My new system is running Vista 64bit and I would like to get Crysis, but the demo will not run and I just wanted to make sure the game will run on a 64 bit system before I spend the money.
Heck all my blabbing on this thread and I didn't answer the OP's question,
I can't see a reason why it wouldn't. Except 64 bit OS's seem to have more problems than 32 bit.
Message edited by physx7 on 04-14-2008 at 06:22:16 PM
------------------------------E7200 @ 2.53Ghz, 2 gigs Mushkin ddr2 800, Gigabyte EP45-UD3R, Western Digital 640 gig, Gigabyte HD 4850 512MB, Asus DVD burner, HP w2007 monitor...
Reply to physx7
Crom, I run games like crysis, bioshock orange box, and COD4 on my vista x64 maxed (Well, except crysis obviously) and I get 1 or 2 frames difference at most between them...
Stop spreading ridiculous FUD.
maybe this is some driver performance problem particular to your machine?
Vista does not suck for gaming.
Message edited by ThreatDown on 04-15-2008 at 11:55:53 PM
Guys, do not fight about this crap, it never goes anywhere. jvandecar, you have obviously never used OSX or you would not have said what you just did. and crom, you have never used vista, I havn't either and I never will because i love OSX, and when your in love with something you don't want another.
and the link you posted to is a contest we all know about, they do those all the time. means nothing. I have no firewall on my MBP, and I have never gotten a virus, or a hiccup on it. nothing but silky smooth performance.
jut remember guys, everything sucks, everyone sucks relative to something or someone else.
It runs fine with my 64bit Ultimate. I suggest you find out why you cant run the demo before you buy the game because the real game is a lot more demanding, especially near the end. I build and sell high-end gaming rigs and haven't sold an XP gaming rig in six months as all the real gamers want Vista and DX10 regardless of what some "expert" says. When you buy the game DO NOT put the 1.1 patch in. It has bugs. Just go with the 1.2 patch.
Message edited by jamstan on 04-20-2008 at 08:38:11 AM
I have no firewall on my MBP, and I have never gotten a virus, or a hiccup on it. nothing but silky smooth performance.
And I have no firewall or AV product on my Vista 64 PC. I mean, "software firewalls" are snake oil anyway and do nothing that closing unused inbound ports does not also do. A little sense with what you give admin privileges to, and not allowing every webscript you can find to run at all times (Firefox+NoScript ftw), and viruses and spyware are not an issue even on a windows box.
The fact that you have no viruses on your MBP is kinda irrelevant, when the only reason there are only about 2 mac viruses in existence is that there are only about 10 macs in existence (yes, and exaggeration I know, but 2.2% of the worldwide market?! That's kinda pathetic and irrelevant)
If the Apple Zealots ever get their way and destroy Windows PCs, then the Mac will suddenly start being virus ridden. Its pretty much the price of success.
There is a REASON apple only have a 2.2% market share. They are expensive, OSX might be pretty and stable (probably because it runs on less than 100 configurations) but outside of Photoshop and desktop publishing applications, its main use is emulating windows.
The amount of people that buy a Mac or a MBP and then run windows 90% of the time via bootcamp, meaning they have just bought an overpriced Windows PC, is amazing.
I've ran some tests of my own. And got different results All tests were run @ 1280x1024 ALL HIGH 0AA+0AF Specs in my sig/configuration page All GPU Benchmarks
64bit DX9
Quote :
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 55.11s, Average FPS: 36.29 Min FPS: 17.33 at frame 144, Max FPS: 52.89 at frame 1001 Average Tri/Sec: 36756300, Tri/Frame: 1012812 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.91 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 48.63s, Average FPS: 41.13 Min FPS: 17.33 at frame 144, Max FPS: 55.97 at frame 1005 Average Tri/Sec: 42158280, Tri/Frame: 1025026 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
64bit DX10
Quote :
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 60.73s, Average FPS: 32.94 Min FPS: 21.30 at frame 144, Max FPS: 47.25 at frame 994 Average Tri/Sec: 33395532, Tri/Frame: 1013974 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 52.03s, Average FPS: 38.44 Min FPS: 21.30 at frame 144, Max FPS: 51.00 at frame 103 Average Tri/Sec: 39426788, Tri/Frame: 1025659 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 51.94s, Average FPS: 38.51 Min FPS: 21.30 at frame 144, Max FPS: 51.54 at frame 82 Average Tri/Sec: 39504248, Tri/Frame: 1025854 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 !TimeDemo Run 3 Finished. Play Time: 51.97s, Average FPS: 38.48 Min FPS: 21.30 at frame 144, Max FPS: 51.54 at frame 82 Average Tri/Sec: 39451364, Tri/Frame: 1025230 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 TimeDemo Play Ended, (4 Runs Performed)
32bit DX9
Quote :
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 50.88s, Average FPS: 39.30 Min FPS: 20.53 at frame 150, Max FPS: 52.85 at frame 977 Average Tri/Sec: 39839580, Tri/Frame: 1013609 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 45.04s, Average FPS: 44.40 Min FPS: 20.53 at frame 150, Max FPS: 56.13 at frame 1003 Average Tri/Sec: 45522368, Tri/Frame: 1025246 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 45.01s, Average FPS: 44.43 Min FPS: 20.53 at frame 150, Max FPS: 56.13 at frame 1003 Average Tri/Sec: 45628284, Tri/Frame: 1026889 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 Press any key to continue . . .
