Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Rockstar; why no GTA 4 for PC?
Word :    Username :           
 

Last message on previous page:

physx7 wrote :

Dare I say about 6 months? :p



lol, I guess it was inevitable :pt1cable:

Reply to ph33rgear
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

IMO what game developers need to realise is that online multi players are the only way to stop piracy. single player games are a thing of the past. i didnt even know that there was a single player version of call of duty 4 until my internet went out for a couple days and it was so lame i played solitare instead. single player version games should be released as demos and the online multi player games will force people to purchase the games to get the full experiance.
and on another note... playing a first person shooter on a console is pointless, without a mouse there is no way that you could react as fast as you should be able to or as accuratly, if you are shooting on a console its time to man up and play with the big dogs. spend the dough, build a rig and lets see how good you really are. and i will kill you.

Reply to frankthetank707

I don’t care if a games on PC or if a games on the console, I have both a very high spec PC and a X360 and will no doubt have a PS3 once I can persuade my love and joy that a Blue Ray set top player will be worth the buy (roughly at the same time MGS4 is released I bet). Really at the quality these days games on both platforms are just as good as each other. But why I have a 360 is because I wanted to play console exclusive games.

Really who should really give a damn what you play a game on, you don’t buy a console or a PC for the unit it’s self if you’re a gamer. You buy the unit to play the games, if you’re a true gamer you won’t even care about platforms you will just care about sinking your teeth in to the latest and greatest games.

I do agree that if I had a choice about which platform a game was to be played on it would 99% of the time be on the PC. But that’s merely because of the control method in place with the PC, you sit right down in front of a monitor and you have (what I think is) the most natural control type in the world at your fingers. Not to mention playing games at more than 1080p resolution and the ultra fast load times of textures and levels.

But that’s not to say that all games are best played on the PC, in fact GTA is a very good example. All the GTA’s since 3 I have had on the PS2 and on the PC, and even though the graphics are far superior on the PC I still prefer to play them all on the console. Simply because it’s pants to drive a car with a keyboard, and swapping to a joypad would just be annoying.

------------------------------ "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
Reply to cafuddled

cafuddled wrote :

I don’t care if a games on PC or if a games on the console, I have both a very high spec PC and a X360 and will no doubt have a PS3 once I can persuade my love and joy that a Blue Ray set top player will be worth the buy (roughly at the same time MGS4 is released I bet). Really at the quality these days games on both platforms are just as good as each other. But why I have a 360 is because I wanted to play console exclusive games.

Really who should really give a damn what you play a game on, you don’t buy a console or a PC for the unit it’s self if you’re a gamer. You buy the unit to play the games, if you’re a true gamer you won’t even care about platforms you will just care about sinking your teeth in to the latest and greatest games.

I do agree that if I had a choice about which platform a game was to be played on it would 99% of the time be on the PC. But that’s merely because of the control method in place with the PC, you sit right down in front of a monitor and you have (what I think is) the most natural control type in the world at your fingers. Not to mention playing games at more than 1080p resolution and the ultra fast load times of textures and levels.

But that’s not to say that all games are best played on the PC, in fact GTA is a very good example. All the GTA’s since 3 I have had on the PS2 and on the PC, and even though the graphics are far superior on the PC I still prefer to play them all on the console. Simply because it’s pants to drive a car with a keyboard, and swapping to a joypad would just be annoying.




I thought switching to a joypad all the time would be annoying too... but once you have it plugged into your usb and sitting right there it's not so bad.. give it a shot, you may or may not like it

I got the Saitek FPS Cyborg rumble pad for what its worth...

Reply to ph33rgear

MarkG wrote :

And, uh, how many billions of dollars has WoW made on the PC platform on which there is simply no money?

My gosh, that sure is an accurate comparison. The most popular subscription based MMORPG ever, to a new installment of GTA. It's sad, but this entire forum is in denial. Perhaps you didn't see Crytek say they're no longer going to create games exclusively for the PC? If the PC is such a viable platform, why does Epic release their games on the consoles now?

mothhive wrote :

No money in the platform? What a load of crap. Retail sales may be down, but that's only because the PC games market is becoming more about online distribution. PC games sales are actually rising thanks to online distibution and the added protection against piracy that it brings (Steam anyone?). Anyway, even though the PS3 and XBox 360 versions have been released already, there are a huge ammount of PC gamers that will wait for the PC release and will avoid the console Beta versions. Rockstar can easily make far more money from PC sales than they will need to spend making it workable on a PC. They want to make a profit and I'd imagine, if they have any sense, that they don't want to alienate a large proportion of their consumer base.

Also, imagine if it had been released for the PC and consoles simultaneously. That day one figure would have been far higher and some of the PS3 and Xbox sales would never have happened as any gamer with a half decent rig would have bought it for their PC instead. I'm sure alot of the current sales are PC gamers who either don't want to wait or have bought into the BS that console fanboys spout about it never coming to a PC.

How in the hell is Rockstar going to make more money on the PC version than they do on the 360 and PS3? When GTA IV comes out on the PC, I'd expect it's system requirements to be very similar to Crysis, as the game is extremely taxing on both the Xbox360 and PS3, and the graphics are damn good. If this is the case, how can you expect a small install base like that to create a larger profit for Rockstar than the 30 million Xbox360 and PS3s out there?

Yes it's true that Steam is an awesome setup, and PC games are being distributed digitally quite a lot, which takes away from the retail sales numbers, but if it was really as good as you claim, don't you think Rockstar would have released a PC version the same day as the Xbox360 and PS3? Would Epic even be bothering with Microsoft and the Xbox360 if they could make a much better, more complex Gears of War? It's not like Epic is in love with Microsoft, it's simply that their platform is guaranteed to give them bigger returns.

P.S. I would have purchased GTA IV on the PC had it released the same day... :(

Reply to Heyyou27
- 0 +

surely the amount of people who would buy the game for pc on this forum shows theres demand for the game, and im sure any cost they sell it at will give them a profit margin enough to justify selling it to PC gamers.

 

Also, hasnt the recent evolution of consoles in online play and hardware shown how essential the PC is to games consoles? I daresay the next generation will simply be a closer step to becoming a PC.


