Apple Updates IMac, Gets Intel's Montevina CPU Early
Cupertino (CA) - Apple today announced refreshed iMacs and is offering an unannounced Intel processor as part of the package: The systems can be ordered with the 45 nm Core 2 Duo Extreme X9100, processor, which is expected to officially launch with Intel’s Montevina refresh. Once again, Apple has the privilege to offer a faster processor than what PC vendors are selling today.
You have to admit, there is a certain pattern. A little over a year ago, Apple announced the availability of an Intel 3.0 GHz quad-core-processor, which, at the time, was not officially announced and appeared to be exclusive to Apple back then. When we asked Intel about this "special" CPU, which turned out to be the Xeon X5365, we were told that the chip was shipping in "limited" quantities.
The Core 2 Duo Extreme X9100 seems to be another "limited quantity" CPU, as Apple has begun offering this processor for its new iMacs today. The reason for the availability of this processor may be that Apple is simply faster at adopting new processors and its design refreshes have been timed perfectly, but there is clearly the impression that Apple has some privileges over other PC manufacturers - and we can’t imagine that HP and Dell are happy about the fact that Apple can be officially shipping and unannounced Intel product.
The new iMacs look just like the iMacs introduced in August of last year, but received a solid hardware upgrade across all major components. Processor speeds now reach from 2.4 GHz over 2.66 and 2.8 GHz all the way to the 3.06 GHz X9100 CPU with 6 MB L2 cache and a 1066 MHz FSB. Apple continues to exclusively rely on mobile processors, even if the power consumption increases on the high end. While the mainstream chips 2.4 and 2.66 GHz versions are rated at a thermal design power (TDP) of 25 watts, the 2.8 GHz (T9600) model runs at a 35 watt TDP and the X9100 at 44 watts.
Hardware capacities no go up to 1 TB, while the standard system memory in the base system remains at 1 GB. There are also new graphics card options, including Nvidia’s 8800GS, which is indicated by Apple to transform the iMac into a gaming system. Realistically, this chip has been available in numerous $1000 PCs for some time and is currently Nvidia’s mainstream graphics chip, positioned below the not available 8800 Ultra, 8800 GTX, 8800 GTS and, oddly enough, the specific 8800 GT for Mac.
Pricing remains about the same as before. Apple charges $1200 for the entry-level 20" iMac with a 2.4 GHz processor, 1 GB memory, a 250 GB hard drive and an ATI HD 2400 XT graphics card. The product family tops out at about $2700 for a system with a 3.06 GHz chip, 4 GB of memory, a 1 TB hard drive and an Nvidia 8800 GS graphics card.
- Buyer's Guides,
- apple ,
- mac ,
- imac
- First Video Of Psystar Mac Clone In The Wild
- AMD Aims To Increase Desktop Processor Sales With Business Platform Pitch
- Toshiba Says 25 Percent Of All Laptops Will Have SSDs By 2011
- 3D Monitors Coming Down In Price, But Still Expensive
- Universal Display Delivers Flexible OLED Prototype With Night-vision Capabilities To US Army
- Windows Data Copy Limits Exposed, Sort Of
- Psystar Shows Off Video Of Mac Clone (sort Of)
- The Pirate Bay Exceeds 12 Million Users
- AMD "Puma" Can't Compete With Core 2 Duo
- Bill Gates Uses 10,000 Times The Energy Of The Average American, MIT Says
- Google Enhances Image Search
- Intel To Build Supercomputers With Cray
- US Secretary Of State Admits Biofuels Raises Food Prices
- AMD Desktop 45nm CPU Lineup Revealed
- ITunes Store Turns 5: Can Anyone Break Its Dominance?
- FSB Limits Exposed: Intel CPUs Don't Scale Very Well In UC Berkeley Test
- AMD Promises New CPU Architecture Soon
- Corning Says No Slowdown In LCD Glass Market





Does anyone know the processor numbers for the 2.4 and 2.6 ghz processors?
What is the chipset in these machines? It is pretty easy to check from Windows if Intel Chipset Software Installation Utility is installed.
The spelling errors and sentence structure make the story a bit hard to understand. Especially this sentence:
"Realistically, this chip has been available in numerous $1000 PCs for some time and is currently Nvidia?s mainstream graphics chip, positioned below the not available 8800 Ultra, 8800 GTX, 8800 GTS and, oddly enough, the specific 8800 GT for Mac."
What about the displays? Did they fix them?