Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Mushkin's 480GB mSATA SSD Now Available

By - Source: Mushkin | B 16 comments

Mushkin revealed its 480GB Atlas mSATA SSD a while ago, but it has now officially gone on sale in the US.

The 480GB Atlas mSATA SSD is aimed at consumers who want a high-performance low form factor SSD, and therefore it also has a user-upgradeable firmware. Specifications include a SandForce SF-2281 controller with unthrottled IOPS, a SATA3 (6Gb/s) interface, Security Set and NCQ, TRIM support (OS or driver support required), S.M.A.R.T. support, built-in BCH ECC (up to 55 bits correctable per 512 Byte sector), support for ATA APM, high speed MLC NAND, mSATA form factor (50.80 x 29.85 x 4.85mm), and a mini PCIe interface.

The max read speed is 540MBps, and the max write speed is 425MBps. With 78K random read IOPS and 28K random write IOPS the little SSD shouldn't disappoint for performance either.

Mushkin aims for the drive to be available worldwide by the end of January.

The mSATA 480GB Atlas SSD is covered by a respectable 3 year warranty.

The suggested retail price is $499.99, however, the unit has already seen a street price of $449.99 at Newegg.

 

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 10 Hide
    Estix , January 18, 2013 3:26 PM
    jaber2over $1/GB not worth it, call me when its below $0.5/GB


    I'm not sure how "a street price of $449.99" for a 480GB drive is over $1/GB...
Other Comments
  • -6 Hide
    jaber2 , January 18, 2013 3:04 PM
    over $1/GB not worth it, call me when its below $0.5/GB
  • 2 Hide
    g00fysmiley , January 18, 2013 3:08 PM
    jaber2over $1/GB not worth it, call me when its below $0.5/GB


    i remember a year ago we were all aiming for the $1 a gig point, they are coing down quite fast, give ti another year i am sure they will drop another 25-30% at least. if you look for a good sale you can get them in the $0.60ish per gig.

    as for this type of drive the idea of a pci dribve like this with that density and speed ... if i had the money to drop on something like an ssd i would love one... just to ahrd to justify for my gaming computer... still want though
  • Display all 16 comments.
  • 10 Hide
    Estix , January 18, 2013 3:26 PM
    jaber2over $1/GB not worth it, call me when its below $0.5/GB


    I'm not sure how "a street price of $449.99" for a 480GB drive is over $1/GB...
  • 0 Hide
    rebel1280 , January 18, 2013 3:44 PM
    Probably wont go down to far seeing as its mSATA and not SATA. The client systems this can be used it in far smaller than your standard port.
  • 0 Hide
    JOSHSKORN , January 18, 2013 5:45 PM
    I was looking at the Chronos Enhanced line actually.

    jaber2over $1/GB not worth it, call me when its below $0.5/GB

    I think you'll be getting that call sometime next year.
  • 0 Hide
    didgetmaster , January 18, 2013 6:16 PM
    Since SSDs have broken the $1/GB barrier, they make perfect sense to purchase in certain conditions. They work very well on systems that have very little (comparatively) data on them. They work great at accelerating massive numbers of queries to a common backend data set, when used as a fast cache.

    But they have to continue to fall to about $.25/GB before they become widely adopted and are affordable for the average user to buy one bigger than 128GB.

    In my opinion, a more expensive form of storage will only gain real traction when it reaches the 10% level. That means that you can buy an SSD which has 1/10 as much capacity as a hard drive at the same price (e.g. if 2 TB HDD == $100 then 200 GB SSD == $100).

    The other barrier to adoption is a lack of good data management systems that automatically put the right data on the right device without a lot of complicated user setup and continued vigilance to keep everything in the right place.
  • -4 Hide
    firemachine69 , January 18, 2013 6:22 PM
    didgetmasterThe other barrier to adoption is a lack of good data management systems that automatically put the right data on the right device without a lot of complicated user setup and continued vigilance to keep everything in the right place.



    You mean if Microsoft and Apple spent their billions sitting in offshore accounts, to actually offer a decent OS interface that would do that automatically?
  • 1 Hide
    A Bad Day , January 18, 2013 7:59 PM
    jaber2over $1/GB not worth it, call me when its below $0.5/GB


    I don't think you have much of a choice for many laptops. Most of them only have one 2.5" drive and a DVD drive space.
  • -1 Hide
    alidan , January 19, 2013 1:41 AM
    here is what it is for me