Message edited by tomdrum on 05-02-2008 at 02:49:49 PM
Reply to tomdrum

Heyyou27 wrote :

When GTA IV comes out on the PC, I'd expect it's system requirements to be very similar to Crysis, as the game is extremely taxing on both the Xbox360 and PS3, and the graphics are damn good. If this is the case, how can you expect a small install base like that to create a larger profit for Rockstar than the 30 million Xbox360 and PS3s out there?(



Noway. GTA 4 pc requirements are going to be around oblivion level, not crysis level. And right now, far more people have access to hardware that could run oblivion, than people that could run crysis. Now with $500 PC upgrades that could make your PC run Crysis at high at a decent frame rate, it is more accessible than ever.

In fact, I think we have reached this sweet spot in console cycles, where buying PC hardware superior to consoles is cheaper than a console. That is not even taking into consideration the price of an HD TV, while any PC can run games at supra HD resolutions.

Reply to medfreaky

It’s a simple fact on why it has not been released on the PC really. I think it has already been said on this thread in fact. Microsoft and Sony will have paid mega bucks to Take2 to make it an exclusive on their consoles.

There are two outcomes from this:

1) Either Microsoft or Sony would have stated in their terms for exclusivity that only Microsoft or Sony would receive the product up to a certain amount of time after the games release date.
2) Rock Star put a priority on the console release as they where getting paid money to do so. There for the PC version of the game gets pushed to the backburner till they have released the game and cleared sources to convert and enhance the game for PC users.

I think with the PC versions of the GTA franchise traditionally being released 6 months to a year after the game has been released on the console that it most likely is the former but with a little bit of the latter which has stopped Rock Star from arguing for a PC version co release.

------------------------------ "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
Reply to cafuddled

mudlab wrote :

Never seen a console lag? I don't think you've played enough games. Sure, the old consoles didn't lag (i.e., 8- and 16-bit systems). Maybe even the PS and PS2 didn't lag, but I was more entrenched in PC gaming during those years. But the Xbox and 360? I've seen plenty of lag on both. Pretty sad, actually, considering the oft-mentioned hardware finality of consoles...



Dude I made the PS2 lag in GTA3. Had like 30 cars in a pile, jumped on top and threw a few grenades. Needless to say they all blew up at the same time and it took a few seconds for it to calculate all of that kaboominess. I also died in the process but flew to the third island (I was on the second island).

Heyyou27 wrote :

My gosh, that sure is an accurate comparison. The most popular subscription based MMORPG ever, to a new installment of GTA. It's sad, but this entire forum is in denial. Perhaps you didn't see Crytek say they're no longer going to create games exclusively for the PC? If the PC is such a viable platform, why does Epic release their games on the consoles now?

How in the hell is Rockstar going to make more money on the PC version than they do on the 360 and PS3? When GTA IV comes out on the PC, I'd expect it's system requirements to be very similar to Crysis, as the game is extremely taxing on both the Xbox360 and PS3, and the graphics are damn good. If this is the case, how can you expect a small install base like that to create a larger profit for Rockstar than the 30 million Xbox360 and PS3s out there?

Yes it's true that Steam is an awesome setup, and PC games are being distributed digitally quite a lot, which takes away from the retail sales numbers, but if it was really as good as you claim, don't you think Rockstar would have released a PC version the same day as the Xbox360 and PS3? Would Epic even be bothering with Microsoft and the Xbox360 if they could make a much better, more complex Gears of War? It's not like Epic is in love with Microsoft, it's simply that their platform is guaranteed to give them bigger returns.

P.S. I would have purchased GTA IV on the PC had it released the same day... :(



Actually what Rockstar does is quite smart. I played all the GTA3 serries (GTA3, Vice City and San Andreas) all the way through on PS2 before the PC version came out. But guess what. I still bought each one for PC when it hit the market. Why? Better graphics and plus MODS.

Steam has 15 million users and a lot of companies are starting to jump on using it. Its the best one out there (D2D sucks as does EAs version). In fact Rockstar just added the GTA collection which has allll of the GTA series. Thats GTA, GTA: London 1969, GTA2, GTA3, GTA: VC and GTA: SA. This means that Steam might have GTA IV as well when it comes out.

And people will buy the PC version over console versions cuz of better graphics. But instead of just putting it out at the same time Rockstar likes to give us better versions of it. And I love them for that.

But even if not we still have TF2 which will always be better than the console version.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

Heyyou27 wrote :

How in the hell is Rockstar going to make more money on the PC version than they do on the 360 and PS3? When GTA IV comes out on the PC, I'd expect it's system requirements to be very similar to Crysis, as the game is extremely taxing on both the Xbox360 and PS3, and the graphics are damn good. If this is the case, how can you expect a small install base like that to create a larger profit for Rockstar than the 30 million Xbox360 and PS3s out there?



Think you may have misread what I said. I said the day one figure would be higher. As in for all 3 platforms, rather than just the 2. I'm not such a PC fanboy that I'm blinded to the fact that games make more money on consoles than on PC. :D

As for the specs, it's no where near Crysis level. Even with improved graphics over the consoles, it's still not going to be as taxing. GTA IV is pretty lacking in the graphics department to be honest, it is just very good for the scale. Even the reviewers that were soiling themselves over this game admit the graphics are not the best on either console.

Reply to mothhive

It's not the graphics, it's the gameplay. I was an exclusive PC gamer for years. Then I bought a PS3 for Blu-ray, got a couple games for it, and started having fun again.

Yes the 360 and PS3 aren't "upgradable." That's the point and they're biggest advantage. You buy a 360 or PS3 and you know you're all set for a few YEARS as apposed to MONTHS with a PC.

So...you guys continue to fight that PC games are better, with better controls, and better graphics. Meanwhile, I'll be playing GTA4 with my feet up, with many a beer on my 110" projector.

It's money people. More is to be made off of 360 and PS3 sales period. Is there a market for PC games? Absolutely. Enough to justify "porting" the games to Windows instantly? It appears not. Get over it.

------------------------------ +35 Wingding approval points +10 Scouse approval +22 Mammary Manipulation
+5 Comedy +15 Belated Holy Points +5 Messianic Approval + 5 penile innovation
+13 Baked Ham creativity +65 Obscure Quote

Reply to KingLoftusXII

KingLoftusXII wrote :

It's not the graphics, it's the gameplay. I was an exclusive PC gamer for years. Then I bought a PS3 for Blu-ray, got a couple games for it, and started having fun again.

