Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

StarCraft II NDA Lifted, Details Unleashed

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

Blizzard lifted the NDA for StarCraft II info.

Now that Blizzard lifted the NDA on StarCraft II, those in the press that acquired an early taste of the game or exclusive insider details have finally posted the content online, revealing quite a load of juicy info. IncGamers is one of the first, announcing that trial versions will not be available until after the retail version ships. Additionally, Blizzard plans to use DRM as well as release downloadable content (DLC) and expansions as seen with the original StarCraft.

"There is also a bunch of stuff that I am sure will occur on Battle.net in terms of feature improvements for the core game itself that will not be quite worthy enough for one of our expansion products, but we want to do it now," said Blizzard's Dustin Browder. "So I am sure there will be stuff in between."

VG247 is also reporting that there is no co-op campaign planned, based on a comment Browder made last month. Additionally, Shacknews posted a lengthy hands-on preview, adding that the game is not only delayed due to Battle.net, but portions of the single-player campaign were "somewhat" unfinished, shedding some light on the game's overall delay (from its original Q4 2009 release date). Browder also revealed to Shack that one entire system "was being reworked from the ground up."

Blues News provides an additional list of new StarCraft II media, with a StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty story/gameplay movie on YouTube, an "Old Rivals" cinematic trailer on GameTrailers, and a few new screenshots over on CVG. Blues also provides links to additional previews and Q&As with Rob Pardo and other Blizzard developers.

Also, for fans wanting to convince Blizzard to include LAN play, there's a petition right here, now featuring over 100,000 signatures and awaits your John Hancock.

Share:
51
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
born2rade 08/17/2009 11:47 PM
Hide
-20+

DRM? Nice..... Arent there people who do not buy games just because of DRM, or am i thinking of something else?

astrodudepsu 08/17/2009 11:52 PM
Hide
-2+

Depends on the DRM. Although with a game of this hype, DRM isn't going to scare off too many people.

megamanx00 08/17/2009 11:56 PM
Hide
-8+

Having DRM on that game pretty much kills what little incentive I had for buying it. I thought it might be interesting, but I'm not gonna put up with DRM for that over hyped game. I won't be playing that one.

pharge 08/18/2009 12:04 PM
Hide
-14+

DRM!!......Hmm... is internet access going to be "REQUIRED" for playing SCII?.... even just for the single player mode?

I like SC... but... no LAN... DRM...

hmmm... where is the Blizzard I used to know?.... now the only thing left for me to recognize it is just the "you never know when" type of release date.

With these many of ceazy stuffs... SCII better to be "GREAT" if not "instant classic" when is finally released (sometime NEXT year?... I hope)...

jalek 08/18/2009 12:25 PM
Hide
-8+

Well.. I'm sure the pirated version won't have DRM.

Unique CD keys seem to work for most games authenticating to a central server, like battle.net. Maybe they'll add in SecureROM so it can authenticate elsewhere and restrict installs.

Another I'll skip. GG.

Zoonie 08/18/2009 12:26 PM
Hide
-10+

Blizz was lost the day they got Vivendi as parent. Gone are the days of putting their gamers first.

Now it's all about the cash and how fast it can be made.

Xzar 08/18/2009 12:27 PM
Hide
-3+

Starcraft 2 will have DLC. I hope the DLC will only be for the single player campaign.

If they release DLC that will affect multiplayer games, such as new units, then everyone who likes to compete on the ladder will have to buy that DLC just to keep up.

Let's say you have a 1900 rating, then blizzard releases new corsairs, devourers and valkyries units as DLC. If I don't buy that particular DLC, I'll be stuck playing with a smaller player pool.

I hope new multiplayer units will be limited to the expansions. They had add the quests and DLC fluff they want for single player, just as long as it doesn't affect multiplayer ladders.

timaahhh 08/18/2009 12:27 PM
Hide
-4+

DRM prevents some from buying games. However Valve made DRM friendly through steam (at least with first party games). Virtually all games have DRM in some shape or form. Internet access is also required with most valve games as well. I have not heard to many complaints their. Prolly cause valve is seen as a hip company.

Honis 08/18/2009 12:29 PM
Hide
-15+

DRM, Must be connected to battlenet, no co-op, no lan...

Sounds like another winner to me!

hopiamani 08/18/2009 12:33 PM
Hide
-2+

DRM?! More details please!

tayb 08/18/2009 12:56 PM
Hide
-4+

Wasn't going to buy the game anyways unless they budged on the LAN. Not at all interested in the game anymore.

masterclam 08/18/2009 12:57 PM
Hide
-7+

they must be doing the lack of lan because they know people are going to pirate it to protest the DRM; a real starcraft fan (everyone) would buy the game if it is anything close to the old one (Ive bought 5 or 6 copies over the years). Get your S**t together blizzard.

Burodsx 08/18/2009 1:06 AM
Hide
-3+

Would have been nice if DRM was even slightly explained in this article.

matt87_50 08/18/2009 1:16 AM
Hide
-4+

wow, talk about a downer, was there any GOOD news to come out of the lifting of the NDA?

Anonymous 08/18/2009 1:16 AM
Hide
-3+

Hmmm, according to the DRM link in the article, online activation (sounds like SecuROM) AND a battle.net account will be required to install the game.

I probably won't be buying this game until the price goes down to or under $20, which is what I did with BioShock and Mass Effect. The original StarCraft doesn't even have copy protection, let alone online activation, although they did add copy protection to WarCraft III.

iulianx 08/18/2009 1:19 AM
Show
Shadow703793 08/18/2009 1:50 AM
Hide
-5+

It's OK Blizzard....we'll just punish you by not buying your DRM games....

