AMD Compares Llano and Sandy Bridge in Video

Sandy Bridge is the new big dog in the consumer computing processor space – or is it? In terms of certain benchmarks, it is, but AMD feels that graphics have a big part to play too. With software supporting more GPU acceleration, there's certainly a valid point.

AMD has just released a video showing its Llano APU system going head to head against an Intel Sandy Bridge CPU. We know which side has the better graphics part integrated, but how does that translate into real-world performance? This is what AMD is trying to show everyone, but keep in mind that these are specific conditions.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
77 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • joytech22
    Did.. Did I just watch Intel get owned in the mobile department?
    Oh boy! let the war commence!

    Until.. the desktop parts are available, then we'll proceed with the desktop war.
    15
  • Other Comments
  • joytech22
    Did.. Did I just watch Intel get owned in the mobile department?
    Oh boy! let the war commence!

    Until.. the desktop parts are available, then we'll proceed with the desktop war.
    15
  • bombat1994
    well done AMD. The processor might not be as powerful but the intergrated graphics are much better than sandy bridge. quite a good effort for a upper market mobile cpu.

    lets just hopes bulldozer can follow suit
    6
  • joytech22
    bombat1994well done AMD. The processor might not be as powerful


    I should probably point this out, AMD's CPU in this video is just a Pheonom II with AMD's GPU on the same die.

    That's why if you had a Phenom with the same clocks and cores as this, they would both perform almost exactly the same in a CPU workload.
    0