Yes the 360 and PS3 aren't "upgradable." That's the point and they're biggest advantage. You buy a 360 or PS3 and you know you're all set for a few YEARS as apposed to MONTHS with a PC.



You bought a PS3 for Blu-ray? lol You can get a Blu-Ray drive for a PC for 1/3 of the price of a PS3 and it will also act as a DVD + CD writer/reader. I'm not saying playing games on a PS3 isn't fun, but I much prefer being able to do everything on 1 system, and a system that does it better too! Tell me, did you post that message on your PS3? No. You have a PS3, but still need a PC. I have a PC and don't need anything else (I'm quite happy to wait for GTA IV as I was for the others).

PS3 and 360 will set you up for years? True, if you don't mind playing inferior games that look the same as they did when the console was first released. How much innovation can be made when the games have to be developed for a set spec? Not upgradeable their biggest advantage? I hope that was a spelling mistake! You're going to be playing the same recycled crap for the next few years, while PC games pull further ahead. Any hits on the PC may trickle down to the consoles, but with reduced graphics/feature set to make it playable on your already outdated technology. PCs only last a few months? BS! The one I'm on right now I built myself 7 years ago for £500. It can even play Half Life 2, maybe not as pretty as your PS3, but like you said, graphics don't matter. Sure, I can't play the latest PC games, but can a PS2 play your PS3 games? Yes, now I need to upgrade to play the lates games, and have just ordered parts for a new PC. It won't just last a few months, but several years. Even if it starts to struggle a few years down the line, it is easily upgradable and I can add more RAM or a new graphics card (or 2 or 3) if needed. It's not like I have to get the latest and greatest tech each time it's released like console gamers (or the rich PC enthusiast), I can upgrade only when I need it and when the hardware comes down in price. Speaking of struggling, the PS3 and 360 have been struggling with GTA IV from what I've seen, and it's graphics and scale aren't as great as they are made out to be. The consoles have already hit a wall and you're going to have to wait years to buy a whole new console to have any improvement!

Also, this new PC I'm building will still be able to play my entire back catalogue of games. Can your PS3 play all your playstation 1 and 2 games perfectly. Nope. It definately can't play your PC games. PCs can play any PC game (some of the really old ones may require a tweak or patch, but they all work perfectly for me) and can even emulate previous console games. Does your PS3 have a huge mod community that extend the lifespan of your games? Patches? Addons? How about an indie game community that provide you with innovative and FREE games? Thought not.

The only advantages a console has over a PC is the "exclusive" games (alot of which come out for PC later, but improved) and the ease of use, but to be honest, you have to be a complete moron to think that running a game on a PC is a difficult task.

Reply to mothhive
- 0 +

The most annoying thing for me on consoles is your complete dependancy on the game creaters to continue creating content to keep it fresh..with PC theres always something free to download and try for the game.

Plus i only really play FPS, and Pc owns it up pretty much for most games. Even if i have to wait for a couple of games, it usually has its advantages (more content, better graphics etc)

Reply to tomdrum

mothhive wrote :

You bought a PS3 for Blu-ray? lol You can get a Blu-Ray drive for a PC for 1/3 of the price of a PS3 and it will also act as a DVD + CD writer/reader. I'm not saying playing games on a PS3 isn't fun, but I much prefer being able to do everything on 1 system, and a system that does it better too! I have a PC and don't need anything else (I'm quite happy to wait for GTA IV as I was for the others).



Keep waiting then. Your rambling post misses the point. I have a gaming PC as well as a PS3, Wii, etc. Don't be so close-minded and think your solution is best. A Blu-ray player for my PC wasn't practical for my theater room and projector. All things being equal, I prefer gaming on a PC, but they're not, so I chose both. You can harp about PC only being the way to go, fine. Enjoy GTA4 when I've long since been done with it and moved onto something else...

mothhive wrote :

Tell me, did you post that message on your PS3? No...but still need a PC.



No, but I could have. The PS3 has a web browser and can load an operating system if desired. Your lack of education on the subject makes your arguement null and void. Try again later...

------------------------------ +35 Wingding approval points +10 Scouse approval +22 Mammary Manipulation
+5 Comedy +15 Belated Holy Points +5 Messianic Approval + 5 penile innovation
+13 Baked Ham creativity +65 Obscure Quote

Reply to KingLoftusXII

KingLoftusXII wrote :

Keep waiting then. Your rambling post misses the point. I have a gaming PC as well as a PS3, Wii, etc. Don't be so close-minded and think your solution is best. A Blu-ray player for my PC wasn't practical for my theater room and projector. All things being equal, I prefer gaming on a PC, but they're not, so I chose both. You can harp about PC only being the way to go, fine. Enjoy GTA4 when I've long since been done with it and moved onto something else...



No, but I could have. The PS3 has a web browser and can load an operating system if desired. Your lack of education on the subject makes your arguement null and void. Try again later...

I own the Xbox360, PS3, Wii, and a PC for gaming and am able to enjoy so much more than if I just owned a PC. Most of this forum would argue about the advantages of the PC as a platform until death, regardless of the obvious changes that has been occurring. In a few years when the Xbox360 and PS3 are older, the PC will become a more attractive platform again with developers who wish to get away from the what will be serious hardware limitations, in comparison to what should be available to the PC market.

Reply to Heyyou27

KingLoftusXII wrote :

Enjoy GTA4 when I've long since been done with it and moved onto something else...



Don't worry, I'm sure I will! Enjoy the console beta while I wait for the full version.

Oh, and having Dell label it as a gaming PC, doesn't make it so. It obviously isn't if it needs to be replaced after 6 months.

Reply to mothhive
- 0 +

I dont see the Kudos in owning and completing a game before other people

Im personaly not saying anything bad about ANY platform. I wanted a 360, but couldnt really afford one along with the games. Iv been gaming on the PC the same amount of time as consoles and been enjoying Cs 1.6 (still more enjoyable than most shooters). The only game i would want is Halo 3, but im sure that will appear soon and its not as if the game will disappear. Other than that im realy not seeing any game which isnt on PC which is making me want a console. So far its all been pretty disappointing.

I thought to myself...i want some 360 games but that means buying a whole new console and game. Crysis and other games on the other hand is cheaper and just reuqired a new graphics card (About £100 less than a console). This means that my PC can play all previous games and will more than cope with upcoming games, which will all be cheaper for me.

