘hijacking’ is the act of ‘scamming’. Scams come in many forms, but the fundamental similarity is the acquisition of another player’s items through misinformation, confusion and pressure, or by taking advantage of basic trust.



This then goes on to show a visual example of how someone can be scammed in-game. Jagex cannot possibly make it any clearer to either parent nor player the importance of security and self-protection.

Reply to Arkhanaut
- 0 +

Quote :



Jagex are very much against scammers - and do their best to prevent and discourage it.



Oh see i did try so very very hard NOT to respond to this, however i will cave and say something.

Do you think those words will taste better with Ketchup or mayonaise?

Reply to Wildy

Geez, just because Charles has put up several things that are bad about Jagex, we are suddenly all against Jagex? Now, just because people are scammed, you think that the Jagex staff are filming the gameplay of scammed players and sending it to Funniest Home Video Shows for money?

Jagex are against scammers. They do their best to discourage and prevent it. That does not mean that they prevent it completely. They try to manage millions of accounts but don't you realise that this would be HARD?

Reply to Buck_Teeth7
- 0 +

Quote :

They try to manage millions of accounts but don't you realise that this would be HARD?



I'm pretty sure, even though i have never personally done it, that winning an Olympic gold medal would also be hard. If fact lets set the bar a little higher. I would imagine that programming a Java based game, creating a company and managing to attract over 9 million players would be hard. Yet all of this has been accomplished.

Hard? Of course it is. Does that mean that they should stop trying?

Oh an in regards to being against Jagex... if that were true in my case i would simply up and quit. But no, they get my $5 per month. Because i do appreciate what they have created. Which is why i feel its so very important for them to make it the best they can. Don't follow the crowd. Be a leader in the Industry.

Reply to Wildy

Quote :

Don't follow the crowd. Be a leader in the Industry.



You can't get much higher than top, to be honest!

Hmm, didn't the news recently say Elton John was experiencing something similar. (Slightly off-topic)

Quote :

Oh see i did try so very very hard NOT to respond to this, however i will cave and say something.



Apparently not hard enough, lol! Best not try the olympics.....or writing a Java based game for that matter.... 8O

Reply to Arkhanaut

Quote :


There's a simple soloution to the problem. Hire PMods that are good. They seem to hire people who aren't capable of being PMods.


How about having Jagex mods actually be in the game -- which they promise to parents but don't do?

Quote :


Also, Charles, try to be more optimistic, the good features of RuneScape outnumber the bad by far, stop breeding a race of people who think that RuneScape is nothing but cr*p.


"Breeding a race of people"? That's a rather bizarre phrase -- not to mention hysterical.

I am, so far, one voice in the wilderness on this issue. How much power do you really think I have? 99.99% of Runescape players and parents have so far never even heard of me or read a word I wrote. Compare that to Jagex's propaganda machine...


If there is a "race of people" that has been "bred" with respect to Runescape, it would be the masses of dittoheads who parrot everything Jagex says as if it were gospel. I am not referring to you or anyone here, but it's easy to see the brainwashing that goes on by spending time on Runescape-related forums.

Jagex says "13+" is the age for the game, so people repeat it while ignoring Jagex's deliberate marketing of the game to pre-pubescent kids.

Jagex says "we care about scamming", so people repeat it and ignore the evidence to the contrary.

And so on.

I'm just the messenger here.

Charles

Reply to charlesk

I think you're losing your points here which detracts from your arguments.

Quote :

How about having Jagex mods actually be in the game -- which they promise to parents but don't do?



Firstly, I would direct you to this simple search here:
http://www.youtube.com/results?sea [...] rch=Search
This shows more than 80 videos (There are lots more) where people have seen Jagex Mods and thought to record them on video. How many more instances have there been where it hasn't been videoed? I would imagine hundreds at least since the majority of people don't video seeing a mod in a game.
It would seem highly irregular if the makers of a game never actually entered the game themselves.

Quote :

Jagex's propaganda machine...



As mentioned before, Jagex has not and does not advertise Runescape anywhere which is what makes it something of a phenomenon. Perhaps you are referring to 3rd party sites who might advertise it for their own ends? Where have you seen this "propoganda machine" as you delicately put it? On their own website?

