Ads
Ads
All about Motherboards
 Latest Motherboards articles
Enthusiast P55: Eight LGA 1156 Boards Between $150 And $200

Enthusiast P55: Eight LGA 1156 Boards Between $150 And $200
Upper-range P55 motherboards cost around $100 less than similarly-equipped X58 products, but are these still good enough for enthusiasts? We take a closer look at eight different models, dissect their features, benchmark them, and come away with a winner. Read More

  • Seven AMD 785G-Based Motherboards Rounded Up
    When AMD launched its 785G chipset, we were impressed by the mainstream value enabled from such an affordable platform. In this roundup, we're covering seven different 785G-based board covering ATX, microATX, DDR2 memory, DDR3, and two different sockets. Read More
All Motherboards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
Ads

Sponsored links

Asus Unveils First USB 3.0 Motherboard

Next news
12:20 PM - October 30, 2009 by Jane McEntegart

Asustek has unveiled the first USB 3.0 motherboard.

Asus Wednesday unveiled the first motherboard to support SuperSpeed USB. SuperSpeed USB, also known as USB 3.0, boasts transfer rates of up to 10 times faster than what users can expect with USB 2.0.

The Asus Xtreme Design P7DP55DE-E Premium packs two USB 3.0 ports and, given that the motherboard uses Intel's P55 Express Chipset, which doesn't even support USB 3.0, it's not surprising to learn some folk were a little confused when they first heard the news. However, Asus has enlisted the help of a third party controller, which makes for a pretty handy workaround.

Aside from the two USB 3.0 ports, the Xtreme Design P7DP55DE-E Premium has 10 USB 2.0 ports, six 3GB per second SATA ports, two 6GB per second SATA ports, two PCIe x16 graphic card slots and two Gigabit Ethernet ports.

All together now, ooooh!

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
cekasone 10/30/2009 6:33 PM
Hide
-2+

still waiting for sata 3 and pcie 3

tayb 10/30/2009 6:35 PM
Show
claudeb 10/30/2009 6:41 PM
Hide
-4+

tayb :
Man is this going to get annoyingly confusing with USB 3.0 and USB 2.0 ports right near each other


the usb 3s are blue.

claudeb 10/30/2009 6:42 PM
Hide
-2+

i would rather just buy the p7p55d pro and their usb3 sata3 pcie x4 card, which is 29.99.

Gin Fushicho 10/30/2009 6:48 PM
Hide
-3+

Jesus how the hell did they fit it all on that board?

Gin Fushicho 10/30/2009 6:48 PM
Hide
-13+

cekasone :
still waiting for sata 3 and pcie 3



"two 6GB per second SATA ports"

Thats SATA gen 3.

descendency 10/30/2009 6:50 PM
Hide
-7+

Why isn't this X58?

El_Capitan 10/30/2009 6:54 PM
Show
ProDigit80 10/30/2009 6:57 PM
Hide
-1+

certainly has plenty of USB ports!

tester24 10/30/2009 7:05 PM
Hide
-3+

I'm with El_Capitan with the wait for USB 3. Sata 3.0 can wait as well. As for PCIe 3.0 WHY!? Nothing that has come out can even saturate a single 16x bus. The only use that I see is for SLI and even then if you buy a decent board you can at least get 2 2.0 x16 slots.

jcknouse 10/30/2009 7:23 PM
Hide
-1+

For $299, I'd want the USB 3.0, all the SATA to be 6.0, etc.

Otherwise, I'll stick with $200 and less for hardware I can get now. :)

insaneclowngod 10/30/2009 7:30 PM
Hide
-5+

El_Capitan :
but we'd also have to buy a third-party controller? Sounds like a "great" deal.


The controller is built on to the motherboard, so you would not need to buy anything other than the board.

jonpaul37 10/30/2009 7:52 PM
Hide
-0+

They just wanted to be the first to jump out on this..., soon enough, USB 3.0 will be the standard as it is backwards-compatible with USB 2.0 devices. all motherboards will have only USB 3.0 ports soon enough, chipset design will follow suit, thy have to...