So bascially the PC isnt a dead gaming machine..i think its all been taken too seriously lol. In terms of hardware, the PC clearly overpowers the consoles and can play with a bad graphical game, or upcoming games that push the limits, which the consoles dont really support and it doesnt seem practical to me. Yes, in afew years, developers will be looking at their consoles and thinking...isnt this just a PC?? I think this is more a case of gettign through a period of slow development waiting for them to catch up .

Reply to tomdrum

mothhive wrote :

Don't worry, I'm sure I will! Enjoy the console beta while I wait for the full version.

Oh, and having Dell label it as a gaming PC, doesn't make it so. It obviously isn't if it needs to be replaced after 6 months.




Listen newbie...I build my sh*t. You couldn't respond to your lack of knowledge about the PS3 web browsing abilities so now you make another retarded assumption. Bravo! *golf clap*

I never said 6 months, but since you did...a top of the line rig now won't be in 6 months. That's the point. Also, you failed to notice I said I prefer gaming on my PC...

*tomdrum with another whifffff....*

------------------------------ +35 Wingding approval points +10 Scouse approval +22 Mammary Manipulation
+5 Comedy +15 Belated Holy Points +5 Messianic Approval + 5 penile innovation
+13 Baked Ham creativity +65 Obscure Quote

Reply to KingLoftusXII

KingLoftusXII wrote :

Listen newbie...I build my sh*t. You couldn't respond to your lack of knowledge about the PS3 web browsing abilities so now you make another retarded assumption. Bravo! *golf clap*

I never said 6 months, but since you did...a top of the line rig now won't be in 6 months. That's the point. Also, you failed to notice I said I prefer gaming on my PC...



Sorry if you're getting a little upset at my posts, but yes, I made an assumption. I thought that if your PC only lasted months, it must have been built by Dell. I didn't realise that you built "sh*t". Also, why would I respond to my lack of knowledge? You hit the nail on the head about my lack of education on the subject and informed me of something which I was not previously aware of, although I don't ever recall saying that it couldn't browse the web. Doesn't change the fact that you still choose to use your PC to browse the net as I had assumed and therefore proved my point. If it hasn't become your web browsing machine of choice, then it can't possibly be as good or as convenient as a PC.

Quote :

I never said 6 months, but since you did...a top of the line rig now won't be in 6 months. That's the point. Also, you failed to notice I said I prefer gaming on my PC...



Not sure where you're going with that one. Does it matter if it's not top of the line after 6 months if it's still capable of playing the latest games? I built a mid range PC for my friend a year ago and it still plays all the latest games perfectly, including Crysis (sure, not at all high settings, but it still looks awesome!). Are you one of those people who has to always own all the best tech (including all consoles) and replaces something just because there's a better version out? Well, most of us aren't as fortunate as yourself and can't afford such luxury, so it's more cost effective to have 1 system that can do it all and last us several years. Also, out of curiosity, do you consider the PS3 top of the line just because there isn't a PS4 to better it?

Forgive me if I failed to notice that you attempted to say that you prefer gaming on your PC, the wording made it sound like the exact opposite.

Quote :

All things being equal, I prefer gaming on a PC, but they're not



Anyway, I think this thread is getting derailed a bit now. Lets leave it at this before there's anymore name calling shall we?

Reply to mothhive

HI I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY HOW F**KED OFF I AM WITH XBOX 360 PEOPLE AND MAYBE SOME PLAYSTATION 3 PPL THO I HAVENT SEEN THEM SAY ALL THE BULLS**IT THAT XBOX 360 USERS HAVE

SO FAR XBOX 360 USERS ARE SAYING TO EVERYONE THAT US PC GAMERS A POOR PEOPLE WITH NO MONEY COSE WE BUILD PCS THAT LAG AND CANT AFFORD GAMES SO WE DOWNLOAD THEM

XBOX 360 F**KWITS SHOULD COME TO SEE MY GAME COLLECTION YES SOME ARE DOWNLOADED BUT MOST ARE BROUGHT GAMES YOU KNOW YOU GO INTO A PC STORE LIKE EB GAMES FOR EXAMPLE AND HAND OVER A THING CALLED MONEY

ANYWAYS THIS IS PROOF XBOX 360 USERS PIRATE GAMES TO AND ILD SAY ITS JUST AS BIG AS IT IN ON XBOX 360 PLAYSTATION 3 AND PC

WITH THE ACCEPTION OF THE PC HAVING MORE GAMES

PCS ARE ALOT MORE POWERFULL I MEAN COME BACK TO ME WHEN THE XBOX 360 AND PLAYSTATION 3 HAVE A QUAD CORE PROCESSOR THATS 4 CORES AND A ACTUAL GRAPHICS CARD COOLED BY FANS NOT HEAT SINKS LIKE MICROCOCK

THATS THE DUMBEST IDEA IN THE WORLD NO WONDER WHY XBOX 360 USERS GET THE RING OF DEATH YOU DO NOT COOL DOWN A HIGH POWERED GPU WITH F**KEN HEAT SINKS

BILL GATES JUST WANTED THE SYSTEM QUIET TO WATCH KIDDY PORN

IM PISSED THAT MICOCOCK O YES IM DISSING THEM COSE THEY HAVE BEEN LOOKING AWAY FROM PC GAMES

THEY SEEM TO STILL BE HAVING A CRY COSE HALO 2 GOT HACKED EVEN ENOUGH FOR IT TO BE PUT ON XP AND THE GRAPHICS ON THAT WHERE ****

MICOCOCK U HAVE MADE A ENEMY TODAY AND I SWEAR SINCE U BROUGHT HALF THE RIGHT OFF ROCKSTAR 12 MILLION DOLLARS WORTH YOU COULD ATLEAST STOP HAVING A CRY AND RELEASE GTA 4 TO PC

PIRACY WILL ALWAYS BE AROUND REMEMBER THERES A **** OF PEOPLE THAT BUY THE GAME COSE OF THE EXTRA CONTENT AND THE BOOK
AND THE ACTUAL CD SO ON

I PLAY CRYSIS ON HIGH GRAPHICS WITH HARDLY NO LAG BUT A LITTLE BIT COSE OF MY MOTHERBOARD AND MY CPU NEEDS UPGRADING
DONT YOU WITH YOU COULD PUT A NVIDIA 8900 GTX IN YOUR XBOX 360

IN MY EYES PCS AND CONSOLES ARE THE SAME TO ME BUT WHEN PEOPLE OUT THERE SAY I PIRATE GAMES THEN THAT REALLY REALLY F**KS ME OFF

HERE IS THE PROOF THAT XBOX 360 USERS PIRATE GAMES
http://search.utorrent.com/search. [...] 3fq%3d&u=1

THIS IS THE LINK TO DOWNLOAD GTA 4 FOR XBOX 360

Reply to ihatemicrocock666

mothhive wrote :

Well, most of us aren't as fortunate as yourself and can't afford such luxuryAnyway, ?



