ADATA Doubles Down on SATA III With Value SSD
ADATA has introduced another budget-friendly SSD to the market with their announcement of the S510 SATA 6 Gb/s SSD to go along with the S511 SSD.
The S510 is only available in a 120 GB capacity (though with it being hailed as a budget-friendly SSD, why not a 64 GB version, ADATA?) and is equipped with a SandForce SF-2200 series controller, Asynchronous (MLC) NAND Flash memory, and native support for the SATA 6Gb/s platform. It has a MTBF of 1 million hours, TRIM support, features a 2.5-inch to 3.5-inch mounting bracket, free Disk Migration Utility software, along with a 3-year warranty.
ADATA lists the S510 performance numbers for sequential reads and writes as 550 MB/s and 510 MB/s (ATTO), 4K Random Write (Aligned): 60,000 IOPS (Max 85,000 IOPS). AS-SSD performance shows a big difference with sequential reads and writes at up to 200 MB/s and 140 MB/s respectively. 
Read more about the SSD at ADATA's Product Page.

but i need ssd to be cheaper
1$ per gB is for an affordable ssd
actually ocz vertex plus is at $1/GB now, I didn't regret on the upgrade.
@Doug Crowthers
So how much is it? That will be what many of us want to know.
I didnt understand this part, whats AS-SSD ??
Have you considered lots of memory and raid 0 spinning drives rather than an SSD? For audio/video editing large sequential bandwidth might be more important than an SSD's brilliant random access performance. 4 x 1TB Spinpoint F3's in raid 0 cost $200-250 and would give you 400-500MB/sec of sequential and 4TB of storage. Any good video/audio software is going to prestage/stream the data into memory and act on it there....
It is a benchmark application, and the numbers are the performance for the ADATA SSD.
people who use ssds for boot purposes only, yea, sub 100gb is awesome.
i want an ssd for storage.
see, with how i use a computer, the main bottleneck on it is the hdd, and not the speed, the speed could be 50mb and 50mb or probably 25 and 25 and would seem just as fast, what i want it for is no seek time. this would make my computer infinitely faster.
see, sheer speed for me is worthless, but that seek time, that would make all the difference in the world.
Look out for the 4TB Western Digital Caviar Black (whenever it comes out) .. it'll probably have an improved version of the piezoelectric arm to further reduces access times. Might be fast enough for you. You can use Ultimate Defrag or O&O defrag to place certain files and folders on the outer edge of the platters..
1TB is hardly enough for real video editing. I use one 1TB drive for editing, and another for cold storage, and while they are plenty fast for editing most things (including real time low compression 1080p editing, though not exporting). But I just do little stuff. To do any real projects you would want much more space, and a RAID array would allow you to do real time editing with more effects/correction, as well as faster exporting and transcoding times (not to mention redundancy for drive failures).
SSDs are great at reducing latency which makes boot times, and opening/closing all those huge Adobe programs and other large production programs much faster and seamless. But to use it as an editing drive is like using an F1 racing car as a barge.
ill look into them, thanks, but being on xp, i'm sure there are loops i'm going to have to jump through.
if seek time is even half of what it is now, ill move over to them
Thanks a ton Lothdk. Why is this BIG difference?? is it false advertising?