Anonymous 10/30/2009 8:01 PM
Hide
-0+

So is the USB 3-controller implemented in such a way as to not be bottlenecked on a single PCIe-line?

If it is this would be kinda pointless as USB 3-devices are likely to be backwards compatible anyway.

dark_lord69 10/30/2009 8:10 PM
Hide
-0+

cekasone :
still waiting for sata 3 and pcie 3


SATA 3 will be worth waiting for... IF YOU USE A SOLID STATE DRIVE!
Otherwise SATA 2 is more than enough.
ALSO
Same story for PCIe 3.0
I don't know of any video cards that can reach the max capability of a PCIe (16X) slot. You really don't need more until technology advances on other fronts.

monicas 10/30/2009 8:13 PM
Hide
-0+

I think its really good to see a company step up and push 3.0 out to market. I've always liked Asus products and it seems that they are always pushing the standards at least on motherboards. Along with Gigabyte, they make some of the best mobo's around. So its no surprise they did this.

Not sure what 3.0 devices are currently out! Anyone know?

Monica S
Los Angeles Computer Repair
http://www.sebecomputercare.com

dauthus 10/30/2009 8:20 PM
Hide
-0+

Gigabyte was actually the first company to unveil a new line of mobos with USB 3.0 slots, which was about 2 days ago.
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/FileLis [...] models.htm

agentjon 10/30/2009 8:22 PM
Hide
-2+

What is the selling point of USB 3.0. Faster data transfer with storage devices? eSATA aready offers that and my keyboard does not need something 10 times faster USB 2.0 to work correctly.

ssalim 10/30/2009 8:28 PM
Hide
-0+

Not for most of us. Maybe in 10 years.

rooket 10/30/2009 8:39 PM
Hide
-0+

World's first USB 3.0 motherboard with very horrible RMA support. I'll be impressed when Evga comes out with theirs. *sweeps this Asus product under the carpet*

Lucid Moments 10/30/2009 8:47 PM
Hide
-0+

agentjon :
What is the selling point of USB 3.0. Faster data transfer with storage devices? eSATA aready offers that and my keyboard does not need something 10 times faster USB 2.0 to work correctly.



eSATA is adequate for a fixed implementation, but a portable device would work much better with USB3.0 since it supplies the power also.

itrendslave 10/30/2009 9:01 PM
Hide
-0+

Jane McEntegart :
Aside from the two USB 3.0 ports, the Xtreme Design P7DP55DE-E Premium has 10 USB 2.0 ports, six 3GB per second SATA ports, two 6GB per second SATA ports, two PCIe x16 graphic card slots and two Gigabit Ethernet ports.



This is incorrect and is likely confusing people. GB = gigaBYTE. Gb = gigabit. (8 bits in a byte) Those numbers should DEFINITELY not be gigaBYTE. You've got the numbers correct, but they're gigaBIT speeds.

wildwell 10/30/2009 9:02 PM
Hide
-0+

Awesome, I wasn't expecting USB 3 boards until early next year. Aside from them being blue colored, are the USB 3 connections the same shape as USB 1 & 2?

backIn5 10/30/2009 9:45 PM
Hide
-0+

Is there any equipment out there that supports USB 3 to use it with?

Same goes for SATA 3, though I think a few drives were introduced with SATA 3, just not sure if they actually sell them yet.

And of-course the biggest problem - bottleneck. Especially with P55 that only has a 2GB/s DMI linking the peripherals.

I think USB 3 and SATA 3 will only pay off once PCI Express 3 comes out, assuming by then there will be affordable devices that can actually benefit from all those three new 3rd generation technologies.

ajcroteau 10/30/2009 9:51 PM
Hide
-0+

I'm confused... why not make all the USB ports 3.0...