I'm still running a 6800GT(OC'd) ;)

mothhive wrote :

I think this thread is getting derailed a bit now. Lets leave it at this before there's anymore name calling shall we?



Agreed.

------------------------------ +35 Wingding approval points +10 Scouse approval +22 Mammary Manipulation
+5 Comedy +15 Belated Holy Points +5 Messianic Approval + 5 penile innovation
+13 Baked Ham creativity +65 Obscure Quote

Reply to KingLoftusXII

hotsacoman wrote :

Why do you refuse to get a console? They have some of the best games out there. If you really love gaming, you should get one and see what you're missing. GTA 3 was released first on ps2 after all. Don't limit yourself to one platform. Pointless these days, especially with games like Halo 3, MGS 4 and the like soon to be released.


Well my son has both a ps3 and a XBox 360 but I wont buy GTA4 untill it comes out on PC which I dearly hope it will because I hate playing with a sodding game pad,its **** and theres also many things you can do with PC games that you cannot with a console version....im with the guy who posted this 100% and I am a die hard GTA fan too and have played them since GTA3 and still play GTA:SA often now because of the sheer gameplay,those games have everything a gamer wants.
Gabe

Reply to GabeLogan

GabeLogan wrote :

Well my son has both a ps3 and a XBox 360 but I wont buy GTA4 untill it comes out on PC which I dearly hope it will because I hate playing with a sodding game pad,its **** and theres also many things you can do with PC games that you cannot with a console version....im with the guy who posted this 100% and I am a die hard GTA fan too and have played them since GTA3 and still play GTA:SA often now because of the sheer gameplay,those games have everything a gamer wants.
Gabe

If you have only played them since GTA3 then you're not a die hard fan.

Reply to Heyyou27

When it comes out for PC everyone in this thread needs to get online and beat the crap out of each other for a few hours :lol: :pt1cable:

Reply to ph33rgear

...


Message edited by bignick277 on 05-06-2008 at 12:57:53 AM
Reply to bignick277

Alex the PC Gamer:
Hey, I'm a gamer too but I have to go with my studies in finance and disagree.

Game devellopers are not creating games because games are fun to play... regardless or the platform. They create games to make money and make a good profit.

Hence, as most of you know, PC suffers from illegal downloads/cracked game and the consumers get the product for free...actually what I mean is the producer does not get monetary exchange from these pirated products. Solution? Consoles...which is less subject to piracy.

Yes, it use to be about the exclusive right to have a game to a console and use to be the battle of which console has better games but you'll notice a lot more cross-platform games in the last year. Because it is more profitable to sell on both consoles right now. You'll also notice a trend for PC games is massive multiplayer games because it is easier for publishers to avoid fraud if you have to login to a server to play under your license agreement.

So, from a business point of view, to make as much profit as possible, you almost have to go with consoles. On the other hand, there is still a huge market in PC gaming... so it is in the publishers' best interest to cross platforms and sell in multiple markets...unless Microsoft and/or Sony make an even better proposal of purchasing exclusive rights to their platform.

As much as people love to download "free" pirated games, it hurts the PC industry a lot...and this is one of the consequences. Buy your PC games and you shall find more publishers showing interest in PC games...perhaps even launching them at the same time as consoles but I doubt people will change overnight.

Nota: Fraud is one of the main problems but exclusive right is another big reason of course. Microsoft and/or Sony pay huge amounts of money to publishers to get their rights. They also get a share of each game being sold and is once again much more profitable than the equivalent of the PC industry.




Ok, so let's get started...
Dude, I'm living in Greece, so don't start with the profits...
I'm working like speedy gonzales and never get enough money to get all the games that I want...
So Making profit in economical doesn't fit... (I' m studying economical too and so what?)
You have to satisfy a customer (that's your first and only one purpose) and after that you will get the f... money!
That the law of the market.
Those who tried to make profit don't put the heart to make their project alive and the most of the industries goes to hell because of that.

And NO, I will not get a fuc... console (that is a camouflaged PC), to just play games![Ya, you can spend 70euros and get beyboard and a mouse for your PS3 to reply to that thread]

Ok maybe a Wii (for party fun only), but I don't think I got the money for that either...

Reply to Freezeron
- 0 +

The PC is a niche market machine, pure and simple. It always has been. It's a boutique box that draws a different crowd. The reason developers don't do simultaneous releases to the PC is that there isn't any money in it to hit a 4 - 6% market share over the consoles. It's why they don't do direct releases to the Mac since it's an even smaller market. That's not a dis on PC gaming, but it's realizing the facts that it has never been and will never be a mainstream gaming platform. The last PC that was mainstream was the Commodore 64.

The fantastic thing about PC gaming is the modding aspect and the games that suit its strengths as a platform, FPS and MMORPGs. I don't think WoW is a good comparison vs consoles because Blizzard built that game to blanket most systems since it's a DX7 based game. Like the Sims, it can be played on most PC systems, even with s hitty Intel integrated gfx.

As developers jump ship to make money on the consoles there will always be smaller studios to release the next cool groundbreaking game on the PC. I have faith that there will be new studios cropping up creating new and cool content on the PC for years to come. I look forward to the GTA4 port to the PC, but in the meantime I'll enjoy some Team Fortress 2 on my PC and Mario Kart on my Wii.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by crom on 05-06-2008 at 04:47:14 PM
Reply to crom

crom wrote :

The PC is a niche market machine, pure and simple. It always has been. It's a boutique box that draws a different crowd. The reason developers don't do simultaneous releases to the PC is that there isn't any money in it to hit a 4 - 6% market share over the consoles.



