Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Digital Playground Optimizing iPorn for iPad

By - Source: Tom's Guide US | B 31 comments

iPad paves way for bigger iPorn.

Yes, yes, we know it's been a literal bombardment of Apple iPad news regardless of which tech site you visit – which proves just how much of a splash a single, highly anticipated product can make.

Digital Playground, one of the world's largest makers of adult videos, wasted no time in getting on the iPad bandwagon. Shortly after Steve Jobs announced the iPad yesterday, Digital Playground announced porn optimized for the iPad, reported Tech Radar.

 "As the world leader of high-definition productions, Digital Playground is poised to deliver the highest quality movies to all platforms including the iPad," said Farley Cahen, VP of New Business Development.

"Users can now enjoy the handheld experience by viewing on 10-inch screen where prior they were watching on an iPhone or iPod screen."

So there you have it, folks – in the world where size matters, the iPad will soon be here to please.

Display 31 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 23 Hide
    adaman2576 , January 28, 2010 10:30 PM
    I'm surprised it even took a whole day.
  • 22 Hide
    sunsetblonde , January 28, 2010 11:06 PM
    So you need two hands to operate this?
  • 21 Hide
    endoftheline2 , January 28, 2010 10:42 PM
    I thought apple doesn't allow porn to be sold on the in its app store like that
Other Comments
  • 23 Hide
    adaman2576 , January 28, 2010 10:30 PM
    I'm surprised it even took a whole day.
  • 21 Hide
    endoftheline2 , January 28, 2010 10:42 PM
    I thought apple doesn't allow porn to be sold on the in its app store like that
  • 21 Hide
    joex444 , January 28, 2010 11:04 PM
    Yeah, way to go moron. 1024x768 and 10" is a pixel density nearly twice as high as a 21" screen with 1920x1080. Maybe I should dumb it down for your simple mind -- it looks twice as detailed since each pixel is sqrt(2) smaller.
  • 22 Hide
    sunsetblonde , January 28, 2010 11:06 PM
    So you need two hands to operate this?
  • 19 Hide
    ravewulf , January 28, 2010 11:13 PM
    Or I could just keep using my 21" computer monitor
  • 15 Hide
    gaevs , January 28, 2010 11:23 PM
    Or you just can wait for a real tablet with a real OS.. just saying..
  • 4 Hide
    eklipz330 , January 28, 2010 11:25 PM
    gotta release those iPad stain removers asap

    super pun intended
  • 10 Hide
    SAL-e , January 28, 2010 11:46 PM
    ravewulfOr I could just keep using my 21" computer monitor

    Yes, but can you drag your 21" monitor into the bathroom?! /sarcastic.

    I need a cold shower now.
  • 19 Hide
    tacoslave , January 28, 2010 11:50 PM
    SAL-eYes, but can you drag your 21" monitor into the bathroom?! /sarcastic.I need a cold shower now.
    and a girlfriend.
  • 15 Hide
    SAL-e , January 29, 2010 12:05 AM
    tacoslaveand a girlfriend.

    LOL.
  • 4 Hide
    RAMEON01 , January 29, 2010 12:32 AM
    joex444Yeah, way to go moron. 1024x768 and 10" is a pixel density nearly twice as high as a 21" screen with 1920x1080. Maybe I should dumb it down for your simple mind -- it looks twice as detailed since each pixel is sqrt(2) smaller.


    I was more referring that most movies are ran at 1920x1080, that if you did play a video in that aspect ratio it would either not be true "full screen" or be distorted if it was made to be. sorry if I didn't illaberate enough before you went off on your accusations on what you thought I meant. Also, name calling is what my 9yo does so I'll refrain.
  • 0 Hide
    fafner , January 29, 2010 1:38 AM
    RAMEON01I was more referring that most movies are ran at 1920x1080


    Really? I must be out of the loop. Most movies I've watched on my screen are hardly 1080p let alone porn.

    RAMEON01
    that if you did play a video in that aspect ratio it would either not be true "full screen" or be distorted if it was made to be.


    LOL. Really? Distorted? I think I need new glasses.


    RAMEON01
    Also, name calling is what my 9yo does so I'll refrain.


    LOL. Guess what? You just did.
  • 5 Hide
    aletoil , January 29, 2010 1:52 AM
    I guess its for couples porn only cause who is gonna hold the device?
  • 6 Hide
    welshmousepk , January 29, 2010 3:32 AM
    aletoilI guess its for couples porn only cause who is gonna hold the device?


    maybe we will see an iPad accessory called iFap? basically a stand and easy-wash screen protector in one.
  • 0 Hide
    saran008 , January 29, 2010 6:13 AM
    Too sad to hear that they took one full day to release ;) 
  • -2 Hide
    Anonymous , January 29, 2010 6:39 AM
    I love how people like people who sound smart...but are idiots. Take joex for example. If he wasn't thinking too hard of an insult (moron is first class, by the way), he would have been able to do some elementary math and figured out the pixel density for a 21" monitor is about 104.9 or 107.8, depending on 1080 vs 1200. The iPad has a pixel density of 128. Again, if you actually passed the 6th grade, 128 is not twice as much as 104.9. Should I dumb it down for your simple mind?
  • 6 Hide
    rebturtle , January 29, 2010 7:12 AM
    Let's calm down guys, before someone's glasses get slapped off and have to be masking-taped back together. Nerds and porn, now this is entertainment!
  • 6 Hide
    urlsen , January 29, 2010 7:30 AM
    sunsetblondeSo you need two hands to operate this?


    Lool.. THumbs :) 
  • 6 Hide
    Chris_TC , January 29, 2010 7:55 AM
    Quote:
    1024x768 and 10" is a pixel density nearly twice as high as a 21" screen with 1920x1080. Maybe I should dumb it down for your simple mind -- it looks twice as detailed since each pixel is sqrt(2) smaller.


    Of course it doesn't look twice as detailed. According to your logic, SD is more detailed than HD. Uh, yeah, right.

    Pixel size only matters if you're so close to the screen that you can see the pixels. Seeing the pixels is bad. But I sit very close to a 24 inch screen @ 1920x1200, and I don't see any pixels. So a higher pixel density than that really isn't needed unless your nose practically touches the screen.
Display more comments