Anonymous 10/30/2009 10:38 PM
Hide
-1+

all the ports arent usb3 as the usb3 controller chip costs $15 and supports only 2 ports, for them to make all 12 ports usb3 would cost alot of $$$. usb3 is indeed the same size and shape connector, it can also supply alot more power so external harddrives wont need a power supply too.

there is a sata3 hdd out: http://benchmarkreviews.com/index. [...] &Itemid=46

descendency 10/31/2009 4:13 AM
Hide
-0+

ajcroteau :
I'm confused... why not make all the USB ports 3.0...



I think it has something to do with how the USB3 ports are added in the first place. I think they are added on through a chip outside of where the USB is usually found. So they would need a larger chip to support more USB3 ports, which isn't feasible at this time.

christop 10/31/2009 5:06 AM
Hide
-0+

kinda cool would like to demo this board for a few months..

liquidsnake718 10/31/2009 6:18 AM
Hide
-1+

Ok so now where is the X58? This should be standard in X58 mb's 2.0.......

JohnnyLucky 10/31/2009 12:15 PM
Hide
-0+

Well lets's see.... a total of 12 USB ports on one motherboard. How much is enough?

r0x0r 10/31/2009 12:45 PM
Hide
-0+

Hmm... Since there's so much bandwidth on USB3, I wonder if I can get a hub and connect my keyboard, mouse, modem, MP3 player, thumb drive, bluetooth dongle, etc into one port...


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • USB 3.0 will, of course, also require new USB hubs to allow connecting several devices through one physical connection. USB 3.0 hubs will be more sophisticated than USB 2.0 devices, as they will include two separate hubs in one single device: one SuperSpeed hub for USB 3.0 operation, and a second one for USB 2.0. This will be entirely transparent to the user, as all ports will be connected to both hubs. However, this approach does not increase the maximum amount of devices per USB host port, which remains 127. Will USB 3.0 Hubs Be More Expensive? The implementation of such a double-feature hub will most likely have a negative impact on first-generation USB 3.0 hubs, although we expect future product generations to be based on unified silicon, meaning that one controller supports both hub functions. We also want to point at compatibility issues with USB 1.1, as USB 3.0 devices are not supposed to maintain compatibility with the old 12 Mbit/s standard. Hence, USB 3.0 hubs will not cooperate with old USB 1.1 controllers. Market Penetration by 2010 The specification is set now, but it will take a few more months until devices are available in any significant quantities. The USB 3.0 Promoter Group expects USB 3.0 consumer products to be available by 2010, which is a year later than expected. Most companies will be busy implementing USB 3.0 for the rest of this year, but we expect controllers to be ready before 2009 closes out. Windows 7 Without USB 3.0 Support? Microsoft has already announced that it won't be supporting USB 3.0 natively when Windows 7 ships. The time between finalization of the USB 3.0 specification and the completion of Windows 7 appears to be too short to fit support into the Windows 7 production pipeline. However, Microsoft will definitely add USB 3.0 support via updates. It remains to be seen whether or not Windows XP or Windows Vista will be upgraded with USB 3.0 support, allowing current users to benefit from SuperSpeed technology. The delays also impacted the product development of other manufacturers, such as Intel. First, rumors said that the Ibex Peak chipset (P55) would be supporting USB 3.0, which is definitely not the case. Users will have to wait for Intel’s 2010 platform to get integrated USB 3.0 hardware support.