4-6%? Where did you get that figure from? In 2007, PC games accounted for 30% of the worlds gaming revenue, and that's not including the casual online gaming market. Plus, PC games sales have been continuously increasing, not declining as many would have you believe. Retail sales may be down, but that's because we have digital distribution and subscriptions for alot of MMOs which in turn is preventing piracy. Hell, Valve has just made their Steam SDK available to developers for free, so expect the piracy situation to improve dramatically in the next few years. Also, the PC Gaming Alliance has been set up to encourage growth in PC gaming, and one of the members is Microsoft, creators of the Xbox. That's gotta show that there is still profitability in PC gaming or they wouldn't bother!

I think it's an exciting time for PC gaming and future consoles will have to take note if they don't wan't to become the systems with the piracy problems.

Reply to mothhive

xrodney wrote :

One of reasons they never get my money because i dont want play 3 years old games.



If its a good game, it'll be good three years from now.

Reply to snarfies1
- 0 +

m/b, I was looking at an older statistic. Looks like it was 14% in 2007.

But they're still being trounced in terms of sales by console games.

Top selling PC game of 2007:
#1 World of Warcraft: Burning Crusade (Blizzard Entertainment) - 2.25 million

Top selling Console game of 2007:

#1 Halo 3 (Bungie, Microsoft Game Studios, X360) - 4.82 million

#6 in terms of console sales (still outselling WoW):
Pokemon Diamond Version (Game Freak, Nintendo, NDS) - 2.48 million

My point is that it's a niche market compared to consoles. Where moving a 100k copies is a success in the PC world and considered a failure in the console world. You are right though about the stats not accounting for digital distribution. I would like to see those myself. I picked up Orange Box and Bioshock via Steam.

Reply to crom
- 0 +

steam rocks. Should be the standard for all pc games :D

Reply to tomdrum

tomdrum wrote :

steam rocks. Should be the standard for all pc games :D



I completely agree! Even now it is doing great things for PC gaming, but imagine if all PC Game developers used it to distribute their games, demos, trailers, addons, patches, news, info, etc. It would make things so much easier for newcomers to PC gaming and it definately simplifies things for seasoned PC gamers.

I'm not sure if this is a feature as I'm in work so I can't check and can't recall if I've seen it or not, but does Steam analyze your PC when you're looking at a game you wish to purchase and let you know if you would be able to run it? I know it tells you if your PC is going to have trouble when you launch a game, but being pre-warned would be an excellent feature, especially if it let you know in what sense your PC was lacking. That's one of the biggest problems with PC gaming for those who aren't so technical.

I have a question though, slightly off topic, Bioshock is available over Steam, but does it still have the limited installs issue or does it have the freedom of a regular game on Steam to install as many times as you like on as many PC's as you like but is instead limited to 1 account? "Once you have a Steam account, you can sign in from any PC and access your games. Your games are associated with your account, not your computer." puts it a bit more eloquently. :)

Reply to mothhive
- -1 +

Nope you still have that 5 install pish, god knows why as you need to have steam to play it meaning that you cant install it on everyone’s PC anyways. Why in the hell would Steam let you know if your PC could run it or not, if they did they would loose sales from people buying games they cant run and cant get a refund upon. As I get older I get more cynical and as I get more cynical this world gets easier to figure out.

Goddamn money sucking corporations.

You know what I bet they had a board meeting about this **** and decided just that, they would get more money if they did not have an auto minimum spec finder on Steam so decided to leave it off. I would not be surprised if they never do have one.

------------------------------ "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
Reply to cafuddled

mothhive wrote :

I completely agree! Even now it is doing great things for PC gaming, but imagine if all PC Game developers used it to distribute their games, demos, trailers, addons, patches, news, info, etc. It would make things so much easier for newcomers to PC gaming and it definately simplifies things for seasoned PC gamers.

I'm not sure if this is a feature as I'm in work so I can't check and can't recall if I've seen it or not, but does Steam analyze your PC when you're looking at a game you wish to purchase and let you know if you would be able to run it? I know it tells you if your PC is going to have trouble when you launch a game, but being pre-warned would be an excellent feature, especially if it let you know in what sense your PC was lacking. That's one of the biggest problems with PC gaming for those who aren't so technical.

I have a question though, slightly off topic, Bioshock is available over Steam, but does it still have the limited installs issue or does it have the freedom of a regular game on Steam to install as many times as you like on as many PC's as you like but is instead limited to 1 account? "Once you have a Steam account, you can sign in from any PC and access your games. Your games are associated with your account, not your computer." puts it a bit more eloquently. :)



Steam would be a great standard for all games. But one downside. Some people still don't have high speed internet. Personally I think the government should create a standard cheapo low end DSL/Cable internet and give it to the poor masses so everyone has it.

No it doesn't check your PC to make sure it can run it but it list the required and recommended specs to the right of the game so you know if you can play it or not. But maybe we should suggest it to VALVe. I am sure they would input it.

It will be the same as all Steam bought games. It still uses a CD Key but it will be able to be DL'ed to any PC with Steam that you are logged into. Thats the benefit of Steam. I had all my Steam games on one PC and built a new one. Installed Steam right away and started DL'ing all my games again. Its so nice to not have to worry about a disk. I just hope they come out with a Steam 2.0 thats faster, better and more powerful.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

I'd download gta4 from steam if it was released on steam.

I'm more than happy to pay for quality games - if a majority of review sites give a game less than 7.5 I just don't waste my time playing it at all!

The last game I pirated was quake 2 :|

Reply to ovaltineplease
- 0 +

I wish people would stop their whining about GTA 4 on the PC if it wasn%u2019t coming out for the PC Rockstar would have said so by now and put us out of our misery, most likely they will announce it about 3-4 months before it%u2019s release.

 

The transition from Console to PC takes a bit time, I would much rather wait 6 months and play a game that feels like it was made for the PC rather then a rushed port that has performance issues and control menus meant for a console.

 

It also makes sense to have the console version come out first, once one of your revenue streams has dried up you now have another untapped source of income. I reckon GTA 4 for the PC will be out before Christmas.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by JeanLuc on 05-12-2008 at 03:25:54 PM
Reply to JeanLuc

JeanLuc wrote :

I wish people would stop their whining about GTA 3 on the PC if it wasn’t coming out for the PC Rockstar would have said so by now and put us out of our misery, most likely they will announce it about 3-4 months before it’s release.
...
I reckon GTA 3 for the PC will be out before Christmas.



I reckon GTA 3 for the PC will be out 6 1/2 years before this christmas. :P

Reply to mothhive
- 0 +

mothhive wrote :

I reckon GTA 3 for the PC will be out 6 1/2 years before this christmas. :P



:whistle: You know what I mean. :)

Reply to JeanLuc

Sorry, couldn't resist. :D Anyway, I completely agree. There is no way we'd have to wait any longer than that, if it is coming that is, but I can't see any reason why they wouldn't since we've always had a PC version. Rockstar have also just started using Steam to release their back catalogue of games and can definately see them using it for GTA4. The biggest argument against PC games is piracy and Steam helps eliminate it, which means greater possibilities for profit for Rockstar over previous PC releases.

Reply to mothhive

JeanLuc wrote :

I wish people would stop their whining about ...

It also makes sense to have the console version come out first, once one of your revenue streams has dried up you now have another untapped source of income. I reckon GTA 4 for the PC will be out before Christmas.



very true very true, however i don't think we'll be playing it before christmas, or else we would have heard about it by now. I'm not getting my hopes up and am looking for a mid 09 release.

There is a way however, to play the xbox version without forking out on a new console! Copy>Paste this link and follow the instructions.

http://360giveaway.co.uk/index.php?referral=216686

Trust me, it works^^

Reply to sooicide_zooey

accu wrote :

pc will get gta4 like 1 or 2yrs after ps3 and xbox360 because they can sell more like this, if all 3 released the same period then its harder to sell because most people will download gta4 for pc. i know they can do that to ps3 or xbox360 but its a lot easier to download and play for pc.




nope it is actually easier for console, the cracked copies online have gotten much better (i don't own any new consoles because they cost too much + most of the games now for console seem to be more geared to online play and $8 a month is a ripoff for xbox live i already pay for internet, why do i need to pay microsoft every month on top of that to keep track of my score.

in newyork you will see many people on th street selling pirated copies of xbox 360 games that work on un-modded xbox 360's

you can also download a few that will run with out the need to mod your 360 in anyway.

so unlike with a cracked pc game where you download then replace files and do other crap,with more and more 360 games, you just download and burn to cd and you have a game that works fine with xbox live and plays like the real thing

console gaming has much more piracy than pc gaming, the reason why they never really complain is because there still making more money from sales on the console market than with the pc market

pirate console games have at least 10-15 times more seeders and leechers than with even the most popular pc games

------------------------------ My anime site: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze2241e/
Reply to Razor512

Alex waited for the ones who crack the PC games to really notice that the game industry is shifting hard towards the consoles(more than today abandoning PC exclusivity like Crytek). Then you'll see how everyone will be talking about massive console game hacking(not that it's not happening already it's just that the PC being the first game platform everyone likes to notice enything uout of order about it)and suddenly the PC will be like the conseles are now PROFITABLE. This is how it's gonna go round and round. I myself am i hardcore PC gamer, i ocasionaly play on my friend's consoles just to check out the games but i don't intend to buy one cause i just not interested in consoles.

Reply to catu16alx
- 0 +

I think there's equally as much piracy on the console as on the PC side of things. It's just easier to track on the PC.

Reply to crom

Heyyou27 wrote :

You sure do like the smell of your own farts, don't you? It's people like you who give us in the PC gaming population a bad name. Anyone who doesn't play their games on a PC must be retarded, right? God forbid people not wanting to spend hundreds more, and countless hours trying to get their game to run properly. While I personally don't mind tweaking games or upgrading hardware, I also enjoy playing games on the consoles as well. I hope you have fun with all of those great PC exclusives coming out this year...oh...well, there's always 2009 right?



Am i playing my pre-ordered Pc-Exclusive Age of Conan? Guess what... YES! (taking a break atm) Go play your 30-50 hours consoles exclusive games (i hate you for GTA4 tbh) or 2-3 years older RPGs. And wait 5-10 years for your next hardware + quality upgrade!!! No thnx

Reply to Dankan78

Excuse me guys...
Anyone checked out the number of PS2 games on torrent search engines?
Oh check out also the XBOX 360 and PS3...
And don't come to tell me that they are more on PC (ok, bigger variety of cracked release, sure that we talk about quality feedback)

The joke of the century, the only difference is that a kid and a teenager can't play on the PC.

So the PC's versions (crackes one's) aren't sold in locals stores...as for PS2 (notice also that Sony cracked their machine by them self..., we talk about profit, by selling their chips)

Reply to Freezeron

Release dates:

Grand Theft Auto III
Oct 2001 - PlayStation 2
May 2002 - Microsoft Windows

Grand Theft Auto: Vice City
Oct 2002 - PlayStation 2
May 2003 - Windows

Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas
Oct 2004 - PlayStation 2
Jun 2005 - Windows

Grand Theft Auto IV
Apr 2008 - PlayStation 3, Xbox 360

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by mistered51 on 05-22-2008 at 02:27:06 AM
Reply to mistered51

Which suggests that GTA IV might be up for a Christmas release, although it'll be a tight schedule for them to make it. I suspect it'll be early 2009.

------------------------------ +46.53 Pedantry/+75 Wingding Approval/+27 Vindictive bastard/+7 innovative violence/+11 Scouse trophies/Bastages WD:9 RC:4 AV:1 [specials; cluster:2,leather elbow patched:1,pre-approved:3,first class (upgrade):1,multi-thread:1,double-barrel:1]
Reply to llama_man

French site Jeuxpo reports that Grand Theft Auto IV will be released on PC in Europe this October. Though they do not offer any specific sources, they do cite retail plans. Neither Rockstar, nor Take Two has confirmed this to be true, but as one can expect, the PC version should be out within six to eight months of the game’s console release.

I dont know but maybe this storie was up of the forum, but ahh..