Quote :

Jagex says "13+" is the age for the game, so people repeat it while ignoring Jagex's deliberate marketing of the game to pre-pubescent kids.



Perhaps they repeat it because some people seem unable to grasp the simple concept of fact?
Just because one chooses to ignore it doesn't make it cease to exist.

Quote :

agex says "we care about scamming", so people repeat it and ignore the evidence to the contrary.



What hard evidence is there to the contrary? A couple of posts on a forum of someone complaining? That's called conjecture and would be thrown out of a case based on evidence.

Forgive me for asking, but who exactly are you the messenger for? I thought you wrote the article.....or was it someone else? You can't be a messenger for your own work.

Reply to Arkhanaut

Oh, additionally in response to the Jagex promoting luring comment, this is taken directly from the Rules Pages on the website:

The following are against the rules and illegal in Runescape:

Quote :


# Offering an item and then removing the item within the first or second trade screen.
# Offering an item and changing the agreed price within the first or second trade screen.
# Misleading players by providing false or inaccurate information, for your own personal gain.
# Luring players into the Wilderness under false pretences.

Reply to Arkhanaut

Quote :


Jagex are very much against scammers - and do their best to prevent and discourage it.


You're quoting Jagex's boilerplate. The reality is very different, and that's part of why I wrote this two-part article.

Quote :


The last thing that I would want as a player is to tell 9 million players about how I was scammed by 1 person, only to find that now 9 million other people know how to do it. That makes a lot of sense to me.


Well, it makes no sense to me at all. It leaves victims ignorant and helpless, while not stopping the scammers at all -- because they communicate privately and share the new scams that way.

My new site will contain a full description of all the scams and lures anyway. If Jagex wants to keep people in the dark, then it's up to others to warn them.

Quote :


Sure, I would want other people to be warned about it to protect them, but the way to do this would be to report it to Jagex privately who would then take the necessary steps to try and stop it.


Except they don't. There are many common scams that have been around for literally months or years that Jagex knows about, doesn't fix and doesn't warn people about.

For example, even right now you can go to the Runescape knowledge base and find Jagex telling players that they can't die and lose items in player-owned houses, when scammers are doing exactly that. Jagex:

[*:fc1ef5cd7d] Won't fix the problem;
[*:fc1ef5cd7d] Won't take the false claim out of the KB;
[*:fc1ef5cd7d] Won't warn people not to take valuables into others' houses; and
[*:fc1ef5cd7d] Won't let anyone talk about the issue on its forums.

That's not what I would call taking scamming seriously.

Quote :


Also, it protects that person from being ridiculed or laughed at (by other children, of course) in the event that they perhaps did something a bit silly which caused them to be scammed.


Better to give the potential victims a place to read up on scams and avoid being victims in the first place.

Quote :


Price manipulation is illegal in Runescape and again, Jagex does its best to prevent it.


Has nothing to do with the issue of rares, if that's why you brought it up.

And by the way, people manipulate the prices of non-rare items constantly. Do you even play Runescape?

Quote :


This then goes on to show a visual example of how someone can be scammed in-game.


Again, I have to wonder if you even play the game, because anyone who does knows that scamming has grown out of control in Runescape. It's everywhere.

Edit: They banned luring! It's about time... and I have to wonder if it's a coincidence that they did it 3 days after my article was published. ;)

Charles

Reply to charlesk

They literally just changed this today.. and it's nice to see.

Well, except that I have to completely rewrite Part 2 of my article. ;)

Charles

Quote :

Oh, additionally in response to the Jagex promoting luring comment, this is taken directly from the Rules Pages on the website:

The following are against the rules and illegal in Runescape:


# Offering an item and then removing the item within the first or second trade screen.
# Offering an item and changing the agreed price within the first or second trade screen.
# Misleading players by providing false or inaccurate information, for your own personal gain.
# Luring players into the Wilderness under false pretences.

Reply to charlesk
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > RuneScape Exposed Part 1: An Education Kids Don't Need
Go to:

There are 1102 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them