Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Blizzard's StarCraft II Closed Beta Begins

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

Gamers who signed up to participate in the StarCraft II beta should keep an eye on their Inboxes.

Blizzard said today that the closed beta for StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is officially underway. The company revealed in a press release that "thousands" of gamers will begin to receive their invitations starting today. This will be the first phase of many in the closed beta, so don't panic just yet if your invitation isn't sitting in your Inbox.

"In addition to providing feedback on the multiplayer balance of StarCraft II, testers are also getting a first look at Blizzard Entertainment's revamped Battle.net service, which will be the online platform for StarCraft II, World of Warcraft, and future Blizzard Entertainment games," the company said.

Here are the official beta specs:

PC Minimum Requirements:

Windows XP SP3/Vista SP1/Windows 7
2.2 GHz Pentium IV or equivalent AMD Athlon processor
1 GB system RAM/1.5 GB for Vista and Windows 7
128 MB NVidia GeForce 6600 GT/ATI Radeon 9800 PRO video card
1024x768 minimum display resolution
4 GB free hard space (Beta)
Broadband connection

StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty is currently slated to ship in the first half of 2010.

Share:
38
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
roastmaster 02/18/2010 2:05 AM
Hide
-4+

WOW FINALLY!!!

roastmaster 02/18/2010 2:05 AM
Hide
--3+

Wow Finally!!!

ColMirage 02/18/2010 2:21 AM
Hide
-3+

Didn't make it in ;_; uncool.

Anonymous 02/18/2010 2:24 AM
Hide
--3+

in the upper right corner on teamliquid.com you can see live user streams of members whos playing right now

skit75 02/18/2010 2:31 AM
Hide
-8+

I hope the transition is better than the Warcraft 2 to Warcraft 3 fiasco. I personally thought the 3d move screwed up the gameplay and I enjoyed Warcraft 2 much more than 3.
The bar has been set so high by the original Starcraft. I can't imagine this release being on the same scale as the original in its day but, one could still hope despite no LAN support which is a huge hurdle to overcome in itself for this genre.

ultimate91 02/18/2010 2:48 AM
Hide
-2+

WOW! I have waiting for Starcraft II since Starcrft release when I was 7 grade! That is very good news to hear this information!

Haven't anybody thounght the requiemnet a little lower than recently game?

frozenlead 02/18/2010 2:56 AM
Hide
-8+

Yeah...those system requirements are really low for a new game. I mean, I know Blizzard likes to keep lots of people in their consumer base...but a 9800 Pro?

Nightskeeter 02/18/2010 3:04 AM
Show
Shadow703793 02/18/2010 3:10 AM
Hide
-17+

Quote :By your grammar im astonished that you [/b]past[/b] the 5th grade.

Check your self too :P

akoegle 02/18/2010 3:10 AM
Hide
-1+

Mr Parrish

Please fix the title, thats just silly.

IzzyCraft 02/18/2010 3:14 AM
Hide
-4+

I have the beta and my 8800gts and E8400 can only mark 40 fps under ultra settings at 1650x1050
If i make some things to medium and to high i can get a smooth 60 fps+ The game looks great but on lowest settings it's so bare

gnookergi 02/18/2010 3:24 AM
Hide
-2+

Shadow703793 :
Check your self too


LOL! You got PWND! BTW, did you ever stop to think that English could possibly be a second language for that person?

Yay! Star Craft!

Nightskeeter 02/18/2010 3:41 AM
Hide
-1+

IzzyCraft :
I have the beta and my 8800gts and E8400 can only mark 40 fps under ultra settings at 1650x1050If i make some things to medium and to high i can get a smooth 60 fps+ The game looks great but on lowest settings it's so bare




Yeah, but 40FPS is plenty for a RTS. Hell the original probibly only ran at under 30FPS like Diablo 2 anyway....

Glad to hear how your system runs the game though, cause I have that same Processor! But I have a 4870 1GB running 1080P.

Thanks for sharing how it runs on your system!

Burodsx 02/18/2010 3:46 AM
Hide
-1+

I'd love to partake in the beta. *crosses fingers*

Anonymous 02/18/2010 4:12 AM
Hide
--3+

I've been a member of battle.net for years and have WC3: Reign of Chaos, The Frozen Throne, Starcraft, and Diablo II. It feels like I waited over 10 years for the 2nd installment of this game, and I never got my beta key through battle.net tho, I actually got tired of waiting and came upon this site that had a couple hundred keys to give out. I'm not sure if they still have any keys available, but this was the site: http://gamebetakeys.com/starcraft2/

I think that they get new keys every few days so it's best to check back now and then.

randoMIZER 02/18/2010 4:23 AM
Hide
-2+

Nightskeeter :
Wow.Ultimate91By your grammar im astonished that you past the 5th grade.Reading your comment was almost as painful as watching the Special Olympics, or Womans Basketball.