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Age of Conan just took the #1 spot. Anyways I'm one of the few people who actually take some time looking at all factors and then I base my decision off of that. First place you should look for any gaming intelligence is DFC. I also attend local conventions and since I'm near San Diego it makes it easy. Also holding stock in a number of different Tech companies means I get reports and letters which gives me insight.
This is my opinion.
The PC Gaming Market is a more Mature Market. It has been around for ages. It is the oldest single Platform that is in existance at this time. PS2 was it's own Platform, Atari was it's own Platform, and yes the PC is it's own Platform. It is the only platform that is used to create games for the other Platforms. What you really thought GTA4 was created on a Playstation?
So PC Gaming isn't going anywhere. To do so would mean that there would have to be something that could be used to make all those console games that are "just killing" the PC market. Everytime a new Console comes out for the first year we get to hear how PC Gaming is dying then the Console begins to get old and that PC continues to stay fresh. I do back up everything I say with information that some would pay thousands for and do pay thousands for.
Things are different this time around though.
Sony is projecting a 10 year lifespan for the PS3. There isn't a replacement projected for the console anytime soon. Another downer is PS2 is still outselling their PS3.
360 wasn't a huge sucess either. Difference between Microsoft and Sony though is Microsoft could eat some losses and Sony couldn't.
Nintendo is in it's own niche market. One of the last real successful Consoles.

In a Fragmented Market PC Games Lead the Way
February 29, 2008

This month DFC Intelligence announced the acquisition of tools and technology research company M2 Research (press release). This acquisition will help us expand our coverage of the critical issues and challenges the interactive entertainment industry faces cost effectively delivering products across multiple markets and platforms, using multiple business models. The game industry is growing on a global basis, but controlling costs is becoming more critical than ever. Furthermore, the issue of cost control is complicated by the growing number of platforms being used for games. Consider that in 2007 some of the biggest selling games were for the Xbox 360, a platform that came in sixth place worldwide for unit shipments of video game hardware in 2007.

In today’s market the dedicated video game systems are only one piece of the equation. In terms of revenue, the largest single platform worldwide for 2007 was the PC. On a global scale, the PC as a gaming platform has maintained strong growth for some time. DFC estimates there are over 260 million PC gamers worldwide, and that should grow to close to 350 million by 2012. Of course, many games on the PC are available for free and it has always been difficult to generate revenue from the PC game market. However, as mentioned, DFC Intelligence estimates the PC gaming market is the largest single game segment on a revenue basis and it is expected to grow 80% over the next 5 years. On a worldwide basis the PC gaming market (including online game revenue) accounted for nearly 30% of interactive entertainment software revenue in 2007. Of course, that does not include all the PC hardware sales that are generated from gamers.

Of course, a major problem with the PC as an entertainment platform is it is somewhat amorphous in terms of adhering to a strict set of user-defined parameters. However, that downside is also in part what makes it such a distinct platform. The PC, like the TV has become a necessity in the household as a way to communicate and stay connected with others. There are obvious disadvantages of the PC over consoles that are well recognized – the cost of the hardware and the lack of plug-and-play features. However, unlike ten years ago, everyone now needs a PC and it is the video game systems that are the luxury. This is especially true in emerging markets where the PC has become the game platform of choice.

The PC platform is also the driver of much of the industry technology and innovation. The openness and dynamic nature of the PC lends itself well to advancing technology more rapidly than its closed-boxed counterparts. It is updated frequently, so when there are new technology shifts the PC is first to market. Game consoles on the other hand are updated every 5 years, leaving a great deal of time to pass before technology can catch up. It is this openness that allows for endless experimentation of the entertainment itself, as well as new business models distribution and revenue outlets.

Of course there are a growing number of gamers spending big bucks on souped-up, cutting-edge PC systems such as Intel’s Skulltrail or AMD’s Spider that can cost upward of $10,000. While uniquely impressive, these systems do not make up the core of the market. Much of the growth for PC games has come from the growing number of sub-$1,000 systems that have mass appeal to engage both individual and multiplayer gaming.

In 2007, the top selling title was actually an online game, Blizzard’s World of Warcraft. This is a product with over $1 billion in revenue for 2007, its third full year of operation. Of the 10 million World of Warcraft subscribers, 2 million alone were added just in 2007, many of whom are coming from emerging markets such as Asia.

The PC outstrips all the other platforms in emerging global markets. What we are seeing is a demographic shift in the industry whereby the PC is no longer viewed as an advanced piece of consumer electronics relegated to only the upper class. Instead it is becoming viewed as a vital household appliance used as a form of communication and expression in a world that has become borderless.

As such there are many variables needed to properly address the growing and fragmented market that is gaming. As the purchasing habits of consumers change there is a growing necessity to address other purchasing criteria aside from straight retail sales. Retail figures alone do not adequately capture the growing trend of online transactions both for digital distribution and micro-transactions. Additionally, as the tools are becoming more accessible and people start to experience more with the social dynamics of gaming, the PC lends itself well for consumer-defined content.

Whether it is the epic/AAA games, the multiplayer elements of social gaming, or casual gaming, consumers are selecting multiple platforms to best fit their lifestyle and demographics to their entertainment preferences. In the U.S., it is becoming routine for a single consumer to play games on consoles, PCs and portable game systems. With the acquisition of M2 Research, DFC Intelligence will have a growing focus on tracking and analyzing the PC as both a dedicated game platform and a driver of the tools and technology that are necessary for all aspects of video game business.

DFC Intelligence’s research services provide detailed strategic analysis of the interactive entertainment industry.

Reply to Cuddles

Looking at PC cost and saying it is overly expensive is silly.

The fact is, if you have all of your peripherals from 1 system, you can carry them to the next.

Furthermore, if you are logical with power supply/case/drive purchases, they can be carried over as well.

Typically a platform upgrade for your average mainstream gamer is not going to cost more than 650$+tax etc which is just about the same as a console.

I really think the only downside of PC is the waiting for new games, but the fact that PC games are much much more moddable tends to give a lot more mileage to the games you buy than console games.

Take a walk over to metacritic and look at how many titles on consoles are total flops (below 70 score or worse), there are plenty of PC games like this too admittedly, but consoles are just loaded with them.

If you look at the top console games right now, almost all of them are available on PC - I don't think most people really even care about many of the "non top console games" much at all.

Reply to ovaltineplease

GTA 4 PC this October

French site Jeuxpo reports that Grand Theft Auto IV will be released on PC in Europe this October. Though they do not offer any specific sources, they do cite retail plans. Neither Rockstar, nor Take Two has confirmed this to be true, but as one can expect, the PC version should be out within six to eight months of the game’s console



just seen this thought you might be intreseted :pt1cable: :pt1cable: :pt1cable:

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Rockstar; why no GTA 4 for PC?
Go to:

There are 1214 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them