Shadow703793 08/18/2009 1:51 AM
Hide
-4+

iulianx :
Am i the only one who doesn't know what NDA is? Define your abbreviations, please!


NDA = Non disclosure agreement

Regulas 08/18/2009 1:59 AM
Hide
-0+

Let me see, 3 part game now with downloadable content as well and even smaller items to buy from battle-net to please all the kiddies and suck them dry of their cash, is what I think I read. Can you (Blizzard) think of any other way to try and milk us for as much cash as possible. I know subscription fees for battle-net now.
No SC2 for me until a year or two when I can pick it all up in some type of game of the year release or something to that nature.

wongster 08/18/2009 2:03 AM
Hide
-1+

i too did not know what nda stood for

Montezuma 08/18/2009 2:13 AM
Hide
--1+

I do not purchase games with DRM. Ever. If the future of gaming is bloated with nothing but DRM-only games, then I will quit gaming. I enjoy gaming, hell, I love gaming. I have been playing games for a long time, but I refuse to support DRM. It sucks that companies feel they have a right to force their customers into DRM use, but I am not a customer that will be told what to do.

kslghost 08/18/2009 3:04 AM
Hide
-0+

Almost every game in the world has some form of DRM. DRM is a necessary evil, as the world thinks everything should be free. I don't necessarily agree with all the directions that Blizzard has taken, but if you say you were going to buy a game or not because of DRM, you were probably never going to buy the game. You were very likely going to download it because you knew it would be readily available.

Stardock's Demigod is an interesting case. The game shipped without DRM. 100,000+ downloads within a week caused the servers to shutdown and crash constantly, because they forgot to properly block people even trying to access the servers. A company goes the way of supporting non-DRM methods and ends up paying dearly for it with an unplayable game for those who went out and purchased legitimate copies of the game.

If you go on a LAN tunneling type service, such as Garena or Gameranger, there are thousands upon thousands (maybe a million across all different games and services) that have illegally downloaded the game and play it on these workarounds. If you think about it, perhaps as much as 50% of a game's audience may be people who have downloaded the game illegitimately, and I'm pretty sure any game company is willing to sacrifice the so-stating 5% of people who absolutely refuse to buy a game because of DRM.

My hope is that the DRM that loads up with Starcraft is a simple, smart system. I personally love Steam, as it doesn't require me to keep a bunch of crappy space-wasting disks or remember obscure passwords and logins or have CD-keys written on scraps of paper.

Anonymous 08/18/2009 3:05 AM
Hide
-0+

lol surprise surprise, its just like I said. lol

Shadow703793 08/18/2009 4:02 AM
Hide
-1+

@kslghost and demonhorde665: True, but more DRM is going in the way of SecuRom,etc than the way of Valve.

jeraldjunkmail 08/18/2009 4:40 AM
Hide
-1+

THIS game deserves hype, and promises to be an instant classic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ohNzHWL7FI

Not this starcraft 2 tripe. Sequls are almost never innovative. Thats why they are sequels... Wasn't starcraft a play on the title "Warcraft"?

Anonymous 08/18/2009 4:43 AM
Hide
-0+

I'll throw in the obligatory "I won't be buying this game" comment. ...Not that i ever said i would be buying it, but i thought about it for a few. But all the evil, I just can't take. Commenter "Zoonie" speaks the absolute truth. Games are going downhill because not enough people are catching on to this fundamental behavioral shift in the industry. Vote with your dollars! It's the only thing they listen to!

By the way, there will be piracy, and there WILL be LAN play*! It's going to be on fricking sourceforge ffs!!!

This is just another case of Idiot Company implementing draconian restrictions cuz tech-ignorant bean-counters and managers believe too much in technology and moral righteousness. They don't realize the force they are up against when it comes to crackers/hackers. That the power to create ("copy protection", "DRM" and evil s*** like that) is the power to destroy ("copy protection", "DRM" and evil s*** like that). We're talking about ppl who are too busy to waste time to posting on this board, because they are ... right now .... hacking! For fun! How can those who simply do it for money EVER prevail against those who do it for fun/love/challenge? Crunch THOSE numbers much?!

(*It may not be perfect, but it will exist. IMO Multi-Theft Auto pretty much removed any remaining doubts about what aftermarket hacking can introduce to a game. Bless their little hearts, the ppl who work on this kind of stuff, cuz you know they work 10x as hard on their product and care 10x as much for it to be awesome. I laugh at you, Vivendi-Blizzard, and await the inevitable.)

@ Matt87_50: well, why u think it was NDA'ed this long?!?! Damage control, ofc.

redgarl 08/18/2009 6:02 AM
Hide
--1+

DRM are not helping the industry, using Games for Windows Live is not helping the industry, using Battlenet over anything else is not helping the industry, not allowing lan games are not helping the industry...

I wonder lately if Blizzard is actually making a game or an anti-piracy software...

ebattleon 08/18/2009 6:40 AM
Show
supertrek32 08/18/2009 7:10 AM
Hide
-0+

Give me DRM or take away LAN. I can deal with one, but doing both is pushing it.

matt87_50 08/18/2009 7:37 AM
Hide
-3+

iulianx :
Am i the only one who doesn't know what NDA is? Define your abbreviations, please!



we would, but unfortunately our NDAs forbid us from telling you.

sicundercover 08/18/2009 7:44 AM
Hide
-0+

All I have to say about this is

MEH.


Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads