Badaboom's GPU-accelerated Video Encoding Promises A Lot, Not Yet Ready For Prime Time
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (3) |
- Share
San Jose (CA) - Digital videographers know the pain and drudgery of rendering video. Even on the fastest processors, rendering high definition H.264 footage can take minutes, even hours, but an upcoming product by Elemental Technologies promises to cut that time dramatically. Using the stream processing power of Nvidia’s CUDA-enabled graphics cards, the Badaboom media converter will transcode video faster than real-time. But there’s a lot more work that needs to be done because in a demonstration at the NVISION conference in San Jose, Badaboom and the upcoming Elemental Technologies plug-in for Adobe Premiere crashed frequently and sometimes refused to process AVCHD video.
To be fair, the Steve Goffena with Elemental Technologies told us the product wasn’t yet finished and said the crashes were to be expected. The Badaboom media converter will come in two versions, one for standard definition content and the Badaboom Pro, which will transcode high definition video. Another attendee asked if the encoder could convert an AVCHD video (a favorite of many flash-based camcorders) into an Apple iPhone-friendly format. After several tries and crashes, the rep encoded the clip at around 14-17 frames a second. Sure it wasn’t a world record, but the task manager showed an impressive 6% CPU utilization during encoding.
Elemental Technologies is also working on a plug-in for Adobe Premiere that will move the encoding from the CPU to GPU. While this product is almost done, the rep could only show us the menu options within Adobe Premiere because the actual rendering engine wasn’t yet finished - so we could set all the options, pull-down menus and checkboxes, but when it came time to render the CPU was still doing the work. This was confirmed by the company rep and the 90%+ reading in the CPU utilization screen.
Goffena said his team is finishing up Badaboom and the Premiere plug-in and should release commercial versions later this year. You can download a beta version of Badaboom on Nvidia’s website, but according to Goffena the program will self-destruct on August 29th. Sadly, there are no plans for a Sony Vegas plug-in.
Even on an 8-core Skulltrail system, rendering long clips of HD H.264 can take quite a while (and god help you if you’re rendering out an entire Blu-Ray disc), so we really hope Elemental Technologies can pull this of.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Best offers
The WinFast PxVC1100 Video Transcoding Card: Worth The Price?
The SpursEngine-based WinFast PxVC1100, which centers on the same architecture as the PS3's Cell processor, shows off its ability to accelerate video encoding. But does its performance justify the price? Or is your money better invested in a faster CPU? Read More
-
CPU Charts, An ATI Update, And Zotac's Mini-ITX Board
Chris checks in with an update on our 2009 CPU Charts, pricing on ATI's Radeon HD 5800/5900s graphics cards, news of official bitstreaming support, an interesting tidbit on power consumption in Eyefinity mode, and Zotac's second-gen mini-ITX board. Read More
-
Which Networking Technology Is Right For Your Home?
Powerline, MoCA, 802.11 wireless, or conventional Ethernet--which networking technology is right for your home? Netgear sent us product based on all four technologies and we ran them through their paces to help you decide which works best in your home. Read More
- badaboom nvidia
- gpu video encoding
- badaboom media converter
- processor for rendering
- realtime video encoding
- video encoding cpu
- adobe premiere cuda
- gpu video encoder
- badaboom pro
- badaboom premiere plugin
- video rendering and cpu
- video encoding using graphic cards
- h.264 sony vegas 8
- adobe premiere nvidia cuda
- badaboom crashes

1.) x264 is still faster.
2.) badaboom is only baseline h264
GPU based solutions have a LONG LONG way to go.
The Badaboom media converter will come in two versions, one for standard definition content and the Badaboom Pro
OK, that's just retarded and unless this encoder does what x264 can do it is totally WORTHLESS.
Got to agree with above posters.