Related articles

• At the end of the day, the Ageia acquisition could be another lucrative acquisition for Nvidia that can be traced down to Jen-Hsun Huang, known to industry insiders as an extremely dedicated individual who is lucky enough to have the whole company behind him. The reason for this almost fanatical fellowship at Nvidia lies within some publicized events in Nvidia's past. For instance, when Nvidia has hit with the trouble surrounding the GeForce FX, Jen-Hsun Huang and the executive decided not to fire anyone. Cost-cutting was mainly done on the executive level, but unlike Apple's $1 salary, this move was not advertised at all. All of the executives did not took any bonuses and invested heavily in the company, also reducing their salary to the legal minimum (read: Steve Jobs salary minus the stock options), just to get through rough weather. The storm did not last for long, but the executive team got a massive payoff: The whole company is now said to stands by its leadership and the constant expansion only speaks of the power the company now has. When AMD acquired ATI, several industry insiders and analysts were quick to say that Nvidia's days are over. With Intel Larrabee on one side and AMD Fusion on another, wiping out Nvidia was expected to be a walk in the park. However, today Nvidia is a billion dollar per quarter company. We have often said that we expect GPGPUs the next big thing and Nvidia's CUDA is in place to take advantage of this trend. Nvidia's current market cap is $14.46 billion, while AMD is at $4.59 billion. Sadly for Jen-Hsun Huang, Nvidia could not took over AMD, since he reportedly was unable to generate support for the move - despite he publicly always said that he isn't interested in CPUs, but wanted to focus on graphics instead. We heard that the debt-to-equity ratio was too big for the current size of the company. It will be interesting to see what will happen when Fusion and Nehalem arrive on desktop and mobile platforms. There have been talks that AMD could become an interesting acquisition target once cost is under control and there is more visibility how effective its roadmap will be. There may be another chance for Huang. With integration of PhysX into its products, Nvidia is providing a clear signal that the nForce chipset is not going anywhere and that the company will continue to squeeze the CPU to the point where the CPU is just another component of a computer, regardless of Intel's plans to integrate everything into Nehalem/QuickPath interface (formerly known as CSI: Santa Clara or Nehalem's direct interconnect like Hypertransport). The only thing that Nvidia will have to be careful about are FSB licenses. If that is the case, the company will continue to be a formidable rival.

• In our last BPOS story, we used a cost scenario for a small business based on a 10-user operation running Small Business Server 2008. The numbers we used were somewhat back-of-the-napkin and ignored many costs, leading to an initial view that BPOS cost more per seat than running the applications on-site before secondary expenses. However, it wasn’t really an apples-to-apples analysis. SBS includes Exchange Server 2007 and SharePoint Services 3.0 while BPOS also adds Office Communications Online and Office Live Meeting. To get this functionality on site would require Office Communications Server 2007 R2, which would add another $1,000 for the server software and 10 standard CALs, plus the expense of another server system. It’s easy to lose track of just how many resources it takes to run business software. Ignoring this oversight, we’d budgeted for one $2,500 server to run SBS 2008, and if you look up the system requirements you’ll see that, yes, Small Business Server Standard only requires one server. So we were initially stunned to run through a cost comparison tool Microsoft provided to us and learn that for 10 users the tool recommended procuring nine servers worth $45,000. Further scrutiny showed that the tool was only examining what it would take to run Windows Server 2008 in an enterprise setting. We remained confident about our small business analysis, and the enterprise calculations were obviously handled by Microsoft’s own public calculators. But what about the groups in the middle, the medium businesses needing to service more than the 75 seats covered by SBS? Why would BPOS make sense for them? The answer is Windows Essential Business Server 2008, which is more or less the big brother to SBS, only built to cover up to 300 seats instead of 75. According to Microsoft, WEBS requires at least three servers. We’ve been budgeting $2,500 per box. Microsoft prefers to double this in its estimate tools, but we’ll stick with our number for now. Let’s take an easy number and estimate for 100 seats. WEBS 2008 Standard costs $5,067. A pair of 50-pack CAL licenses will cost another $8,100. Add back in Office Communications Server 2007 R2 Enterprise Edition with 100 matching CALs ($3,999 plus $13,900). Bring in four servers for an even $10,000 and we’re at $41,066. Divided by 100 users and spread over three years, that’s roughly $137 per user per year, or $11.40 per month. This gets us a lot closer to the $15 per month per user for BPOS. According to a survey by Redmondmag.com, the mean salary for base pay (before bonuses and other compensation) in the IT field is $71,988. Let’s be optimistic and assume that it only requires one IT person in a company of 100 to manage all of those business servers, applications, and users on a half-time basis. Would $35,000 annually be a fair expense for this? If so, the cost of that part-timer adds another $29.16 per user per month to our on-site costs—more than double the cost of the server hardware and software he or she is supporting. Mind you, that’s just one IT employee working part-time. Imagine what one or two full-timers does to the equation as the seat count increases. Then add in the costs of electricity each month to run those servers as well as the additional air conditioning needed for their environment. Now think two or three years down the road when it’s time to upgrade those systems and software packages. You’re looking at another $10,000 for hardware. How much would the extra IT costs run for the platform update? $5,000? $20,000? All of that forms the monthly bottom line, and all of that disappears when the applications are hosted under an SPS model. Microsoft handles all of the IT, application support, upgrades, energy, hardware, and everything else. In a very small business environment, the question of why BPOS makes economic sense gets murky. At the mid-level, the answer seems obvious. Check out our Microsoft BPOS Resource Center