32bit DX10
Quote :
============================================================== TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s) !TimeDemo Run 0 Finished. Play Time: 56.80s, Average FPS: 35.21 Min FPS: 18.46 at frame 146, Max FPS: 47.70 at frame 1002 Average Tri/Sec: 35701148, Tri/Frame: 1013985 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90 !TimeDemo Run 1 Finished. Play Time: 51.36s, Average FPS: 38.94 Min FPS: 18.46 at frame 146, Max FPS: 51.61 at frame 102 Average Tri/Sec: 39937660, Tri/Frame: 1025696 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 !TimeDemo Run 2 Finished. Play Time: 51.69s, Average FPS: 38.69 Min FPS: 18.46 at frame 146, Max FPS: 51.61 at frame 102 Average Tri/Sec: 39695076, Tri/Frame: 1025996 Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89 Press any key to continue . . .
I'm not going to argue anymore with you Crom. Now it's time for :Put Up or Shut Up Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2GHz (8*400) Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3 8GB DDR2-800 4-5-4-15 GeForce 8800GT 512MB (stock) Western Digital Caviar SE16 250GB <--- Vista Home Premium SP1 RC 64-bit Samsung SpinPoint T166 320GB <--- Windows XP Professional SP2
[See the end for some comments on the results.]
The tests:
Crysis GPU-test (1280x1024):
Vista (%u201DHigh%u201D, DX10, 64-bit): 35fps (avg)
Vista (%u201DHigh%u201D, DX9, 64-bit): 37fps (avg)
Vista (%u201DHigh%u201D, DX10, 32-bit): 35fps (avg)
Vista (%u201DHigh%u201D, DX9, 32-bit): 36fps (avg)
Vista (%u201DVery High%u201D, DX10, 64-bit): 20fps (avg)
XP (%u201DHigh%u201D): 39fps (avg)
Crysis CPU-test 2 (800x600):
Vista (%u201DLow%u201D, except %u201DPhysics%u201D on high, DX9, 32-bit): 60fps (avg)
Vista (%u201DLow%u201D, except %u201DPhysics%u201D on high, DX9, 64-bit): 54fps (avg)
XP (%u201DLow%u201D, except %u201DPhysics%u201D on high): 69fps (avg)
Comments:
I'll be doing a full Crysis Vista 64 vs XP Benchmark on my own computer in the near future on my own system. General reports from a number of different sources show that Windows Vista 64 bit is roughly 10-20% faster than Windows Vista 32 bit and runs on less energy consumption. With Vista SP1 32 bit vs XP SP 2 there is no discernible difference in performance. I'm also disheartened that the person who ran the above benchmark ran each OS from a different Hard Drive thus the results were skewed more into XP SP 2's favor. This should still give you a rather good idea on what your system will look like running Crysis on a variable amount of different Resolutions and settings which should answer any and all questions you may have.
Message edited by cliffro on 04-20-2008 at 09:09:21 PM
Just a quick add, while you will be able to play the single player campaign on Vista 64bit, you will not be able to play on any punkbuster servers using Vista 64bit. The clowns over at evenbalance haven't yet figured out how to write 64bit code i guess. Cheeses me off, and it's strike two for me personally against punkbuster. Strike one was it's incompatibility with processguard.
My new system is running Vista 64bit and I would like to get Crysis, but the demo will not run and I just wanted to make sure the game will run on a 64 bit system before I spend the money.
I have finished the boxed game under vista 64 on highest quality settings. Game ran perfectly without any glitches. But do not forget to install latest patch after you finish your setup. Only thing I saw was the missing shortcuts on the desktop, which might caused by the language difference of my operating system I guess. Anyway, if you install boxed game on vista 64, there should be a "bin64" folder under somewhere in the game folder, where you can find the 64-bit executable.
As a reference, my system is:
Core 2 duo e6600, 4x1gb ddr2-1066mhz (kingston), asus en8800gtx 768mb, soudn blaster audigy, raid 0 - 2xWD320gb hdd, Vista64-bit business edition, Windows XP 32-bit on dual boot, 22" viewsonic lcd monitor (1680x1050) etc... etc.. etc
Benchmark always displayed 17-21 fps during timedemo, but I have never experienced a screen lag or slowdown issue which affected my game experience. By the way, I directly started the game in Delta setting and finished it, which is the way I like first person shooters (most realistic way for me).
Crom you ridiculous boy,i spent 1000 euro not 5000 on a very good rig that runs crysis on very high at 1920x1200 on vista 3.2 athalon 64, with a evga gtx 260 4 gigs on ram. I had started using this hardware at first on xp and i finally switched reluctantly to vista and to my surprise i got a way better frame rate on my vista. Yeh sure vista is a bit different, i used to think it was rubbish too but it is very good for games...and as for games for linux i use ubuntu also and cannot see crysis or any other high spec games working on for a long time.
Crom you ridiculous boy,i spent 1000 euro not 5000 on a very good rig that runs crysis on very high at 1920x1200 on vista 3.2 athalon 64, with a evga gtx 260 4 gigs on ram. I had started using this hardware at first on xp and i finally switched reluctantly to vista and to my surprise i got a way better frame rate on my vista. Yeh sure vista is a bit different, i used to think it was rubbish too but it is very good for games...and as for games for linux i use ubuntu also and cannot see crysis or any other high spec games working on for a long time.