Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $195.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $1195.70 PC Connection More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $204.32 PC Connection More info |
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE: Same Speed, Less Power
Today AMD is introducing a revision of its flagship Phenom II X4 965 processor rated at 125W, replacing the 140W part, as well as a new 3.1 version of its Overdrive overclocking software. We take a quick look at both to see what advantages they offer. Read More
-
Overclocked On Air: Intel's Core i5-750
Intel's new quad-core i5 and i7 CPUs for LGA 1156 deliver plenty of performance and impressive efficiency. But how far can they be overclocked? We take the entry-level model Core i5-750 as far as it'll go with a modest air cooler and benchmark it. Read More
-
Does Turbo Boost Help Or Hurt Core i5/i7's Power Efficiency?
Intel’s LGA 1156 processors serve up terrific new levels of performance to the mainstream. Now it’s time to look at how efficiency changed from Core 2 Quad to Core i5/i7. We found Turbo Boost technology to be a potential issue, despite its clear value. Read More
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Sponsored links
Report: Intel Monitoring Atom Popularity in China
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (10) |
- Share
Intel is reportedly watching Atom sales in China, concerned about netbook popularity in that area.
According to Digitimes’ sources, Intel has been monitoring Atom supplies and controlling availability in the Chinese market since the beginning of May. The report says Intel has even rejected orders from some China-based white-box players and that the company also closely monitoring Taiwan-based notebook makers with high inventory levels of Atom processors.
Netbook popularity is growing by the day and while some would argue that Intel should be happy the small processor is selling so well, when you take a step back, it’s easy to see why it’s all making Intel a little nervous.
With the world and its mother ponying up for netbooks and manufacturers producing netbooks with larger displays, people are starting to use the little computers as a replacement for everyday computing. Intel is no doubt worried that the Atom is going to cannibalize the sales of its more expensive Celeron, Pentium or Core processors.
According to Digitimes, Intel commented by stating that the story is unfounded and that the company does not comment on industry rumors, adding that its business model is to work with OEMs, ODMs, distributors and selected independent design houses.
Check out the full report on Digitimes.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
Intel Demonstrates Atom, New Centrino and Its Own Line of SSDs Drives
At IDF day 2 in Shanghai, Intel demonstrated its ultra tiny Atom processors, a next generation Centrino platform called Montevina and announced it will enter the SSD storage market.
-
Atom Benchmarked: 4W Of Performance
Originally developed for use in nettops, the Atom is now available for desktops. But how economical is the little platform, and is it powerful enough to handle daily work requirements?
-
Efficiency: Core 2 Nukes Atom On The Desktop
Atom is geared for low-cost, low-power netbooks and nettops, while the device is a poor choice for desktop PC applications. We show you why Core 2 is better, and give some guidance on how to pick the best power supply for your low-power application.
what's wrong with that, if someone wants a cheap comp that can just go on the net & watch movies or listen to music, why not? that's 99% of what I do & would be happy with something like that.
perhaps they should be happy they made something that could sell so well.
Go Nvidia and Via!
Too bad AMD can't make a competitive product otherwise they would make a killing there.
Those little sisters love that adam.....
wait, oh atom. man I keep getting confused.
Intel has always made their business model off of going with high end processors to feed their R&D, and not about going with efficency on the lower end like AMD. I can see why they're worried honestly.
Yea to bad Intel has been a little skittish lately its kinda funny maybe AMD is finally getting to them all in all the more competition the better. XD Go AMD!!
Cannibilize or not, sales are sales. If Intel is smart, they would sell volumes of Atom, and then slash prices on the higher offerings to make it more attractive.
All Intel is doing is allowing AMD a chance to expand in China.
Cannibilize or not, sales are sales. If Intel is smart, they would sell volumes of Atom, and then slash prices on the higher offerings to make it more attractive.All Intel is doing is allowing AMD a chance to expand in China.
Not necessarily always a good idea. Yes you always want to maintain market share, but as you lower prices, you have to sell more units to get the same profit. Their business model was built on the bigger processors being the meat, and these lower ends being the gravy. I'd be worried about my business model flipping because suddenly you're selling as many units or more yet making less money.
Shareholders are such a fickle bunch.
More epic fail from Intel. Bringing computing back to 2002 levels, I'm looking forward to AMD's Yukon and Congo CPUs.
VIA Nano FTW!
Look at production costs THG!!!! Cannibalization of Celeron sales would not be a bad thing as the atom is what 8X smaller? so unless it is selling for 10X lower price, then it's probably not impacting profits. Obviously Core is a totally different story - and that is what Intel is worried about. The main problem Intel has with it encroaching on Celeron is that it would just be a matter of time before it moved further on up to the low end Core2's.
Recall, Atom was never meant to be an everyday CPU, yet the fanboys seem to want to trash it. Yet noone trashes Geode, or ARM or other devices which have a specific application it is designed for. Again remember, Atom was desigend with consumer electronice, smart phones and MID's in mind - netbook was just an offshoot. Now folks are whining that a product designed for ultramobile devices is not good enough for everyday computer use.
Given where the market is headed, I would expect Intel to 'split the Atom' - a beefed up version after the SOC design to move upstream in the netbook, CULV notebook market and a scaled back version for the intended smart phone, consumer electronic market. The only real question is are the idiot fanboys going to continue whining about HD playback on devices that have screens NOT CAPABLE of diaplying those resolutions?!?!