YouTube Announces Plans to Stream 1080p Video
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (32) |
- Share
YouTube has announced plans to stream video in 1080p.
YouTube this week announced in a blog post that, starting next week, the Google-owned video hosting site will start streaming content in high definition.
"Starting next week, YouTube's HD mode will add support for viewing videos in 720p or 1080p, depending on the resolution of the original source, up from our maximum output of 720p today," said Software Engineer Billy Biggs.
YouTubers should see the change over the next few days and the site is encouraging users to up their monitors to 1080p so they can really enjoy full screen videos.
Bigg says the folks at YouTube are in the process of re-encoding all the 1080p videos users have already uploaded.
Check the original post here.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
- Looking for some help [Homebuilt Systems]
- Can an S3 Prosavage DDR 32mb Run high definition videos.? on youtube? [Graphic & Displays]
- Need Advice for First (Gaming) Computer Build [Homebuilt Systems]
- Recommended: Converters for Sony Products(XPERIA/Walkman/PS3 /PSP /Son [Applications]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
Related articles
-
CES 2007: Highly integrated DTV chips expected to debut
Pre CES 2007 coverage - Las Vegas (NV) - iSuppli expects DTV chip vendors to announce a variety of highly integrated chipsets at CES 2007 in an effort to gain a foothold in the ever- increasing DTV market. In the past few years, the Digital Television (DTV) market has expanded at a breakneck pace, growing to more than 100 million units in 2007, up from 70 million units in 2006, iSuppli forecasts. Not surprisingly, this growth has attracted a large number of chip companies that are offering up differing chipsets in order to enable a number of different DTV applications. At the 2007 Consumer Electronics Show (CES), DTV promises to be one of the staples of the show with current and future applications on display for the world to see. However, CES is also a stage for semiconductor vendors to showcase their innovations as a precursor to consumer electronics released at a later date. Integrate this The fastest-growing DTV segment is the integrated flat panel variety - televisions that include a digital receiver built into the TV. The most important aspects of this market are video quality for front-of-screen performance and system Bill of Materials (BOM) costs. The latter can be achieved by moving to more advanced process technology where additional functionality can be integrated into the same piece of silicon. Moving from 90 nanometer and above process technologies to 65 nanometer will allow chip designers the ability to integrate more functionality onto a single piece of silicon thus reducing the overall system costs by reducing the semiconductor content in these consumer electronics. Broadcom has recently released a chip that does exactly this, integrating fully High Definition 1080p support along with motion adaptive de-lacing, dual video decoders, dual HDMI receivers, six 10-bit ADCs for PC and HD inputs, dual channel LVDS transmitters and much more. As said before, expect to see more companies announce similar integrated chips at CES. Fragmented market There is no clear market leader in the DTV chip market with the largest market share only at 15%. In 2005, that position was occupied by NXP Semiconductors. With all of the major players vying for dominance in a variety of different DTV markets and with at least five companies that survive in a given market, chip vendors are trying everything they can in order to achieve the best price/performance ratio while enabling as much functionality as possible. Moving to a lower process technology allows companies the ability to increase the volume of chips rapidly softening the drain of price declines that are sweeping across the DTV market. Government mandates Another factor driving an increased presence of DTV offerings at CES is the government mandates beginning to take effect this year. After March, all televisions sold in the U.S. must have a digital tuner built-in. A certain number of Integrated DTVs (iDTVs) at higher sizes had been required to include a digital tuner but after March every television at every size will be required to have a digital tuner inside. Shyam Nagrani is the principal analyst for display electronics at iSuppli. You can contact him at snagrani@isuppli.com
-
CES 2007: New HD media player from Netgear
Netgear has announced its Digital Entertainer HD (EVA8000), a UPnP AV / DLNA networked media player supporting up to 1080p video via its HDMI 1.1 port. The EVA8000 can display still, music and video files streamed from UPnP AV sources without the need to run server software on a PC. However, running included software on a Windows PC enables the EVA8000 to play iTunes content, view YouTube videos and access a Windows desktop across a network. Read the complete story here. (SmallnetBuilder)
-
