Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Crucial Releases New (20% Faster) m4 SSD Firmware

by - source: Crucial

Crucial's new firmware update provides a "free" performance increase for its m4 Series.

Crucial has issued a firmware update for its m4 series of SSDs and promises a range of performance improvements beyond your normal firmware fixes. The company is claiming up to a 20 percent performance increase in sequential read speeds.  It is like "having your cake and eating it too" - You get those little firmware bugs fixed and you get a nice performance increase for free.

SSDs rely heavily on their firmware for their performance, along with controller-related features such as Garbage Collection, Wear-leveling, to name a couple. Other improvements in the firmware upgrade includes; increased throughput performance, lower write latency, improved chipset compatibility, improvement for cold boot failures, and faster boot up time. The firmware comes through an ISO image that is installed through a CD or DVD. (This is one area I would've like to see Crucial take a page from OCZ and provide its firmware updates from a "Crucial Toolbox".)

Crucial's Official Release Notes:

“Release Date: 08/25/2011

Change Log:

  • Changes made in version 0002 (m4 can be updated to revision 0009 directly from either revision 0001 or 0002)
  • Improved throughput performance.
  • Increase in PCMark Vantage benchmark score, resulting in improved user experience in most operating systems.
  • Improved write latency for better performance under heavy write workloads.
  • Faster boot up times.
  • Improved compatibility with latest chipsets.
  • Compensation for SATA speed negotiation issues between some SATA-II chipsets and the SATA-III device.
  • Improvement for intermittent failures in cold boot up related to some specific host systems.”
Firmware Download: Crucial
Share:
43
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
sseyler 08/27/2011 6:10 AM
Hide
-10+

If these claims are even 50% true, then great! It would put even more pressure on OCZ Vertex 3 drives.

mute20 08/27/2011 6:12 AM
Hide
-20+

If this was released by apple they would have charged 40$

eklipz330 08/27/2011 6:28 AM
Hide
-6+

sseyler :
If these claims are even 50% true, then great! It would put even more pressure on OCZ Vertex 3 drives.


i don't wanna sound rude, but OCZ reliability has plummeted, that's why they've become cheaper. look at the newegg reviews, there are many complaints of their SSD's failing after 7 or so months. that doesn;t so too great. crucial on the other hand seems to be rolling out with great products... i might pick up the 64gb m4 for OS =]

heroictofu 08/27/2011 6:37 AM
Hide
-5+

Yeah, based on all the Sandforce errors I've been hearing about, Crucial's M4 looks mighty fine right about now. And with a potential 20% increase in performance, that puts it pretty darn close, if not surpassing some of the Sandforce controllers out there.

chick0n 08/27/2011 6:47 AM
Hide
-18+

mute20 :
If this was released by apple they would have charged 40$



Why not? Anything outa Apple's labs/factory comes with free magic dust.

AbdullahG 08/27/2011 7:02 AM
Hide
-1+

Well that's good news. Might pick up a Crucial SDD for a new build of mine (just need to save up a little more).

roscolo 08/27/2011 7:02 AM
Hide
-1+

Looks like the best just got a little better. Glad I picked one of these up when Newegg had 'em on sale. I've only just now installed the 128GB m4, so I look forward to giving the new firmware a go!

wintermint 08/27/2011 7:18 AM
Hide
-3+

This is what SSD manufacturers should be focusing on: providing us with FREE firmware updates that will IMPROVE our PERFORMANCE instead of OFFERING us more EXPENSIVE products that holds the same storage amount :]

ikyung 08/27/2011 7:49 AM
Hide
-0+

Been using Crucial c300 for about a year now. Haven't failed, and the firmwares fixed any bugs or problems.

fyend 08/27/2011 8:29 AM
Hide
-7+

Why is free in quotes in the title since it is actually free and all, makes one think there is some catch or hidden charge.

kd0frg 08/27/2011 8:38 AM
Hide
-1+

I just updated my c4 from 0002 to 0009 , worked good, i used a USB flash drive for the bootup, moved the c4 firmware update iso to a flash drive using unetbootin *open unetbootin, dont select a distro or version, just go straight to selecting the ISO, and your usb device and drive, and hit copy/next/install or what ever it was and it copys the bootloader onto your USB drive. It worked good for me* Make sure you disable RAID or AHCI mode in the bios when you do this, your M4 has to be in IDE mode and compatible mode, not *enhanced* if you can help it. it says try not to use your SATA 6 gbps port either, use a SATA2 port 0-1 preferably, but i used my sata 6 port and it worked okay for me.. but thats just me.

roscolo 08/27/2011 8:50 AM
Hide
-4+

Just updated mine. Don't see any huge difference, but I didn't brick it, so it's all good.

