QOTD: How Much Are Google's Services Worth?
Today, many of us pay for our OS and the main programs that we use. Google is now shifting those ideas to web services, which are no less valuable.
Google today announced to the world its Chrome OS, which is just another piece in the puzzle to forming the complete Google-powered environment.
The core of Google's value is still what it can offer all internet users email, maps, translations, document and calendar collaboration, instant messenger, picture and video sharing, and perhaps above all, categorization of information.
Google is branching out, though, with its own web browser, mobile OS and ecosystem, and soon an operating system for netbooks to integrate it all together.
Some traditional office applications can be replaced by Google's cloud-based services, even leading some business to pay the Mountain View, Calif. company for corporate use of its apps.
The goal of the Chrome OS when it launches in the second half of 2010 is to integrate all of the Google services into one cohesive environment. The Chrome OS will be free, and we're guessing that the standard use of mail, documents, calendar will also be free. But at some point, Google's software will begin to push out similar offerings from Microsoft and Apple – software and services that users currently pay for and attach value to.
Assuming that Google's software and services could eventually replace your current paid-for products, how much are you willing to pay for the search giant's present (or eventual) offerings? More or less than what you are paying for now from Microsoft or Apple?
In other words, our QOTD is: How much are Google's services worth to you?

/Agrees.
Since when was giving out a free OS or search bar "new"? I really don't see how Chrome is anything special... Especially not compared to Ubuntu.
Anyone who does anything over check their facebook or sending tweets (both of which I would never do) won't get Google Chrome. That right there is my estimate of (maybe) 20% of PC users. The other 80% will be divided and simply won't get chrome because it's new and they don't know how to install it or don't need to waste their time installing a OS that will do the EXACT SAME THING AS ANY OTHER.
Would I pay for a google program? If they made something worthwhile I suppose, but right now we're not there.
I'm not opposed to getting excited about real innovation (like the anti-virus software that scans from the cloud-side and runs your files through 5 different products faster than your own system could run them through 2) but I think we're on a big wave of hype right now.
I don't think the late adopters have anything to worry about either. Cable TV and landlines may cost a little more, but we still have them (partially) because satellite TV goes out when it rains and VoIP goes down with the Internet.
/discuss.
Where's my money, Google? Where's my money man?
Google doesn't make software, they buy good software (keyhole etc..), thinks of a way to hide the fact they are privacy perverts and say its free.
Opportunity of Google OS:
Things that will work for Google OS are for non-tech heavy users which are > 70% of internet users (probably more). These are for people that "surf the net majority of the time for various reasons." No special or complicated need just to surf and interact through the net.
Ease of use and simple multi-media handling is something that Google can do a better job than windows.
A Unix base structure like the mac OS will simplify and reduce the complexity of the OS. The biggest advantage is much improved security.
Tech Users with Microsoft Windows:
Technology base users that use CAD/CAE tools won’t be too excited to migrate to another OS. It will take a while and it will require for companies such as Cadence/Synopsis..etc to port their design tools to another OS. That will require a lot of work.
Personally it took me a lot of work to migrate my design tools from XP to Windows Ultimate 64bit. I’m one of those who are not even looking forward to Windows 7. Although I’m thinking Vista Ultimate-64 to Windows7-64 transition is hopefully less complicated than XP-32 to Vista-64.
To date I still have 32 bit applications(Programs) that I’m porting to 32/64 OS so it can run on XP and Vista 32/64.
I have so much investment in my setup that I can’t switch OS.
Few of us here will be switching anytime soon we are too in love with our shiny graphics cards and big expensive cases plus you can't run photoshop on OS Chrome.
OS Chrome doesn't really apply to us in any real way but we are not the intended market.
I'm known as the computer nerd of the family and every now and then I get called over to recommend a set up.
The other day I went to see a relative and we started talking about his current set up. The last time I built him a PC it was a desktop but this time he told me he wanted something small and portable.
I asked him what he does with his computer and he told me he uses facebook and twitter. I asked him if he used anything else(I wanted to know if he required anything beefier before I recommended him a cheaper netbook) and he said no.
Anyway as we got talking he started asking me why cellphones boot up so fast and why computers are so slow. As I explained it to him he told me his computer was so slow he was using his iPhone to check his facebook instead of booting up his PC.
He told me the only function he requires from his PC is just something as cheap and small as possible that would allow him to check his facebook status updates every now and then.
Basically he wanted a very simple device that lets him get onto the internet and is cheap as peanuts.
If Google make a device and brand it "Google Internet Minicomputer" and put it in every Walmart as long as it is capable of getting people online for 100-150 dollars and letting them check their emails it will sell very well.
If people get the idea they can do everything they do with a device that cheap they will dump their big desktops and go for netbooks with Chrome OS installed.
Everybody that I talk to that I would call a technoob just wants something to surf the net with and for cheap and thats what Chrome OS is promising to do. If Google make this very cheap and widely available they will ravage Windows sales mercilessly.
You only have to look at netbook sales and see Desktop sales plummeting to see most people value cheap as possible over powerful and frankly superior.
100 dollar "Google Internet MiniComputer" at Walmart is the key to success. Make it boot up in 5 or 10 seconds and let people get to their facebook and twitter accounts and Microsoft is going to have a hard time telling people about how Windows can do more than Chrome OS when none of those functions are required by most users.
The thing with netbooks is if they deliver the intended functions your average user requires(ie facebook and twitter) they won't opt for more expensive alternatives.
Most users just require very basic functions and they want them for as cheap as possible. If ARM was to put together a very cheap small netbook device and then Google Brand it as an internet system and sell it for a hundred dollars at Walmart the majority of internet users wouldn't pay 5 or 6 times as much for a PC or notebook with Windows installed on it.
The reason Windows marketshare will fall because of Chrome OS isn't because Chrome OS is superior in any way or form it's just because Chrome OS is cheaper and it provides the few functions the majority of people need(access to the internet).
It's going to be a hell of a lot harder trying to sell a 600 dollar Dell with Windows 7 when you can go to Walmart and pick up a 100 dollar Chrome OS netbook designed to just give you simple and fast internet access.
If Chrome OS is done right it will eat up the noob marketshare which is also the vast majority of the market in the order of 97 to 98%.
google gets enough money with gooooooogle and adwords