Before running video quality tests, the user should make sure that "pulldown detection" is enabled in the Radeon’s Catalyst drivers, and that "inverse telecine" is enabled in the GeForce drivers. The newest versions of the drivers seem to enable these options by default. In the past, this wasn’t the case. For reference, we’ll compare the integrated motherboard solutions to the low-end discrete cards offered by their respective manufacturers, the GeForce 8400 and Radeon 2400 PRO. We didn’t have a Radeon 3450 on hand, but performance should be very close to that of the 2400 PRO as the 3450 is a die shrink of the 2400 with a slightly increased core clock speed. We’ve used Silicon Optix’s HQV HD-DVD benchmark in our last Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD comparison. Last time, in all of those tests, the discrete GeForce 8400 GS and Radeon 2400 PRO scored a total of zero points in the HQV benchmark. We anticipate that the integrated graphics on the motherboards we’re testing will show similar results, but who knows? Maybe AMD or Nvidia have a trick or two up their respective sleeves. We chose to run the tests only on the Windows Vista operating system this time around, as XP is being phased out. We should note that in our past reviews, the GeForce drivers would not enable any image quality enhancements whatsoever under XP, so if that’s your operating system, a Radeon solution might be a better choice for you. HD Noise Reduction Test: Out Of 25 Points This test shows scenes that are plagued with noise artifacts. Good noise reduction erases most of these artifacts and makes it appear more natural and much less grainy. The trick is to make the noise reduction work without losing detail. HD NOISE REDUCTION TEST Graphics Processor Score Integrated Radeon HD 3200 0 Integrated GeForce 8200 0 Radeon 2400 PRO 0 GeForce 8400 GS 0 This first test is telling of what we can expect as far as image quality enhancements from integrated solutions go: in short, not much. Even the low-end discrete cards don’t have the power to provide any real image-quality enhancements and it takes everything they’ve got just to play HD content. It’s not included on the chart, but we will note that more powerful cards like the Radeon 2600/3650/4650 series and GeForce 8600/9500 series will offer powerful video quality enhancements and perform a lot better in the HD noise reduction test. For a true HTPC enthusiast, these cards are probably a better choice and it’s worth spending the extra money. More on that later, though. Let’s look at the next image-quality benchmark: the HD Video Resolution Loss test. HD Video Resolution Loss Test: Out Of 20 Points This test simply shows a pattern of lines and color bars. If the DVD player can show the smallest lines without flickering, it is successfully de-interlacing the image. VIDEO RESOLUTION LOSS TEST Graphics Processor Score Integrated Radeon HD 3200 0 Integrated GeForce 8200 0 Radeon 2400 PRO 0 GeForce 8400 GS 20 One again, the integrated solutions completely fall on their face. Out of the discrete cards, the GeForce 8400 GS manages to provide some image-quality enhancements, but it should be noted that the HQV Blu-ray disk seemed to stutter playback on that card. HD Video Reconstruction (Jaggies) Test: Out Of 20 Points This test simply shows a few rotating lines in a circle. As the angle changes, interlacing makes the lines appear to become stepped. Successful de-interlacing will remove this stepping. HD VIDEO RECONSTRUCTION TEST Graphics Processor Score Integrated Radeon HD 3200 0 Integrated GeForce 8200 0 Radeon 2400 PRO 0 GeForce 8400 GS 0 Once again, all contenders are unsuccessful at providing anything other than barebones Blu-ray playback; no image quality enhancements are present.
Best offers
|
Radeon HD 4670 Video Card (1GB,... | $69.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $134.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Video Card (1GB,... | $199.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce GTS 250 Video Card (1GB,... | $199.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Radeon HD 5870 Video Card (1GB,... | $409.99 Newegg.com More info |
ATI Radeon HD 5570: Reasonable Gaming Performance For $80?
AMD rounds out its DirectX 11-capable lineup with an entry-level gaming card sporting all of the Radeon HD 5000-series' value-adds. Does the Radeon HD 5570 represent the perfect combination of low-price, gaming performance, and features? Read More
-
ATI Radeon HD 5450: Eyefinity And HTPCs For Everyone?
Spoiler alert: ATI's Radeon HD 5450 is the first DirectX 11 card we've seen with outright poor gaming performance. But with its low price tag, does this Radeon deliver solid value to the masses, or should you be setting your sights a little bit higher? Read More
-
2D, Acceleration, And Windows: Aren't All Graphics Cards Equal?
2D is something we take for granted when we're shopping for a new GPU. But if you do a lot of work on your desktop (and don't we all?), it bears a little more attention. We spent some time testing 2D performance and came up with some surprising results. Read More
All performance charts
- Matrox PCIe Provides 8 DisplayPort Outputs
- Mystery Radeon HD 'X2' Card Spy Shots
- Nvidia CEO: Apple Uses the Best Technology









Yeah, but will we have to now wait 2 years, instead of the current 1 year, for the videos to load?
Wow this is awesome, especially with news of Hulu have a subscription fee, if youtube were smart they would start working out deals with networks to stream full length episodes, people would have no reason to go to hulu...
It's sad to see so many wonderful, bandwidth intensive services cropping up all of the sudden while we have pending bandwidth caps looming over the country..
This sounds good in theory; but who has the steady bandwidth to stream 1080p? then next issue would be the download caps that are being enforced by more isp's these days. As is my streaming usage lands me near my cap. *sarcastic voice* thank you rogers
/EndRant
Thank you God...
Transmaniacon you realize Hulu is owned by the networks...Seriously think before you speak.
