Nvidia Launches GeForce GT 540M Mobile GPU
The old is new again
Nvidia today launched a new mobile GPU, the GeForce GT 540M. Is this a new era of mobile graphics? Not really, which is why today's reveal of the GeForce GT 540M came without much fanfare.
The specs of the new GPU made on the 40nm process include 96 cores and a 128-bit memory bus. If that sounds a little familiar, that's because it's the same as the GeForce GT 435M.
The 540M runs at 672MHz, while the 435M is at 650MHz. On the memory side, the newer GPU is at 900MHz, while the older GPU hit 800MHz.
Nvidia explains its new 500M family, which still uses the 400M technology, like this:
With GeForce GT 540M, we are taking an already proven architecture and using the maturity of the manufacturing process to create GPUs with higher clock settings while staying in the same power envelope. As a result, the GeForce GT 540M delivers a significant increase in fill-rate and memory bandwidth, which ultimately translates to better overall performance.
OEMs are launching these Optimized notebooks with GeForce GT 540M GPUs and dual-core "Arrandale" CPUs in order to hit mainstream price points sooner, ahead of Huron River dual-core platforms that will not be released until later in 2011. It is available immediately in China from Acer, and will be available worldwide next month.
- Ubuntu 11.04 Alpha 1 Released
- BBC Investigates Game Addiction
- WikiLeaks Shows Intel Blackmailed Russian Govt.
- Intel and Nvidia Reportedly Settle License Suit
- Deals for December 6: Samsung SSD for $99.99
- Blizzard Launches StarCraft 2 Public Test Server
- Businesses Lost 86,000 Laptops Worth $2.1 billion
- Adobe Flash 10.2b Makes Better Use of Your GPU
- Air Force Still Using PS3 as 33rd Largest Computer
- 4th WoW Expansion Will Have New Continent
- 3DMark 11 Finally Launched in 3 Versions
- Deals for December 7: 47'' VIZIO 120Hz for $897
- Crankshaft Accelerates Chrome 10
- This is Google's Chrome OS Notebook: The Cr-48
- Acer's Dual-Core Desktop Resembles PS2 Slim
- PC Software Era Turns Into App Era
- Google Animations Show Features of Chrome OS
- Chrome OS Web Store is Now Open and Ready






"The 540M runs at 672MHz, while the 435M is at 650MHz. On the memory side, the newer GPU is at 900MHz, while the older GPU hit 8000MHz."
Yeah that's 800mhz not 8000 but it's okay we are humans.
at $350 beating the 6850 in xfire? i COULD say this would be a pretty good deal, but why no 6870 in xfire? but with a narrow margin ang if you need cude. this would be a pretty sweet deal, but i'd also wait for 6900's but for now. we have a winner?
What are you even talking about? That it is not even relevant to the article...
-.-
Anyways nice to see Nvidia using false naming schemes yet again to make $$$.
Nvidia's numbering system is very strange...i think the 8800-9800-gts250 story is going to repeat again.
damn chromie, one step ahead of me XD
I want the older one. 8000MHz woohoo
Wish I could say AMD was above such naming schemes but they too have caved in with their HD 5000 mobile parts
Nvidia's numbering system is very strange...i think the 8800-9800-gts250 story is going to repeat again.
Ya, really, but seriously, a 22Mhz core increase and a 100Mhz memory increase? I think "a significant increase in fill-rate and memory bandwidth" is stretching it, though the other part of the sentence "which ultimately translates to better overall performance." is true, even if it's most likely < 3% of an improvement (at best, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt).
So, That's why the Fermis were so hot..........:lol:
*&^&%*damn you Nvidia, having fun conning newbs into buying lame notebooks using old tech with a new number. This is pathetic and should be illegal.
Nvidia's numbering system is very strange...i think the 8800-9800-gts250 story is going to repeat again.
just don't peel off the sticker label on that 435M...
Seriously, Nvidia has become the relabel king here. When looking at laptop GPUs, I have to go search for what Core they use and get all the stats before even considering one. Model numbers don't tell the public anything.
AMD did this, at least reasonable:
HD5470 --> HD6300M
Hey Nvidia brings us "2 GENERATIONS" for every AMD 1 Gen, hooray...
GT300M/GT400M (another rebrand) vs Mobility HD5000
Is it me or nvidia will use all of their GT*** naming before AMD even reaches the HD8000 series (2012)?
2011 --> GT600/700 (one more if they face major failures)
I will check in acer web.
very nice, looking forward to advanced in laptop graphics.. finally!
I honestly think this naming thing is a non-issue. Why the web keeps creating problems when there exists none is beyond me.
Does anyone have experience with this vidcard? Regardless of stupid naming, does the card perform?