Muphry's Law just kicked your ass.

trevorvdw 02/18/2010 4:27 AM
Hide
-0+

Hopefully its come a long way since Blizzcon where it looked and played like a 5 year old game. They (Blizz) did poach some people from Relic (Dawn of War 2/Company of Heroes folks) so that should help.

matt87_50 02/18/2010 4:35 AM
Hide
--1+

2.2 GHz Pentium IV !?!?!!?

are they trying to trick us in to thinking that it hasn't taken them 11 years to make this by making it look like it came out in 2004 !?

it BETTER LOOK GOOD!!

their stupid "oh, every n00b with an abacus has to be able to run it" policy mixed with how long it has taken to polish it makes me wonder..

I'm all for low minimums, but we better be able to crank it up.

I still think starcraft looks good, low res sure, but the hand crafted (pre-rendered?) sprites have a certain quality feel to them. warcraft III was a joke graphically, the ONLY RTS to come close to replicating the look of it's previous sprite version in 3D is Red Alert 3.

the main reason I like starcraft is because of how different the races are. but I don't care how different they are mechanically, if they don't LOOK different, the illusion is broken.

JohnnyLucky 02/18/2010 5:10 AM
Hide
-0+

GEE! Anybody click through to the really large version of the image? It's bigger than my 22 inch display. Lots of fine details. WOW!

MoUsE-WiZ 02/18/2010 5:38 AM
Hide
-0+

Just posting to brag. Downloading it now... good timing too, it's our spring break equivalent at my university, and I was all afraid I'd have to spend time coding this week ~_~

Gin Fushicho 02/18/2010 8:11 AM
Hide
-1+

Glad the default resolution isn't 480x640 like in Diablo 2. xP

anamaniac 02/18/2010 8:21 AM
Hide
-1+

=)
I've bought 4 computers since I played the original Starcraft. Granted, I'm more of a Diable/Warcraft fan, but I'd love to play this. Hell, I'd love to play the original right now.
I've spent hundreds of hours on Diablo 2 (only a dozen or so on the original), 1500 on WoW, a few hundred on WC3...

Blizzard has gotten a lot of money from me.
... I want in. =(

Gin Fushicho :
Glad the default resolution isn't 480x640 like in Diablo 2. xP


Yeah...
Got my Crysis rig running smooth, and I decide to load up the gold ole' Diablo 2. 640x480 (800x640 in the expansion, but I lost the CD-key). I'm running a 22" 2048x1152 monitor, 640x480 just isn't happening, sorry.

acasel 02/18/2010 8:27 AM
Hide
-0+

I hope they will release this game accompanied by "OFFLINE" multiplayer...............................

Anonymous 02/18/2010 9:04 AM
Hide
-1+

still sucks theres no lan option!

td854 02/18/2010 9:20 AM
Hide
-0+

Would have been nice to get in but it doesn't look like I was chosen. I was in 2nd or 3rd grade when the original Starcraft came out, and I remember waiting for Brood War. Played that damn thing for years and years.

IzzyCraft 02/18/2010 10:04 AM
Hide
--2+

dredg96 :
still sucks theres no lan option!


like it sucks in mw2 lol just suck it up they aren't going to change their minds when mw2 still told a shit load lol oh yeah so many people just boycotted it because no dedicated servers =p.

anamaniac 02/18/2010 10:20 AM
Hide
-0+

IzzyCraft :
like it sucks in mw2 lol just suck it up they aren't going to change their minds when mw2 still told a shit load lol oh yeah so many people just boycotted it because no dedicated servers =p.


Well, they sold shitloads, but only on the console versions.
Sales on the PC version bombed. =)
Too bad though this probably just motivated them to do more console only games. =(

Wolygon 02/18/2010 11:14 AM
Hide
-0+

I hope this ends up as a "Modern Warfare 2" 2. Although I doubt it. No LAN support and you have to be logged in to Battle.Net to play single player. No Thank you.

This is a game where The Pirate Bay will give me a better version, and I will very gladly go that way seeing as Blizzard don't seem to want to fix it.

I wish that there could be a boycott on this game, although that will never happen since people have been waiting for this for too long and so they don't care that they're getting a half baked game.

Ciuy 02/18/2010 11:45 AM
Hide
-0+

FINALLYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

grishona 02/18/2010 12:33 PM
Hide
--1+

its good that the requirements arent that high, as many as possible should be able to run the game. only makes it more opponents to face on battle net, i bet it looks good but on the stram i saw last night i didnt liked the graphics that much, but the had low quality on.
cant wait to try it out.
guess it will take a while untill i like it..

sicpric 02/18/2010 1:21 PM
Hide
-0+

Regardless of no LAN support this game is still going to rock


Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads