Acer Doubles C7 Chromebook's RAM, Updates HDD, More
Acer has quietly updated the specs of its C7 Chromebook... and the price.
SlashGear points out that Acer has "quietly" upgraded its C7 Chromebook to a $299.99 premium model, boosting the notebook's list of specs as well as its pricetag. New to this second installment is a larger hard drive, a larger battery, and double the RAM while still keeping the cost relatively low.
According to the new list of specs, the Acer Chromebook still sports an Intel Celeron 847 dual-core CPU clocked at 1.10 Ghz, 2 MB of cache, and the Intel NM70 Express chipset. The size of the notebook's CineCrystal LED-backlit screen is also still the same, measuring 11.6-inches and packing a 1366 x 768 resolution – Intel HD Graphics is the GPU of choice.
As previously stated, the big jump on the spec list is the Chromebook's local storage capacity, increased from 320 GB to 500 GB (5400 RPM HDD). Given that this notebook is heavily reliant on the cloud, both Google and Acer are pushing users to store their data online despite the HDD upgrade, offering an additional 100 GB free for the first two years of the Chromebook's ownership.
As for the other improvements, the 2 GB of DDR3 SDRAM has been increased to 4 GB. The Chromebook's battery has also doubled in capacity, moving up from a 2,500 mAh li-ion pack promising 3.5 hours of runtime to a 6-cell 5,000 mAh li-ion pack with an estimated 6 hours runtime.
In addition to the upgrades, Acer's revamped C7 Chromebook features a 2-in-1 card reader, 802.11 a/b/g/n and 10/100 Ethernet network connectivity, three USB ports, an HDMI port and a VGA port. There's also an HD webcam, a multi-gesture touchpad and Google's Chrome OS keyboard, but there is no optical drive installed for reading and writing to CDs and DVDs.
"Start in seconds and have that new computer feeling -- every time. Chromebook's cloud-based Chrome OS and built-in virus protection refresh on reboot," Acer states. "No updates to track, no discs to insert, and backups are automatic, too. Unlike other computers, Chromebooks get better with age. Plus, Chrome OS's intuitive interface makes it all so simple."
Not interested.
You connect to the internet? You do? You're already providing the ISPs with everything.
I've tried it in best buy. The google guy told me that it was the second day without plugging it to the wall (it was a samsung, though), what I noticed was that he would show it and then immediately close the lid so it would sleep. Chrome is good for somebody that will check emails and navigate the internet for a while to check some simple stuff. forget about doing too much. I would rather have a tablet and add a keyboard, personally. It is interesting, but looks more limited than android. Only the old people were buying it.
Connecting to the internet does not provide your ISP with any sensitive data that is stored on your local drive and not being sent over the internet...
I think he means google.
wasn't there an article that the google android antimalware was like 15% detection rate?
It'd better get better with age, otherwise if bugs are not resolved and performance improved no one will adopt it!
And the interface is very simple, for there is not much to do, though I don't know how many apps does google have that can run in this OS
I think Mace's comment has more to do with how cloud-centric applications/OS tend to store every trivial thing online and become severely crippled without internet connectivity than the ISP benefiting from some new information to leverage. App writers/publishers though do get privileged access to tons of information and I can see why people may be worried about that - I'm not particularly comfortable with the amount of personal info my Nexus7 contains, even less so considering that nearly every app "require" tons of permissions that have no apparent justification, likely due to the advertisement toolkit(s).
Before cloud-centric devices, devices focused on facilitating access to LAN-based storage and other devices but now, everyone is pushing towards online/cloud storage by making that easier to access than LAN. You want to transfer a file between two cloud-based devices, the files sync over the cloud instead of directly over the LAN. This could hurt quite a bit if (more) ISPs start implementing caps, in which case the issue is the amount of data transferred rather than its nature.
Cloud-based everything sounds nice in principle but it is also scary in many ways.
It's all here: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/12/how-to-install-ubuntu-on-acers-199-c7-chromebook/
I will have to keep my eyes out now at Best Buy for one of these. No dual booting into cloud computing for me, wipe the thing and give Ubuntu all of it.
Okeydokey.
Though personally I think they should have tossed in the larger battery and ram and left the HD alone and tried to his the $250 price point, or at least the battery to hit $250 to compete with the Samsung at their exact price point. Than the only big difference would have been the better build quality and less heat the Samsung has and the better spec and upgradable system would have been the Acer c7.
I am really hoping these cheap chromebooks bring back the cheap netbook market and make netbooks what they were suppose to be. Cheap laptops to get on the internet and do basic tasks cheaply and effectively.
Well if your thinking The Chrome OS is a Basic Laptop for Kids and Old People you are wrong, this OS Type will take over The Whole OS World as you know it. Windows and Apple will Run to do the same and Redesign their Whole System in Both PC and Smart Phones, Micro Computing is Coming with High Power and Micro OS's. But this is a very good thing and if done right your OS and Apps will be smaller data packets that can be sent easy back and forth over The Internet to your Cloud Drive, I also believe you will have a Host Server at Home that you can use to back up or store Apps. If you remove Chrome OS your just stepping back in Time and not Forward.
Well, I don't have much of a use to be online without what these companies offer; so, unless someone is willing to offer the same stuff for free (with them losing tons of money, because of paranoid users), then I am stuck with these supposedly awful privacy policies. Look, even the most egregious of privacy policies have one thing in common: you're more than welcome to dump them and use your own resources to build the same innovative offerings. I suspect you don't have the personal resources & talents to do this, so if you had your way, the internet would be a desert: no water, no food, no reason to be there - but, with total privacy. Think about it...