Nintendo Sues Nyko For Copyright and Patent Infringements
When a company designs a product that becomes extremely successful it’s not entirely unusual for other companies to jump on the band wagon and create something that’s nearly identical to that product in an effort to cash in on some of the popularity, all the while tiptoing around copyright and patent laws. We’ve seen it with the iPhone, the eeepc and countless other products over the years.
However, while most companies try not to infringe on the original company’s design in order to avoid hefty lawsuits, sometimes we see a product that raises a few eyebrows inside and out of the company that holds the copyright to x, y or z product.
Bloomberg reports that Nintendo is suing accessory seller Nyko for allegedly copying its patented designs and infringing on its trademarks for the Nunchuk controller name and packaging. Last Tuesday Nintendo filed a federal lawsuit that said Nyko’s wireless nunchuck `wholly appropriates the novel shape, design, overall appearance and even the color and materials used in the Nintendo Nunchuk controller."
In a copyright lawsuit, hearing a statement like this from the original manufacturer is nearly a given and you’re just as likely to get a statement from the accused company saying something along the lines of, "it was an accident!" as is the case with Nyko. In an interview with Bloomberg, Nyko spokesperson, C.C. Swiney said the company had "not knowingly violated anyone’s intellectual property," and was still examining the issue.
The case comes just a few weeks after Nintendo itself was sued (along with Microsoft) for copyright infringements in it’s controllers.
In August 2006 a Texas gaming company by the name of Anascape Ltd filed a patent infringement suit against Microsoft and Nintendo alleging that both companies had infringed on patents Anascape holds on analog sensors, tactile feedback, and vibration mechanisms in it’s game controllers.
However, while Microsoft chose to settle out of court, Nintendo decided to see the lawsuit through to the end and in mid-May, an east Texas jury ruled that Nintendo should pay Anascape $21m for patents infringed in the Japanese company’s Wii Classic, Wavebird, and GameCube controllers.
- TSMC Chang Positive About 450 Mm Wafer Migration
- Second-gen Tesla Packs More Memory, Bandwidth, Processing Horsepower
- Boeing 787 Cockpit Revealed
- Dell Launches Final Windows XP PC Systems
- AMD Puts 5 TFlops In Your PC
- NASA Orders Up The Next Generation In Space Suits
- AMD Has A One-year Exclusive On PCIe External Connector
- Intel To Launch Lower Price Quad-core CPU
- CMO's Quad Full High Def Display
- Nvidia Rolls Out 236 Watt Graphics Card Design
- Honda Rolls Out New Zero-emission Car
- Asustek To Expand Eee Brand
- Young Adults Willing To Pay For Music - Survey
- Clearspeed Squeezes 96 GFlops Out Of 12 Watts
- Gigabyte, MSI And Leadtek Launch Nvidia GeForce 200-based Graphics Cards
- AMD To Update Its Low-power CPU Lineup
- Man Cleared Of Child Porn Charges, DIA Stands By Decision To Fire Him
- Intel To Reveal Nehalem Clocking Architecture Details





I can't even find an Anascape product. What are they doing, just sitting on the copywrite waiting to sue people? That's pretty stupid. I think your copywrite should expire if you do nothing with it for a long time.
Anyway, isn't it a bad idea to sue someone that supports your platform?
I dont think it should expire, because some people cant do anything with the great idea they created, how ever you shouldnt beable to so, or get a limited capabilities to sue someone until you have a product or prototype thats in/schedualed to be produced