Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Seagate Reveals HDD With 1 TB Platters

By - Source: Seagate

The Seagate Barracuda XT 3 TB HDD will be the company's first to use 1 TB platters.

For those who still can't give up the tried-and-true method of serving up data on a silver platter, Seagate has revealed a new flagship 3.5-inch hard drive with an areal density of 625 Gigabits per square inch using 1 TB platters. The drive, slated as the "world's first" for the general consumer, will be added to the company's GoFlex Desk line sometime in mid-2011 and eventually offered in four storage capacities: 3 TB, 2 TB, 1.5 TB and 1 TB.

"Organizations of all sizes and consumers worldwide are amassing digital content at light speed, generating immense demand for storage of digital content of every imaginable kind," said Rocky Pimentel, Seagate Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing. "We remain keenly focused on delivering the storage capacity, speed and manageability our customers need to thrive in an increasingly digital world."

Seagate said that the first model-- the Barracuda XT 3 TB HDD-- will have enough storage to house up to 120 HD movies, 1,500 video games, thousands of photos and virtually countless hours of digital music. Compatible with both PC and Mac, the drive will also come packed with an NTFS driver for Mac, allowing it to store and access files from both Windows and Mac OS X computers without reformatting. Rotational speeds and other hardware specs were not provided.

Although Seagate is the first HDD manufacturer to bring the new high-density drives to the market, Samsung was actually the first to break the barrier on storage capacity for hard drives using one-terabyte-per-platter areal density. The tech was shown at CeBIT 2011 and will be used to create 2 TB HDDS using only two platters, the company said.

There are 46 Comments. B
Other Comments
  • 2
    nforce4max , May 4, 2011 1:01 AM
    Cool
  • 7
    mikewong , May 4, 2011 1:01 AM
    Yeah... Of course!
    But what about reliability?
  • 1
    Mottamort , May 4, 2011 1:09 AM
    I still have a 450mb hard drive from seagate :D 
  • 1
    toastninja17 , May 4, 2011 1:11 AM
    cooooooooost
  • 3
    jrharbort , May 4, 2011 1:14 AM
    The increased density will also translate to faster read/write rates. I wouldn't be surprised if 7200 RPM versions were capable of reaching 140~150MB/s peak read rates.

    These would be perfect for mass storage drives alongside an SSD in performance machines.
  • 6
    banthracis , May 4, 2011 1:15 AM
    How exactly are they gonna turn 1tb platters into a 1.5tb drive? You can't use half a platter...
  • 2
    ko888 , May 4, 2011 1:27 AM
    banthracisHow exactly are they gonna turn 1tb platters into a 1.5tb drive? You can't use half a platter...

    A platter has two sides, 0.5 TB per side.

    The drive could have two platters and three heads.
  • -1
    kancaras , May 4, 2011 1:34 AM
    Quote:
    A platter has two sides, 0.5 TB per side.

    The drive could have two platters and three heads.

    i think toshiba or another company is using three platter drives. anyway how can you put 3Gs in a 2-platter drive?
  • 3
    omnimodis78 , May 4, 2011 1:38 AM
    "ZoomFor those who still can't give up the tried-and-true method of serving up data on a silver platter"
    --------------------------------------------------
    OK, we're not exactly talking about 3.5" floppy diskettes here! You make it sound like HDD options are some archaic form of technology. Even with the best SSD system drive in one's PC, it makes 100% sense to have 1 or more HDDs as the data drives. I have a 60GB SSD for system, and just over 5TB of HDD drives. Perfect for my many movies, music, documents, and photos. No way I could afford or would even honestly care to put these things on SSD. It would be like building a regular garage on prime real estate...
  • 1
    kilo_17 , May 4, 2011 1:41 AM
    Neat. I can never imagine needing 3TB worth of storage, myself. I still have quite a bit of room on my 320GB Caviar Blue.
  • 3
    JohnnyLucky , May 4, 2011 1:42 AM
    I am constantly amazed that the srtorage capacity of hard drives. I have a difficult time imaging a home user, gamer, or enthusiast trying to fill a 3TB drive to capacity. Are individuals simply downloading everything in site simply because they can or is there some practical use for such enormous data capacity?
  • 2
    jpoos , May 4, 2011 1:44 AM
    "Samsung was actually the first to break the barrier on storage capacity for hard drives using one-terabyte-per-platter areal density"
    this drive appears 2 weeks after the Seagate takeover of Samsung HDD.... someone wanna check under the Seagate sticker, see if it's really a Samsung drive hidden under there?
  • 0
    house70 , May 4, 2011 1:45 AM
    There may be specific applications that require such storage. But, for average Joe that fills it with some home movies and photos and music, the HDD will reach the end-of-life way before it gets even close to full capacity.
  • 0
    house70 , May 4, 2011 1:46 AM
    ...And, when that happens, the cost effectiveness plummets, because you're throwing away so many GB of unused capacity.
  • 3
    afrobacon , May 4, 2011 1:46 AM
    Looks like my possible next HDD upgrade; especially since Samsung is going extinct. Let's hope these are reliable and not overly priced.
  • 1
    ko888 , May 4, 2011 1:47 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    A platter has two sides, 0.5 TB per side.

    The drive could have two platters and three heads.

    i think toshiba or another company is using three platter drives. anyway how can you put 3Gs in a 2-platter drive?

    Where in the article do you see "3Gs in a 2-platter drive"?

    The article specifically states "The tech was shown at CeBIT 2011 and will be used to create 2 TB HDDS using only two platters, the company said."

    A 3 TB drive would require three platters.
  • 3
    rpmrush , May 4, 2011 1:56 AM
    3TB fills very quickly with HD movies. 120HD movies is what they are quoting for full uncompressed 25GB blue rays. HD pulled off the net is 6-12GB for 1080p and 2-6GB for 720p depending on how they are encoded. I ate up 2TB in less than a month after buying my first HD tv. I have over 1.5TB in backups of pictures and music. I have another 2TB in 480p movies. I have an older PC so all my sata ports are filled and I have one 1TB external usb 2.0 and a 2TB usb 3.0 on a an internal usb 3.0 card. My boot drive is a 60GB Kingston SSD. If I could reduce all this data clutter to simply 2 or 3 internal 3TB drives...SWEET! So to the doubters of who would fill this...catch up with the times!
  • 1
    Onus , May 4, 2011 2:00 AM
    Well JL, I suspect there are a lot of people who are copying their DVD collections to a home media server so they can stream their movies anywhere, not just run them piecemeal on one TV.
  • 0
    manan , May 4, 2011 2:01 AM
    ko888A platter has two sides, 0.5 TB per side.The drive could have two platters and three heads.


    One can use 1 TB platter + 500 GB Platter, Cannot be ? Is there any rule that specify both platters must have same size?
  • 2
    nebun , May 4, 2011 2:02 AM
    mikewongYeah... Of course!But what about reliability?

    seagate hdds are not as good as they used to be :( 
Display more comments