Ads
Ads
All about Miscellaneous
 Latest Miscellaneous articles
Village Tronic ViBook: Multi-Monitor For Your Netbook

Village Tronic ViBook: Multi-Monitor For Your Netbook
Once you've used a multi-monitor setup, it's almost impossible to go back to a single screen. Notebook users likely feel this pain most sharply. However, Village Tronic's ViBook proposes a USB-based solution for the folks looking for more display space. Read More

  • ADVERTORIAL Microsoft BPOS: Taking Action
    Moving to Microsoft Business Productivity Online Suite quickly and smoothly may require the help of a qualified advisor. That's an opportunity for potential BPOS customers and those who want to become BPOS advisors. Read More
All Miscellaneous articles

Newsletters


Need help ?
  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
action : Line Rider Beta 2 The new version of Line Rider! With the pencil tool make a line from the left top to the right bottom. use the hand to move the line if needed and...
Ads

Sponsored links

Nintendo Sues Nyko For Copyright and Patent Infringements

Next news
11:00 AM - June 16, 2008 by Jane McEntegart

When a company designs a product that becomes extremely successful it’s not entirely unusual for other companies to jump on the band wagon and create something that’s nearly identical to that product in an effort to cash in on some of the popularity, all the while tiptoing around copyright and patent laws. We’ve seen it with the iPhone, the eeepc and countless other products over the years.

However, while most companies try not to infringe on the original company’s design in order to avoid hefty lawsuits, sometimes we see a product that raises a few eyebrows inside and out of the company that holds the copyright to x, y or z product.

Bloomberg reports that Nintendo is suing accessory seller Nyko for allegedly copying its patented designs and infringing on its trademarks for the Nunchuk controller name and packaging. Last Tuesday Nintendo filed a federal lawsuit that said Nyko’s wireless nunchuck `wholly appropriates the novel shape, design, overall appearance and even the color and materials used in the Nintendo Nunchuk controller."

In a copyright lawsuit, hearing a statement like this from the original manufacturer is nearly a given and you’re just as likely to get a statement from the accused company saying something along the lines of, "it was an accident!" as is the case with Nyko. In an interview with Bloomberg, Nyko spokesperson, C.C. Swiney said the company had "not knowingly violated anyone’s intellectual property," and was still examining the issue.

The case comes just a few weeks after Nintendo itself was sued (along with Microsoft) for copyright infringements in it’s controllers.

In August 2006 a Texas gaming company by the name of Anascape Ltd filed a patent infringement suit against Microsoft and Nintendo alleging that both companies had infringed on patents Anascape holds on analog sensors, tactile feedback, and vibration mechanisms in it’s game controllers.

However, while Microsoft chose to settle out of court, Nintendo decided to see the lawsuit through to the end and in mid-May, an east Texas jury ruled that Nintendo should pay Anascape $21m for patents infringed in the Japanese company’s Wii Classic, Wavebird, and GameCube controllers.

Source : Tom's Hardware

Talkback
Add your comment
pocketdrummer 06/16/2008 11:08 PM
Hide
-0+

I can't even find an Anascape product. What are they doing, just sitting on the copywrite waiting to sue people? That's pretty stupid. I think your copywrite should expire if you do nothing with it for a long time.

Anyway, isn't it a bad idea to sue someone that supports your platform?

Anonymous 06/17/2008 2:06 PM
Hide
-0+

I dont think it should expire, because some people cant do anything with the great idea they created, how ever you shouldnt beable to so, or get a limited capabilities to sue someone until you have a product or prototype thats in/schedualed to be produced

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links