    1$ a gb for an os drive
    i love that drive
    .50$ for a game drive
    cant wait for that point because my brother has one with games on it... got to love next to no load times.
    .25$ for general small thing storage
    images, saved files, and so forth. i have a folder with over 40k images in it, and another with about 20k rars, on a hdd, those folders and files are a nightmare to deal with, but on a ssd... just cant wait.
  • 3 Hide
    sna , January 19, 2013 10:03 AM
    didgetmasterSince SSDs have broken the $1/GB barrier, they make perfect sense to purchase in certain conditions. They work very well on systems that have very little (comparatively) data on them. They work great at accelerating massive numbers of queries to a common backend data set, when used as a fast cache.But they have to continue to fall to about $.25/GB before they become widely adopted and are affordable for the average user to buy one bigger than 128GB.In my opinion, a more expensive form of storage will only gain real traction when it reaches the 10% level. That means that you can buy an SSD which has 1/10 as much capacity as a hard drive at the same price (e.g. if 2 TB HDD == $100 then 200 GB SSD == $100).The other barrier to adoption is a lack of good data management systems that automatically put the right data on the right device without a lot of complicated user setup and continued vigilance to keep everything in the right place.


    I come from an era where we used to pay 1000$ for 2G harddisks..

    and the home users paid 300$ for 500MB harddisks ...

    and the one US dollar that time is worth 4 US $ today (in gold price for example)

    today people are Complaining about 440$ for 480G harddisk that is light speed...

    lol , stop being greedy and open your wallet ...

    all my Storage is SSD in my system and it is STILL cheaper than my game box price I used to pay for 20 years ago ... with 16MB ram and 2G harddisk ...

    people need to wake up ... IT IS CHEAP to have it .. but you dont want to pay for it.

    true PCs became cheaper you can have a full gaming PC for 1000$ today ... but in the PAST this was a dream and Gaming PC were over 2000$ and STILL People bought them and didnt consider them expensive , given ALSO that that time a new CAR price was 1/4 of today that is that 2000$ is worth 8000$ today ..

    wake up people , open your wallet and enjoy it...
  • 0 Hide
    tsnor , January 19, 2013 11:33 AM
    MSATA is for LAPTOPS.

    ex. my thinkpad has a 2.5in drive bay and an msata port. If there had been any reasonable msata (like the msata crucial m4 - faster than this one) then i'd still have a spinning 700gb drive and an ssd in the smata port rather than replacing the spinning drive.

    check the last msata review. 256gb drives. for some reason Mushkin drives were marginally slower then they should have been.
  • 0 Hide
    N.Broekhuijsen , January 19, 2013 11:47 AM
    tsnorMSATA is for LAPTOPS.

    Not necessarily; A lot of higher-end motherboards come with mSATA ports these days, where you can either put an SSD in there to use as a boot drive, or as a caching SSD. It's becoming increasingly popular to throw a cheap 8gb or 16gb caching SSD in the mSATA port in both laptops and desktops because it's a very affordable way to get SSD esque performance.
  • 0 Hide
    uglynerdman , January 19, 2013 8:44 PM
    you people acting like its not a good deal. obviously have no experince in the old msata ssd prices. the muskin at the price of 440 for 480 is insane. msata ssd prices were very high per gb, unless you went to higher capacities. I think this price is a steal. compared to last year. im on a msata ssd as my os drive. there wasnt much difference in what your laptop provider could give you for their price and what you could buy yourself price wise.
  • 0 Hide
    didgetmaster , January 19, 2013 10:37 PM
    sna: "I come from an era where we used to pay 1000$ for 2G harddisks.."

    I'm not sure what you are talking about. My first hard disk back in 1986 was $800 for a 10MB. By the time 2GB drives came around 1997 they were about $200.

    In any case, the point is not that SSDs at $1/GB are super cheap when compared to what we used to pay for a GB 10 or 20 years ago, but how they compare with alternatives TODAY! SSDs are quite a bit faster than HDDs so they can command a premium price. But when a new technology offers just a 2x or 3x performance gain at a 10x or 20x price premium, wide adoption is not going to happen.

    Just like the new 4 TB HDDs. Regular people will not buy them when they cost more than 2 separate 2TB drives unless you have some special condition that makes it worth while. Data centers that are more concerned with power, heat, and space than drive price would rather buy one disk than two, but everyone else will wait until the price drops.

    So it's not about being greedy or cheap. It is about being practical.
  • 0 Hide
    didgetmaster , January 19, 2013 10:52 PM
    firemachine69You mean if Microsoft and Apple spent their billions sitting in offshore accounts, to actually offer a decent OS interface that would do that automatically?


    Actually, I hope that neither Microsoft nor Apple gets its act together and tries to solve this problem. I am currently working on a new data management solution that I think will be far superior to anything they might develop but my solution will more likely be more accepted if the pain that currently accompanies the archaic architectures of file systems remains strong.
  • 0 Hide
    rwinches , January 20, 2013 2:25 AM
    Didget - Barracuda 2GB drives were $1950.00 when they came out. This is a great deal and a good indication of things to come, as we know the price will drop and others will have offerings.

    I remember when 10MB drives were $7000, hell 512KB fixed head (512) drum drives were even more.