ARM Releases Guide to Enable 2 GHz Cortex-A9 Manufacturing
ARM has begun offering a Processor Optimization Pack (POP) specifically for Cortex-A9-based SoCs that are manufactured in 28 nm at Globalfoundries fabs.
The POP enables chips that run at a minimum of 1 to 1.6 GHz and 2 GHz in a "typical" scenario.
"As consumer demand for high-performance, energy-efficient mobile devices increases, Globalfoundries and ARM are lowering the risk for customers by delivering optimized Cortex-A9 cores on a proven 28 nm SoC process," said Kevin Meyer, vice president at Globalfoundries, in a prepared statement. "This latest ARM physical IP solution for our 28nm-SLP process delivers industry-leading performance and energy-efficiency, while also decreasing time to market for customers’ latest mobile products."
ARM is offering the POP as an upgrade for single- and dual-core Cortex-A9 designs to achieve higher clock speeds and enable Smartphone vendors to maintain a "competitive edge". The package comes with ARM's Artisan Physical IP logic libraries and memory instances, a benchmark report that describes the exact conditions and results ARM achieved for its core implementation, as well as an implementation guide that offers detail about the methodology that was used to achieve the improved result.
- Microsoft Signing Off on Windows 8 Build 8250 as Preview
- EverQuest Officially Goes Free to Play on March 16
- TI: Dual-Core OMAP5 Faster Than Quad-Core Cortex A9
- HP Releasing Windows 8 Atom-Based Tablet Too
- UK Ad Uses Facial-recognition to Target Women
- Dutch Ad Points to a Diablo 3 Launch on April 19
- Nvidia to Demo VoLTE, LTE Gaming at MWC 2012
- Trackpad Patent Hints Google May Bring Android to Desktop
- Office 15 Apps Will Have Touch Mode
- HTC Launches "One" Product Line With Android 4.0, 8MP Cams
- Intel's Ivy Bridge CPU Die Layout Estimated
- Microsoft Engineers Windows 8 Metro for Power Efficiency
- Intel-powered Android Smartphone Headed to Orange
- Intel Confirms Slight Delay in Ivy Bridge Core CPU Launch
- Deals Feb 27: 1TB Iomega NAS (Cloud Edition) $129.99 FS
- Intel Announces Dual-Core HyperThreaded Atom for Phones
- Three New Bulldozer FX CPUs Scheduled Soon on Leaked Slide
- Need A Job? Bethesda Hiring for "Future Gen"





I already feel out of date with my dual core 1.2ghz exynos processor.
But the question is, is it just high clock speeds and no performance, like bulldozer? Because the galaxy s2 original on att with the 1.2ghz processor beats the new skyrocket with the 1.5ghz dual core, because the snapdragon 3 is just no good.
i would have prefered if they release a guide to lower the power comsuption on SoC´s.
GloFo can barely do 32nm for AMD. Now they have 28nm for other people?
I would love to see a benchmark of the processor...
Could Toms just blacklist any post with the LazyCash.com (qikr.co/6phqn)? It'll be best for everyone in here.
Could Toms just blacklist any post with the LazyCash.com (qikr.co/6phqn)? It'll be best for everyone in here.
You should probably remove that link – I almost reported it as spam (I've seen subtle spam before similar to that).
GF has both 32 and 28nm sites. ANd GF's 32nm is doing just fine?
ARM going the same route as intel did with pentium... ARM architecture seems pretty rubbish to me.
ARM going the same route as intel did with pentium... ARM architecture seems pretty rubbish to me.
What does a power efficient architecture getting a clock frequency boost by going on a smaller production process node has to do with Pentium (I'm assuming you mean Netburst technology here) where Intel promised we'd see 10GHz in "a few years". Only to find out that if their architecture indeed reached 10GHz the energy density would be greater than in a thermonuclear meltdown?
GloFo can barely do 32nm for AMD. Now they have 28nm for other people?
This comment is flawed - AMD CPU's have a far, far higher transistor count per core than Cortex A9.
It stands to reason that less complex units are easier to manufacture.
GloFo can barely do 32nm for AMD. Now they have 28nm for other people?
It is just that the 32-bit RISC (by ARM Holdings) is easier to manufacture/fabricate than x86. That's a fact.
hmmm and i wonder when intel decides it's time to go 22nm with Atom...

Honestly, it's a lot of fun to Intel-troll other fabs
If there no competition in the 22nm market when intel introduces their cpus, be prepared for prices that we haven seen since the early 2000s, before AMD pushed thier shit in.

Intel makes you pay for the best