Is this really that big of change? "[...] YouTube's HD mode [...] viewing videos in 720p or 1080p[...]"
You can still enjoy your lower quality videos... chill
I thought youtube was having financial troubles due to the high amount of trafic their servers must do, now they are increasing it ?!
Don't get me wrong I LOVE HD and I guess this might be a sign that in the future box office movies will stream on youtube.
I would love to see the day when I can watch theater released movies in my home on release day in HD quality streaming from youtube and paying a small fee like I would a ticket but now I get to control the sound volume or pause the movie if I want to ( tho I highly doubt something like this will happen, in the eyes of the studios 1 person pays and he can have his friends family and neighbors in to see it )
The problem will be ISP (Internet Service Provider)... offering limited bandwidth for try stopping the download.
I really hate having a so limited bandwidth.
Who wants to see some viral of a dog doing it's stuff to somebody's leg in 1080p? Not me. Youtube have got to get some serious content like movies. If they have the servers and bandwidth, I would pay to stream a movie or TV show in 1080p.
Highly highly compressed doesn't count as 1080P in my book.
oh snap.. millions of videos watched everyday by people on YouTube, that will kill ISP's
(come on Comcast, improve your network first.. before charging people more and giving them less)
Highly highly compressed doesn't count as 1080P in my book.
+1... it's not "HD", it starts out as 1080p - but unless you're showing static shots it will be much worse than 1080p due to compression artifacts.
Oh good. That means most people will be able to watch 2 ten minute videos a month before they hit their ISP's bitcaps.
thsi will go great with my comcast throteling
YouTHDube
You have to have 4.0 mbps or greater to stream 1080p. I've got 1.5, the fastest I can get without going with EVIL Comcast and paying 5x as much as I pay right now.
(. But hey, it's $20 a month!
My mobile phone(30$ a month) is faster
The test video I saw doesn't look any different to me. Could have been the original video or just the way Youtube does it.
Sure, they can call it "1080P" because of the resolution. Compression will shred most of the quality in that resolution by my guess. Usually you will see pixelated artifacts in the image and they become more evident as you reach the edges of the frame. It doesn't take a trained eye to see this type of loss.
Uploading 1080P on Road Runners feeble 700K up stream sounds like a ball.
Good luck uploading 1080p 10min video.
I think this will have a minimal effect, other than driving bandwidth caps more and more. I can't imaging ever streaming 1080p, I tend to steer away even from 720p, I download most of it, hate waiting for steaming vids to load.
@ sKiT75
Of course they have to compress. Look back a few years and see how they went from utter crap (unless you used &fmt=18), to introducing high quality, to 720p which is pretty decent. 1080p should look bomb. It won't be Bluray, but you are streaming this...
My complaint is how to upload 1080p videos, as other people have already pointed out. I get 26/22, about 3 MB/s each way with Verizon fios. The upload is too good for the Youtube servers to keep up. This is disastrous. Joking aside, I feel sorry for the people who live outside of Verizon's reach and for those who have to put up with dumb bandwidth caps.
Too bad no US ISP's (say for FIOS) sell enough upload to make this worth my time to upload in a timely manner.
Unless I leave it running overnight.
Of course, 1080p on a little window of 320x240 pixels should be no problem for everyone.
Today's D1 and lower resolution videos on youtube already have bandwidth problems that cause my video playback to stall all the time. My ISP bandwidth has never been the problem. So announcing 1080p is just for some upper management douche at youtube/google to say "Hey, we met our goal of offering 1080p by such and such date. Now please give us our insane bonuses". It won't be usable anytime soon.
It's sad to see so many wonderful, bandwidth intensive services cropping up all of the sudden while we have pending bandwidth caps looming over the country..
This deserves repeating.
Too bad no US ISP's (say for FIOS) sell enough upload to make this worth my time to upload in a timely manner. Unless I leave it running overnight.
What are you talking about? Verizon has bomb upload. They have 15/5, 25/15, and 50/20. I think we are supposed to get 25/15, and we get 26/22.
and the sound will be better,no?
This sounds good in theory; but who has the steady bandwidth to stream 1080p? then next issue would be the download caps that are being enforced by more isp's these days. As is my streaming usage lands me near my cap. *sarcastic voice* thank you rogers /EndRant
Streaming the videos should work fine on your average 10Mb connection or whatever is the norm over there (most people in my town here in Sweden have 50Mb or 100Mb for about $30 - $40 a month). The question is, can the Youtube servers keep up? Isn't Youtube already losing money?
What a coincidence! Just on Wednesday we were looking into who, if anybody, was allowing users to post videos for 1080p streaming!
MMM MMM.. Good old corporatism.. "Can you buy new monitors to watch the 1080p, and also everyone with a 30/60 gig dl cap... ya we want you to fork over more loot a month too.."
Itll all help the "HECONME"..i mean "Economy"