  • Toshiba and SSDs Competing in a market that’s been targeted by the world’s largest semiconductor company is no easy task. Given Intel’s push into the SSD (solid state storage) market, Toshiba has tried to differentiate itself from Intel’s more commodity-like approach. For example, Toshiba offers a half-terabyte SSD, while Intel’s current largest SSD is 160GB. Now Toshiba is pushing into alternative form factors, such as a mSATA (mini-SATA) configuration in 30GB and 62GB sizes, suitable for netbooks or server boot drives. These drives plug directly into a mini-PCI interface and are substantially smaller (up to 1/7th the size of a 2.5-inch form factor). Toshiba will also be offering similar configurations in a “half-slim” form factor, smaller than a business card, with no actual case, that plugs directly into a SATA port. USB 3.0 Update We mentioned USB 3.0 (also known as “SuperSpeed USB”) in our day two IDF update. We’re updating that brief mention today with an update after a technical session on USB 3.0’s steady march towards actual products. Up to 10x performance increase--480 Mb/s to 5 Gb/sFast Sync-N-Go to minimize user wait timeOptimize power efficiency--uses 1/3 the power of USB 2.0; no device polling and lower active and idle power requirementsBackward compatible with USB 2.0. NEC announced the first SuperSpeed USB host controller, the uDP 720200. Asus had a PCI Express interface card based on the NEC chip, running in several PCs, connected to various peripherals. Asus is also showing its previously-announced P6X58 Premium motherboard with the NEC controller built directly onto the motherboard. The system was connected to a solid state drive streaming data off at 250MB/sec, around eight times faster than similar USB 2.0 products. Fujitsu demoed a laptop PC with the NEC host controller, too. Given Intel’s public roadmaps, it may be a good year before we see SuperSpeed USB embedded into PC core logic. Then there’s the issue of software support. At the USB 3.0 technical session, senior program manager Lars Guisti of Microsoft gave an update on how SuperSpeed USB’s XHCI driver stack might be implemented into Windows. It’s a fairly complex driver stack, given support for backward compatibility, the new power management features, and higher data speeds. Microsoft will be delivering native support for XHCI in some future Windows update, but the timing is uncertain.

  • The USB Implementers Forum introduced the final USB 3.0 specification at the end of 2008. As you can imagine, the new standard once again will accelerate throughput, and although the speed bump isn’t as significant as 40x when USB 1.1 was replaced by USB 2.0, there still is a 10x increase in bandwidth. USB 3.0 is specified to run at 5 Gbit/s maximum speed. However, this increase is still great enough to offer almost twice the bandwidth of today’s Serial ATA standard (3 Gbit/s gross bandwidth). Is 5 Gbit/s Too Much? Every enthusiast will confirm USB 2.0 being one of the main bottlenecks in modern PCs and notebooks, as the peak net throughput typically lies between 30 and 35 MB/s. However, 3.5” desktop hard drives typically reach far more than 100 MB/s today (there even is a 2.5” notebook hard drive that can deliver this kind of throughput). Fast flash SSDs break 200 MB/s. Still, 5 Gbit/s (or 5,120 Mbit/s) equal 640 MB/s gross bandwidth.  While we don’t expect hard drives to get anywhere near 600 MB/s within the predictable future, next-generation flash SSDs might surpass that number in only a few year's time. And this type of throughput is getting more and more important as increasing amounts of data also extend the time required to run backups. The faster your storage, the easier it is to maintain short backup windows. Headroom For The Future It isn’t uncommon for digital camcorders to store multiple gigabytes of video data. Moreover, the rising prevalence of HD-capable cameras will require larger and faster storage devices to handle the increasing amount of data. USB 2.0 already takes quite a while to transfer double-digit gigabyte quantities of data to a PC for editing purposes. The USB-IF shares the opinion that bandwidth remains of principle importance and expects USB 3.0 to be capable of handling all consumer devices within the next five years. 8b/10b Encoding In an effort to ensure reliable data transfers, USB 3.0 utilizes an 8b/10b encoding, which is also being used by Serial ATA. 10-bit words are represented in a 10-bit encoding, which results in more reliable transfer at the expense of useable bandwidth. Hence the conversion from bits to bytes has to happen at 10:1 instead at 8:1. Throughput OverviewSpecification/InterfaceNominal Throughput (Mbit/s)Nominal Throughput (MByte/s)USB 1.x1.50.19 USB 1.x 121.5USB 2.0 48060USB 3.0 5,000500* FireWire 400 40050FireWire 800 80080* SATA / eSATA 150 1,500150* SATA / eSATA 300 3,000300*  * 8b/10b Encoding