Wish I Was Wealthy 08/27/2011 10:50 AM
Show
soldier37 08/27/2011 3:50 PM
Hide
-0+

Great news as I use a M4 128Gb for my boot drive and a few games/apps. Still on Sata 2 mb but thats changing soon!

robertito 08/27/2011 4:56 PM
Show
whysobluepandabear 08/27/2011 5:46 PM
Hide
-0+

mute20 :
If this was released by apple they would have charged 40$


Probably. The dollar sign always goes before the number. The cents symbol goes at the end.....

bgrthnu 08/27/2011 6:05 PM
Hide
-0+

If I were to go pick up one of these drives today, would the firmware already be updated with 0009 or will I need to do this myself when I get it?

bitacora 08/27/2011 6:09 PM
Hide
-0+

After firmware update 0002->0009, CrystalDiskMark seq read 241.3 MB/s (0002)-> seq read 131.8 MB/s (0009). -45% less read speed.

yapchagi 08/27/2011 8:48 PM
Hide
-0+

can anyone confirm this increased reading speed running @SATA 6G on native intel SATA 6G controller?
Maybe on Marvell controller too, just to compare.
Anyone?

beenthere 08/27/2011 10:05 PM
Hide
-2+

All of the SSD suppliers have had reliability, firmware, power or compatibility issues including Crucial, Intel, OCZ, Corsair, etc. This is simply unacceptable IMO. Increased speed is fine if it doesn't create issues. IMO until SSDs become reliable and trouble-free, people should stop buying them so there is a financial incentive to correct the operational issues.

From Tom's Aug. SSD review:

"There's no debating whether SSDs offer blistering performance. That that doesn't really matter if you can't trust the device holding that important information. When you read about Corsair's Force 3 recall, OCZ's firmware updates to prevent BSODs, Crucial's link power management issues, and Intel's SSD 320 that loses capacity after a power failure, all within a two-month period, you have to acknowledge that we're dealing with a technology that's simply a lot newer (and consequently less mature) than mechanical storage."

aberkae 08/27/2011 10:27 PM
Hide
-1+

All the m4 were on sale yesterday 15% off @ newegg
i had the c300 256gig for more than a year now and i love this this thing

crucial ftw!

buzznut 08/27/2011 11:42 PM
Hide
-1+

bgrthnu :
If I were to go pick up one of these drives today, would the firmware already be updated with 0009 or will I need to do this myself when I get it?


No, it definitely would not have the new version and one would indeed have to update the firmware. Better to do this before the OS is installed anyway.

antonioq1966 08/28/2011 1:32 AM
Hide
-3+

Just updated my M4 64GB from firmware 0001 to 0009. It is connected to Sata III port. The result is a nice boost in reads, not much change in writes. CrystalDiskMark reports:
reads
seq went from 412.6 to 523.9
512k from 357.3 to 426
4k from 26.39 to 27.45
4k QD32 from 235.9 to 301.9
writes
seq 105.2 to 107.2
512k from 105.3 to 105.8
4k from 54.65 to 58.19
4k QD32 from 103.1 to 102.3
Can't be sure if boot time is less-it was always smokin' fast.

Wamphryi 08/28/2011 3:16 AM
Hide
-1+

By coincidence I went hunting for a Firmware Update for my Crucial M4 just yesterday. The reason why I did this was every few cold boots the M4 would not maintain its place in the HDD boot priority in BIOS. I was also in a situation where the PC would hang or reboot without rhyme or reason. I applied the Firmware and it didn't brick my drive. Follow the instructions as provided by Crucial or you will not succeed in updating. So far the problems I was having have not repeated but time will tell.

kd0frg 08/28/2011 3:33 AM
Hide
-0+

mine is a m4 64gb but i dont get readings half as good
mine is a marvell 6gbps controller, with an older driver, because if i use the newest driver i get stuttering on my videos on netflix

heres my readings from crystladiskmark 3.0.1

seq = 293.8 read / 106.8 write
512k = 221.7 / 59.35
4k = 8.841 / 41.66
4k qd32 = 27.69 / 50.60

i dont know if i got any speed increase or not though since i cant find my screen shots i took from my tests with 0002 firmware



fredgiblet 08/28/2011 6:39 AM
Hide
-0+

@beenthere

Every HDD manufacturer has had dud models too.

I updated my firmware, took about 2 minutes from download to booted again, painless if somewhat annoying having to switch to IDE then back to AHCI.

yapchagi 08/28/2011 7:42 AM
Hide
-0+

To antonioq1966, now that's called AWESOMENESS!!!!
That's exactly what I wanted to see, read speed from 412 mb/s to 523 mb/s.

I just used calculator default read speed 415 mb/s x 1.20 (20% increase) = 498 mb/s (BYE BYE SANDFORCE!!!)

yapchagi 08/28/2011 7:47 AM
Hide
--1+

kd0frg, that seq read speed is pretty low.

I used to have Crucial C300 RealSSD 256 GB running on Marvell 9123 (AHCI mode) and crystaldiskmark seq read speed was 328 mb/s.
And that was running on a Core i7 930 at default clock 2.8 GHZ.

kd0frg 08/28/2011 10:18 AM
Hide
-0+

yeah im not sure what the problem is, im runnin a i7 930 @ 3.36ghz, 12gb of ram, AHCI is turned on, the marvel controller is 91xx it says in my device manager, the mobo is an asus p6x58d premium motherboard, theres almost 30gb free on the drive

kd0frg 08/28/2011 10:22 AM
Hide
-0+

driver ver is 1.0.0.1036 on the marvel controller

yapchagi 08/28/2011 10:42 AM
Hide
-1+

I'm also using P6X58D Premium. I don't know why you have low read speed. My CPU clock was even lower than yours when I benchmarked the C300.


Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads